Is CloudFlare bad for SEO?
-
I have been hit by DDoS attacks lately...not on a huge scale, but probably done by some "script kiddies" or competitors of mine.
Still, I need to take some action in order to protect my server and my site against all of this spam traffic that is being sent to it. In the process of researching the tools available for defending a website from a DDoS attack, I came across the service offered by CloudFlare.com.
According to the CloudFlare website, they protect your site against a DDoS attack by showing users/visitors they find suspicious an interstitial that asks them if they are a real user or a bot...this interstitial contains a Captcha that suspicious users are asked to enter in order to visit the site.
I'm just wondering what kind of an effect such an interstitial could have on my Google rankings...I can imagine that such a thing could add to increased click-backs to the SERPs and, if Google detects this, to lower rankings.
Has anyone had experience with the DDoS protection services offered by CloudFlare, who can say a word or two regarding any effects this may have on SEO?
Thanks
-
i know this is a old thread and i see where people says cloudflare dont have a bad effect but i need someone to tell me more about it because am scare loosing all my hardwork on my Music niche
-
Wanna know if cloudflare depends on some country and unavailable in some countries? thinking of using this as well on my subscene page
-
it should not negatively impact your ranking in any way shape or form. If you are seeing the speed increase from it it will most likely be a positive effect on your rankings. Google no longer uses IP's so it's fine. to have a reverse proxy in front like CloudFlare. you like it and you think it's fine to help move site, by all means, try it out.
It will only have a negative impact on your rankings if you do something that's almost impossible in block Google Bot with your firewall which is not going to happen unless you really start getting technical with the WAF, in other words, don't worry about it
sincerely,
Tom
-
Seriously I wanted to go for cloudflare too on my music blog because they make site super fast but I'm scared to loose my ranking
Should I or not
-
I agree that they are much better than they where I’m still using Incapsula & Fastly.
I use CloudFlare Enterprise for China.
Glad to hear you’re doing well!
Tom
-
We have hundreds of sites managed through Cloudflare. So far the good far outweighs the bad, although I am beginning to suspect bad neighbors could certainly negatively influence ranking. We have a few comparisons ongoing. We will know for sure in the coming months. I only wish Cloudflare would take a higher stance about which sites it is willing to get in bed with.
Here https://sarkariresultsite.com/ is the our new website which is managed by Cloudflare.
-
With CloudFlare the challenge page you refer to is dependent on your security questions. My knowledge of DDos mitigation is not great, but what I do is have the CloudFlare security settings on Low. If I was to come under attack, I would react and put the security settings on high for the duration.
If the DDos is bad, than you may need the expensive plan that has specialist DDos protection.
today i transfer my site https://sarkariresultsite.in on cloud flare with cloudflare flexible SSL
-
Generally speaking, CAPTCHA based DDoS protection is not advised as it will drive away clients and DDoS bots alike.
Same goes for delay pages.Also, DDoS attacks are swift and can bring site/server down in minutes so the manual approach is risky and probably less effective than it sounds on paper. Even if you are always near your PC, like many of us here are, you`ll still be exposed on weekends, nighttime, launch breaks, etc... Hackers know that and will exploit it. (favorite attack time - VERY EARLY Sunday mornings... )
You should also consider that DDoS can serve as a means to an end. It's often used to "soften" the protective layer to hack the database, inject the site with backdoors, deface or delete it and so on and so forth.
What you really need is a combination of auto-triggering and transparent mitigation, which shies away from intrusive mitigation methods in favor of more subtle progressive challenges (i.e. JS challenge combined with reputation and behavior monitoring).
This may sound fancy but it really this is the emerging industry standard and growing competition between vendors actually drives costs down. -
With CloudFlare the challenge page you refer to is dependent on your security questions. My knowledge of DDos mitigation is not great, but what I do is have the CloudFlare security settings on Low. If I was to come under attack, I would react and put the security settings on high for the duration.
If the DDos is bad, then you may need the expensive plan that has specialist DDos protection.
-
Hi
SEO wise, there are many things to consider before on-boarding a CDN service and bot filtering is one of them.
I've covered the topic in 2 blogs posts about a year ago:1. CDN's SEO related advantages 2. CDN's SEO related myths (and possible issues to consider)
PS: I work for CDN-based security and acceleration service provider - Incapsula.
