Process for moving existing articles to new structure (URLs, titles, etc)
-
I am in the midst of a major redesign of my site, including revamping existing articles . I have a couple of hundred articles and I am reviewing all aspects of these articles, including titles, URLs, content, etc. I am putting together a process as I move each article across to the new site and have SEO very much in mind. I'd appreciate any feedback on this.
First off, let me be clear that I consider the quality of the content paramount. Anything suggested below is considered "supporting" (that content) from an SEO perspective. But, since I am moving this content across, I may as well take the opportunity to clean things up.
The existing articles don't have particularly good SEO-related attributes, in terms of their titles, URLs, use of keywords and so on. So, I plan to do the following for each article. For illustrative purposes (our site serves the wedding industry), I will use an article about how to involve children at a wedding. Questionsunder each bullet.
- Use the "Keyword Difficulty" feature on Moz Pro to research a specific keyword for each article. In the example case I used "involving children in our wedding".
- Honestly, I am not really sure what to do with this feature
I've read everything from "focus on the long tail" to "don't fear highly competitive keywords". So, my current thinking is merely to use it as interesting information for they keyword I choose but not actually make any specific decisions from that ie. make sure the keyword is relevant to the article as the first priority and use the tool to check out search volume.
- Not sure what I should read into a zero for recent Bing searches. Is that really an important factor? I'm assuming the Google information is not available from Google (it would be displayed here otherwise, I'm guessing)
- Use a title that uses these keywords. In this case, I simply went with "Involving children in our wedding".
- Same for URL - /wedding-guests/involving-children-in-our-wedding
- If I have a reasonable, short and human-friendly term like this (I can do this with virtually every article quite easily), is there any reason why the URL and the title should not be the same? In short, the title and URL are both a relatively concise "mini-sentence"
- Make sure the meta description of the article is easy-to-read (for humans) and uses the keyword (sentence)
- Make sure that the theme (we are moving to WordPress) uses H1 for the page header/title and H2 for sections within the document
- Implement 301 redirects from the old URL (old site) to the new URL
- This seems like a pretty obvious approach for articles where the URL has changed (which will be most of them). But what do I do with articles that I am going to remove. Should I redirect (301) to a related article (so at least the visitor ends up on a page that is generally relevant) or just let this "fall through" as a non-existent page (401)?
As I say, I have 200+ articles to go through I want to make sure I am taking this advantage to clean things up.
Anything leaping out as missing/problematic?
Thanks in advance
Mark
-
You're very welcome Mark!
-
Donna, thank you so much for the response and my apologies for the delayed response (I read as you replied but forgot to thank you). I believe I am on the right track and your responses give me confidence that the changes make sense.
Thank you again.
Mark
-
Hi Mark,
I see your questions have been sitting unaswered for a while now. Let me take a crack at it.
1. Keyword Difficulty - "...my current thinking is merely to ... make sure the keyword is relevant to the article as the first priority and use the tool to check out search volume." Good strategy. When it comes to blogging, one of the main objectives is to built relevance and trust. Picking the most relevant, most applicable phrases that match your intended content is what counts. Volume should only be a consideration if you have options that are equally relevant.
"Not sure what I should read into a zero for recent Bing searches. Is that really an important factor? **"**You are correct. Google doesn't give Moz access to it's keyword data. I would again use relevance as the deciding criteria and not worry about volume.
2. Titles - I think your question is "should I use the keyword phrase in my title and if so, does it have to be exact match". The answer is yes and no. Yes you should use your chosen keyword phrase in your title tag. It doesn't have be an exact match but understand that if you're in a highly competitive market (and certainly the wedding market is competitive), then the closer you are to an exact match the better. Again here though, your first priority should be in appealing to searchers. So if you think "Involving children in our wedding" will be compelling enough to attract clicks thru to your site then go for it. If you think something like "The pros and cons of involving children in our wedding" (or something else) would be more compelling, I'd go for that.
