Link juice retained when using nofollows?
-
Is it still true that when linking to other sites with nofollow links, the juice is retained on your page? Or is the juice lost, but just not passed on to the other site?
I found this whiteboard friday, but it's pretty old (2007): http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-the-juice-is-loose
Looking forward to your thoughts!
-
Thanks a lot for your responses guys! It's now all clear to me!
-
Yup Paddy is right.
I would read this blog post about PageRank Sculpting that Matt Cutts wrote http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/
And I also found this video useful http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4IE4WLPLZQ&feature=share&list=PL841CB8F9F31BF5D5
-
Example 1 is mostly correct, but jazy point is that it would be more like this:
5 Nofollows: 0 juice each but 47.5 thrown away (2.5 naturally lost)
5 Follows: 9.5 juice each (47.5 juice total, 2.5 naturally lost)
Total 47.5, with 47.5 thrown out and 5 naturally lost
-
Thanks for your response again!
If Paddys Displays is correct though (Example 1), then the follow links would get 10 juice right? Instead of 19,5?
5 Nofollows: 0 juice each but 50 thrown away
5 Follows: 10 juice each (50 juice total)
So 50 juice is given away, and 50 juice is lost? Total 100.
Or is it what you're saying (example 2)
5 nofollow: 0 juice each but 2,5 juice thrown away
5 follows: 19,5 juice each (total 97,5)
Total: 97,5 juice given away, 2,5 juice lost. Total 100
-
In your example the links that do not have the nofollow attribute would get 20 each.
Well actually it would be something like 19.5 each because they take a tiny bit off everytime it's passed on (otherwise the system wouldnt work mathematically).
Paddys Displays is correct, ignore what I'm saying if I'm confusing you - apologies.
-
Hello both, thank you very much for your response.
One think still isn't clear though: Paddy Displays says that juice is lost (thrown out of the window), while Jazy states that the juice is not lost, but passed on to the other follow links on the page. Which of both is correct?
So say there is 100 juice. One of my pages contains 5 follow links and 5 nofollow links. Do the 5 follow links get 10 juice each, or 20? And if I'm right, there is no juice retained?
-
It all changed in 2008/09, and link sculpting in this way does not work anymore. page authority is shared equally to all links, but for no-follow its not passed, just just thrown out the window (not retained)
-
Link Juice or PankRank is shared between all the links on your page equally that don't have nofollow on them.
I found this video which still seems relevant http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-matt-cutts-on-nofollow
I hope that helps you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Internal linking: Global Nav Bar obscuring link authority?
I was watching Rand's whiteboard on how links in the headers/footers can impact SEO: moz.com/blog/links-headers-footers-navigation-impact-seo If I understood correctly: 1) Google will use the first link in the html that it sees for a given page. Additional links will not be considered for passing weight. 2) Text links in body (carry more weight than) > image links > nav links > footer links If we want to use a global nav bar, is there a simple solution for not obscuring the links in the body content? (It seems very awkward to load the header nav last (and bring it up via css after the page loads), and this also goes against Google wanting people to load above-the-fold content quickly.) If I internally link to a page that was not important enough to get a spot in the global nav, but I include this link in the body as a text link (for example, an accessory specific to that item), is this internal link really getting more weight in Google's eyes because it wasn't in the nav? This seems strange to me. Thanks!
Whiteboard Friday | | HalfPriceBanners0 -
Should this site be using Rel=Canonical VS No Index
I'm currently working on this site https://www.visitliverpool.com/accommodation I've been watching this video by Rand - https://moz.com/blog/rel-canonical but it's still unclear in this scenario. if you use the search facility "check availability" half way down the page the results page (urlparams) are no indexed. Would it be better to index and canonicalise? There is no similar content but I'm concerned that no index will remove the ability for semantic content to be visible to google. LADkajY
Whiteboard Friday | | Andrew-SEO0 -
What is the best way to buy expired similar domain names and point them at your site to garner link juice?
what is the best way to buy expired similar domain names and point them at your site to garner link juice? there are lots of domains with good links pointing to them that are now expired and those links would be in the same subject as your site and a good addition to your current links. I've heard that 301 redirected links only pass half value but even that would be a great addition to your domain authority if you could purchase those domains and 301 them to your site? what are everyone's thoughts on this and how do i go about this? Thanks in advance mozzers! Ron
Whiteboard Friday | | Ron100 -
Need help linking Youtube account to Google+ profile? (please read description, thank you)
Our Youtube was managed by a SEO company. We are no longer working with them, but separated on amicable terms. I want to link our youtube account to our company owner's personal google+ profile. However, when I try to do so, the only option Youtube allows me is the former SEO company's google+ account as the only link option. Can someone tell me how I can link our youtube account to our company owner's g+? I can still contact our former SEO company if the need to 'release' ownership. Thank you!
Whiteboard Friday | | CamiloSC0 -
Unnatural links
Realizing that there are several links pointing to my domain, and most of them I do not recognize, who seem to have been made by a competitor in order to hurt me in Google, how should I to proceed?
Whiteboard Friday | | soulmktpro0 -
Affiliate links with hash tags
We are setting up a brand new internal affiliate program for our site. When creating the affiliate URLs I learned that we can use hash tags (#) instead of question marks (?). I remember Rand did a White Board Friday years ago (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-using-the-hash) saying that this was a better way to build affiliate URLs because it basically acts as a stop and/or canonical for the URL. We already have canonical tags but I was thinking of using this in hopes of getting a little extra juice from the affiliate links. Questions: Does Google still treat hash tags the same as they did 3-4 years ago? Does anyone see using hash tags as worse than something else, like a question mark? Thanks!
Whiteboard Friday | | costume0 -
Are Creating Free WordPress and Joomla Themes a good link building strategy?
Hello Everyone, I have been analyzing various link building strategies recently. One tactic that always seems to come up is to give stuff away. I wanted to get everyones thoughts on creating Wordpress and Joomla Themes, then giving them away as a link building strategy? The goal would be to create some stellar themes, then place our website link in the footer with some text that would read "Wordpress Theme by Pete Juratovic" and Pete Juratovic would point to my website. Is this a good tactic, or would this look like spam? If spam, why? Why would this tactic be any different then creating a great infographic as a link building stratedgy? Pete
Whiteboard Friday | | Juratovic0 -
How would you Oustsource Link Building if your budget is $200?
Hi, We all know that Link building is a tough job which requires persistent effort , and for a content creator it takes focus away from his job , which is "creating content". So content producers resort to "outsourcing" their link building. Now, unlike business/ enterprise , professional SEO's cost a fortune and beyond reach of an upcoming content creator. So he/she resorts to cheaper link building mediums like Forum Posts , Blog Comments , Article submissions , automate bookmarking site submissions etc. All the above software relatively do not cost much ($50-$100) BUT create links which do not have much value and hence not desirable. ============ My question is - ============= How can a content producer (like me) with a budget of meager $200 spend his money to get "most value" out of his link building activities
Whiteboard Friday | | krishru0