If other websites implement our RSS feed sidewide on there website, can that hurt our own website?
-
Think about the switching anchors from the backlinks and the 100s of sidewide inlinks... I gues Google will understand that it's just a RSS feed right?
-
I am more of a layperson, and joined this site to research certain topics.
I wrote a blog post on the topic of RSS feed scraping and content theft .. which if I understand it was not exactly the OP question.
Having read the other answers here, however, I am actually wondering if my blog post is inaccurate ... or incomplete, and needs correction.
Are you all saying that there is no harm in your RSS feed being scraped, and it might actually be helpful due to the backlinks you might get? Or are you saying that Google ignores those links as it is clear they come from an RSS feed?
Or, am I misunderstanding your point entirely?
THanks for clarifyingl Here is the post if anyone wants to scan it and respond.
Thanks
PS if I have misunderstood the protocol, and am not to piggyback on someone elses topic, or add a link, please advise. My first foray into this forum
-
Hi David,
Thanks for the clear explenation!
The ownership implementation is a logical but good idea! Dit didn't crossed my mind until now
-
I do need to give recognition to David's answer below. For while most of the time you don't need to worry about RSS links, I've heard of webmasters who've been stung by this. It seems likely to hit lower authority sites harder.
If it is a concern, at least you have the power to do something about it.
1. Always place a rel canonical on every page, with an absolute URL (full path) This way if the scrapers take the whole page, the canonical link pointing to yourself might stay in tact.
2. If you suspect over-optimization filters you can de-optimize your anchor text, or add greater variety.
3. In extreme cases you can file a DMCA takedown request of your copywrited content, but at volume this solution doesn't scale, and is a messy business regardless.\
Regardless, these are for the minority of cases. Most of the time you shouldn't have to worry about it.
-
Hi Cyrus,
Thanks for your reply! As I thought Google wil understand it and ignore RSS generated links.
Above I explained my question, beceause I gues I was a little bit to short...I just copy-paste the addition from above:
I don't mean that I put 100s of link in the RSS feed but, when our RSS feed is shown on an other website, we receive backlinks from that website (through the RSS feed) with switchin anchors. In addition is 9 of the 10 times the RSS feed implemented in the sidebar, so sidewide links. The question is if this situation can hurt the website?..Did this clear my question?
But your answer is clear... Google will understand and ignore just as I expected.
So we don't have to worry about this issue I guesss...
-
Hi David, thanks for your insights...
Maybe I didn't wrote down the second answer as clear as possible..."I am not sure exactly what the question is in the second part. Are you asking if you should put hundreds of site-wide links in your RSS Feed? Either way, here is good measure to take"
I don't mean that I put 100s of link in the RSS feed but, when our RSS feed is shown on an other website, we receive backlinks from that website (through the RSS feed) with switchin anchors. In addition is 9 of the 10 times the RSS feed implemented in the sidebar, so sidewide links. The question is if this situation can hurt the website?..Did this clear my question?
-
Normally, I would bow out as I must be mistaken to any of the SEO Staff at SEOmoz as each of them have forgotten more than I will know. However, I have spent a lot of time on this issue, I learned jQuery for the reason of combating this. I am 100% certain, at least for how it was between June 2012 and Feb. 2013.
I realize that Google has stated they can tell the difference but, Google has a policy of misinformation as part of it's strategy to protect search integrity. I give misinformation it's due credit, it ended the cold war, but it also means you cannot trust anything Google says until it is proven true.
You can parse an RSS feed in a manor that will not retain anything to identify it as coming from an RSS. Google will only know it is your content by chronology, in other words that they always find it on your site first.
How would google know that this:
Came from an RSS feed? It is just an a link, identical to the other billions out there.
I have tested this with two WordPress Installs. Both had Google Analytic and were Verified with Google Webmaster.
On the first I would post articles of 100% original content. On the second I would pick them up and then parse the feed, post it as a post, mention it on the social medias and 100% of the articles would stay indexed on the not original domain and 0% would stay indexed on the original domain.
