Penguin 2.1 recovery
-
Our website took a huge hit due to Penguin 2.1 we are looking to keep our domain but create a new site to disavow all our links. Will this work? Any Ideas on this tactic?
-
Here's the only correct answer to this question: "Nobody knows".
According to Google, you need to identify your manipulative links, disavow or preferably remove them and then wait for a Penguin refresh. However, they've never been clear on whether removing is necessary. John Mueller hinted in a hangout that disavowing was the same as manually removing but then he went on to say that it could be better to manually remove.
I have seen some sites make some sort of recovery with Penguin, but the scary reality is that very few do. In order to recover you need to have a good base of natural links (not self made, but earned) and also be able to attract new links in the future. And, you need to do an extremely thorough job on cleaning up your link profile.
"we are looking to keep our domain but create a new site to disavow all our links. " - If you start up a new site on the same domain then you'll still have all of the same bad backlinks that got you into Penguin trouble so you won't be any further ahead. EDIT: That is, assuming that most of your links point to your home page. If you have bad links pointing to inner pages then you can change those urls and effectively remove those bad links. But, in most cases the bad links are pointing to the home page and those can't be removed by changing the site.
-
I will write a brief response not covering all my thoughts (due to time, sorry) -
Disavowing all links will not be enough to lift a site wide penalty. Tactics change depending upon whether this was a manual action or algorithmic penalty. Do you have any messages in GWT?
You need to make real, documented efforts to manually remove each and every bad link you have pointing at your site. There are many guides to how to do this and even a definitive guide on the Moz blog currently that works very well. The jest of it is you need to request each link be removed, remove it yourself, and document yourself along the way. Take screenshots of contact forms filled out on domains in question, keep email copies, and organize spreadsheets. Submit all of this to Google as a reconsideration package and only disavow those that never respond after multiple requests.
If it isn't manual and isn't site-wide, simply changing site structure and all URLs MIGHT potentially work, huge emphasis on MIGHT.
But the one thing that is for sure is your best bet is to start removing those links while shifting your efforts to a true SEM campaign and producing quality content to build organic links.
Read around and listen to the awesome people in this community. Check the blogs! You can do this!
-
Hi Steve
Others will comment on this I am sure and how effective your strategy may be. The article here may also help you.
Peter
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
So, blog directories post-Penguin. Thoughts?
How risky is it to submit blogs to directories like the ones found in this list? http://www.searchenginejournal.com/20-essential-blog-directories-to-submit-your-blog-to/
Link Building | | danieldavid18030 -
2 backlinking questions
I've got 2 questions regarding backlinking. 1 - I recently watched a webinar saying I should never get backlinks from any sites lower than a PR 3. However, I have found some relevant websites to our niche that are lower than that. We have recently set-up a new website that currently has a PR 0. Bearing that in mind do you think it was still be good for SEO to try and get links from the lower PR sites to build up our own PR? 2 - Has anyone found out what Google thinks of gaining links from domains hosted in other countries? For example, our websites are hosted in the UK, does it look suspicious to search engines if we have links from USA or other countries? Thanks
Link Building | | AAttias0 -
Did Google Panda and Penguins have any effect on Outbound Links?
I am just a beginner in SEO. But has any of the changes recently implemented by google affected out bound links? Meaning if a website now has a good number of outbound links to strong websites and pages could that Translate to better rankings?
Link Building | | sherohass0 -
Classified Sites Ranking on Page 1
How is it that Craigslist, and Backpage get a boost from google and take over 1 or more of the page one results in my niche? Ive also seen people ask a yahoo question, and answer with a link to their website? Are these just temporary boosts?
Link Building | | TP_Marketing0 -
When a competitor site jumps from 4000 to 10000 links in 2 months are they most likely spamming?
One of my competitors site's jumped from about 4000 links 2 months ago to about 10000 links today. That seems REALLY unnatural to me given the market (roofing products), but if it isn't what are they doing? My gut tells me it's fake, but I'm just curious what some of your takes on it are.
Link Building | | kadesmith0 -
JoeAnt, HotVsNot - Post Penguin?
Just curious as to the Mozzers views on directories such as HotVsNot, JoeAnt post Googles Penguin update. It seems to me that these kind of directories are exactly the kind of sites that Penguin is targeting? Yet, i can't find any evidence that links from these sites have been negatively effected. Would appreciate your views on whether these are "safe" directories, just a matter of time before Google hits them, or that Google has already hit them Justin
Link Building | | JustinTaylor880 -
In light of penguin - what are your thoughts on widget based link-building?
Hi all, I thought it would be interesting to see if people's perceptions of widget based link building have changed. By that I mean - Do you think it's ok to give somebody a tool to use oon their website with a reference to the creator of that tool or will that count as 'manipulative or unnatural' link building? I'll start the discussion off by saying... I think this type of link building is ok and legitimate as you are merely referencing the creator of the tool whose widget you are using on your website. My only caveat would be to ensure that the anchor text is not manipulative but relevant. Looking forward to hearing what you all think about this as I'm sure many people maybe put off by doing this.
Link Building | | A_Q0