Web traffic tanked, not Penguin nor Panda...I am stumped...
-
I have had my current website for several years now, and traffic has been slowly building.
2010 = 49 hits a day, 2011 = 71 hits a day, 2012 = 157 hits a day.
I target local traffic and local keywords around by business.
I have kept up with SEO changes, using Facebook, social media, updated tags, and kept content fresh, added more galleries images, Auth tags & markup. I have 301 older sites that I have run in the past.
Then early this spring everything dropped, slowly but surely, now I'm at 90 hits a day
SERPS for my main phrase "boudoir photography" us at less than 50 according to MOZ.
I have been watching the new Algo updates, and never had any issues because I don't spam article marketing, I don't buy links, I try to keep content fresh, I don't use directories...I designed the site for PEOPLE not SEO.
I get major press about once to twice a year, newspapers still don't get links though.. grrrrr
I get natural links through gallery shows, events, local blogs, art shows...
So I thought it might be over the year I have slowly added too many less than 100 word pages?
Media, Bio, Art I combined all into one page. One page with 300+ words VS 3 pages of 100 words.
I did a 301 several pages and trimmed my menu down from 11 to 8 to help everything look cleaner and more eye pleasing...I started asking my friends/clients/collaborators for more links with no link text so they are natural...& not just "boudoir photography"
Traffic is still dropping...
What have I missed?
-
This is am amazing detailed answer.
I went through and removed links to the inisignicfia blog entirely.
I found some forums I had a signature and removed the sig those on three forums.
I took down my entire tumblr.
I did a disavow on several domains & subdomanins that "collect" links.
Total of over 500 individual links have been removed via webmaster, signature removal, & disavowal tool.
I changed/removed anchor text/links on a few other older blogs/forums.
Get listed has me as two business, I'll update those so they all match.
Citation finder looks amazing I'll dig deeper after lunch.
I just added/fixed:
Nokia, teleatlas, navteq information
I will work on more reviews, (reviews for my clients are a bit tricky due to the nature of my business, but I can get some from my more public clients.)
Here is the rel canonical, Is it set up wrong?
http://www.bayareaboudoir.com/capture.jpg
I fixed the home page anchor text, I'll work on a "logo"
I'm not extra concerned about Oakland specific traffic, as my clients come to me from 25 - 200 miles away. I do like the SF page idea...
I'll revamp my meta descriptions.
- your site loads at non-www (bayareaboudoir.com) - this should redirect to www version.
- not a huge issue, but /index.html should redirect to the main homepage.
I'm a little stumped on exactly how to code these?
Thanks again
-
I completely agree with Dan's advice - he just gave you like a grand of free research and advice. Age doesn't matter - you need to clean up bad links from the past.
-
Hi There
I'll just go through some of the biggest things I see in a few areas of the site;
Off Site / Backlinks
- anchor text - you've got too much commercial anchor and not enough branded or non-commercial. see the open site explorer report here. Any anchors that you have control over I would change them to your brand name or domain name. I'm referring to the anchors that say "oakland boudoir photography" etc
- disavowing - as others have recommended, if you do have old back links that are of low quality, it won't hurt to disavow them. what you really should do though is use webmaster tools list of back links. I find the Open Site Explorer backlinks to be great for a lot of things, but when it comes to finding and disavowing all of your damaging old links, you really have to go with Google's list. There's going to be a lot more in there.
Local SEO
- check ExpressUpdateUSA - ExpressUpdateUSA is a data provider to dozens of listing services. If your info is not correct with them, that's why you may wrong addresses pop back up again. Make sure all your info is correct with them.
- use GetListed.org and Whitespark Local Citation Finder or Citation Builder. These services are going to help you find, claim and optimize more local listings than you could ever dream of. Is this the highest quality thing to be doing? Not always, especially as you get past the big ones (Google+, Yelp etc) but can't hurt.
- claim GPS listings. add your business to Nokia Maps , NAVTEQ, tele atlas
- I agree, reviews are huge. This search has a bunch of great articles for ideas in how to get them.
