Homepage indexation issue
-
Hello all,
I've been scratching my head about this one for a while now... Let me explain the situation.
I'm working on a multi-lingual website. Visitors are redirected (301) when they visit the homepage to the correct domain.com/en/default.html, domain.com/nl/default.html, domain.com/fr/default.html or domain.com/de/default.html based on browser language. I have doubts about the impact on the ability for Google to index the website because of that, but that's a problem for another day.
The problem I'm having right now, is that domain.com/nl/default.html, domain.com/de/default.html and domain.com/fr/default.html are all indexed. When I search for the URL in Google I get the correct page on number one so I'm pretty sure those are indexed correctly. When I search for domain/en/default.html though, the homepage appears without /en/default.html extension. Does this mean Google assumes the domain.com page is the same as domain.com/en/default.html even though the redirect that's in place?
Would be great if someone could shed some light on this.
Thanks in advance!
-
Questions
- This type of behavior is considered a temporary redirect. Maybe it's better to think of the name as a conditional redirect. In which case, "Oh, your browser is in FR, with that condition let's send you here..." The 301 is supposed to be used as an unconditional redirect, telling crawlers that you're trying to migrate from URL A to B permanently, so get rid of URL A.
- Not necessarily. VS a 301, yes. but scrapability is mostly down to linking and sitemaps.
- Yup.
- Nope. You'd want to interlink directly to the other languages anyways though in case the 302 doesn't work for whatever reasons. Then the link is passing authority and the user has an option available to them if they'd like to get there on their own.
- Right. It'd be best to interlink with hreflang on each as you never know for certain how someone arrives at those pages. Best to give them and crawlers the guidance to where the other translations reside.
You're welcome! Hopefully that clears it all up for you.
-
Thanks a lot for your answer. The follow up question above also continues on your answer. Would be great to hear your thoughts.
-
Thanks a lot for this one. I have never worked on these kinds of automatic redirects so I thought to stay away from them till I got the indexation issue fixed. But I understand from your answer the two might be related.
Just to clarify and make sure I'm doing the right thing.
The situation at the moment: domain.com -> browser language = EN -> 301 redirect to domain.com/en/default.htm
domain.com -> browser language = NL -> 301 redirect to domain.com/nl/default.htm
domain.com -> browser language = DE -> 301 redirect to domain.com/de/default.htm
domain.com -> browser language = FR -> 301 redirect to domain.com/fr/default.htmIn this situation using the query "site:domain.com", the results include the /de/, /nl/, /fr/ and domain.com, but excludes /en/.
You advise to change this in to: domain.com -> browser language = EN -> 302 redirect to domain.com/en/default.htm
domain.com -> browser language = NL -> 302 redirect to domain.com/nl/default.htm
domain.com -> browser language = DE -> 302 redirect to domain.com/de/default.htm
domain.com -> browser language = FR -> 302 redirect to domain.com/fr/default.htmI need to include a hreflang=x-default on the domain.com page.
A few question that pop-up in my mind:
I always thought a 302 was only used for temporarily redirects?
Does using a 302 improves the scrapability of the website?
Would it possibily result in /en/default.htm be indexed again?
Does a 302 pass along authority?
I assume I need to implement href lang on the /LANGUAGE/default.htm pages as well right?Thanks a lot!
-
As others have mentioned, using a 301 redirect in this situation is not the most efficient use case, especially if you want all versions of your site to be indexed and available to users.
For displaying regional content (e.g. you have the same content, but it is translated to a specific language on different page versions) you would want to use hreflang to tell Google that you have multiple versions and the regions they satisfy. This will allow Google to serve up the regional specific content to users in international Google search engines and Google will index/know which versions are appropriate.
Reference link: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077
Additional reference: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/182192?hl=en#2
-
If you can, get that 301 redirection issue solved first as it's definitely not the type of one you want to use for this behavior. Google specifically recommends, "... to automatically serve the appropriate HTML content to your users depending on their location and language settings. You will either do that by using server-side 302 redirects or by dynamically serving the right HTML content." From here: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2014/05/creating-right-homepage-for-your.html. They go further into the hreflang tags here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en.
After getting the 301 cleaned up, for finding indexed pages it's better to use the "site:" search based operator in Google, Google Webmaster Tools, and Analytics. But really, get that 301 changed. Cheers!
-
If I understand your post correctly, domain.com/de/default.html has a 301 redirect to correctly direct traffic to the appropriate home page for their language?