-
Hi
http://www.neustar.biz/enterprise/ddos-protection
https://www.verisigninc.com/en_US/forms/ddosattackservice.xhtml
http://www.incapsula.com/ddos/anti-ddos-protection
What can happen
If you want a true built for enterprise host that actually has a perfect record and will care more than any other that I know of about security, up time and would you benefit yes you would fire host is the best they offer built-in DoS/DDoS mitigation
2 answer your question about cloud flair I do not feel adding them will give you the same advantages as a enterprise level hosting company.
For instance I believe fire host to be the best let's say you think liquid Web managed dedicated with layer 7 DDoS protection is better.
Well that's up to you and me to make our decisions. Based on past history and our own opinions of the companies.
If you where to add CloudFlare
you would receive CloudFlare layer 7 DDoS protection only once you started paying $200 a month of free cloud for a service is not a system that will protect you against an attack
http://www.cloudflare.com/features-security
There content delivery network as they call it is simply a reverse proxy it's not what other people would call a true CDN once again the issues would be a large with the base plan http://www.cloudflare.com/features-cdn
Your so-called anti-cast DNS CloudFlare says is standard changes your IP address by definition any cast and DNS does not change your IP. There are some methods two get around this but it's not simple.
A $200 a month "CloudFlare Railgun origin network optimizer"
http://www.cloudflare.com/railgun
Will do the same thing as any high end content delivery network as far as fixing the front end code edge cast will do that as will NetDNA, Akamai, numerous others so may I can't list them all.
Information on Akamai stopping attacks
The unique thing is edge cast is very fast so is Akamai you can purchase a Akamai CDN from liquid Web for $120 a month with a terabyte of bandwidth that's a lot.
It will do more than the CloudFlare Railgun including help stop DDoS attacks it will do it faster and if were to spend the money on a liquid Web VPS with DDoS you would be at about $175 a month or you could start off on the base package with fire host and that would cost you $200 a month however for a month $250 you can you can add edge casts outstanding content delivery network
I have accounts with liquid Web and fire host I use fire host primarily and really do not do much with liquid Web however both of them are better than CloudFlare in terms of protection and in terms of speed.
http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/cn-domain-service-restored-following-massive-ddos-attack
I of course have tried to use CloudFlare and found it worthless to me.
My main point is for $200 a month you can get a much faster and safer setup.
The other thing to remember when CloudFlare said it blocked a 300 GB attack that is considered fictitious and debatable by many in the
industry myself included. I don't think switches that At 10 Gb can do that when there's only two pointing at it
Here is a link from cloud flair talking about how good of a job they did saving the Internet and stopping the biggest attack ever. They did not succeed in keeping Spamhaus online so they did not stop the attack in my opinion.
http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
"On Monday, March 18, 2013 Spamhaus contacted CloudFlare regarding an attack they were seeing against their website spamhaus.org. They signed up for CloudFlare and we quickly mitigated the attack." & said there was "more then than 300Gbps of attack traffic"
The other big difference between CF and everyone else is they utilize there any cast network to accept the attack this slows down any one on that network instantly as it did when "the attack that almost broke the Internet happened"
Instead of moving the traffic to a private cloud and dealing with it so it would not affect others using their service they basically did not have any regard for their users at that time.
"The attackers were quiet for a day. Then, on March 22 at 18:00 UTC, the attack resumed, peaking at 120Gbps of traffic hitting our network. As we discussed in the previous blog post, CloudFlare uses Anycast technology which spreads the load of a distributed attack across all our data centers. This allowed us to mitigate the attack without it affecting Spamhaus or any of our other customers. The attackers ceased their attack against the Spamhaus website four hours after it started."
CloudFlare actually spread the attack on to their own customers this is something that harmed everyone using their service that day for I believe five days total.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2013/03/28/spamhaus_mega_ddos_little_collateral_damage/
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1065748
Nearly half of DDoS attacks in the first half of 2013 are now larger than 1Gbps, up from 13.5 percent in 2012,
http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/prolexic-stops-massive-dns-reflection-attack
largest DNS reflection attack ever recorded,” which peaked at 167Gbps.
If this is now the largest what was the 300gbps?
It is not bad for SEO in itself however using a CAPTCHA page if it thinks your visitors is a attack or bot is very bad & happens allot I know changing your IP address can cause some issues. What I'm getting at is if you want the type of protection you were talking about there are much better methods of going about getting it.
Try them out see what you think you can really only learn more about it.
I hope this helps you,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are feeds bad for duplicate content?