On Site SEO
- link to your homepage with your brand name as anchor text. right now, your name is the anchor text for all links back to homepage. put the homepage link on your brand name and possibly logo for good UX
- if you're especially trying to rank for local queries, you need your city in the title tag(s). Don't stuff all kinds of cities in there. Just put "Oakland, CA". Unfortunately since you're not located in SF, it's not going to help much to put SF in the title tag to rank for SF
- If you want to rank for SF, I would suggest having a specific page with content about San Francisco. Testimonials of clients there, case studies of work there etc etc. I would also suggest getting people from San Fran to write reviews for you on Yelp, Google etc etc
- your site loads at non-www (bayareaboudoir.com) - this should redirect to www version.
- not a huge issue, but /index.html should redirect to the main homepage.
- In general, meta descriptions could be a little longer (not over 156). Make them like natural sentences, rather than lists of keywords.
-Dan
-
That is a friends old blog.
5-10 years ago everyone had a blog and everyone was linking to each other in blogrolls & lists. Time goes on and many of the older blogs have gone defunct, or just sit and are no longer updated. Now everyone is on Tumblr. I miss the old Livejournal days. I know that Google has made changes to the weight of blogs, since so many people have started blogs JUST to rank. You can now even BUY blogs and links for pay and the whole article spamming issue.
I was wondering if the older blogs & older defunct websites is part of what is dropping rankings since the "link juice" is now stale and no longer current. It just seems to be a bit too rapid for this to be the main cause, also most of the recent algo updates would have tanked me sooner?
So you're suggesting I ask to have some of the older links removed from defunct blogs/websites if I have contact with the webmaster or do disavow if I am no longer in contact? How old is too old?
3 years, 5 years, 10 years?
I am currently working on NEW FRESH relevant natural local links through other local businesses, current blogs, news outlets and the like. I have gotten some great press recently.
(boudoir site)
(to my portrait site)
-
I was easily able to find spam links (http://www.insignifica.org/linksblog/2010_04.shtml), so I suggest you review all your backlinks and disavow and try to remove them.
-
I have tried to fix the wrong google maps/places address for 3 years now, they validate by sending a postcard to a defunct address...
When I get the Google Phone call I go over with them and they say they have the correct Oakland address...
My Auth and schema markup has the Oakland address on my websites as well.
I can not get rid of the old listing?
This listing is over 3 years old why would it tank my ranking this spring 2013?
-
It's definitely possible, I would consolidate your efforts in one Google Places account and encourage people you know to promote you there.
-
I have some Yelp reviews:
http://www.yelp.com/biz/carle-photography-oakland-2
I have a google + page:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/103255579254885041970/about
I JUST found an OLD google plus page:
https://plus.google.com/113751542266047416565/photos?hl=en
& if you search for my name all sorts of other of my photography comes up with a 3 YEAR old address (I have been trying to fix for years)
Could having TWO sites be causing the issues?
-
I don't see a presence for your site on Google+, which might explain the drop in traffic.
David Mihm did a great Whiteboard Friday about "How Business Listings Are Made": http://moz.com/blog/how-business-listings-made-whiteboard-friday. I would run a search for your target keyword in your location and see if your business is listed. If not, consider creating a Google Places account for your business, and encourage friends, family, and customers to promote you and give you positive reviews there.
-
Have you looked into local reviews? David Mihm presented in Boise last week about local search. Local reviews on Yelp, Yellow Pages... (I can't remember the others) but directory reviews are starting to carry weight with local search. It does seem like a bit of a pain, but you can ask customers to write a review for you on "x" place...(Sorry, we don't do a lot of local search... so remembering exactly what directory/ review places have slipped my mind.) Also, have you connected your geolocation with Google Maps?... this is also testing to carry weight.
