Removing a link to a 404 page
-
Hi guys,
If I found a low quality or spam link pointing to my site, but the link points to a 404, 500, etc (inaccessible, error page),
Should I bother asking him to remove the link?
Thanks
-
Just to clarify - the page on your site no longer exists (404s/500s/etc.)? If the target of the link doesn't exist, the link should be more or less dead. I generally wouldn't bother disavowing. It's a bit situational, though - I'm not sure if you're working to disavow thousands of links and this is a large-scale problem or if there's just this one like or handful you're worried about. If you've got a handful of spammy links that all point to dead pages, I wouldn't lose sleep over it.
-
I thought the OP was talking about having the spammy site remove the backlink which would be a little counter productive in my experience dealing with these sites admins, as opposed to disavowing that external spammy backlink.
EDIT: Here is a more recent clarification and semi-official word from google on how to use the disavow tool: it's not a surgical knife with ricing coating, it's a disavow tool... use it like a "machete"
but i guess if he meant removal of his own 404 url on his back-end, it would be wise to 301 them instead, especially if they do have other quality and non-spammy backlinks. But, I would still disavow a spammy 3rd party backlink anyway. no harm in doing that.
-
The link recovery campaign mentioned above is probably called for and I second that a spammy link pointing to a 404 is not a good reason to disavow. Avoid the tool if at all possible.
-
Probably less important for the Spammy link, but there would be a decent chance you have other links pointing to the same broken pages which would be worthy of the 301 redirect. I'm a pretty big fan of not Disavow'ing unless absolutely necessary, it's a tad overused in my opinion.
-
Even though it is linkingEither that, or use the now good ol disavow tool on Google webmaster tools, far faster and easier imho.
I would remove them or disavow them immediately.
But it would be good to wait and hear from more seasoned folks (10+ years) who lurk in the dark around here often...
edit: I would say use disavow tool with caution and ENSURE 100% that the backlink source is spammy and low quality and sure to be caught in googles net sooner or later. but i do believe in proactively taking care of this issue to a good extent rather than waiting and seeing the damage rolling out. this can also be based on the total number of followed links that you have, on a small scale, it becomes more of an important task compared to when you have thousands or tens of thousands of links.
However. just to make it clear how bad this can be if left ignored, one of our niche clients has a total of no more than 400 backlinks so far and their direct local competitor has some 60,000 plus. and is a few years senior of a domain based on existence history. yet with us proactively taking care of low quality sites that we find constantly, we have been able to raise their DA and so far reach and tie with the bigger local competitor.
a good portion of those 60000 backlinks are spammy and in need of being removed by manual request or disavow. and i bet quite a few of them end up on old and expired 404s, but the effect cannot be more obvious when these issues are not taken care of on time.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Disavow links from legit sites but have spammy link profiles?
I'm currently doing a backlink audit for our site with a LOT of backlinks. Some of the linking sites are legitimate business websites in our industry who have linked to us for a totally legitimate reason (we have good content!). However, these businesses themselves have a spammy backlink profile—that is, the only sites linking to that site are obvious link farm sites. Here is an illustration: spammyseolinks.com; payforseo.xyz; blackhat.ru ==all link to==> legitbusiness.com ==links to==> mysite.com Should I disavow this backlink? I guess it's not really giving me much SEO worth since it surely been branded a spammy junk domain, but then again, it's a real website that we've earned a link from because we're doing stuff the right way. Is it hurting or helping me?
Link Building | | THandorf0 -
Internal Link Building and Link Juice Quality
Hi There! I manage the website for a law office that covers many geographical locations. For very specific niche content, we would prefer to create one piece of content and link to the various geographic locations where we would handle that topic instead of posting multiple variations of the same content for each specific geographical area. If we put a button on these pages that has links to each location, will that have the same "link juice" effect to the pages we're linking that linking directly in the text would? (example: the Where can we help you? button on this page : http://www.zdfirm.com/volkswagen-recall/) Thank you!
Link Building | | ZDAdmin0 -
Site review : Should I finish on-page optimization before I start link building ??
Site Review am seeing slight improvement with a few keywords and have revamp site do i need to first on page before link building ? I was wondering do i need to complete all on page seo before i move on to link building & marketing content ?? Kindest regards, Stephen sportingdesires
Link Building | | sportingdesires0 -
Do footer links pass less link juice?
One of my best inbound links for PA and DA happens to be a footer link, curious if it's less valuable or has any value at all.
Link Building | | Theskimonster0 -
Best way to get over the Hump (from page 2 to page 1)
Hello, I've recently been able to bring my site way up in the rankings for some very competitive keywords. I've done nothing spammy, and everything has been done with a lot of detail and a focus on only using the best techniques. My site is on page 2 for a lot of keywords. What would be your suggestions for getting over that hump and making it to page 1? I'm happy with my results (coming from pages 30-50 to page 2 over a couple of months) but I'm not satisfied and won't be until I can be on the top of page 1... Any suggestions are welcome... Thanks
Link Building | | Prime850 -
How do i remove bad links ?
Google have sent me an email regarding manipulativre link or paid link etc. Tey are asking me to fix the issue then resubmit my site for consideration. My site IS still in the search results but i suspect that they may remove it soon. I suspect that a competitor may have a contact in google andthey are submitting complaints against my business but we do have many link to my site . How am i going to know exactly what link are the problem.
Link Building | | SydneyMove0 -
Links from any country?
My site is aimed primarily at the UK, 90% of the traffic is from the UK and most of my links are from other UK based and UK targetted websites. The content is actually fairly international (apart from certain terms like Plasterboard instead of Drywall, etc). My question is: Should I concentrate on gathering links from the UK, or should I widen my search and try to get links from US and European websites? Are there any particular advantages or disadvantages to keeping links "local"?
Link Building | | Jingo010 -
Do image links with no alt tags pass link value?
"... an image link with no alt tag is useless to search engines..." according to a Nov 2007 seomoz blog post. Is this still the case in 2011? I ask because I'm about to obtain a banner link on a high-traffic site (chiefly for the clickthrough value) but I notice the site uses neither "title" nor "alt" tags.
Link Building | | Jeepster0