Then, we switched and had 100% indexed on the original domain. We tested it again on two more domains that were not new. One a PR3 and one a PR1 with the exact same outcome.
The single best thing you can do is post it on Google+, in my experience, after I post on Google+, within just a few minutes I have Google bot on the page.
Establish ownership on each of your pages with meta author or meta publisher tags too, it will help a lot.
-
I'm hesitant to give a definite answer on this. Short answer: Yes, Google should understand these are RSS generated links and typically ignore them. But I've also heard grumblings from webmasters who swear this isn't true.
A better question might be: why 100's of sitewide links? And why are they included in the RSS? The RSS typically includes an article body without much additional navigation. If you address these issues, consolidating your links and cleaning your feed, I'd say you likely have little to worry about from scrapers.
-
To answer your first question, yes it can hurt you. Are they doing this without your permission? You can always send them a take down notice. You will find a great article here by SEOmoz's Sarah Bird titled 4 Ways to Protect Your Copyrights.
I am not sure exactly what the question is in the second part. Are you asking if you should put hundreds of site-wide links in your RSS Feed? Either way, here is good measure to take.
-
Make sure you are pinging your posts to more than just one service or so.
-
Make sure you are linking your posts on Google+ as soon as you post them and Facebook / Twitter / Etc. Too.
-
Make sure you have SOME good links to establish clear ownership of content.
-
I would not put a bunch of links in these feeds. Google may see this site, which is probably involved in other not so great activity as a desired backlink to you and you could end up with undesired association, especially if the link count is very high.
-
There is nothing about an RSS feed, once parsed and restructured as a web page that will make it known to Google that it was an RSS Feed.
-
Why do you have an RSS feed and does anyone follow it?
If you do not have anyone following it, you may want to just shut it down for a while. If you have a good following for it then that is not an option. I had an issue with copy-n-paste content hijacking and we put a small bit of JavaScript in that would whatever you wanted into the clipboard as they copied and then they would paste it in their site. We noticed a big drop in activity after they noticed alerts on their website like
"ALERT: All readers of the content, I have a confession. I have stolen this content and I am involved in Blackhat SEO. For those of you who do not know what that is you will probably know my tools. Ever had a virus or got spam mail? You got that because of visiting sites like mine. Please click here to report me because this message was actually inserted by the guy I stole this from and I do not even realize it is here yet."
Not only does it reduce the theft, it is also fun for the whole family. I am sure by now there are similar tools for RSS.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How do I increase my website DA and PA?
I want to launch a new site like www.plaza.ir. How can I improve its Da and PA quickly ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | arpaymantul0 -
Consolidating product pages during website migration
Hello, We are an e-commerce & content site undergoing a website migration and redesign in the coming months. We will be getting an entirely new website. Many of our URLs will be changing: Current URL setup: www.mysite.com/catalog/SKU12345/product-title-here
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | katelynroberts
Future URL setup: www.mysite.com/catalog/product-title-here So we're aware we will be using plenty of 301 redirects to achieve this. Further to this though, we currently have a product page for each configuration of a product - for example, a single-sided bookmark has its own page and URL, and the double-sided version of the same bookmark has its own page and URL. In our site redesign, we are hoping to consolidate each of these instances into one product page where users can select single or double-sided and the price will update accordingly. The bookmark URLs would then go from:
_www.mysite.com/catalog/SKU12345/bookmark-single-sided _(call this URL A for simplicity)www.mysite.com/catalog/SKU67890/bookmark-double-sided (call this URL B) To (after migrating to the new URL structure for the new site, and the now-consolidated single- & double-sided product pages):
