At a Loss With What to do With This Site
-
Hi people, a friend of mine runs a payday loan site with a very valuable domain name: http://bit.ly/1lyJgME
The site was penalised by Google about 18 months ago, up until then it ranked #1 for payday loan and on the 1st page for the plural, payday loans in the UK. Now the website is nowhere in the top 200 results for either of the phrases, but he has not received any notification from Google and if he checks in webmaster tools in the manual actions section there is nothing there.
He has gone through all of the links to his site several times and attempted to remove any unnatural links, those that he could not get rid of after emailing twice he disavowed - about 800, a lot were not even built by him.
He has sent 2-3 reconsideration requests to Google and every time they said that the site had not been penalised, or something to that affect.
The site does have lots of quality organic links from websites like Wired Magazine and the National Geographic, more then enough decent links to rank somewhere on Google for its keywords.
I feel that the site may have been held to a higher standard because a lot of people think that payday loan websites are unethical.
What do you think he should do? Can you spot anything on site that is wrong? He has definitely tried to remove every single unnatural link and the ones he could not he disavowed.
-
Hi guys, thanks for the responses.
We have used the Screamingfrog tool and spotted a bunch of 403 pages so we are looking into that.
Images were all used with permission.
I have mentioned the telephone number and address thing to the guy.
I have checked about the national geographic link and there was definitely no bribe involved.
-
Perfect! You think he'd take $100 to link to me? And, do you promise not to tell Google?
EDIT: That page has a meta robots nofollow on it. That sneaky devil.
-
-
Very interesting! But the important question is how I can get a payday loans link from the pope's site. Have you mastered that yet EGOL?
-
Looks like one of the NG bloggers got some infographics from paydayloans.co.uk and posted them on the NatGeo blog
http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/09/28/is-it-green-to-be-green/
http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/07/24/great-depression-vs-great-recession/
Even though NG is a white hat site (almost up there with the Pope's site), it is possible that Google thought that the loan guys were sneaking in some spammy infographic links. One of those posts give two links to paydayloans.co.uk and to another site in the loan sector. If I was the editor at NG those posts would not have been approved.
NatGeo looks to be a favorite target of the payday loan linkbuilders.
-
Just a quick question, what have National Geographic and Wired Magazine got to do with payday loans? Obviously I haven't seen them but if they are just random links then I'd count them as spammy even though they are on highly authoritative websites. If you look at the distribution of anchor text as well it is heavily weighted to keyword anchor text links (payday loans) rather than branded links.
Exact Match Domains took a bit of hit as well so the benefits that the website would have received from having an EMD would have been devalued. I'd say to work on building some quality and relevant links because the website is lacking in them.
-
Payday loans sites are notoriously difficult to recover because of the widespread spam in the industry.
Do you have any manual action at all in Webmaster Tools? To check, go to Search Traffic --> Manual Actions.
If there is no manual action then it's possible that the site is affected by the Payday Loans algo: http://searchengineland.com/google-pay-day-loan-algorithm-google-search-algorithm-update-to-target-spammy-queries-162941. Unfortunately we don't know a lot about this algorithm and how to recover.
One of the things that I think is vitally important is that in order to rank as a payday loans site you have to be a legitimate brick and mortar business. (This is just my opinion. I don't have proof of this.) When I go to the site, the fact that there is no phone number published raises flags for me. When I Googled the address I got a building that primarily has a carpet store in it. I found this site that shows me businesses near 928 High Rd and there is no mention of a Payday Loans company: http://www.192.com/places/n/n12-9/n12-9rw/
I think that Google only wants to rank Payday loan sites that are legitimate businesses and don't just exist online. Don't get me wrong - You still could be a legitimate business, but from Google's standpoint the site looks like many of the hundreds of other payday loans sites that exist only on the internet and are affiliates of well known trusted businesses.
If that's not it, then it's possible that the Penguin algorithm is affecting the site. What I have found is that recovery from Penguin is EXTREMELY hard for a payday loans site. When we have removed manual penalties from Payday loans sites, Google has given us remote example links that were nowhere to be found on any backlink checkers. Penguin is slightly different because Google won't give you example links, but if Penguin was the issue then you have to find close to every bad backlink ever made in order to see recovery and you have to have a good base of truly natural links.