If that is what you are saying than the chances are the the domain.com/de/default.html is no longer being indexed because of the 301 redirect. That redirect tells the engines that the page has moved, so they stop crawling it. I am not an expert on redirecting home pages, but maybe look into Ref lang tags and REL canonical tags in place of the 301 redirect.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
URLs dropping from index (Crawled, currently not indexed)
I've noticed that some of our URLs have recently dropped completely out of Google's index. When carrying out a URL inspection in GSC, it comes up with 'Crawled, currently not indexed'. Strangely, I've also noticed that under referring page it says 'None detected', which is definitely not the case. I wonder if it could be something to do with the following? https://www.seroundtable.com/google-ranking-index-drop-30192.html - It seems to be a bug affecting quite a few people. Here are a few examples of the URLs that have gone missing: https://www.ihasco.co.uk/courses/detail/sexual-harassment-awareness-training https://www.ihasco.co.uk/courses/detail/conflict-resolution-training https://www.ihasco.co.uk/courses/detail/prevent-duty-training Any help here would be massively appreciated!
Technical SEO | | iHasco0 -
Accidental No Index
Hi everyone, We control several client sites at my company. The developers accidentally had a no index robot implemented in the site code when we did the HTTPS upgrade without knowing it (yes it's true). Ten days later we noticed traffic was falling. After a couple days we found the no index tags and removed them and resumbitted the sitemaps. The sites started ranking for their own keywords again within a day or two. The organic traffic is still down considerably and other keywords they are not ranking for in the same spot as they were before or at all. If I look in Google Search console, it says we submitted for example 4,000 URLs and only 160 have been indexed. I feel like maybe Google is taking a long time to re-index to remainder of the sites?? Has anyone has this issue?? We're starting to get very concerned so any input would be appreciate. I read an article on here from 2011 about a company that did the same and they were ranking for their keywords within a week. It's been 8 days since our fix.
Technical SEO | | AliMac260 -
Sitemap indexation
3 days ago I sent in a new sitemap for a new platform. Its 23.412 pages but until now its only 4 pages (!!) that are indexed according to the Webmaster Tools. Why so few? Our stage-enviroment got indexed (more than 50K pages) in a few days by a mistake.
Technical SEO | | Morten_Hjort0 -
.htaccess Redirect 301 issues
I have completely rewritten my web site, adding structure to the file directories. Subsequently added was Redirect information within the .htaccess file. The following example ...
Technical SEO | | Cyberace
Redirect 301 /armaflex.html http://www.just-insulation.com/002-brands/armaflex.html
Returns this response in the URL bar of ...
http://www.just-insulation.com/002-brands/armaflex.html?file=armaflex
I am at a loss to understand why the suffix "?file=armaflex" is added The following code is inserted at the top of the file ...
RewriteEngine On redirect html pages to the root domain RewriteRule ^index.html$ / [NC,R,L] Force www. prefix in URLs and redirect non-www to www RewriteCond %{http_host} ^just-insulation.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.just-insulation.com/ [R=301,NC] Any advice would be most welcome.0 -
If Google's index contains multiple URLs for my homepage, does that mean the canonical tag is not working?
I have a site which is using canonical tags on all pages, however not all duplicate versions of the homepage are 301'd due to a limitation in the hosting platform. So some site visitors get www.example.com/default.aspx while others just get www.example.com. I can see the correct canonical tag on the source code of both versions of this homepage, but when I search Google for the specific URL "www.example.com/default.aspx" I see that they've indexed that specific URL as well as the "clean" one. Is this a concern... shouldn't Google only show me the clean URL?
Technical SEO | | JMagary0 -
Subdomains Issue
Hi , We have created sub domains of our site to target various Geo´s. For example, geo, uk.site.com, de.site,com and all these sub domains have the same content as main domain. Will it affect our SEO Rankings? How can we solve this if it affects our rankings?
Technical SEO | | mikerbrt240 -
Spam posts indexed, what to do now?
Hi, So we had a staff problem last week and we let some spam posts (cheap nike jerseys etc.) that also got indexed by Google. (We just checked and there are lik 105 already indexed) Of course we have now removed all these spam posts but what is the best practice at this point? Are we supposed to do something else to remove these from Google's index? (maybe through google webmaster tools?) We have already edited robots.txt to disallow those pages as a quick remedy. And finally, could this have done any harm? We were quite slow noticing these posts to remove them. They were there for about 12 days. thanks
Technical SEO | | Gamer070 -
Rel=canonical issue
Re. http://www.appetise.com. We have been alerted that we are "not making appropriate use of the rel=canonical tag". Please could someone just clarify this for us and let us know the recommended remedial action we need to take to rectify the issue? Many Thanks, RB
Technical SEO | | E-resistible0