www.mysite.com/catalog/bookmark (call this URL C) What is the best way to make this transition without losing too much of our SEO value? I understand there is nearly always traffic loss with URL changes but I'd like to at least minimize the damage as best I can. We have backlinks and ranks for many product pages so I want to make sure we pass as much of this as we can. (And is this at all further complicated by the fact that URL A & B won't exist on the new site, and URL C doesn't exist on the current site? Does this impact the use of the 301 redirects and if so, how?) Are we better off to approach this page consolidation after the site migration and treat it as a separate project? This is something that is important to our user experience, and is definitely a change we want to make. Any advice is appreciated - thank you! I'm a fairly beginner-intermediate SEO so this is all somewhat new but I want to be able to at least convey some understanding to our developer of what we need to do. I was able to find this discussion (https://moz.com/community/q/merging-pages-and-seo) which describes a similar situation and solutions if we were just consolidating the pages but doesn't quite have the complicating factor of the entire site migration happening at the same time. Thanks so much!0 -
Restructuring Areas of a Website
Hi We are changing the structure of 2 areas of our site but the URL's won't be changing. We're effectively removing the first category level as it doesn't make much sense: Current structure Cat 1 - http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/cupboards-lockers Cat 2s - http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/lockers & http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/cupboards Cat 3s... New structure will look like Cat 1's http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/lockers & http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/cupboards Cat 2's.... etc The top category 1 doesn't rank for much & the level 2's perform better anyway. Will moving the structure change rankings even though the URLs don't change - just what is assigned to them in the back changes I know if the on-page content changes, things may be affected, but we're minimising this as much as possible. Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
How to Target Country Specific Website Traffic?
I have a website with .com domain but I need to generate traffic from UK? I have already set my GEO Targeting location as UK in Google Webmasters & set country location as UK in Google Analytics as well but still, i get traffic only from India. I have also set Geo-targeting code at the backend of the website. But nothing seems works. Can anyone help me how can is do this? I am unable to understand what else can be done.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoninj0 -
Can you give me some advices to rank this domain?
Hi Moz community, I've a coleague that's working to rank this site: www.devsar.com. The selected keywords are:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gaston Riera
Mobile development
Web development
Django Development
Python Development I've checked the site: It's fast and clean. Has a good PA and DA. It's responsive and good lookking. Meta description , title, hreflang.. everything in order. Link profile a little rare (checked with ahref.com), it's because someone made a mistake redirecting some expired domain Can you help me to help my mate out?
Thanks
GR.0 -
Problem with Google finding our website
We have an issue with Google finding our website: (URL removed) When we google "(keyword removed)" in google.com.au, our website doesn't come up anywhere. This is despite inserting the suitable title tag and onsite copy for SEO. We found this strange, and thought we'd investigate further. We decided to just google the website URL in google.com.au, to see if it was being properly found. Our site appeared at the top but with this description: A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more. We also can see that the incorrect title tag is appearing. From this, we assumed that there must be an issue with the robot.txt file. We decided to put a new robot.txt file up: (URL removed) This hasn't solved the problem though and we still have the same issue. If someone could get to the bottom of this for us, we would be most appreciative. We are thinking that there may possibly be another robot.txt file that we can't find that is causing issues, or something else we're not sure of! We want to get to the bottom of it so that the site can be appropriately found. Any help here would be most appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gavo0 -
What can you do about negative SEO?
We have a list of 240 domains (look exactly the same) linking to our site for a certain keyword. over 3000 links in total. It means that 50% of our keywords are this keyword and it's not a branded keyword which can affect us in the long term. I have done a WHOIS search and found a name, email and number. Vikas Kumar. I linkedin searched him and found his "legit" SEO site which has EXACTLY the same registration details as the spam sites. I emailed him and he said it would cost 5$ a link removal. I phoned him and he DENIED these emails. He then denied owning these sites etc. We have disavowed them but the anchor text % is still affecting us. Is there anything we can do? I know negative SEO isn't illegal but it's really frustrating. Anyone else had any problems with this type of thing?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AndyB_UK1 -
Benefits of Implementing Open Graph?
I understand the benefits of implementing Open Graph as a local business, but am unclear of the benefits for a website, for example, a health website. Does Bing use OG in their search algorithm?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0