Why is OSE showing no data for this URL?
-
Hi all,
Does anyone have any ideas as to why OSE might not have any data for this URL:
http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/shure-slx24-sm58-wireless-microphone-system-j3
It is not a new page at all. It's been on the site for years.
Is OSE being quirky? Or is there an underlying problem with this page?
Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this,
Dana
-
Hi Paul,
We discovered that the problem was being caused by a trailing "comma" at the end of the keyword string that we once used to populate the Meta keywords tag. Unfortunately, the keyword information in those fields is still being parsed. The parser did not know what to do when it encountered a comma followed by nothing.
We did run a query and found that this problem was affecting 128 of our product pages and had been for a long time. We haven't been populating the keywords for almost a year now, so the problem is at least that old.
The commas are now gone.
Thanks again to you and Andrew!
-
Glad I could help, Dana.
And yes, "borked" is a technical term. It's defined as existing in a badly broken state as a result of an inexperienced/inattentive user making unauthorised/incorrect changes to a website's code or content
Can also be used as a verb: "he borked the database so badly the whole site went 503".
Not that it's ever been applied to me or anything.
And yea - sometimes our tools can mislead us, even though the info they provided was "technically" correct.
Suggestion for a fast way to test the rest of the site for this kind of error: Use the paid version of Screaming Frog to program a search for a snippet of code that should be in the content area of every product page. Limit the crawl to the product pages category. (Or whatever sections of the site you're worried about.)
You could search for something as simple as class="productExtendedDescription" which would at least ensure the content container was there. Still wouldn't prove there was any content it it, but if you wanted to get fancy with regex, you could even do that too. You could also search for the tag, which would indicate that the rest of the pages' code likely exists.
Just an idea to speed up the testing process.
Paul
-
Thanks so much Paul,
Yes, when I ran a "Fetch as Googlebot" it returned a "Success" message, but when I looked at what Google is seeing there is no content on the page.
"borked" - great term...I am definitely going to have to file that one away for future use!
If the problem is isolated to this page, that's one thing. I am more concerned that this problem is effecting a larger number of pages.
Once I figure it out, I'll come back here and post what we found/fixed.
I really appreciate the comments from you and Andrew very much!
-
Dana, there's no content on that page.
The massive head section with all it's JavaScript is there, making it look like there's lots of code, but the actual body content has somehow been deleted.
This is all I see in the actual body of the page:
|
<form name="headerForm" action="IAFDispatcher" onsubmit="return submitQuery()" method="post">
That's it. There's no actual content, no footer, no closing or tag, which makes me think someone's actually deleted the content part of the code by accident.
Good luck figuring out who borked it
Paul
</form>
|
-
I just ran the source code for this page through the validator at: http://validator.w3.org/
There are a multitude of problems that need to be addressed. Thanks very much Andrew. I do have enough HTML knowledge to provide guidance to our IT manager on how to fix the problems. I don't have access to much of the source code, so it will certainly be a "project" to fix the issues.
I am sure these problems are everywhere all over the site, as many people with very little experience in coding and design have had their hands in the pot (so to speak) over the years.
At least this will allow me to prove to our CEO that our underlying code is indeed presenting a problem for indexing and crawling.
-
I did some comparisons with other pages and it doesn't seem that the drop-down frequency selector is the culprit. This page also has one: www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/shure-slx24-sm58-wireless-microphone-system-h5
but the cache in Google seems to be fine for this page and OSE displays data for it just fine.
-
Could the coding issue be related to the drop down box that's located just above the pricing on the right hand side? That is one thing that makes this product page different from others on our site.
Thoughts?
-
I also see what you mean that there is a problem with Google's cache. The cache date is really old (April 11) and there is no preview of the page.
Anyone who can point me in the right direction?
-
Thanks so much for responding Andrew. I have suspected problems with our code for a long time, but I am not a coder, sp it's been a challenge to attempt to identify the specific problem.
I believe this is not just a problem with this page, but could be a problem across many pages on our site.
Can you are any of my fellow Mozzers point to what you are seeing in the source code that leads you to believe it is corrupted?
