Should I Even Bother Trying To Recover This Site After Google Penguin?
-
Hello all,
I would like to get your opinion on whether I should invest time and money to improve a website which was hit by Google Penguin in April 2014.
(I know, April 2014 was nearly 2 years ago. However, this site has not been a top priority for us and we have just left until now).
The site is www.salmonrecipes.net
Basically, we aggregated over 700 salmon recipes from major supermarkets, famous chefs, and others (all with their permission) and made them available on this site. It was a good site at the time but it is showing its age now.
For a few years we were occasionally #1 on Google in the US for "salmon recipes", but normally we would be between #2 and #4.
We made money from the site almost entirely through Adsense. We never made a huge amount, but it paid our office rent every month, which was handy.
We also built up an email database of several thousand followers, but we've not really used this much. (Yet).
In the year from 25th April 2011 to 24th April 2012 the site attracted just over 500k visits.
After the rankings dropped due to Google Penguin, traffic dropped by 77% in the year from 25th April 2011 to 24th April 2012. Rankings and traffic have not recovered at all, and are only getting worse.
I am happy to accept that we deserved our rankings to fall during the Google Penguin re-shuffle. I stupidly commissioned an offshore company to build lots of links which, in hindsight, were basically just spam, and totally without any real value. However they assured me it was safe and I trusted them, despite my own nagging reservations.
Anyway, I have full details of all the links they created, and therefore I could remove many of these 'relatively' easily. (Of course, removing hundreds of links would take a lot of time).
My questions ...
1. How can I evaluate the probability of this site 'recovering' from Google Penguin. I am willing to invest time/money on link removal and new (ethical) SEO work if there is a reasonable chance of regaining a position in the top 5 on Google (US) for "salmon recipes" and various long-tail terms. But I am keen to avoid spending time/money on this if it is unlikely we will recover. How can I figure out my chances?
2. Generally, I accept that this model of site is in decline. Relying on Google to drive traffic to a site, and on Google to produce revenue via its Adsense scheme, is risky and not entirely sensible. Also, Google seems to provide more and more 'answers' itself, rather than sending people to e.g. a website listing recipes. Given this, is it worth investing any money in this at all?
3. Can you recommend anyone who specialises in this kind of recovery work. (As I said, I have a comprehensive list of all the links that were built, etc).
OK, that is all for now.
I am really looking forward to whatever opinions you may have about this. I'll provide more info if required.
Huge thanks
David -
If you have the ability to remove the bad links, then this is always the better option. It's a bit of a pain and can take some time but removing is always better than disavowing.
Feel free to send me an email at marie@hiswebmarketing.com and I'll put you in touch with someone who can give you a good idea as to whether or not your site is a good candidate for recovery.
-
Thanks Marie,
I really appreciate you taking the time to provide your thoughts here.
I am sure you are right, and that almost all the links we created over the years are probably now considered unnatural, regardless of whether they were built in a relatively low intensity way several years ago or more high intensity by our Sri Lanakan supplier. Regardless, I fear that once they are all removed / disavowed, then we still won't rank very highly as we won't have enough natural links to provide the rankings we hope for. Of course, if take a long term view of the project then it is definitely better to 'wipe clean' our past mistakes now and start again from a low base, rather than to just leave all the unnatural links in place forever. But it is still a sobering thought to have to spend time/money on cleaning this up now with no real understanding of what to expect once the work is done.
One quick question ... can I simply disavow bad links right away, or would it be better for me to try to remove them manually first?
Finally, I would really appreciate you putting me in touch with your friend who may be able to look into this in a little more detail for me.
Huge thanks again
David -
Hi David,
"At that time we did occasionally do some off-site SEO work such as paying for a batch of articles to be created and submitted, or getting a custom written press release distributed."
Many of these links are likely ones that Google may now consider unnatural. Whether or not your site can recover from Penguin really depends, IMO, on the number of truly naturally earned links that you have. I've worked with companies with manual penalties (a little bit different than Penguin, but still quite similar) where we tried to remove the penalty by just dealing with the most obvious spam links made by a low quality SEO link building company. Google failed us and gave us example links that were from years ago prior to hiring an SEO. They were links that the site owner had made on his own via publishing articles and submitting to directories. My point is that you may find that some of your previous rankings were propped up on the power of links that are now considered unnatural.
Unfortunately though, to know whether you're likely to be able to recover is a tough call. I am not currently taking on clients for consulting jobs like this, but I'm happy to put you in touch with someone who can take a really good look at your site and give you an idea as to whether or not recovery is likely and how hard it would be to do the work.