I'd recommend to look into what Mihm has said about local search. This would definitely be applicable to your issue.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Dedicated landing pages vs responsive web design
I've been doing some research into web design and page layout as my company is considering a re-design. However, we have come to an argument around responsive webdesign vs SEO. The argument is around me (SEO specialist) arguing that I want dedicated pages for all my content as it's good for SEO since it focuses keywords and content properly, and it still adheres to good user journeys (providing it's done correctly), and my web designer arguing that mobile traffic is on the rise (which it is I know) so we should have more content under 1 URL and use responsive web design so that users can just scroll through content instead of having to keep be direct to different pages. What do I do... I can't find any blogs, questions, or whiteboards that really touches on this topic, so can anyone advise me on whether I should: Create dedicated landing pages for each bit of content which is good for SEO and taking users on a journey around my site OR All content that is relative to a landing page, put all under that one URL (e.g. "About us" may have info on the company, our team, our history, careers) and allow people to scroll down what could be a very long page on any device, but may effect SEO as I can't focus keywords/content under one URL properly, so it may effect rankings. Any advice SEO and user experience whizzes out there?
Web Design | | blackboxideas0 -
Web Hosting and CDN for Wordpress Site Load Speed - Suggestions Needed
We all know that website load speed is more important than ever. While I love the look and feel of parallax and Wordpress, I want to do everything I can to keep the load speed down. I see a lot of conflicting information regarding web hosting services, CDN services and other service (Cloudflare for example). I am looking to hear from those with their own experiences to let me know what they think is the ideal setup for a parallax Wordpress site is as far as which services to use, including: 1. Web Hosting
Web Design | | Gauge123
2. CDN
3. Any other service or product that would help to provide and extremely fast site load time. Thank you!0 -
Lots of Listing Pages with Thin Content on Real Estate Web Site-Best to Set them to No-Index?
Greetings Moz Community: As a commercial real estate broker in Manhattan I run a web site with over 600 pages. Basically the pages are organized in the following categories: 1. Neighborhoods (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/neighborhoods/midtown-manhattan) 25 PAGES Low bounce rate 2. Types of Space (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/commercial-space/loft-space)
Web Design | | Kingalan1
15 PAGES Low bounce rate. 3. Blog (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/how-long-does-leasing-process-take
30 PAGES Medium/high bounce rate 4. Services (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/brokerage-services/relocate-to-new-office-space) High bounce rate
3 PAGES 5. About Us (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/about-us/what-we-do
4 PAGES High bounce rate 6. Listings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/listings/305-fifth-avenue-office-suite-1340sf)
300 PAGES High bounce rate (65%), thin content 7. Buildings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/928-broadway
300 PAGES Very high bounce rate (exceeding 75%) Most of the listing pages do not have more than 100 words. My SEO firm is advising me to set them "No-Index, Follow". They believe the thin content could be hurting me. Is this an acceptable strategy? I am concerned that when Google detects 300 pages set to "No-Follow" they could interpret this as the site seeking to hide something and penalize us. Also, the building pages have a low click thru rate. Would it make sense to set them to "No-Follow" as well? Basically, would it increase authority in Google's eyes if we set pages that have thin content and/or low click thru rates to "No-Follow"? Any harm in doing this for about half the pages on the site? I might add that while I don't suffer from any manual penalty volume has gone down substantially in the last month. We upgraded the site in early June and somehow 175 pages were submitted to Google that should not have been indexed. A removal request has been made for those pages. Prior to that we were hit by Panda in April 2012 with search volume dropping from about 7,000 per month to 3,000 per month. Volume had increased back to 4,500 by April this year only to start tanking again. It was down to 3,600 in June. About 30 toxic links were removed in late April and a disavow file was submitted with Google in late April for removal of links from 80 toxic domains. Thanks in advance for your responses!! Alan0 -
Penguin 2.0 drop due to poor anchor text?
