Is a press release a bad idea?
-
We've never sent out a press release before using one of the services, and thought it might finally be time. Then I saw that Google seems to be calling services like PR Newswire out.
"Links with optimized anchor text in articles or press releases distributed on other sites."
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66356?hl=en
So, is it worth it to spend a few hundred bucks to distribute a press release, or am I better off just publishing it on my blog for my blog writing service and promoting it all the regular ways?
-
PRWeb have advised that all their links are "no-follow" with effect from when google made this announcement.
And i believe Matt Cutts clarified in a video recently that good press releases have value, as it will get your message out there and potentially picked up by bloggers and press agencies, what you wont get anymore, is any google juice!
-
Published yesterday by Aaron Wall...
-
For strategic reasons, Boston would be better.
I like your idea, though.
-
Good point, but I'd check references, etc.
Hmmm. Tough one.
-
Scott,
Do a search on public relations Denver. Look at the pr blog one, then the one without shoes, then the one about mid page looking for interns. I am willing to bet you can find someone within that group that would take your $500.
If you say they do a good job, I am willing to give them a shot as well.Best,
-
Yeah, but what you're paying the provider for is the sure knowledge that they're going to spam your press release. On Craigslist you wouldn't even be sure your $500 would go to do even that.
-
That's an interesting idea.
I could just go on craigslist or someplace and say, "I was going to pay $500 to newswire or someone to distribute my press release, but I'd rather pay a person. Send me a proposal about how you'd send out this press release (I'll send you the early version) and the best proposal will get that $500, and the prospect of more work in the future."
Not sure where I could post that, but maybe it's worth doing.
Thanks!
-
Scott, I am not saying you are. My point is about PR Web, newswire, etc. What they do is spam the world with their news releases and yes, some get a bit of traction. At the same time, I can tell you of individual pages of content I have written, placed on a client site, and watched as it got picked up by Google as a news piece and made my client some money. (No, that does not happen even regularly.) My point is that there is a news release or PR release that is real and then there are these SALES companies whose only motivation is to SELL YOU on their PR product of sorts.
If what you have is newsworthy, put it out there yourself or use one of them and see what happens. If I put out a piece about a lawyer who has decided to take a certain case (say tainted baby food) is that really news? Bob X has decided his firm the X law firm is now taking tainted baby food cases (then a rehash of something that has been in the news for a year), that IMO is worthless. If it is truly newsworthy, if you are the only one it applies to, etc. give it a go with them and then tell us what happened.
Or, pick up the phone or email several PR professionals where you are and ask what they would charge to put it out to their "contacts." I am guessing if you get half lucky they will get a better response for you than one of the PR Spam companies. It is simply a choice for you of try it and see or try something else and see. Then you will have the experience for the next time.
Hope that clarifies
Best to you.
-
Hey, I'm not doing this for a quick-and-dirty way to boost SEO. I'm doing this because I really think it's news and I want the world to know.
If that's the case, does PR Newswire or one of the others help?
-
If I may put a few words in EGOL's response, it is like this: You can do the quick and dirty SEO or the higher end longer lasting SEO. You do get what you pay for so: For the quick and dirty you quickly get dirty - When you do the longer lasting SEO (good site, content, etc) you end up higher end in more ways than one.
Yes, that is original!
-
That's a really good point about the news value of the release.
I think this news is big, but I've had trouble getting reporters to write about us. The reason for that is that we are a blog writing service. We pay writers to essentially ghost write posts for our business clients.
The reporters, already feeling besieged, think that we are somehow degrading the world of writing, so they don't like to cover us.
Our news release addresses the question of the treatment of our writers, so that's why I'm hopeful we'll get some traction with this news release.
-
They say they send stuff to 20,000 publications, who knows how true that is.
Yes. This is exactly why I would not use them - even if they paid me hundreds of dollars.
This is something to recommend to your competitors. Definitely not to use for yourself.
-
There are some entry level plans that you can do for a few hundred dollars, and there are some new players, too. PressKing seems interesting. They say they send stuff to 20,000 publications, who knows how true that is.
-
I think that the problem arises when the release is loaded with KW anchor links and spammed out to every PR site on the web... and the PR companies email spam every blogger email address that they can get their hands on - even if the blogger does not cover anything even close to the topic of the release. Some PR companies know nothing of Penguin and happily think that they are "spreading the word".
-
They're like any other content, in that they're only worthwhile if there is an original idea behind them and they are of substantial interest to your audience or their influencers. When press releases came to common use on the web, the need for creativity in creating them increased as the number of people releasing them increased. A great press release is still worth the money, but if it's not great--it probably isn't.
-
Press releases used to be dignified and worthy efforts. Then the web turned the PR industry into a bunch of spammers who wear suits to work.
So, is it worth it to spend a few hundred bucks to distribute a press release...
That might cost you an awful lot more if you get slapped with a Penguin problem.
