Webmaster Tools vs. Google Trends data doesn't add up
-
I am investigating a two-month 25% drop in organic traffic from Google to a client's site. When I turned to the Webmaster Tools data for the site, there is a clear, gradual drop over the course of a couple months both in impressions and clicks. In general, the drop occurred across many pages and for a large number of queries; there wasn't a core group of keywords or pages that saw the drop...it was more sitewide. Yet, the average rankings reported by WMT were, for the top 100 or so landing pages, not significantly different.
The site hosts information about medical conditions, and I wouldn't expect any time-related variations in search volume, and this was confirmed by looking at Google Trends data for a number of the top keywords. I started to look at the data by query for all the top keywords (all ranked in the top 10), and saw the following general trend: impressions were down, rankings stayed in the top 10, and Google Trends showed either flat or rising volumes.
So I am trying to make sense of that. If the search volume trend did not decline and rankings held inside the top 10, then how could the number of impressions drop significantly? Am I trusting the WMT data too much? But the reality is that the volume of traffic measured by Google Analytics from Google organic did indeed drop the way Webmaster Tools show it.
-
You're welcome! One last suggestion I'd make is if you have the budget, to augment Moz rankings with daily rank tracking. Weekly might be enough, but if you want to turn it up a notch try Authority Labs. I find them accurate and robust for daily rank tracking.
-
We have WMT data monthly, and are setting up a Moz campaign for the site so that we'll have weekly de-personalized data moving forward. Will also take a look at the SEMrush data. Thanks for the suggestions.
-
Also, you can try to see if SEMrush has any past ranking data - depending on the volumes, you might find something: http://www.semrush.com/
-
I wouldn't call it inaccurate, it just operates a bit different. For example;
- It's only when a page ranks - the "avg position" is only when someone actually searched, and the page ranked somewhere - it does not calculate a hypothetical ranking
- It's averaged over time periods - when you are looking at average ranking - the time period can muddy numbers. Shifting in actual ranking over 2-3 months might show an "average" position of 5, but actual could have been 5, 2, 7, 15, 1, 6, etc over time
- It's averages for logged in, logged out, search plus your world etc - rank checkers give a constant number based upon trying to de-personalize. But WMT is averaging personalized rankings, G+ "search plus your world", localized rankings etc - which is a muddy number as well.
In short - tracking rankings give you a steady ranking eliminating changing variables. I'm sure WMT is accurate, but there's a lot more moving parts so it's suspect to these things and can not be looked at as "rankings" but rather an actual look at where you happened to rank when a page did show up in someone's search.
-
For that time period we don't have a second source of rankings data. Should there be reason to believe that the Webmaster Tools ranking data is not accurate?
-
I think your first step should be to verify rankings with another tool. Hopefully you've tracked rankings somewhere else? Do you see any changes there?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Blocking Standard pages with Robots.txt (t&c's, shipping policy, pricing & privacy policies etc)
Hi I've just had best practice site migration completed for my old e-commerce store into a Shopify environment and I see in GSC that it's reporting my standard pages as blocked by robots.txt, such as these below examples. Surely I don't want these blocked ? is that likely due to my migrators or s defaults setting with Shopify does anyone know? : t&c's shipping policy pricing policy privacy policy etc So in summary: Shall I unblock these? What caused it Shopify default settings or more likely my migration team? All Best Dan
Reporting & Analytics | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Google News Bug
During today and yesterday we are getting a lot of visits (Over 400) from http://news.google.com the visits are all at the same time and to different pages, the visits are very brief so much so that it pushes our bounce rate up to 69% in GA. Is there anything we can do to stop this? Thank you in advance?
Reporting & Analytics | | Palmbourne0 -
Is Google still differentiating TLD?
I need to find an article or something with factual findings that shows Google no longer gives extra value to .com, .net, .us, edu. etc. or proving that is still does.
Reporting & Analytics | | PPI0 -
How do I add event tracking to these buttons?
I have two separate events that I would like to track on my site. [Ask a Question](javascript:__doPostBack('ctl00$MainContent$AskQuestionButton','')) and I think I would want to use this-_gaq.push ([‘_trackEvent’,’event category’,’event action’,’event label’, event value]); Is that correct? Where would I place it in the button code? Would this work?
Reporting & Analytics | | EcommerceSite
_gaq.push ([‘_trackEvent’,’AskAQuestion’,’Submitted’,’event label’, event value]); The event doesn't have a label or value. Are those left blank?1 -
No option to connect to google analytics!
I figured it out had to click on the pencil icon. On GA looks like this http://orlandocouponsfree.com - http://orlandocouponsfree.comUA-9313894-1orlandocouponsfree.combut url is http://www.orlandocouponsfree.com/Is this an issue? When I tried to connect to google analytics yesterday. There was a connection issue with Moz & GA. I refreshed page hoping it would help. Now it won't let me choose domain. When I view campaign it says I should connect properties. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/jkJ0ZdF.png[/IMG] I click link and get to this page which doesn't provide my an option. http://analytics.moz.com/settings/campaign/89561.117561 [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/jkJ0ZdF.png[/IMG]
Reporting & Analytics | | touristips0 -
Re-branding with Google Analytics
GM Mozzers, I apologize in advance if my description of this issue is confusing, but I'm doing my best here. Anyway, due to legal reasons, one of the publications I manage was forced to change their name. We set-up a 301 redirect from the previous domain and have also set-up an analytics profile for the new domain, however, as it stands, visits to the old domain outnumber those to the new domain 12:1. Is there anyway to set-up my analytics profile to the new URL so that this traffic is being attributed to the new domain and the new site, since, after all, it is a redirect. I hope that I explained this sufficiently. Any and all insight will be very much appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | NiallSmith0 -
Duplicate content? Split URLs? I don't know what to call this but it's seriously messing up my Google Analytics reports
Hi Friends, This issue is crimping my analytics efforts and I really need some help. I just don't trust the analytics data at this point. I don't know if my problem should be called duplicate content or what, but the SEOmoz crawler shows the following URLS (below) on my nonprofit's website. These are all versions of our main landing pages, and all google analytics data is getting split between them. For instance, I'll get stats for the /camp page and different stats for the /camp/ page. In order to make my report I need to consolidate the 2 sets of stats and re-do all the calculations. My CMS is looking into the issue and has supposedly set up redirects to the pages w/out the trailing slash, but they said that setting up the "ref canonical" is not relevant to our situation. If anyone has insights or suggestions I would be grateful to hear them. I'm at my wit's end (and it was a short journey from my wit's beginning ...) Thanks. URL www.enf.org/camp www.enf.org/camp/ www.enf.org/foundation www.enf.org/foundation/ www.enf.org/Garden www.enf.org/garden www.enf.org/Hante_Adventures www.enf.org/hante_adventures www.enf.org/hante_adventures/ www.enf.org/oases www.enf.org/oases/ www.enf.org/outdoor_academy www.enf.org/outdoor_academy/
Reporting & Analytics | | DMoff0 -
Disclaimer about using Google Analytic?
When using GA on my Website do I need to have a disclaimer that 'We are using Google Analtyic to Track information'?
Reporting & Analytics | | daracreative0