Best Course of Action For Over Optimized Link Profile
-
I'm working on a few sites right now and before I came on board, they purchased spammy link building packages. For instance, one site shows 3.8k links from 600 root domains. As you can guess, these are ALL spammy pages with dozens to hundreds of links on each. They're all targeted keywords to the homepage. Our other site shows 600+, and again, all spammy links from unrelated spam sites and free link directory packages.
The site in question had duplicate content taken from other sites and about 7 pages total indexed. It has since been updated to a WordPress theme with original content and many additional pages. It also has proper SCHEMA locations as it is a legitimate, local business.
We receive next to no organic traffic, the pages don't rank for the terms (duh), and basically I'm concerned with moving forward. I don't want to spend time building legitimate links to our sites if we're already nuked by Google.
What I'm asking is, do any of you have experience _successfully _using the disavow tool to remove past links? I really don't think a solid link building campaign to our newly updated site is going to undo the thousands of spammy and over-optimized links we have in place already.
How likely is it that Google gets the point that we are a legitimate site with new, fresh content when the site receives legitimate links from related sites and such?
-
Sounds like you're on the right track, nice job! And, I agree with you, I wouldn't pay a company to remove links, even if I paid them to put them up in the first place. Especially since you have the power of the disavow tool.
Good luck!
-
Hi Kristina,
Thanks for the response. Your outline is honestly the exact steps I've taken, only I didn't use RMOOV or any other service to identify the bad links because virtually ALL of our links were bad.
Here's what I did:
I downloaded all of our links from both OSE and WMT and stripped duplicates. I then used an Excel add-in that stripped ROOT domains into the B column. I combined that with some Excel functions to compare a list of domains I'd created (good domains, such as our local citations) and return a result if they showed up. That way I could enter a list with Yelp, Angie's List, etc. and remove the "good" links. So I stripped out duplicates, good domains, and had the rest.
I got all the WHOIS information I could by using this Bulk WHOIS checker and grouped domains together with the same WHOIS information (as well as sites which were clearly part of the same network). I've sent out hundreds of requests and screen shotted all of them for when the time comes to prove our case to Google.
And I've been keeping the disavow sheet current as I go along, noting sites which have no contact information, appear to be down for now (still disavowing in case they return), and sites which demand payment to remove links.
And as you asked about in the end, I contacted the company which purchased/built these links in the first place. They claimed they still had control over them. When I asked them about removing them, they stopped responding. They're shady, and honestly I wouldn't feel comfortable paying them to remove links, because they could just generate more in the future and offer their "link removal services" to us down the line.
Thanks again for the response! I'm still plugging away at removing these crappy links. One day the profiles will be balanced enough to sustain Google's algorithm changes!
-
Unfortunately, I'm not sure of a way you can go about this quickly without a service like Link Detox and RMOOV. But, if I were in your shoes, I would:
- Get a list of all URLs pointing to your site. Sounds like you already have one, based on the question.
- If you're willing to use a service, use Link Detox to identify spammy links. If you'd like to do this on your own, get the PageRank for each link (it'll be quicker with an API, but you can always use Google's toolbar). If it's a PageRank 0, it's probably bad.
- Manually review PageRank 1 and 2 sites. Sorry, no way to skip that without using a tool.
- Get a list of spammy sites that you'd like to remove links from. Use Whois to find the contact information. They have an API as well.
- Email all of them. This needs to be done by you regardless of whether or not there's a tool out there for it, because you're going to need to have those emails as evidence that you're taking steps to clean this up in case you ever get hit by Penguin.
- After giving them enough time to respond, and a few follow up emails, disavow any links that webmasters weren't willing to take links down for.
You didn't make it sound like it's an option, but it's worth mentioning that many of these sites may still be owned by the person who was originally paid to put those links up. Any chance you could dig through finances to get contact information for all paid links and remove them that way?
Good luck!
-
Hey Gary,
Thanks for the helpful response and I'm sorry to hear about your site being hit. I don't think our site was ever "hit" by anything. The only link building that has been done were the spam packages that were purchased before I came on board.
But even if we haven't been hit yet, I really doubt we'll be able to climb too high with these links in place. I guess I have no chance but to start requesting that these links be removed.
Do you have any helpful hints on how I can go about this quicker? Is the Link Assistant tool any good? I see that it has options for importing links and searching their page for contact information w/ a built-in email client. Any ideas?
Thanks all.
Edit: Just to clarify, I know there are services for this like RemoveEm and RMOOV. I'm curious about software being available to do this ourselves. Thanks.
-
You could be just one more Penguin revision away from a penalty.
I would get most of those bad links in a disavow file right away. The start to contact as many as you can and get the worst ones removed. this will safeguard you from a future penalty.
Once this is done you will have to wait for Google to re-crawl all those links to apply the nofollow attribute via the disavow.
While you wait for that to happen you can start by getting some traction on white hat link building / outreach.