-
The last time I answered a question around this, a PR Web rep sent me a nasty email. In spite of that my opinion remains unchanged. I do not believe they are worth the costs. Yes, I still see their "press releases" ranking occasionally for certain legal terms and I don't keep up with how long that lasts, etc. Even though Google says they don't like them, the results seem to say otherwise. But, I have yet to see the "few hundred bucks" plan you mention here.
I was looking at it some time back and you had to give them thousands up front and they tell you when you can or cannot put out a release, etc.
You can get links with good content and diligence. So, all you PR reps give us a call
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Scribd embed links - bad idea?
My client's site in question has a TON of outstanding, constantly updated, highly detailed articles. The site owner also has a branded collection of nearly all of them on Scribd. I guess I can live with that because dupe content isn't an issue and the pdfs there link back to the site and another domain of ours. Plus it gets a lot of eyeballs on our newish brand and content, and we can run reports on users. BUT, we have Scribd social share buttons on each article on our site that (among other things) allows a user to grab a direct link to the content on Scribd or an embed link for their blog or whatever. So, two questions really - Foremost, shouldn't we get rid of that embed option on our page? I mean, isn't is stealing from our backlink potential? I can't imagine juice would somehow pass back to us through a Scribd-located doc or embed but I haven't found info affirming or contradicting that. And secondly, isn't a Scribd collection a bit analogous to posting videos on YouTube and hoping your page will ultimately benefit from it via clickthroughs, etc? At this year's MozCon I heard a strong argument against that. Thanks -
Branding | | Jen_Floyd0 -
Author Site And Book Site - Multiple Sites Bad Idea?
The question: I've been doing work for authors lately and a common question is if they should have a site for their book and a site for themselves. Separate sites with different domain names. At first I thought this would be a bad idea. Why spread information across two sites if they can be related and used together in one? But I see a lot of authors doing this and some with marketing companies. One site for the author with information about them, their books, their social media presence. Then another site for their book, with new social media accounts, other info, etc. What do you guys think? Has anyone tried both and seen any pros and cons? Is there a perfect answer?
Branding | | JoshBowers20120 -
Is duplicating video across several sites a bad thing?
Hi, We have a fairly successful YouTube Channel where we create unique and helpful videos that are related to our core business activity. When we create these videos would you consider it a bad thing to not only post them on YouTube but also a couple of the smaller sites such as Metacafe and Dailymotion? Sending to multiple sites would possibly achieve more total views but would this kind of duplication potentially be harmful to the overall success of the video and have a knock on effect when it comes to how it ranks in Google? Thanks for your help.
Branding | | ChrisHolgate0 -
Questions about Press Releases
Are sites such as Marketwire, PRWeb, PRnewswire, BusinessWire, e-Releases and PitchEngine good for editorial back links? Also, if I have a press release on PRWeb, for example, can I have the EXACT same one on Martketwire, etc or do I need to worry about duplicate content?
Branding | | tutugirl0 -
Is it a good idea to participate in review / giveaway bloggers
Hi, I sell Gift Baskets for children and the best customers are Moms. Is it a good idea to participate in review / giveaway mom bloggers? The way it works I give the blogger a product to review. They write their true experience with the Gift Basket and they link to my site Then we do a few product giveaway to moms / (bloggers subscriber) once a month. Then moms will review the winning products. To participate in drawing moms will visit my site, follow my tweeter. Like or dislike me on Facebook……. For each action they do they will get one extra chance on drawing. In here I will get few links to different page of the site. Are these links are good links? I am not paying cash to buy the link. But I give them product to review and they get to keep it. Simply Sassy Media at http://simplysassymedia.com/ is a good example. they manage and connect me to a lot of the blogger sites.
Branding | | giftbasket4kids0 -
How to capitalize from a press release?
My largest client, a financial services outfit are about to launch a major new service. As part of this, their PR agency is about to issue a press release that will go to financial journalists and the whole stock exchange. Is there some way, as their SEO advisor, that I can increase the impact of this and help them to further benefit? Thanks in advance...
Branding | | generalzod0 -
Is it a bad idea to have a catchy brand name url redirect to an exact match domain
A friend wanted to setup a website where people would share and vote on "widget" ideas where the winning idea got build for free. They bought cute the domain name widg.et and branded their site as widg.et. However, for SEO, they are having widg.et forward to www.sharewidgets.com. Then, to complicate things further, they changed their business model to remove the voting feature and now the site is just set to show off the widgets they've made and let people order new custom widgets. They might add the voting feature back later. "Widget" and "widgets" in this case has an SEOmoz difficulty of 72% and 71%, so quite high and none of the two word or long tail phrases have much traffic. What do you think they should do: Remove all domain forwarding and use widg.et as their only domain as it's less confusing and better for branding Get another domain that includes their keyword widget for the SEO exact match benefit Keep it as is, even though "sharewidgets" is no longer quite as applicable Many Thanks!
Branding | | skincareseo0 -
Any ideas on how to leverage celebrity spottings for SEO?
Recently, a Hollywood celebrity was seen wearing a product manufactured by one of my clients. Any out of the box ideas on how to leverage this for SEO?
Branding | | Czarto0