Does Feedburner URL of the Home Page Carry Link Equity?
-
Hi There,
During an SEO Audit, I found that OSE categorizes Feedburner URL of root domains under link-equity passing and followed.
For example, the following link has been categorized under link-equity passing and followed:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/SpoonflowerBlog
I have heard that a lot of SEOs saying feedburner links don't carry any link juice.
If that's true, then why does OSE categorize feedburner URL of root domains under link-equity passing and followed?
I would appreciate if someone from the Moz staff could take some to answer this. Thanks.
-
So the short answer is there's nothing in Feedburner's robots.txt to prevent crawlers from accessing those URLs, even indexing them. You'll find them in Moz's index because those URLs are completely discoverable on the web. It appears to me Google is making a special case out of them. Although they don't do that for all Feedburner URLs.
From a larger picture point of view, there's always going to be a discrepancy between what Google counts and what you find in OSE, or Majestic, or Ahrefs.
So we don't really know how Google is treating those URLs. I would suspect they are using them for discovery. It's possible they pass link equity as well, but I wouldn't say that with a lot of confidence.
It's possible we'll considering treating these URLs different in the future if we become more confident in how we believe Google treats them.
Regardless, thanks for the heads up.
-
Thanks Cyrus,
I agree that there's a contradiction there and I await your response on this.
Cheers,
-
Good question. Technically, I can't find a robots.txt directive that would prevent Google (or Moz) from crawling those feeds, although Google says otherwise.
Bit of a mystery. Let me check with our engineers and see if they can shed some light.
-
Not a Moz staff but here is my 2 cents on the topic :
I don't think Google indexes those results in the SERP site:feeds.feedburner.com . As such I am inclined to believe they carry little to no weight from an SEO point of view.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved learning about links...
Hello! I'm wanting to gain some insight about backlinks, and wondering why a client's digital ads don't count towards our external link count. We don't see the domain listed in the Linking Domains and were just curious. Any information would be appreciated as we're always trying to learn! Thanks!
Link Explorer | | Ebbeka0 -
Why Moz Link Explorer is showing wrong data?
Hi everyone. I am using Moz Link Explorer to find relevant links from competitors and when I narrow it down to Link Type: Follow Status: Active I get the list. All good here... BUT ... Inspecting the actual link on the page there is a no=follow attached to it. Is this feature still working properly on the new Link Explorer or is a bug? Thanks!
Link Explorer | | Sorin_T0 -
Decrease in page Authority
My Page Authority Has been decrease from 31 to 24 in a week while my DA has increased from 38 to 39.I have checked all my latest link but didn't found any spamy links.Please help me .Whether this is a update or something else
Link Explorer | | sapna19910 -
OSE 'request CSV' for links blank
After doing the link check on a domain, got 40 or so links. Clicked Request CSV The file that is downloaded contains no links. The column headings are there but no content Did this twice and got same blank file. OSE is showing the 40 links
Link Explorer | | cbpayne0 -
OSE: Missing back-links and High DA website with low DA backlinks
I have gone through a website with 81 DA; where its link equity back-links with highest DA of 70. Hardly 5 back-links 60 to 70 DA and just 25 root domains. This seems very unusual to me. Can someone clarify this for me? Can a website with low DA back-links can make high DA? If so what could be other major contributing factors for this?
Link Explorer | | vtmoz0 -
Unable to fully see full spectrum of links built on some backlink checkers
We have built various links in directories and blogs to our website. We can clearly see that these links have been established on these websites. Some we have built well over 6 months ago. However, upon using a range of tools such as Moz Open Explorer, Cognitive SEO Backlink Explorer and SEM Rush's Backlink Checker, we cannot see in any of these backlink checking tools the full spectrum of links we know we have built displayed. In instances of using these tools, we are only seeing a very small sample of links that we have built. Our question here is then threefold: Why is it that a lot of these tools don't pick up the links we know we have built? Does google eventually see all the links we have built? Or does it suffer from the same problem as backlink checkers, unable to identify all built links? Is there a backlink checker that is throughly comprehensive, or close to, in its ability to identify all links? We have heard good things about Ahrefs and would love to hear people's thoughts here.
Link Explorer | | Gavo0 -
Root domains that link to the URL or domain
Hello Everyone, I need help understanding how does Moz linking root domains work. My website shows 73 domain pointing backlinks to my domain in google webmaster where on Moz Linking domain it only shows 18 domian. Any help on how this works. Thanks in advance. Sagar
Link Explorer | | wolfeyes1 -
Discrepancy between OSE internal links and Webmaster Tools
Hi, We have been attempting to increase our rankings for our key term for a number of months now, and we are seeing an unusual discrepancy between OSE and Webmaster Tools that we believe may be causing us harm. OSE shows our homepage, www.unionroom.com, as having only 27 internal links (only three of these aren't 301's too), whereas Webmaster Tools is showing just over 1,500 internal links to the homepage. The three pages that OSE are displaying as linking back to the homepage are the homepage, our blog and our accessibility page. These pages are all ran off the same template and have the same header and footer (with three home links spread across header and footer). You can see our confusion! Is this a case of OSE's stats being incorrect (the website has been live for ~6 months) or is there an issue with our in-linking structure that we are missing? Thanks!
Link Explorer | | unionroom0