Google is sticking it to E-commerce Companies right?
-
Hi all,
Excuse the rant - but I'd be interested to hear others thoughts on this...
I am completely disheartened by the Google Algorithm updates of the last 18 months. They seem to be completely geared up to making life much much harder for E-commerce companies to rank organically, and much easier for informational sites to rank organically, with the only exception being national or global brands that have millions of pounds to invest in off-line marketing like TV advertising.
Is it not all a devious strategy by Google to ensure e-commerce companies have to pay for their traffic? It seems like if you genuinely want to compete organically as an e-tailer, without investing millions in off-line advertising, you basically have to become a publishing house as well as shop. My company sells building supplies. There are plenty of magazines and info-sites out there offering tips, advice, interactive tools etc. for how to build your own home, home improvement advice etc. But if I want to start getting 'natural' links, I have to become an online magazine and information resource as well and start competing with these other reputable info-resources - where is the sense in that? If house-builders want advice and information on building regulations, planning permission etc. they'll visit government information sites and other reputable online resources to get that information, if they want to buy materials they'll go to a shop.
It just seems like Google is trying to make every site an information resource - how else are you supposed to get natural links without publishing 'sharable' information - no-one shares links to products really, well not building materials anyway - maybe sexy products like ferrari cars and super-duper laptops or sound systems, but no one is going to go "oh that's a really nice piece of timber, I'll share that with all my friends before I buy it".
Just feels like it's getting harder and harder and more and more expensive to trade online. What's everyone else think?
Luke
-
Hello Luke,
I will have to agree with you since I manage a site with no content section which makes it very difficult to earn links.
What I am doing is to find creative link strategies to earn links. As you mentioned, competing with big names is not easy especially when your budget is limited.
The resource that Tom mentioned are great and I use them a lot, also I would suggest this article that is very interesting and might give you some ideas
http://pointblankseo.com/creative-link-building
Hope it helps
-
What's everyone else think?
I am building information sites with small stores.... and small stores with lots of information.
My investment in information content pays back slowly as people looking for information find my sites in information SERPs and then make a purchase.
On those information pages you can also make nice money running ads. If you run adsense ads you can block direct competitors or if you run a network like Tribal your competitors will probably not be seen because they don't advertise there.
They seem to be completely geared up to making life much much harder for E-commerce companies to rank organically, and much easier for informational sites to rank organically,
In most of my money SERPs the sites that I have difficulty beating are the big retail and auction sites like Amazon and Ebay..... I have more information on my site for my product line than all of my competitors combined, potential customers can email questions, call us on phone and watch videos about how to use products.... still can't beat the big retailers who simply sell, offer no support, no information and allow all of their customers to come to us for support.... but that is exactly why some people buy from us instead of them - even if we charge more than amazon.
It just seems like Google is trying to make every site an information resource - how else are you supposed to get natural links without publishing 'sharable' information
It seems that you clearly understand the business model needed for success. So, what's stopping you???
-
I hear you Luke. There's always the option to rely on traffic from other search engines or take the "things were so much better before there was Google" perspective.
-
Hi Luke
Really sorry you're feeling dismayed with all of this. I've met a number of people who feel the same as you - and I have had my fair share of scepticism recently as well.
On the other end of the spectrum, you see websites using complete spam tactics to rank well and get away with it, which causes no end of frustration for people trying to do the "right" thing, if there is such a thing in SEO.
Acquiring those reputable links in a sustainable way usually does involve sharing information and content that people may want to link to, or offering expertise for people to use you as a source. However, it doesn't have to be just written content you offer.
You might be able to develop online tools that would help loads of people in your industry - for example, think of those that have created free invoice generators and tax calculators. Tools like that are infinatly usable and will get a lot of links. Similarly, a lot of people in the SEO sphere have developed WordPress plugins that many webmasters will find useful, all with a branded link back to the provider's site. So that could be an option.
Online PR could also be an option for you. Every day I see pretty regular requests for people with a knowledge in the housing industry to provide comment or analysis. It may be a bit of a stretch from just building supplies, but if you have the expertise there are a lot of valuable links that can be earned.
Exhaust all the methods you possibly can in this guide and have a look into the Link Club program - these are two great resources for earning links in creative ways.