We've recovered payday loans sites from manual penalties, but have learned that these cases are significantly harder than other sites. As such, we now only take clients in the loans vertical that have true brick and mortar businesses and we charge significantly more for these sites.
I wish I had more encouraging advice for you. If the site is truly a legitimate business outside of the internet, then I would work hard to establish that fact so that Google can recognize you. I'd focus next on doing everything you can to find additional unnatural backlinks that you can disavow. Make sure that you are disavowing on the domain level as well.
-
just sayin.....
This site is displaying a lot of images that they probably do not own... images owned by companies who are really really aggressive in going after infringers. In 2012, Google said that they were getting millions of DMCA notices EVERY MONTH and were taking action against sites that get repeated complaints. The Pirate Update. More here.
This might not be the problem you are seeing at this time... but if they don't have permission for the images would be a good thing to get under control.
-
He needs to start with the obvious first. Take a look at Webmaster Tools to make sure Google is indexing his pages. Do a Fetch on some pages to see what Google sees. Next move would be to have a full, in depth site audit done to review all the elements of the site. Screaming Frog is a good tool for that. Then he needs to go back and explore his links again. Adding some new, relevant links will help.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Self linking - loss of link juice?
There are 10 links on page that point to this page where they exist (link to the page itself). Does it influence on ranking? And what's happening to link juice? How does it spread? Is there any loss of it?
Link Building | | templatemonster0 -
How do we identify poor backlink sites
We are often being preached to not get backlinks to dodgy or spammy sites but how do we identify these sites?
Link Building | | dynamyt1000 -
Whats the Best Link Building Strategy for News Sites
Hello, I have a news portal and l am working with 3 editors, they are writing 3-5 daily unique news articles. I would like to know if whats the best link building strategy for news sites that l need to keep getting links from? What sort of sites l should find links for best link building? Please inform me. thanks.
Link Building | | rk19800 -
If a bad link domain drops from my site do I regain authority.
Hi Guys, I wanted to know for example if 2 years ago I purchased SEO from some guys that were building links to sites that had very high PR which was important way back when. And now those links are negatively affecting my SEO stopping me reaching position 1 for a term 'replacement keys' and we are stuck in position 2. If the sites were to be reset or domains sold for those sites that were linking in do you think this was remove the penalty on us as a knock-on effect. Thanks James
Link Building | | jameslane880 -
30,746 Links from One Site to Our Site
I learned this morning in our Google Webmaster Account about a website has 30,746 links to our website. Both our website and their site present information related to plastic materials, so in essence they complement one another. However, is having that massive amount of links from one site to ours a bad thing and should we use Google Disavow? Also, they have a PR3 while our site is PR5 (not sure if that matters much).
Link Building | | Prospector-Plastics0 -
Top 20 sites for backlinking
My security jobs website was doing very well in Search engines until the penguin got hold of me. I don't profess to be at pro at SEO however seem to have a knack of getting sites to rank well. I think I made some basic mistakes with the original security jobs website, to many links to soon, so I have started again and will build up slowly the backlinks quality rather than quantity this time. My questions is what are the top 20 or so sites that are good to backlink from?
Link Building | | SecJobs0 -
Targeting high Page Authority sites vs high Pagerank sites for backlinks?
For many years I've been working on seo/backlinks for my website. When doing analysis in opensiteexplorer I notice that the highest listed backlinks for my site are sites with high page authority and domain authority, rather than pagerank. For example one of the highest backlinks for my website has page authority/domain authority of 72/96 but the site itself is only a PR2, while my other backlinks have PR4, 5, or 6 with lower page authority. For a while I've been trying to partner with websites for backlinks from high pagerank sites, as I've always believed this is the #1 metric in relaying link juice. But OSE's metrics seem to not follow that train of thought -- it believes page authority/domain authority is a more important measure. Is it? Should I change my strategy to try to partner with websites that have high page authority rather than focusing so much on pagerank?
Link Building | | DiamondJewelryEmpire0 -
Should you guest post on a site with no quality links?
Suppose a site is related to your industry and has a relatively good domain authority of 49. However when you look at their link profile it is mostly directories and they don't seem to have any natural links from quality sites. Would you still take the link if they offered to publish your guest post?
Link Building | | ProjectLabs1