"I am fairly sure that a high percentage of our inward links are either having no positive effect or, worse, are having a negative effect. What is the simplest/easiest/cheapest way for me to safely and comprehensively get rid of all these dodgy links so that I can start new SEO activity afresh?"
Tough question to answer. If you want to try doing this on your own...and I think it's certainly possible to do it on your own, then get as complete a list of backlinks as you can. This may mean buying a membership for a month on ahrefs.com and majesticseo.com. You can also download your links from Open site explorer, and of course, look at your Webmaster Tools links as well. Put these links all together in a spreadsheet and manually look at one link from each domain linking to you. For every single link, assess whether it was likely one that was made for SEO purposes. If so, then add it to your disavow file and disavow on the domain level. If you're not sure, then it's best to err on the side of caution and disavow. Then, once your done, file your disavow file. The next time Penguin refreshes (or possibly after two refreshes), if you have done a thorough enough job you should see some improvement. If you don't, it means that either you have not disavowed all of your self made links, or that Panda is affecting your site which is a whole other issue.
One other thought - if you were given reports from your link building companies on what links were made, then start off by disavowing all of those.
Good luck!
-
Hi Marie and Andy,
Thanks for your contributions.
Marie, your first post touches upon many very important issues.
We did rank well for e.g. "salmon recipes" on Google US and particularly on Google UK for a couple of years or more, before Penguin. At that time we did occasionally do some off-site SEO work such as paying for a batch of articles to be created and submitted, or getting a custom written press release distributed. This work seemed to make a positive difference at the time, but I can't be totally sure how worthwhile it was in terms of securing our good ranking at that time.
Then, we scaled up the off-site SEO quite a lot, hiring a company from Sri Lanka to do lots of work every month.
I am guessing that the links generated by this later and more intensive period of work are more spammy than those produced in the earlier, low-key efforts. I appreciate that the earlier work wouldn't have generated much in the way of 'quality' links, but my gut feeling is that this earlier work is probably less likely to be seen as definitely spammy.
Anyway, I guess I just don't know where we would have deserved to rank without any of this paid-for SEO work at all, and I have no idea where we'd deserve to be now if the spammy links get removed or disavowed.
I suppose there is not going to be any kind of clear answer to any of this without first doing the work to remove/disavow the links.
Maybe I should be looking at this a different way.
I am fairly sure that a high percentage of our inward links are either having no positive effect or, worse, are having a negative effect. What is the simplest/easiest/cheapest way for me to safely and comprehensively get rid of all these dodgy links so that I can start new SEO activity afresh?
Cheers
David -
Hi Marie,
I am exactly the same as you in those circumstances and certainly no offence was taken to anything that you said. I didn't even think about that
-Andy
-
Hi Andy,
I just wasn't completely clear whether the previous high rankings were obtained before or after hiring a link builder. It sounds like they were there before the bad links were made and if so, that is great news and the site does have some chance at recovery. With that being said, I'd be a little concerned about a possible Panda issue if the site consists primarily of information that is aggregated from other sources.
Please know that my comment about checking references before hiring anyone was not meant to be a slight on your offer to help. If you have success with Penguin recovery then that is fantastic, and David, you should take Andy up on his offer! I'm just always careful to advise site owners to check references because there are a lot of people out there who claim to be able to recover any Penguin hit site but have never actually done so.
-
"Prior to building the spammy links, did you guys rank well?"
As David said above...
"For a few years we were occasionally #1 on Google in the US for "salmon recipes", but normally we would be between #2 and #4."
And
"In the year from 25th April 2011 to 24th April 2012 the site attracted just over 500k visits."
-Andy
-
Prior to building the spammy links, did you guys rank well? Do you have a good number of truly naturally earned links? If so, then yes, you could recover from Penguin. You will need to do an extremely thorough backlink audit and disavow every link that was self made for SEO purposes.
With that being said, there really haven't been many cases of true Penguin recovery reported. There are many people who say that they can help, but if you are going to hire a company, be sure to ask for references from site owners whom they have helped recover. Don't let them hide behind a NDA. Any site owner that has truly recovered from Penguin would be very happy to give a glowing recommendation.
My personal belief as to why there haven't been many recoveries is that most sites that got into Penguin trouble would not have ranked if it were not for the power of unnatural links. They'll never get that link equity back and as such, disavowing links is not going to cause the site to improve because there are no good links there to support rankings. But, if you've truly got good links then it's worth a try!