One of my clients has been invited to feature his blog posts here https://app.mindsettlers.com/. Here is an example of what his author page would look like: https://app.mindsettlers.com/author/6rs0WXbbqwqsgEO0sWuIQU. I like that he would get the exposure however I am concerned about duplicate content with the feed. If he has a canonical tag on each blog post to itself, would that be sufficient for the search engines? Is there something else that could be done? Or should he decline? Would love your thoughts! Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cindyt-17038
Cindy T.0 -
Pagination, Javascript & SEO
Hi I need some help identifying whether we need to rethink the way we paginated product pages, On this page http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches when clicking page 1,2, etc - we have javascript to sort the results, the URL displayed and the URL linked to are different. e.g. The URL for these paginated pages is for example: page2 http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches#productBeginIndex:30&orderBy:5&pageView:list& Then the arrows either side of pagination, link to the paginated landing page e.g. http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches?page=3 - this is where the rel/prev details are - done for Google However - when clicking on this arrow, the URL loaded is different again - http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches#productBeginIndex:60&orderBy:5&pageView:list& & doesn't take you http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches?page=3 I did not set this up, but I am concerned that the URL http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/workbenches?page=3 never actually loads, but it's linked to Google can crawl it. Is this a problem? I am looking to implement a view all option. Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Would this be considered cloaking and would it be a bad move?
I posted this topic last night, http://moz.com/community/q/seo-dealing-with-a-cdn-on-a-site about issues I am having with a client's images falling out of index because they have a CDN now. So I have come up with a work around, but it might be considered cloaking and I am not sure. A month ago we changed over to using a CDN and the images started falling out of the index after that. Currently when you land on a page the images are served from cdn.site.com What I am thinking about doing is detecting Google Bot and when Google Bot crawls the site serve images from site.com. The images will be the exact same images as served from the CDN so it is not a content switcharoo thing. It is just to try to get the images back in the index. So would this be considered cloaking in your opinion?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LesleyPaone0 -
Website Layout and SEO
Hi All, As a brand new user to Wordpress and having read articles and forum posts I have purchased Studiopress Genesis Enterprise Theme. QuestionWordpress like any traditional bespoke site can be written to incorporate variations of columns structures.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mark_Ch
What is the best column strategy or page layout strategy for SEO? Thanks Mark0 -
How to seo websites on another server
We have partners that want us to build and manage a co-branded white label for them. We will have unique content on the white label, however the white label will be located on our server. I was planning to put it on a subdomain and mask the URL, however was told that google will see through that and not give any credit to the white label. Our partners all have high PR and we are a new company with low PR. We want the white labels to get the credit from the partner websites. Should we do it through url masking or by changing the A Record in the other website to point to our server?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TravelerVIP0 -
Are tags an issue in SEO
SEOMoz saw that my tags were duplicate pages. Are tags a serious issue in SEO? Should I remove it entirely to prevent the duplicate pages?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | visualartistics0 -
A very basic seo question
Sorry, been a long day and wanted a second opinion on this please.... I am developing an affiliate store which will have dozens of products in each category. We will not be indexing the product pages themselves as they are all duplicate content. The plan is to have just the first page of the category results indexed as this will have unique content about the products in that section. The later pagnated pages (ie pages 2,3,4,5 etc) will have 12 products on each but no unique content. Would the best advice be to add a canonical tag to all pages in the 'chairs' category pointing to the page with the first 12 results and the descriptions? This would ensure that the visitors are able to browse many pages of product but google won't index products 13 and onwards. Am I right in my thinkings? A supplemental question. What is the best way to block google from indexing/crawling 90,000 product listings which are pulled direct from the merchant so are not unique in the least. I have previous played with banning google from the product folder but it reports health issues in webmaster tools. Would the best route be a no index tag on all the product pages and to no follow all the products in the category listings? Many thanks Carl
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Grumpy_Carl0 -
Whitelabel stores and consequences for SEO
Hello I have a very important question to you. We are planning to a open 2 – 5 “whitelabel” web shops in each country that run on the same platform and server (Demandware) as our current web sites. Each white label site will have own domain. The product selection will be identical and prices will be identical, but the sites will be branded differently with other logo and colors and name for the store. The question is about the consequences for SEO for such project. What are the risks for the rankings for us, if the whitelabel products have same product descriptions and names as our existing web shop has? Will it affect our rankings? How would google rank 3 whitelabel stores that have own domains but otherwise identical product content? What is the minimal that should be changed from SEO point of view in order to avoid Google penalties or ranking problems? Looking forward to hear from you Greetings,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EuropeanSEOguy
Rolf0