Has the Humminbird update caused links to be worth less or more?
-
As things move on will links be worth less as recent updates including the hummingbird update are moving further and further in the direction of content and social signals being the important.
On the other hand good links are becoming so hard to find, that may make them become more important than ever.
I'm trying to split my time up between content creation and link building/PR. which area should be focused on most. we have more quality content than we do quality links. our link profile is good but far to small. any suggestions what to focus on?
-
thanks ill look into that.
-
Great to hear that your content is bringing in good results.
One thing that you might consider, if you don't have it already, is a way to give people easy access to your new content. I have a blog where I make very short posts (these are noindex because they are only a sentence or two) about great content in the industry niche. I make five to eight posts per day (you could also do the same but once a week or once a month) and these are sent out to subscribers by feedburner. This has attracted thousands of subscribers. The advantage of this is... when I publish a new article I give it a good position in the feed - and it goes out to 15,000 people. That instantly produces some sharing, maybe some links and a lot of traffic.
Find a way to build your tribe.
-
I should have worded the question differently. More the future of search rather than a specific update.
Moz shows that to our root domain we have 34 domains and 4595 total links. We have been working on content for 6 months and i'm pretty happy with the results. We have a content creation system and the quality just keeps getting better so its all ticking along nicely. I could put more time/money but I feel we are ahead of the pack by a mile in our market. I think Point 2) of your solutions is the way to go as I feel we are just lagging way way behind links wise. So much so that our content just is not bubbling up.
Many of our competitors have 1000's of domains (lots of crap ones I may add) and i think we are just too far behind to ignore it and do the "build it they will come" method.
i'm a massive fan of content driven SEO, however i do wonder where the line should be drawn and where an amount of link building and network making needs to be done to get the content out.
-
I'm trying to split my time up between content creation and link building/PR. which area should be focused on most.
If you are working on an established domain take a look at where your articles will rank without any linkbuilding.
When I toss up a new article (this is something substantive that might have 1000 to 3000 words and several photos or pieces of graphic art) it will rank deep in the SERPs. But, over the next six months to a year it will slowly climb the SERPs and often rank on the first page of google - many of those will eventually go to one of the top three positions.
As an example, I published a new article eight months ago. Right out of the gate it ranked at about position #160. No worries I knew that it would move up. Slowly, very slowly, it climbed the SERPs. It took about five months to make it to the first page of the SERPs. Then, today it is at #4 and pulling nice traffic. No linkbuilding done by me but a bit of a wait for rankings. I don't think this page will get to #1 because wikipedia and a couple very powerful sites with good content are up there, but who knows what will happen.
I am very happy with these results and instead of spending any time on linkbuilding, I am making my next page of content.
If good content on your site does that then in my opinion, linkbuilding is a waste of time - unless your article needs immediate results. Consider spending 100% of your time into building content. Every piece of great content has the ability to attract links, the more you have up the more links you will attract without any effort from you.
If you content on your site does not do that then one (or more) of these three things are holding your back.
-
visitors are not responding well to your content, then could be bouncing, not sharing, not linking. For that to happen you have to honestly look at your content and ask.. "Is this the best article on the web for this topic?" if not that then it must offer a very unique perspective of very high quality that will resonate with readers. If your articles are not that high in quality then I would spend my time making them better. The "no linkbuilding method" will not work unless your content is asskicking good.
-
your site doesn't have enough authority yet to project pages into high rankings, in that case you might need some linkbuilding to get your site strength up
-
you are in an extremely brutal competitive environment and will need to do more linkbuilding.
That's how I decide, and I am 100% on content building for all of my sites. My comments here have nothing to do with hummingbird or any other google update. This is not about Google's algo or updates, this is about building a great website.
-
-
If I may add a quick one "build it and they will come" is a great idea but I still recommend you put it out to your network as people can't find your content by magic this is where social media and even if your niche fits it blogs can be so helpful, it helps you target the people you are aiming your content at.
-
My 2 cents.
Just focus on content and a little bit of outreach/PR. Do not make link building. If you have good content, links will come, "build it and they will come".
I started focusing on posting some great stuff on our blog, including the images; a few days ago we got a link for entrepreneur.com because of an image we posted, couple days later 2 links to an article from SEJ and ahrefs. No outreach or PR was done for any of those links.
So, if you ask me, just focus on content, not only the words, images, video, presentations, etc. Links will come. 1 link from a good site, an earned link, is much better than links you may get by doing guest posting for example.
