Fixing up poorly performing eCommerce SIte with content? First things first..
-
I had a small site that was performing well enough for me for 6 years--nice source of extra family income. It was a very out of date platform (1990's) and I moved it to Big Commerce in December. Since then visits and sales have just plummeted. It has died and I am sad.
I want to remain positive. It's a viable niche product line, I have tons of quality inventory, my site platform is current. I am a good writer and am willing to add content if it will help. From what I can determine apart from technical issues I may not know about I think I suffer from THIN CONTENT.
I want to pretend I'm opening a new business and start over in today's environment. I have had bad experiences with two SEO consultants (one ripped me off financially, the other gave me advice that hurt me) so I have no choice but to educate myself. I got started in ecommerce back in 1998 with the help of many wonderful kind people on forums so I'm turning to this resource once again.
What would you do first if you were me especially to get some revenue flowing asap? I need help. I need to know if there is hope or if I should liquidate at the nearest swap meet Thanks!
-
Thanks a million. Very to the point and useful.
-
Perhaps going back to eBay (shudder) or Etsy is the way to go again...
I used to be an eBay powerseller and walked away from that when I saw how much more efficient and inexpensive it was to sell on a website. I walked away from a successful store. I was tired of paypay, tired of bidders who did not pay and tired of the work that it took to do relistings, etc.
Are small e-commerce sites doomed? Does Google even want them?
No. If you are selling niche products and have a site with lots of useful information such as articles on how to select, how to use, how to maintain the products that you sell, sites like that are succeeding. I own a few of them. I have great rankings and beat ebay, amazon, manufacturers and just about everyone. To do that we have two people working all day every day on improvements and new content. That might be enough to hold positions in our niches.
Do they want retailers on Google shopping and out of the organic search results? Has that shipped sailed?
They want sites who earn their positions. If you have a great informative site that is one of the best in your niche I think that you have a great chance to succeed.
But, if you want to toss up a product site and expect it to rank without earning popularity then I would not be betting on you in the long term - or even in the short term.
That's why I came here. I need to know more about what I don't know.
Start reading questions that are similar to yours. See who answers, who gives good advice, who has a style that you like. That's how I have found every person who has ever worked on one of my websites.
-
"get you back in the money with your new platform - if that is possible."
Thank you. Excellent answer.
The POSSIBILITY of re-establishing myself is what I want to ascertain. The damage is done from the conversion because it was not done properly. The "expert" who was helping me did not warn me of the ramifications of the move.
I am not opposed to putting money out for help, if it's the right help. I don't want to spend $5000 only to be led down the primrose path. In my day job I get 5 calls a day from SEO sales people. I've been burned twice. That's why I came here. I need to know more about what I don't know.
Are small e-commerce sites doomed? Does Google even want them? Do they want retailers on Google shopping and out of the organic search results? Has that shipped sailed?
Perhaps going back to eBay (shudder) or Etsy is the way to go again...
I would like to get some feedback from credible people like yourself before I move forward so I thank you.
-
What would you do first if you were me especially to get some revenue flowing asap?
I don't know your level of expertise and if you understand how to move a site from one platform to another, performing all of the redirects and .htaccess writing that is needed. If those jobs are not done properly rankings will tank - sometimes temporarily, sometime for a very long time, maybe never recovering the original power that was lost. That could be your problem, maybe not.
You said ASAP. If that is what you want then you need an expert who can diagnose right away, perform corrections and get you back in the money with your new platform - if that is possible.
I am not saying that to solicit business because I don't work on other people's websites. I am saying that because lots of people ask for help in forums then fart around for weeks or months trying to recover a site by applying guesses offered by people who have not spent enough to diving deep into the site to determine exactly what is wrong.
So, if you want out fast, hire someone who knows what they are doing.
If you have lots of time, no budget, or the loss of income isn't that important then you can see what advice you get here. It might be an easy fix and it is at least worth a day or two while this question is visible to see what you get.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is best practice for fixing urls that have duplicate content, non-static and other issues?