-
Hi David,
Whilst I can't go into specifics here, it is somewhat messy in there, including a couple that are even flagged as especially dangerous. I can give you more info if you wish to mail me at info@inetseo.co.uk
However, this isn't the worst I have seen, and have had complete recoveries from those, so all is not lost
-Andy
-
Thanks Andy, it is reassuring to know that no site is beyond help!
We have never received any kind of manual penalty or warning for this site. The decline in rankings was purely algorithmic, with a clear and major drop on 24th April 2012.
It you want to run a quick scan for me, that would be fantastic. I would really appreciate that.
I look forward to hearing from you whenever you have had time to do this.
Huge thanks again
David
-
Hi David,
No site is beyond help. I have worked with sites who have been seeing hundreds of thousands of monthly visitors, only to be hit by Penguin / Panda, and seen later recoveries. What it sounds like you need is to disavow lots of the links that are associated with you now. It certainly isn't something that you need to give up on and shouldn't cost the earth to do it.
I would be happy to run a quick scan for you to give you an idea of what sort of state your link profile is in, if you wish?
Have you had a manual penalty from Google at all, or does this appear to just be algorithmic?
-Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Active, Old Large site with SEO issues... Fix or Rebuild?
Looking for opinions and guidance here. Would sincerely appreciate help. I started a site long, long ago (1996 to be exact) focused on travel in the US. The site did very well in the search results up until panda as I built it off templates using public databases to fill in the blanks where I didn't have curated content. The site currently indexes around 310,000 pages. I haven't been actively working on the site for years and while user content has kept things somewhat current, I am jumping back into this site as it provides income for my parents (who are retired). My questions is this. Will it be easier to track through all my issues and repair, or rebuild as a new site so I can insure everything is in order with today's SEO? and bonus points for this answer ... how do you handle 301 redirects for thousands of incoming links 😕 Some info to help: CURRENTLY DA is in the low 40s some pages still rank on first page of SERPs (long-tail mainly) urls are dynamic (I have built multiple versions through the years and the last major overhaul was prior to CMS popularity for this size of site) domain is short (4 letters) but not really what I want at this point Lots of original content, but oddly that content has been copied by other sites through the years WHAT I WANT TO DO get into a CMS so that anyone can add/curate content without needing tech knowledge change to a more relevant domain (I have a different vision) remove old, boilerplate content, but keep original
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Millibit1 -
Site traffic halved not sure why
Hi guys, not sure if anyone can help, but we had a client's google organic traffic literally halve from the week at the end of August to September (29 Aug 2016 to be precise) and it hasn't recovered since (here's a screenshot from GA http://puu.sh/sAmd3/b071dd1e57.png) I've been doing a lot of digging around on Moz and elsewhere about any Google updates that may have gone through around that time and there doesn't seem to be anything that I would think would affect it. I thought it might be to do with Penguin, but that doesn't seem to be the case. A while ago before then we did have some domains and pages 301 redirected to the main site when multiple other sites were rolled into the one, but I wouldn't have thought that should affect it. After that I've also gone and removed all those sites and redirects too (couple of weeks ago) but that doesn't seem to have fixed it. There's no black hat SEO done on the site so very odd to have this happen. I'm rather out of ideas what it could be that has impacted things so suddenly and that we couldn't get it recovered from. Any ideas would be much appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BrisbaneSEOWorks0 -
Recovering from Black Hat/Negative SEO with a twist
Hey everyone, This is a first for me, I'm wondering if anyone has experienced a similar situation and if so, what the best course of action was for you. Scenario In the process of designing a new site for a client, we discovered that his previous site, although having decent page rank and traffic had been hacked. The site was built on Wordpress so it's likely there was a vulnerability somewhere that allowed someone to create loads of dynamic pages; www.domain.com/?id=102, ?id=103, ?id=104 and so on. These dynamic pages ended up being malware with a trojan horse our servers recognized and subsequently blocked access to. We have since helped them remedy the vulnerability and remove the malware that was creating these crappy dynamic pages. Another automated program appears to have been recently blasting spam links (mostly comment spam and directory links) to these dynamically created pages at an incredibly rapid rate, and is still actively doing so. Right now we're looking at a small business website with a touch over 500k low-quality spammy links pointing to malware pages from the previously compromised site. Important: As of right now, there's been no manual penalty on the site, nor has a "This Site May Have Been Compromised" marker in the organic search results for the site. We were able to discover this before things got too bad for them. Next Steps? The concern is that when the Penguin refresh occurs, Google is going to notice all these garbage links pointing to those malware pages and then potentially slap a penalty on the site. The main questions I have are: Should we report this proactively to the web spam team using the guidelines here? (https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport?hl=en&pli=1) Should we request a malware review as recommended within the same guidelines, keeping in mind the site hasn't been given a 'hacked' snippet in the search results? (https://support.google.com/webmasters/topic/4598410?hl=en&ref_topic=4596795) Is submitting a massive disavow links file right now, including the 490k-something domains, the only way we can escape the wrath of Google when these links are discovered? Is it too hopeful to imagine their algorithm will detect the negative-SEO nature of these links and not give them any credit? Would love some input or examples from anyone who can help, thanks in advance!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Etna0 -
WP Datar site shady linking to my site
Hello, I have done some research on this but cannot find a solid answer to my question. After recently reviewing my "not found" errors in webmaster tools, I see that a site called "WP Datar" has linked to a number of our pages that actually do not exist. I am wondering first, if this will harm our site, and second, what is the best way to get those links from their site taken down? I tried emailing, but of course, the email address listed on the site did not work. 🙂 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | lfrazer0 -
Should you include keywords in your domain name to rank well on Google Places?
