Rankings Drop Penguin 2.0
-
Hey guys,
Suffering a horrible rankings drop after penguin 2.0. We have 4 popular sites and have seen a steady decline in rankings and traffic after 22nd May.
I've looked into it a little bit and am wondering if WordPress blog sidebar links might be hurting us. Specifically my brother and I both have sidebar links on our personal blogs which are getting indexed on every page, and I'm wondering if it's distorting our link profiles.
Specifically, I read something about links coming from sites which aren't relevant to your niche and overly optimised anchor text. Both sites have very simple single keyword anchor texts on the links.
We're pretty white hat in terms of SEO, we've never done that much link building, and when we do, it's usually with worthwhile directories or with sites we have relationships with. Therefore we don't have that many links.
Any ideas on how best to investigate this?
Thanks.
-
Thanks for the comprehensive reply.
We actually used to work like that under our company name. One of the main reasons for splitting at the time to separate sites was that Google stopped allowing different display URLs for AdWords - we would advertise buyahipflask.com but redirect to macdonald-sporrans.com. We got significantly better click-through rates for the individually branded domains.
We also felt that it was easier to develop good relevant content and social strategies around individual niches, rather than a single brand. IE I feel it would be hard to make our single site which might have 10,000 products on it, rank well for 'quaichs' which is only about 200 of those products.
However, I fully agree with your points about our current setup. Perhaps my ideal would be to have single sites with better names/brands!?
-
If you want to know how I would approach this in a new light and strategy. It would take some time, planning and work to develop, but the rewards down the line would be much greater! It looks like the way you have things setup now, look like a potential link wheel of sites playing off each other with specific 'KW anchor text rich links internally.
Here's a detailed plan I would put in place. Granted this is a rough outlook without having all access and full disclosure on the sites.
1. Look to develop your Brand! Build a brand name that you can expand on product wise. Develop out 1 site which encompasses all the products you sell. Perhaps later you want to add more? Is there any reason why you could not assimilate all these sites into 1 Brand site?
2. Plan to move all products under one shell site, and plan to redirect all your traffic to the new BRAND site
Work with one domain you can build on for clients, products, social, content and link building.
3. Register a new BRAND domain once you have decided on one. Make sure to remove any <keywords>from your URL and build a brand people can relate too in it's product niche. Keyword rich domains have been hurt in various niche's from the last few updates. Build something that people want to share is your best bet.</keywords>
4. Migrate all your content, products, and pages to the new domain/brand site.
5. Plan out detailed 301 redirect from all your old sites, domains and internal pages to the new MASTER BRAND site where it will hold all your products for sale, keeping some of your link value.
6. Run detailed back link profiles in OSE on the old sites, to weed out the weak one's and the make to be very thorough. Remove any back-links you don't want (many methods), and clean up the link profile until it looks very clean
7. Plan and prepare a social media strategy around your products and brand. Get the clear one's setup and build out from there as needed (specific), to aid in reinforcing the brand and site.
8. Plan a content development strategy around your products. Develop out information, product details, where they can get them, why it' better. Find linking partners through sharing information and content. Build links to external sources that relate to product in your niche. Get people talking about you and what you offer
9. This way, when you tie in the social media strategy with content development, you can handle working with one domain, and drive all your efforts to one site/domain and location.
The way you have it setup now (4 sites and 1 blog), your are turning your efforts into more work!!?? Running multiple domains, social media and content development and link building. Why would you cause yourself so much work???
Ultimately, building a brand site is the best bet. This will also help you with the link building and content development to support the domain and site.
It's a rough sketch and requires work but would pay off in the long run. The way you have it setup now, needs to be modified to succeed in the long run
Hope to see a future post once you get it all aligned and working for you!
Cheers.
-
Thanks for the reply - interesting opinion.
I'm aware that our 'brands' are also URLs and contain keywords so perhaps changing the blogs from having keyword only anchor text to having brand name anchor text is better.
Ultimately, I'm happy to do whatever will be better. As we have control of the links it's very easy to remove them quickly. I thought about doing that and then recalled someone saying 'all links are good links' so wondered whether it wouldn't be worth the effort.
At least a good starting point is - from looking at our link profile - do you think those links from the blogs are the ones that we should be concerned about?
-
Personally, I think that the recent updates have targeted non-relevant linking heavily; I read an article somewhere written by the owner of a UK based web design agency. His company website was effected by the updates because they placed footer links on all of the websites he they had designed. When they changed the anchor text to brand their rankings started to increase again.