Hi, my website experienced a 30% drop in organic traffic following the Penguin 2.0 update, and after years of designing my website with SEO in mind, generating unique content for users, and only focusing on relevant websites in my link building strategy, I'm a bit disheartened by the drop in traffic. Having rolled out a new design of my website at the start of April, I suspect that I've accidentally messed up the structure of the website, making my site difficult to crawl, or making Google think that my site is spammy. Looking at Google Webmaster Tools, the number 1 anchor text in the site is "remove all filters" - which is clearly not what I want! The "remove all filters" link on my website appears when my hotels page loads with filters or sorting or availability dates in place - I included that link to make it easy for users to view the complete hotel listing again. An example of this link is towards the top right hand side of this page: http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-hotels/agganis-arena-hotels/300382?star=2 With over 6000 venues on my website, this link has the potential to appear thousands of times, and while the anchor text is always "remove all filters", the destination URL will be different depending on the venue the user is looking at. I'm guessing that to Google, this looks VERY spammy indeed!? I tried to make the filtering/sorting/availability less visible to Google's crawl when I designed the site, through the use of forms, jquery and javascript etc., but it does look like the crawl is managing to access these pages and find the "remove all filters" link. What is the best approach to take when a standard "clear all..." type link is required on a listing page, without making the link appear spammy to Google - it's a link which is only in place to benefit the user - not to cause trouble! My final question to you guys is - do you think this one sloppy piece of work could be enough to cause my site to drop significantly following the Penguin 2.0 update, or is it likely to be a bigger problem than this? And if it is probably due to this piece of work, is it likely that solving the problem could result in a prompt rise back up the rankings, or is there going to be a black mark against my website going forward and slow down recovery? Any advice/suggestions will be greatly appreciated, Thanks Mike
Web Design | | mjk260 -
Tips for Panda-Proofing an Image Gallery
I'm currently working on a website that has a video, image and media gallery with over 9,000 items. The gallery can be found here:
Web Design | | Peter264
http://flyawaysimulation.com/images/16/microsoft-flight-simulator-x/ Every image has a page of its own. Therefore, essentially 9,000 pages of very thin content, especially the image pages with no UGC comments. Does anyone here have any tips to "panda-proof" these pages? The images still need to be indexed. What can we do here? The site also hosts videos, which of course the page the video resides on needs to stay in the index too (like youtube). Example of the video page here: http://flyawaysimulation.com/images/media/9371/fsps-3d-real-cockpit-effect-for-fsx/ Really want to hear your thoughts. Thanks in advance!0 -
Am I on the right track -- still not seeing results in rank, traffic, etc.
I am a complete novice, but I tend to learn quickly. My site is one year old, and I have very low traffic. I also rank poorly. I have recently learned a ton, and made some changes: 1. Put in meta no follow, no index tags on certain pages 2. Found and fixed some horrid content -- I had forgotten to finish certain pages (!) and they had been left up for months -- a good example is /California-homeschool.html basically said "Washington homeschool, blah, blah, blah" for about 8 months before I fixed it (!) 3. Added new content, changed the look and navigation of the site, added social media links and have been working to build those up (FB, Twitter, etc) 4. Started blogging regularly. Those are the main things I have done. I plan to continue to add content, tweak the navigation, and blog regularly. From what I can tell, link building should happen organically. My question is: Am I on the right track? Here is a link to my site: http://www.i-school-at-home.com Am I missing anything -- there seems to be so much info out there. Because there is a time lag between making changes and seeing results, I just would love to know if I am on the right track, before I devote more time to this strategy. What I would like to do is be the #1 homeschool website (long term goal) and generate revenue (eventually) from affiliate marketing and creating my own curriculum and resources. Thank you!!!!!!
Web Design | | WendyKKelly0 -
Looking for quality, cheap web design company recommendations
Does anyone have any recommendations of a very cheap web design company from India or other countries where the work is also high quality? I can project manage the development and provide a set of web standards such as to use valid code, no meta keyword tags, no flash, etc etc. I am looking for companies I can trust to perform the actual work. The web is full of companies but examples of quality work with WordPress, Joomla and particular ecommerce platforms is very thin or non-existent. If you can share any companies which you have personal experience with, I would appreciate it.
Web Design | | RyanKent0 -
Any discussions on the actual web page design and how it might affect SEO?
Are there any links to previous discussions or tips, techniques for how creative design has any impact on seo??
Web Design | | theideapeople1