Is it okay to include keywords in your domain name (as well as business name) to rank well on Google Places? In my opinion, this is very spammy and the sites using this technique will be slapped by Google sooner or later.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | thegoatman1 -
Massive drop in Google traffic after upping pagecount 8-fold.
I run a book recommendation site -- Flashlight Worthy. It's a collection of original, topical book lists: "The Best Books for Healthy (Vegetarian) Babies" or "Keystone Mysteries: The Best Mystery Books Set in Pennsylvania" or "5 Books That Helped Me Discover and Love My Italian Heritage". It's been online for 4+ years. Historically, it's been made up of: a single home page ~50 "category" pages, and ~425 "book list" pages. (That 50 number and 425 number both started out much smaller and grew over time but has been around 425 for the last year or so as I've focused my time elsewhere.) On Friday, June 15 we made a pretty big change to the site -- we added a page for every Author who has a book that appears on a list. This took the number of pages in our sitemap from ~500 to 4,149 overnight. If an Author has more than one book on the site, the page shows every book they have on the site, such as this page: http://www.flashlightworthybooks.com/books-by/Roald-Dahl/2805 ..but the vast majority of these author pages have just one book listed, such as this page: http://www.flashlightworthybooks.com/books-by/Barbara-Kilarski/2116 Obviously we did this as an SEO play -- we figured that our content was getting ~1,000 search entries a day for such a wide variety of queries that we may as well create pages that would make natural landing pages for a broader array of queries. And it was working... 5 days after we launched the pages, they had ~100 new searches coming in from Google. (Ok, it peaked at 100 and dropped down to a steady 60 or so day within a few days, but still. And then it trailed off for the last week, dropping lower and lower every day as if they realized it was repurposed content from elsewhere on our site...) Here's the problem: For the last several years the site received ~30,000 search entries a month... a little more than 1,000 a day on weekdays, a little lighter on weekends. This ebbed and flowed a bit as Google made tweaked things (Panda for example), as we garnered fresh inbound links, as the GoodReads behemoth stole some traffic... but by and large, traffic was VERY stable. And then, on Saturday, exactly 3 weeks after we added all these pages, the bottom fell out of our search traffic. Instead of ~1,000 entries a day, we've had ~300 on Saturday and Sunday and it looks like we'll have a similar amount today. And I know this isn't just some Analytics reporting problem as Chartbeat is showing the same drop. As search is ~80% of my traffic I'm VERY eager to solve this problem... So: 1. Do you think the drop is related to my upping my pagecount 8-fold overnight? 2. Do you think I'd climb right back into Google's good graces if I removed all the pages at once? Or just all the pages that only list one author (which would be the vasy majority). 3. Have you ever heard of a situation like this? Where Google "punishes" a site for creating new pages out of existing content? Really, it's useful content -- and these pages are better "answers" for a lot of queries. When someone searches for "Norah Ephron books" it's better they land on a page of ours that pulls together the 4 books we have than taking them to a page that happens to have just one book on it among 5 or 6 others by other authors. What else? Thanks so much, help is very appreciated. Peter
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | petestein1
Flashlight Worthy Book Recommendations
Recommending books so good, they'll keep you up past your bedtime. 😉0 -
How Google deal with a Domain Buy
Hello folks, How is google dealing with those clever peoples who decide to buy a famous place on internet( domain ), to be their domain name. For example if someone buy a very well ranked domain name for some keywords in their niche, is there any punishment? Whats the bad things about buy a domain? Thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | augustos0