What offline signals affect SERPS?
-
A journalist contact of mine was asking whether we were getting close to the point where 'developers' (for which I read Google) can take account of opinions/interests/actions of people who don't use the Internet (the example I was give was 'poor' people and 'rich' people).
This got me thinking about what (if any) offline signals that Google/Bing etc. use as signals for ranking. I understand that some household demographic data may be used for ad targeting (I think I read that Axciom do that) - but are there any others?
-
That's one of the things I was wondering about Nick - how much other (i.e. non-browsing behaviour type) personal information does Google et al gather?
Another type of information is things like the UK Companies House maintains information of registered companies (including registered office address etc.) - could that be useful for local ranking? (BTW I'm not sure Companies House info is relevant, but there may be other sources that are).
-
That said, isn't it down to travel companies to decide what is the best product for certain budgets? Although the concept is interesting, I can only think that Google places answers the post code question. If it were to go further it would need to obtain personal data about the user entering a search query so It can truly match relevant results and i'm just not sure people would be comfortable with that.
-
@Dejan SEO, not sure if using offline data would go against Google's 'philosphoy'. I guess there are (at least) two categories of 'offline' information that would be relevant: things that are truly offline (for which an entirely new 'parser' would be required) and things that can be imported and correlated with online data.
I think the postcode example is a good one - if I live on a particularly poor neighbourhood and do a search for 'where can I get a good family holiday to suit my budget' or something like that, a 'better' result for me might be different to someone living in an affluent area...and Google does say it wants to give the 'best' or most appropriate answer doesn't it?
How to turn that idea into something actionable for SEO? Well, I'll leave that to someone cleverer than me!
@digna99 no, please online ID cards!?!
-
If they are not doing it now, they will be soon I am sure. Why? Since it would be great for business.
I have little doubt that discount travel companies utilize the offline data to signal what type of deal they may offer your or accept.
Depending on what Zip code you are in, or if you use a regular bank card or Platinum American Express to pay.
This will no doubt translate to individual user results via search engines.
This question also got me thinking about the potential of an "Online ID Card" or license to surf the web. While I hate the idea, it would lessen the problems for anti-piracy groups and crime (tracing IP's and proving who did what etc), and would be a marketers dream know exactly who was doing what on the internet.
It would certainly ruin much of what makes the internet great, but it would bring some type order to it for government and corporations.
Sorry I mentioned it.
-
None to my knowledge. Wouldn't loading of offline data into algorithm go against Google's whole philosophy?
What an interesting topic!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google showing different links in SERPs
Google search results are showing my site links in both URLs, "mydomain.com" and "https://mydomain.com". However the one with https is showing a favicon, and the other one is not. So i wanna keep the https one and remove the other one. I went to GSC to submit "mydomain.com" for removal and it said that URL will be deleted in ALL of its variations.So how do i delete the "mydomain.com" links? Should i just index the ones with https again? Would that work? Someone suggested me to do 301 redirect on all pages that are being displayed twice. But i am not sure if i need to do that since i am using squarespace, and both of the links lead to the same page?
SERP Trends | | winter22330 -
Has anyone used youramigo or know what Technics they use or alternative to YourAmigo
please share your experience. I don't know much about them and they approached me for our ecommerce site.
SERP Trends | | bizuhodge0 -
My website is being Cached with non-www and With WWW it is not indexed and cached
Hello Team, I had one question that my website is being indexed and cached with Non-www but with WWW it is not caching it is showing 404 error. Even each and every redirection is proper. Still it is showing an error. Can you please tell me what issue i had with my site?? Here is my links: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nCH1DvhuQT8J:https://www.canvaschamp.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=usa
SERP Trends | | CommercePundit0 -
Getting indexed by Google scholar
Often my Google Scholar alerts result in exactly what I think they will: scholarly articles published in academic journals. However, today I got this completely non-scholarly article https://www.t-nation.com/training/the-exact-reps-that-make-you-grow and I have no idea why Google Scholar is indexing this site. I've read up on how to get indexed by Google Scholar, and this website doesn't seem to have the necessary requirements. I'm curious for anyone whose clients or industry need to get indexed by Google Scholar, what has worked for you?
SERP Trends | | newwhy2 -
Why rich snippets have disappeared in Google search results ?
Hello, Few weeks ago, we have implemented a snippets strategy in order to increase our ranking for our blog posts. That was successful and our results were showing up in Google. But today, every single snippet has disappeared. We go back to a simple search result, without snippets for us or for our competitors. It seems that Google has delete rich snippet for specific keywords because for the generic keywords (for exemple "inbound marketing definition" in our case), there is still a snippet result. Do you know if Google has changed snippets parameters for keywords with low search volume ? Thank you !
SERP Trends | | Laure-Nile0 -
What are the SEO challenges associated with private search engines, like DuckDuckGo?
I read recently that DuckDuckGo doubled in size in 2017. With their search engine, and other alternatives to Google, taking part of the search market away, how can SEO/Marketing/Web pros keep their websites optimized and get traffic from these private search engines? (Also, do any of you have experience with this? What portion of your search traffic is coming from private search engines?)
SERP Trends | | searchencrypt1 -
Why Google shows site's in serp coming with wikipedia link as of its brand name?
Hi Mozzers & Moz Team, Let's know how actually this happens to come in Google SERPs with wikipedia link as of its brand name?
SERP Trends | | Futura
It is great to show, but i really want how this comes with brand associated link of wikipedia. Some sources also come wtih DMOZ if ones don't find in wikipedia. Please find the snapshot, where i borderd in red color , may show you clear in it. Waiting the responses. ujknjVr.jpg0 -
Different Data Center Affecting Listings
I have a client in Phoenix that is completely dominant for every targeted term. However, he is
SERP Trends | | mgordon
dominant for those terms everywhere but in Phoenix (where we want him to
be). (NOTE- this is organic, not affected by local/hybrid). I realize there are different data centers, but these results have been like this for three weeks now. Does anyone have any ideas on why this is occurring and if so, suggestions on how I can get the results in Phoenix to
match everywhere else in the country?0