Big page of clients - links to individual client pages with light content - not sure if canonical or no-follow - HELP
-
Not sure what best practice here is: http://www.5wpr.com/clients/
Is this is a situation where I'm best off adding canonical tags back to the main clients page, or to the practice area each client falls under?
No-following all these links and adding canonical?
No-follow/No-index all client pages?
need some advice here...
-
Ya, I think that will be the best choice.
Good Luck!
-
okay cool - appreciate the input man. i think im just going to no-follow/no-index all the pages. and the big plan strategy is to slowly optimize each individual page as time goes on
-
problem is so many pages with light content - i feel like this is creating a situation where i have a small leak in a big boat - and fixing this page will plug that hole
-
I like the option of placing a 301 redirect from /clients**/index.cfm** to** /clients.**
Just remember to update both the links in your website menu as well as your sitemap.xml.
That will help with page load speed as well as having a very clean submitted sitemap.xml file.
-
If each specific client page is not going to be optimized in a way to be found organically in search results and they only serves as a value page for users who are already on your site, I would probably go with no-index/no-follow.
My logic here is that with the "no-index" you are not takings any risks with duplicate page issues and with "no-follow" your are not passing away link juice for no reason.
I don't think placing a canonical tag to each client would be the best recommended option since the goal of the canonical tag is to simply notify the search engines that page X is really a duplicate copy of page Y. In other words, you are telling search engines that these pages are exact copies of one another and to please pass all the link juice of X to Y without being penalized.
-
I definitely wouldn't canonical them because as far as I can tell the content on the individual client pages is unique.
Honestly I don't see why you're worried. The pages all have unique content and contain no external links. If the main client page contained direct links to the clients' sites then I could see their being an issue but you shouldn't have to nofollow internal links.
-
Maybe a 301 from /clients**/index.cfm** to /clients - is a better option than the canonical to maintain all link equity.
So you think adding a no-index to the links is best option - over a no-follow or even a no-index/no-follow?
I was thinking of adding a canonical tag on each client - to - their respective practice area to help build the authority and ensure importance of the practice areas
-
that's what my plan of action is going to be - but for the mean time i need to figure out what the hell to do with these links
-
That is a very impressive list of clients, however from a UX point of view it's far too many to list on one page.
Instead why not have a dozen or so featured clients which have more in depth case-study each explaining how you approached each project. Then the rest of the clients can be a non-linked list. Maybe you can show a small description on hover of each client.
That would satisfy the SEO aspect as well. You would have a few strong case-study pages, and the rest of the content will be indexed also, just all on one page. Hope this helps.
-
Hi There!
I think the bigger issue here is that the page http://www.5wpr.com/clients/ is a duplicate copy of **http://www.5wpr.com/clients/index.cfm . **
That being said, I think your best option here is to set up a canonical tag from one of the pages to the other. You will need to determine which page you will want to use as your primary page.
Right now the /clients**/index.cfm ** page has a lot more authority than the **/clients/ **page. It is a shame that **/clients/index.cfm **is the page that is being linked through the website menu, since **http://www.5wpr.com/clients/ **is a lot more user friendly.
As far as each individual client's page, some are coming up as duplicate copies to other press releases, company sites, etc (per copyscape.com) while others are not. Looking at the title tag or the content through each of these client pages, they did not seem like major pages that you are targeting to be found organically in the search results, so I would probably just no-index those pages to be on the safe side.
That being said, I too am interested to know how others would handle this situation.
I hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Broken canonical link errors
Hello, Several tools I'm using are returning errors due to "broken canonical links". However, I'm not too sure why is that. Eg.
Technical SEO | | GhillC
Page URL: domain.com/page.html?xxxx
Canonical link URL: domain.com/page.html
Returns an error. Any idea why? Am I doing it wrong? Thanks,
G1 -
Do Canonical Tags Pass Link Juice?
I have an ecommerce website where some pages link to a product page with a different URL. EXAMPLE: 1: /category/product1.html (not indexed by Google) with canonical pointing to product1.html Other page link to the product like below. 2: product1.html (indexed by Google) Now the question is, does 1: pass any link juice to product1.html or not? Is it worth to change everything and link only to one URL? My site is running on Magento!
Technical SEO | | bill3690 -
Rel=canonical on landing page question
Currently we have two versions of a category page on our site (listed below) Version A: www.example.com/category • lives only in the SERPS but does not live on our site navigation • has links • user experience is not the best Version B: www.example.com/category?view=all • lives in our site navigation • has a rel=canonical to version A • very few links and doesn’t appear in the SERPS • user experience is better than version A Because the user experience of version B is better than version A I want to take out the rel=canonical in version B to version A and instead put a rel=canonical to version B in version A. If I do this will version B show up in the SERPS eventually and replace version A? If so, how long do you think this would take? Will this essentially pass page rank from version A to version B
Technical SEO | | znotes0 -
Too many on-page links vs. UX issue
I am having an issue with many of our pages having too many on-page links. I have gotten many of them below the 100 page limit that is suggested and I understand this is not a critical factor with SEO, but my issue is this: Many important pages I am trying to optimize are buried at a "3rd" level which is actually not accessible from the home page navigation dropdown due to our outdated CMS. I am trying to decide if we should develop our site to display these pages on-hover from the main navigation. This would make a lot of sense since users would find these pages easier, however adding this functionality would increase on-page links by a lot more. So in your opinion, would it be worth it to spend the money to have this functionality developed? Or would it end up hurting our SEO standings?
Technical SEO | | isret_efront0 -
Help with Places Pages
How can we get our Google Place page to rank higher, and how can we then keep it there instead of seeing it bounce around? We seem to have trouble getting a decent ranking for our places page even though out website ranks well on Google for geographical phrases?
Technical SEO | | onlinechester0 -
Do web pages have to be linked to a menu?
I have a situation where people search for terms like, say 1978 one dollar bill. Even though there never was a 1978 one dollar bill. I want to make a page to capture these searches but since there wasn't such a thing as a one dollar bill I don't want it connected to the rest of my content which is reality based. Does that make sense? Anyway, my question is, can I publish pages that aren't linked to my menu structure but that will be searchable or, am I going to have to figure out a way to make these oddball pages accessible through my menu?
Technical SEO | | Banknotes0 -
Snippets on every page considered duplicate content?
If I create a page that pulls a 10 snippets of information from various external site, would that content be considered duplicate content? If I link to the source, would it be recommended to use a "nofollow" tag?
Technical SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
Canonical Link for Duplicate Content
A client of ours uses some unique keyword tracking for their landing pages where they append certain metrics in a query string, and pulls that information out dynamically to learn more about their traffic (kind of like Google's UTM tracking). Non-the-less these query strings are now being indexed as separate pages in Google and Yahoo and are being flagged as duplicate content/title tags by the SEOmoz tools. For example: Base Page: www.domain.com/page.html
Technical SEO | | kchandler
Tracking: www.domain.com/page.html?keyword=keyword#source=source Now both of these are being indexed even though it is only one page. So i suggested placing an canonical link tag in the header point back to the base page to start discrediting the tracking URLs: But this means that the base pages will be pointing to themselves as well, would that be an issue? Is their a better way to solve this issue without removing the query tracking all togther? Thanks - Kyle Chandler0