Many thanks for any help. I truly appreciate it!
Dana
-
Hi Dana,
I think your page is corrupted, I have copied a link to the sourcecode I am seeing http://pastebin.com/BRfFT4RR
It looks like Google Cache is also having problems with this page. Perhaps OSE had trouble too and so skipped the page?
- Andrew
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Solving URL Too Long Issues
Moz.com is reporting that many URL's are to long, these particularly affect Product URL's where the URL is typically https://www.domainname.com/collections/category-name/products/product-name, (You guessed it we're using Shopify). However, we use Canonicals that ignore all most of the URL and are just structured https://www.domainname.com/product-name, so Google should be reading the Canonical and not the long-winded version. However, Moz cannot seem to spot this... does anyone else have this problem and how to solve so that we can satisfy the Moz.com crawl engine?
Moz Pro | | Tildenet0 -
No internal links showing up in OpenSiteExplorer report
Hi there A simple one. I was just looking at our site in opensiteexplorer and notice that it says we have no internal links at all: https://www.evernote.com/shard/s244/sh/dd8cc88f-fee4-4ba2-8ec0-f3f8d5c408db/8d3fc3d2aa6fc9d5406051bc91731402 Rather odd as we do. Is this a bug with OSE that anyone knows about or something else? Any ideas / thoughts gratefully received.
Moz Pro | | ArenaFlowers.com0 -
Why doesn't OSE show results from sites like Wikipedia, YouTube, Twitter, etc.?
I know OSE used to provide link data from these domains. But I have been doing link profile lookups on sites that I know have links from these domains - and they don't show up in my results. Just to make sure, they don't even show up when I sort the sites by domain authority.
Moz Pro | | ProspectMX0 -
Why does the CSV report on OSE limit the number of links I can download to less than it should?
I run an inbound link report for the domain www.acornstairlifts.co.uk on OpenSiteExplorer.org using the following filters: Show: All Links from: only external Pages to: pages on this root domain Show links: ungrouped It says that there are around 30,678 links for that query. I then go to the advanced tab, and run a report using the same filters, but when I click download report I only get 2874. I've run this for the past 2 days and I get the same. Why?
Moz Pro | | Brett-Harland0 -
Why is it that certain keywords in my seomoz report card are for the wrong urls
Hi Guys, why is it that seomoz's On Page Optimization Reports for Google TH are attributing certain keywords with certain urls which are wrong? What mean is an example keyword - 'chiang mai villas for rent' has been scored an F against my home page url rather than using our 'Chiang Mai' url, why is this, is there a coding issue on my site? Is it that seomoz is finding something on my home page to suggest I want it to rank for this keyword?
Moz Pro | | ewanTHH0 -
Links from External Sites not Showing on OpenSite or Google Webmaster Tools
Hi, I asked this in another post, but didn't get a solid answer. For several websites I manage, I have access to their Google Webmaster Tools. When I put the site through there, or the link:// or SEOMoz's OpenSite link reporter, I get not even a fraction of the links that I know are pointing to the websites in question. Some of these links are from home pages or side columns, and some are from articles keep within a website, like at Inc.com. I wondered if the links in question were not themselves being indexed, but if I do a very specific search, I can pull them up in the search results. Is it just common knowledge that these link tools are not accurate? And to assume that somehow, search engines really do see all of the inbound links, even if our reporting tools don't. Thanks in advance!
Moz Pro | | lilactree0 -
What happened to OSE/Linkscape data?
Can any member of the Moz team or of the community comment on the most recent OCE/linkscape update as of 09/08/2011. It appears that the link data capture for one of our platform is dramatically different than previously and that there are some huge discrepancies? Any update on the change would be appreciated as we use all these updates as benchmarks. Thanks
Moz Pro | | OlivierChateau0 -
What is the difference between the link count on OSE and Linkscape?
We notice a huge difference in the number of inbound links . Site explore shows 1,200 as an example and linkscape shows over 100,000 for the same site.
Moz Pro | | JamesBarry0