In my experience, a client of mine had dropped considerably in the rankings. I looked into their linking profile and realised they had blog roll links from several non-related websites (built by an old agency). I had them removed by contacting the website owners directly and we are now starting to see rankings return.
If you want to keep the links on your blogs, I would recommend linking with brand anchor text rather than keywords. I know this may be difficult given the URLs of the websites you have given haha.
-
Sure thing, probably should've done that in the first instance!
Sites are: buyakilt.com buyahipflask.com buyatankard.com buyaquaich.com
Blogs are: fer.gy callum-macdonald.com
-
I think you should share you sites and blogs (with links) to help us get a view and a better picture of what might actually be causing the issue
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Inbound link is follow link but we put no follow link back - is it beneficial for rankings?
Dear Moz Community, We are operating in a niche market, where there are not so many content marketing options. What we are left with are link exchanging with relevant sites that are on the same topic but to not directly compete with us. Now we know that if we link back to site A and site a links back to us - for google this is not a very good link. But, some of the sites we are exchanging links with, do not know the term follow vs no follow links. My question - if your link is to site A is a no follow link but they give us a follow link - does it mean thats a better option than a follow vs follow. Thanks for help!
Link Building | | advertisingcloud0 -
How to check if the website effected from Penguin or not?
Hi, We collecting links from some directory and forums etc but i am not quite sure if they are effected from Penguin update. Would you please guide me how i could check this? Thank you
Link Building | | Rubix0 -
Why do hallmarks from web design companies carry so much ranking weight for the recipient website?
Website designers/developers place hallmarks (Website Designed by XXXX) in the footer region of the web sites they have designed/built, how much ranking value do these hallmarks have being that they're pointing from sites that are irrelevant to the web designer's, and why?
Link Building | | UplinkSpyder0 -
Best Anchor Text Practices Post Penguin Panda
my question is what are the best practices Post Penguin and Panda for anchor texts? I have heard info about using brand names, and not having duplicate anchor texts. But i'm confused; if its best to have brand names then likely it will end up being duplicate. Also is having no anchor bad? I have also heard that it is best just to use the website URL. It would be great if someone could clear this up for me thanks.
Link Building | | ilyaelbert0 -
Remove links after Penguin?
My site did not get hit. I am worried that Google will come back and get me for those anchor-text links I built a while back. They are of low to medium quality guest posts. Should I remove my old low-quality links? What about those on sites and pages that have been deindexed by Google? Any point in removing those? I know we can only speculate at this point, but would really appreciate some opinions on this. Has the trend in the past been a slight rollback after a big algorithm update like this? Or could we expect to see more and more sites being penalized? -Mathias
Link Building | | mathiasppc0 -
What Are the Best Practices for Ranking for Synonyms?
This topic has me entirely confused, and unsure if we should keep a website focused on one keyword group, and using synonym contextual links to rank it for other keyword synonyms. We simply have not seen enough data or run enough tests to find our answer, and wanted to reach out to the community to see if anyone has. I have seen Google rank a synonym to my search query on the first page, and is why we are confused. Let's use an example: We'll use "Industry" as the main keyword for our page. "Company" or "Companies" is viewed as a synonym by Google of this keyword. When we query "Industry", "Company" and "Companies" are also found in bold. 1.) Is it best practice to also create a unique page targeting synonyms? Our thinking is that it would be best to try and target exactly what the user is looking for rather than having a synonym to their search for better conversions, but as mentioned above we feel it's best to hit exactly what they query because that's their way of thinking. That they're looking for that exact match. 2.) Have the page "Industry", but do some link building using contextual links "Company" or "Companies" pointing back at our "Industry" page. Would this help rank our "Industry" page for "Company" or "Companies" even though the main page is "Industry"? Just not sure we want to do this as the reasoning explained in #1. Thanks for your help!
Link Building | | cyberlicious0 -
Ranking Inner Pages or the Main Page?
Hello Guys, I am relatively new to the SEO world. So I am just wondering what would be more helpful. Getting the homepage ranked for a list of targeted keywords or creating a separate page for each keyword and then getting those pages ranked? Look forward to hear back, Thanks! Naimath
Link Building | | Sizmic0 -
How long does it take for google see my new backlins and take an effect on my rank?
how long does it take for google see my new backlins and take an effect on my rank?
Link Building | | ctam0