This whole process can be done very very quickly. You must also confirm that the issue of rank drop is related to Penguin or you may see very little changes.
I have a site that was hit so hard by panda and Penguin that its been very difficult to recover and a new domain could be on the cards. Its a large site with a big brand that has been around for 10 years but almost 3 years of bad rankings has been a nightmare and very expensive path for the company to have taken up to this point. Who knows where the company would have been if it was moved to a new domain with 3 years of work applied to it.
-
Thanks for the response. I agree. One thing I want to mention is that each of these sites are connected to Webmaster Tools and none of them have alerts for unnatural or spammy link building.
Also, one of the sites in question ranks for a bunch of keywords in spots 40-80, so Google hasn't totally devalued the domain.
To answer your question, yes, it would be worth it if it would have an impact on the rankings. What I'm curious about is how damaging these links can be. I mean, obviously they're bad, no questions about that. But if Webmaster Tools hasn't sent a message and we currently have some rankings, we can't be totally screwed, can we?
Thanks again for the response. Bah, such a difficult situation.
-
This is really a question of labor versus value. You can use tools as well as contact other sites that have bad links and disconnect that way. It can be done but it takes a lot of time. If it is worth the labor cost do it. If it is not, don't
-
Thanks for the response, Jeff.
I actually meant to include a bit about starting over in the original post as I'd considered that. These sites are for local businesses which have LOTS of local business situations throughout the web. They're legitimate businesses with Yelp reviews and Google+ pages and such and the search engines have absolutely linked the sites with the businesses. I feel like this is the only reason why they're not completely sandboxed and crushed in Google's eyes because they're legit, solid businesses.
So the domain name isn't AMAZING, but it's the company name and lots of legit, local "building" has been done in the previous years just by it functioning as a legitimate business. We have many citations throughout the web that link this business NAP to the site and correcting all of these would be kind of a hassle (even with a service like Yext).
Another site has 375 links, nearly all from directories. I know these links suck, but a small site shouldn't be completely crushed by a directory link package, should it?
-
Unless it's a particularly amazing domain name, this is an issue that's going to follow you for quite some time. The disavow link system can be helpful in circumstances like this, but it's always been promoted by Google as a tool of last resort.
Not knowing much about the site, my $0.02 would probably vote for a clean slate with a new domain name, and shut down the older site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Self linking
There are 10 links on page that point to this page where they exist (link to the page itself). Does it influence on ranking?
Link Building | | templatemonster0 -
Editorial links
http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/1999/01/17484 how do you get a link from an article like this where the author writes for a high domain authority site and just ends up listing a lot of links to different companies?
Link Building | | JohnWalker0 -
Best SEO Link Building Company (textlinkbrokers.com or thinkbigsites.com) ?
We are looking into outsourcing the bulk of our link building. And, so far, I am looking at two different SEO Agencies. textlinkbrokers.com and thinkbigsites.com Has anyone had any experience in working with either of these companies? Has anyone had any great results with a different SEO Link Building Company? Thanks!
Link Building | | FSS0 -
Linkbuilding - Which is best?
Okay so we all know that: 1 Link on 10 Sites > 10 Links on 1 Site (potentially untrue with spammy links on 1 site than 10 links on high authority but that's not the point of this discussion) I've had some discussions at work I seem to be fighting a losing battle... So the questions is... which is better? 1 Link on 1 Site vs 5 Links on 1 Site (same site) We seem to operate on the form of - once we have a link from the site (in most cases blogs for product reviews / guest posts) - that's it , we move on and never talk to them again. For continued growth of links, would it be beneficial if we guest posted on some sites once a month? Then we get a steady stream of links each month.
Link Building | | FreddieChatt1 -
Best way to create deep links - Building links to inner pages
I am looking for a cost effective way to rank 30 inner pages, which are all low competition, long tail keywords. What type of links are the best for this type of project, social bookmarks, article marketing, high pr links, etc.... Also who would be good to hire for this type of project?
Link Building | | newcitymoving0 -
Best way to combat spammy links
Hi folks. A client of mine has taken to building spammy links from commenting on forgein blogs etc. Since hes started this his site has totally dispeared from the SERPS apart from company name searches. I'd be really interested to hear your thoughts on how to bets combat this? Many thanks in advance
Link Building | | EclipseLegal0 -
Link Building: No linked to content in industry
Hello, I'm doing link buidling for a small ecommerce niche. There's no resource content in the niche (looking at OSE Top Content) that has attracted backlinks (on any sites) How should this effect what resource content I should create. Thanks!
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Do image links with no alt tags pass link value?
"... an image link with no alt tag is useless to search engines..." according to a Nov 2007 seomoz blog post. Is this still the case in 2011? I ask because I'm about to obtain a banner link on a high-traffic site (chiefly for the clickthrough value) but I notice the site uses neither "title" nor "alt" tags.
Link Building | | Jeepster0