Is Google indexing something I can't see on my page title?
-
When I do a search for my businesses website (colourpages.com) it returns a listing which is great but the title tag includes Hull Colour Pages which is our old brand name - we changed to colourpages.com 2 years ago yet Hull Colour Pages is still pulling through on the title tag.
I have checked the source and it's as follows:
<title>Plumbers in Hull - Reviews - colourpages.com</title>
I have attached a photo which shows the issue - http://imgur.com/Cva3001
Is Google indexing it from old history that is no longer visible or am I missing something?
-
Hey
Google will rewrite page titles when they believe the rewritten title provides a better or more accurate description of your site. This may be due to what they see as poor page titles or that the revision makes the title closer to users search query so they would be more likely to click through.
Some stated reasons for doing this are:
- Titles are particularly short
- Titles are shared across large parts of your site
- Titles appear to be mostly a collection of keywords
Here is a quote from Google on why they do this:
"If we’ve detected that a particular result has one of the above issues with its title, we may try to generate an improved title from anchors, on-page text, or other sources. However, sometimes even pages with well-formulated, concise, descriptive titles will end up with different titles in our search results to better indicate their relevance to the query. There’s a simple reason for this: the title tag as specified by a webmaster is limited to being static, fixed regardless of the query. Once we know the user’s query, we can often find alternative text from a page that better explains why that result is relevant. Using this alternative text as a title helps the user, and it also can help your site. Users are scanning for their query terms or other signs of relevance in the results, and a title that is tailored for the query can increase the chances that they will click through."
In your case they are showing the whole page title but adding the brand onto the end as they are not seeing the "colourpages.com" bit as being the brand.
Now, there is no way to directly control this but I can think of a few things to look at straight away.
1. Google use lots of brand signals and ideally all listings of your business should be consistent but, they are not. In fact, there are lots of mentions of your old brand. So, if we search for the old brand, your postcode and remove listings from our own site we find lots and lots of listings:
"hull colour pages" -www.colourpages.com "HU1 3RE"
"hull colour pages" -www.colourpages.com
I would claim and tidy these for starters.
2. I would make a small change to your page title as well and change the brand to "Colour Pages" and use a different seperator to show this is not just a "collection of keywords". Something like:
Plumbers in Hull - Reviews | Colour Pages
Here we have a clearly branded page title that is easier to understand and it includes part of the "Hull Colour Pages" so they may be happier with it. We also clearly differentiate between the keywords and branding with a different separator.
3. External Links
Other folks have mentioned external links so certainly run your backlink profile through OSE and see if you can locate sites linking back and get that updated.
To sum up here Google is not seeing your "colourpages.com" as being the brand so first up make the change to the URL to use "Colour Pages" and separate this from the main part of the page title with the horizontal separator and then do an audit of all old brand mentions and get them claimed and updated so all brand signals are consistent.
To put this into perspective, even your Facebook page uses the old brand so you just need to identify all of these old references and start cleaning them up:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hull-Colour-Pages/104140679621054No promises here as Google is a fickle mistress at best but these tips would certainly be where I would start with the title changes done first as that is a quick tweak and then work on the brand mentions and get them all updated so you are consistent on and off site.
Hope that helps!
MarcusReferences:
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35624 http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/023139.html -
There is a wikipedia article using the old name: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hull_Colour_Pages
I bet that editing that would go a long way to fixing your problem...
-
Thank you LindaLV - pleased to hear someone else has had this happen to them.
I will check all external links and see what the descriptions are - see if this helps change what appears on Google.
Thanks for your help
-
Hi Tuzzell
It's happening to a lot of our URL's but this is the one that i copied the code from http://www.colourpages.com/s/plumbers The terms colourpages.com or Hull are ok because we are a local telephone directory site. It's just the term 'Hull Colour Pages' written exactly like this that we was wanting to change as that was our old name until we changed to colourpages.com.
I just can't seem to find it in the code yet it appears the Google results.
Thanks for your quick response on this one
-
This has happened to me as well, having an old name show up in the search results. Google does not always use what you put in the title tag for the page title if it thinks that something else is more relevant.
In my case, there were still a good number of external links to the site with the old name being the anchor text, which is where Google got it, I assume. I see on your site that variations on "Colour Pages" are used in a number of your links; maybe that's where Google is picking it up.
-
Which particular URL are you looking at?