-
I'll pint out he following post :
http://moz.com/blog/hummingbird-unleashed
and say again Hummingbird has not resulted in the drop of rankings its only optimized the way people search.
Nothing has changed good links have always been hard to find and they have always been valuable.
SEO wise for some time we've had to split our time (now more over more things). Keep writing good content and keep getting good links with it. Keep your brand in the social spotlight and interact with customers. There is no one thing to focus on or one strategy that works better than another. Some sites have one way that may not work on another.
The best way which has always been the good way is to make your site for the user, make the site really helpful for the user make that user want to not only come back to the site but share it with their friends. Everything from this will fall into place, just don't blame hummingbird as it's not hummingbird!
Hope that helps a bit and good luck. There are some really good blog articles here on Moz that you can pick some tips on too!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Disavow links from legit sites but have spammy link profiles?
I'm currently doing a backlink audit for our site with a LOT of backlinks. Some of the linking sites are legitimate business websites in our industry who have linked to us for a totally legitimate reason (we have good content!). However, these businesses themselves have a spammy backlink profile—that is, the only sites linking to that site are obvious link farm sites. Here is an illustration: spammyseolinks.com; payforseo.xyz; blackhat.ru ==all link to==> legitbusiness.com ==links to==> mysite.com Should I disavow this backlink? I guess it's not really giving me much SEO worth since it surely been branded a spammy junk domain, but then again, it's a real website that we've earned a link from because we're doing stuff the right way. Is it hurting or helping me?
Link Building | | THandorf0 -
When buying used domains, how do i see the links pointing to that domain? OSE not showing links
when buying used domains, how do i see the links pointing to that domain? Sometimes the open site explorer doesn't show any links to the domain, especially if the domain is parked. Obviously a domain for sale with 1000 domains linking to it has lots of SEO Value right? Thanks mozzers!
Link Building | | Ron100 -
Total Links vs Google Webmaster Site Links
I am interested why the numbers between SEOmoz and Google are so different. In SEOmoz we only show 17,000ish links from 190ish domains. In Google, we show 200,000+ links from 370 domains. Why is there such a dramatic difference?
Link Building | | webspecdesign0 -
Is it a reciprocal Link ?
Hi, I found a great website and tought its content would be extremely interesting for our clients. I wrote about it on my blog (which has an URL with our website URL in it) , Facebook Page and even in Twitter. Meanwhile, I contacted them and offered to write an article about an interesting subject for them. They accepted and liked it so much that they decided to put 2 links for us on two of their pages. My questions are : Will this be a reciprocal link for Google? Did I make a mistake talking about them on my blog ? Did I «devaluate» the links they gave us?
Link Building | | Caru0 -
How might Google differentiate between an artificial link exchange and partners linking to each other?
Hi, All! Artificial link exchanges (contacting a vaguely connected site and requesting to exchange links to increase your PR) is, as far as I know, considered an outdated, not-so-smart technique, as Google might devalue them. Yet, for real business partners to exchange links seems to be an entirely accepted and encouraged technique. While that would be intuitive to a human who's viewing the pages. how might Google detect when two sites that link to each other are linking because they are trusted business associates (valuable) as opposed to when they are doing a link exchange (devalued)? Thanks! Aviva
Link Building | | debi_zyx0 -
Forum links
If you are building links in forums how can you decide which forums to post to? Of course you can have a look at averall traffic in Alexa or mozrank but is there anything else you can look at?
Link Building | | sesertin0 -
Which link should I use for link building?
I have an article which have high rank on Google. But recent, I use mod rewrite url so this article have new url. old: mywebsite.com/c1/p-1 new: mywebsite.com/c-e/p-1 Now, google is indexing old url. I want to ask when I build linking to my site, which link should I use for link building? I should build linking for new url or old url. Thanks
Link Building | | sonzin13040 -
Is it ever the case that a link isn't worth having?
We have been asked to provide a link on our website to a website which provides us with recycled computers to use (our company brand is based around recycling). They have agreed that we will get a reciprocal link back to our site. However the comparisons show that - perhaps this isn't worth it? Our page authority: 39, theirs 26. Our domain authority: 41, theirs 14. Our linking root domains: 41 theirs 7. Finally their links are in the # [li] list [/li] # format I guess my question is threefold: 1 - Will they get significantly more out of this linking opportunity than we will? 2 - Is it worth having the link anyway? (Can it hurt us in any way?). 3 - Does having links in the # [li] list [/li] # format effect the power of the links contained? Thanks.
Link Building | | Benj250