Hi, I know there are several good answers regarding duplicate content issues on this website already, however I have a question that involves the best way to avoid negative SEO impacts if I change the urls for an ecommerce site. Basically a new client has the following website http://www.gardenbeauty.co.uk and I notice that it suffers from duplicate content due to the http://www version and the non www version of the pages - this seems quite easy to fix using the guidance on this website. However I notice that the product page urls are far from ideal in that they have several issues including:- (a) they are mostly too long (b) don't include the keyword terms (in terms of best practice) (c) they don't use Static URLS An example of one these product urls would be http://www.gardenbeauty.co.uk/plant-details.php?name=Autumn Glory&p_genus=Hebe&code=heagl&category=hebe I'd like to address these issues, but the pages rank highly for the products themselves, therefore my question is what would you recommend I do to fix the urls without risking the high positions that many of these product pages have? thanks, Ben
Technical SEO | | bendyman0 -
Is the content on my website is garbage?
I received a mail from google webmasters, that my website is having low quality content. Website - nowwhatmoments.com
Technical SEO | | Green.landon0 -
Mobile site ranking instead of/as well as desktop site in desktop SERPS
I have just noticed that the mobile version of my site is sometimes ranking in the desktop serps either instead of as well as the desktop site. It is not something that I have noticed in the past as it doesn't happen with the keywords that I track, which are highly competitive. It is happening for results that include our brand name, e.g '[brand name][search term]'. The mobile site is served with mobile optimised content from another URL. e.g wwww.domain.com/productpage redirects to m.domain.com/productpage for mobile. Sometimes I am only seen the mobile URL in the desktop SERPS, other times I am seeing both the desktop and mobile URL for the same product. My understanding is that the mobile URL should not be ranking at all in desktop SERPS, could we be being penalised for either bad redirects or duplicate content? Any ideas as to how I could further diagnose and solve the problem if you do believe that it could be harming rankings?
Technical SEO | | pugh0 -
Adding content into an iframe
I want to buy an app/program that will help me create unique content but the content will be inserted to the page via an iframe. I have heard that iframes are problematic. I know that there will not be a lot of indexable content from this but I think that it will make people want to link to me. I would like to hear from someone's experience if I should go ahead or not.
Technical SEO | | JillB20130 -
Does turning website content into PDFs for document sharing sites cause duplicate content?
Website content is 9 tutorials published to unique urls with a contents page linking to each lesson. If I make a PDF version for distribution of document sharing websites, will it create a duplicate content issue? The objective is to get a half decent link, traffic to supplementary opt-in downloads.
Technical SEO | | designquotes0 -
Penalities in a brand new site, Sandbox Time or rather a problem of the site?
Hi guys, 4 weeks ago we launched a site www.adsl-test.it. We just make some article marketing and developed a lots of functionalities to test and share the result of the speed tests runned throug the site. We have been for weeks in 9th google serp page then suddendly for a day (the 29 of february) in the second page next day the website home is disappeared even to brand search like adsl-test. The actual situalion is: it looks like we are not banned (site:www.adsl-test.it is still listed) GWT doesn't show any suggestion and everything looks good for it we are quite high on bing.it and yahoo.it (4th place in the first page) for adsl test search Anybody could help us to understand? Another think that I thought is that we create a single ID for each test that we are running and these test are indexed by google Ex: <cite>www.adsl-test.it/speedtest/w08ZMPKl3R or</cite> <cite>www.adsl-test.it/speedtest/P87t7Z7cd9</cite> Actually the content of these urls are quite different (because the speed measured is different) but, being a badge the other contents in the page are pretty the same. Could be a possible reason? I mean google just think we are creating duplicate content also if they are not effectively duplicated content but just the result of a speed test?
Technical SEO | | codicemigrazione0 -
Duplicate Content issue
I have been asked to review an old website to an identify opportunities for increasing search engine traffic. Whilst reviewing the site I came across a strange loop. On each page there is a link to printer friendly version: http://www.websitename.co.uk/index.php?pageid=7&printfriendly=yes That page also has a link to a printer friendly version http://www.websitename.co.uk/index.php?pageid=7&printfriendly=yes&printfriendly=yes and so on and so on....... Some of these pages are being included in Google's index. I appreciate that this can't be a good thing, however, I am not 100% sure as to the extent to which it is a bad thing and the priority that should be given to getting it sorted. Just wandering what views people have on the issues this may cause?
Technical SEO | | CPLDistribution0 -
Duplicate content
I am getting flagged for duplicate content, SEOmoz is flagging the following as duplicate: www.adgenerator.co.uk/ www.adgenerator.co.uk/index.asp These are obviously meant to be the same path so what measures do I take to let the SE's know that these are to be considered the same page. I have used the canonical meta tag on the Index.asp page.
Technical SEO | | IPIM0