I have just crawled the site and the Meta titles being reported are the same i see in the HTMl (that i looked at, the crawl is 6.5k pages allready and only half way through). When i searched for your URL in Google got the home page back as you would expect and see Hull mentioned in the title, but it was in you meta title too.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking content for phrases that don't exist on-page
I am experiencing an issue with negative keywords, but the “negative” keyword in question isn’t truly negative and is required within the content – the problem is that Google is ranking pages for inaccurate phrases that don’t exist on the page. To explain, this product page (as one of many examples) - https://www.scamblermusic.com/albums/royalty-free-rock-music/ - is optimised for “Royalty free rock music” and it gets a Moz grade of 100. “Royalty free” is the most accurate description of the music (I optimised for “royalty free” instead of “royalty-free” (including a hyphen) because of improved search volume), and there is just one reference to the term “copyrighted” towards the foot of the page – this term is relevant because I need to make the point that the music is licensed, not sold, and the licensee pays for the right to use the music but does not own it (as it remains copyrighted). It turns out however that I appear to need to treat “copyrighted” almost as a negative term because Google isn’t accurately ranking the content. Despite excellent optimisation for “Royalty free rock music” and only one single reference of “copyrighted” within the copy, I am seeing this page (and other album genres) wrongly rank for the following search terms: “free rock music”
On-Page Optimization | | JCN-SBWD
“Copyright free rock music"
“Uncopyrighted rock music”
“Non copyrighted rock music” I understand that pages might rank for “free rock music” because it is part of the “Royalty free rock music” optimisation, what I can’t get my head around is why the page (and similar product pages) are ranking for “Copyright free”, “Uncopyrighted music” and “Non copyrighted music”. “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted” don’t exist anywhere within the copy or source code – why would Google consider it helpful to rank a page for a search term that doesn’t exist as a complete phrase within the content? By the same logic the page should also wrongly rank for “Skylark rock music” or “Pretzel rock music” as the words “Skylark” and “Pretzel” also feature just once within the content and therefore should generate completely inaccurate results too. To me this demonstrates just how poor Google is when it comes to understanding relevant content and optimization - it's taking part of an optimized term and combining it with just one other single-use word and then inappropriately ranking the page for that completely made up phrase. It’s one thing to misinterpret one reference of the term “copyrighted” and something else entirely to rank a page for completely made up terms such as “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted”. It almost makes me think that I’ve got a better chance of accurately ranking content if I buy a goat, shove a cigar up its backside, and sacrifice it in the name of the great god Google! Any advice (about wrongly attributed negative keywords, not goat sacrifice ) would be most welcome.0 -
Are Multiple Page Titles hurting my rankings
The platform that built our website has, for some reason, put multiple page titles on all of our webpages: https://www.backyardadventures.com/ If you open this page and "View Page Source" you will see that there are 50 page title tags (). There is one with our actual page title, but there are 49 others that look like this: <title></span><span class="html-tag">lock</span><span class="html-tag"></title> or <title></span><span class="html-tag">bubbles2</span><span class="html-tag"></title> are just two of the examples. The company said that because they are in a svg tag () they are fine. The title tags show up on some of the Moz tools. Is this effecting our rankings?
On-Page Optimization | | PageLogic0 -
When do Panda ranking factors apply when Google deindexes a page
Here is 2 scenarios Scenario 1 Lets say I have a site with a ton of pages (100,000+) that all have off site duplicate content. And lets say that those pages do not contain any rel="noindex" tags on them. Google then decides to de-index all those pages because of the duplicate content issue and slaps me with a Panda penalty. Since all those pages are no longer indexed by Google does the Panda Penalty still apply even though all those pages have been deindexed? Scenario 2 I add a rel="noindex" to all those 100,000+ off site duplicate content pages. Since Google sees that I have decided to not index them does the Panda penalty come off? What I am getting at is that I have realized that I have a ton of pages with off site duplicate content, even though those pages are already not indexed by Google does me by simply adding the rel="noindex" tag to them tell Google that I am trying to get rid of duplicate content and they lift the Panda penalty? The pages are useful to my users so I need them to stay. Since in both scenarios the pages are not indexed anyways, will Google acknowledge the difference in that I am removing them myself and lift the panda ban? Hope this makes sense
On-Page Optimization | | cbielich0 -
Meta Title for Category Pages
I am trying to improve the SEO for a few key category pages on my blog. I have two ranking really well so I want to boost them and bring up some others. Can I put two keywords in the meta title? Example: Maternity Deals | Pregnancy Deals Or should I just stick with one? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | dealblogger0 -
Using phrases like 'NO 1' or 'Best' int he title tag
Hi All, Quick question - is it illegal, against any rule etc to use phrases such as 'The No 1 rest of the title tag | Brand Name' on a site?
On-Page Optimization | | Webrevolve0 -
Google's view on geolocated results
Hello everyone, I am working on a project so the website is not online at the moment. My question is about Google's view on geolocated results : on the mainpage of the website, a bloc will be displaying local classifieds according to where the visitor is located. What will be Google's view on this bloc as it has no location ? A white empty bloc ? Bonus question : do you have any experience regarding this kind of situation ? How do you best deal with it in your opinion ? Thanks for your help ! Best Regards, Raphael
On-Page Optimization | | Pureshore0 -
Duplicate Page Title
I have a dating site, it's got a lot of duplicate page titles, most of them are the language buttons for the users to view the site in there language. but I think it's obvious that the buttons don't have anything to do with it. I'm thinking that page tittle is basically a description of what the site is. like for an example "online-dating" is this it? please tell me in terms for a dummy, how to fix it.
On-Page Optimization | | clickit2getwithit0 -
How should I rephrase these pages to avoid Phrase duplication within Title Tags
How should I rephrase these pages to avoid Phrase duplication within Title Tags Duplicate Page Title Page1-http://organicfruitbasketsflorist.com/index-2.html Page2- http://organicfruitbasketsflorist.com/Fruit_Baskets_Organic_Fruit_Baskets_New_York_NY.html Page3- http://organicfruitbasketsflorist.com/Fruit_Baskets_Edible_Fruit_Baskets_New_York_NY.html Page4organicfruitbasketsflorist.com/Fruit_Baskets_Business_Fruit_Baskets_New_York_NY.html Page5-http://organicfruitbasketsflorist.com/Fruit_Baskets_Fresh_Flowers_Delivered_New_York_NY.html Page6-http://organicfruitbasketsflorist.com/Coupons.htmlAmi
On-Page Optimization | | amydiamond0