And if you want, feel free to drop me a private message or an email (email in profile) and we can have a chat about some ways you can go about promoting your business, I'd be more than happy to help
All the best
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are there any benefits to using Google+ for business if it has no followers and no user engagement?
My G+ for business currently has 55 followers and no engagement - apart from me liking the posts from my personal G+ Apart from the benefits of having content indexed faster, is there any other benefits for me in this situation, from an SEO perspective? I would like to grow the followers and engagement but not sure how as my social marketing skills are not as strong as my technical seo.
Branding | | AjazMozPro2 -
I have a company with multiple locations through out the US and I am trying to figure out the best way to use Google+ and Facebook.
Should I create separate pages for each location or should I create one account and add all my locations to that account?
Branding | | steve2150 -
How to feature in Google restaurant reviews?
Hi, When I Google a restaurant name here in the UK - try "fat duck bray" I see the photo of the restaurant on the right hand side, the Zagat review score and then right at the bottom of this section there is "More Reviews" with links to Urbanspoon,com, qype.co.uk, Zagat.com and Blackbookmag.com (often TripAdvisor will appear here too.) To one of the sites I work with these are all the competition so the natural question is how would one appear here? I've never seen anything covering this before so interested if anyone else has read anything on this or has any experience on this. Thanks in advance for any answers.
Branding | | ianmcintosh0 -
Google+ Vanity Urls: Brand vs Keyword
We have recently been assigned a Google+ vanity URL for our Google page. By default, Google has assigned to us our top performing non-branded keyword. (Probably roughly twice the highly targeted search volume of our brand) My question is: Should I go with my BRAND NAME as my Google+ vanity url, or should I go with my TOP KEYWORD as my Google+ vanity url?
Branding | | Czarto0 -
Splitting our main website in Two... What is the fastest way for the new sites to become a brand in Googles eyes.
In a couple weeks our main website (which generates all of the revenue) will be split into two because of a long term branding / identity crisis. So my question is, how can i make sure (besides obvious 301 redirects) that these 2 new fresh urls become a brand as quick as possible in googles eyes? So far i am thinking of things like: press releases, blog posts with brand mentions. I am not ignorant and expect this to happen overnight, but we need a strong foundation to build on, which is why i am asking Anyone got a list / case study / advise so I can really blow it up on launch week? Thanks 🙂
Branding | | Hyrule0 -
Yelp Reviews and Google + reviews
After reading this SEOmoz thread http://www.seomoz.org/q/getting-reviews-to-stick-on-yelp-google I have learned that one cannot leave fake reviews because Google and yelp can see if the users are real by the user behavior. If one of your clients is happy with your service and they have never left a Google review or yelp review and you have them leave your company a review it will be filtered and not count. Google’s +1 is fairly new and I am not sure if many users use it. IMO a user is much more likely to Facebook "Like" something. Same goes for Yelp, I feel like many local services don’t have a high enough search volume to benefit from these areas. If a company cannot have a satisfied customer leave a review on Google + or Yelp because they are not active enough on these networks, the company does not receive the credit they deserve. I'm assuming SEOmoz has the contacts to make a change, well here is my idea: How about Yelp and Google + send a letter to the address of the review... (Same as a Google places listing, reviewer will receive letter and enter a pin number online to confirm review) this solves the issue and businesses can receive the credit they deserve. In all fairness if a company does right by someone, the company deserves the review, right? Otherwise this should not be a ranking factor IMHO!
Branding | | SEODinosaur0 -
Ranking Videos on First Page of Google
Hey Guys, My videos are doing well on YouTube with lots of views and comments (about 1.5 million views). Nevertheless, I can’t manage to get them to appear on Google’s first SERP for my branded keywords. What am I doing wrong? What in your opinion are the major ranking factors for YouTube videos? Thanks!
Branding | | ShivaS0 -
Facebook, Google Plus - What to share/like?
Hi everybody! We are planning to offer an incentive to all our customers who interact with us on social media websites. What's the most important thing to ask from a customer? Facebook to like our Facebook business page or to like our own website through Facebook? to just follow us on Facebook or to actually comment / interact on our wall? Google + to +1, share, add to circle our Google+ business webpage or to +1 or share our own website? So basically what do we need to promote most? Our Facebook / Google+ business pages or our own website through social media marketing? While we understand it's important to actually interact with the customers and offer value on social media websites, we are looking to boost our SEO efforts. Thank you!
Branding | | echo10