3. URL - No reason for them not to be the same other than length. Google ignores stop words like "and" and "the". You can shorten your URL by removing them and still achieve your objectives.
4. Meta description - yep. Make it human friendly and use your keyword phrase. Also make it compelling and between 150-160 characters. If you and 9 other articles all contain the same title and description tags, why should I click on yours?
5. "Make sure that the theme (we are moving to WordPress) uses H1 for the page header/title and H2 for sections within the document". Here you just want to make sure when you're publishing your content that you don't end up with multiple H1s. I see that a lot with different Wordpress themes. Some allow you to toggle off and on using the page or post title (at the top) as your H1. You'd have to try it and see.
6. 301 redirects - yes, redirect the old to the new. Any you want to retire, redirect them to their closest relative. If there is nothing similar to redirect retired pages to, consider setting up a custom page-not-found (404) page that explains the URL the visitor is searching for no longer exists and point them to your most popular pages, your blog, a human-readable sitemap, or whatever else makes sense. Don't just let it fall thru, unattended.
"Anything leaping out as missing/problematic?"
If you're new to wordpress, you need to be aware that it creates a lot of duplicate content as a result of how content is stored so as it be easily accessible to readers. The Wordpress for SEO by Yoast plugin is the one I use to manage SEO aspects of the site. I recommend it. It's not completely plug-and-play. You'll need to configure the back end to minimize duplication.
The Yoast plugin also allows you to enter "focus keywords", phrases you think might be good to optimize your page or post for. As I said earlier, I use Keyword Difficulty for main site pages, but just the Yoast plugin and its build-in integration with Google suggest for finding article keywords. You might consider just using it.
Lastly, Moz has best practice guidelines for crafting all these parts and pieces. It would be worth your while to review them if you have not done so already. Sounds like you might already have though.
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ranking after redirecting two URLs to a new domain
I run two websites which operate in similar business sectors. Each has a calculator tool that offers the same functionality. The pages rank 2nd and 5th for the key search term. I'd like to improve the functionality of this and have thought about setting up a new domain for this calculator to move it away from the main sites. If I did this and 301 redirected both pages to the new domain do you think I'd maintain a strong ranking position for this search term on the new domain? Thanks for any advice.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | craigramsay0 -
Page title inconsistency
Hi folks, Our agency rebranded from New Brand Vision to Decibel Digital a few weeks ago. Most things seem to be fine, 301 redirected the site and our site looks much better however there is one issue. When searching for our responsive site using my Iphone5, the page title appears as "New Brand Vision", even though "New Brand Vision" isn't within the source code. Our page title is <title></span><span data-mce-mark="1">Creative Digital Agency in London | Decibel Digital </span><span class="html-tag" data-mce-mark="1"></title> which is picked up on Desktop, but not through mobile search when sourcing our responsive site. Does anyone have any suggestions? Many thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Tangent0 -
Infographics and articles on the same page
Hi i'm currently designing an infographic and the infographic is based on a article my writer had created. I was thinking of ways in which i can add the article and infographic so they complement each other. Obviously the infographic is more in-depth then the article as it contains much more information. The infographic is designed to go viral. I was thinking of putting the info graphic on the top of the page and the written content below it. This way the person looking at the infographic can scroll down to find the more in-depth written discussion/article on the topic. Also from a SEO perspective, the search engines can index the written content (as it won't be able to index the the infographic since it's a image. What do you guys think is the best approach for this situation? Regards, Matt
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mattcarter080 -
URL with a # but no ! being indexed
Given that it contains a #, how come Google is able to index this URL?: http://www.rtl.nl/xl/#/home It was my understanding that Google can't handle # properly unless it's paired with a ! (hash fragment / bang). site:http://www.rtl.nl/xl/#/home returns nothing, but: site:http://www.rtl.nl/xl returns http://www.rtl.nl/xl/#/home in the result set
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EdelmanDigital0 -
Blog URL Canonical
Hi Guy's, I would like to know your thoughts on the following set-up for blog canonical. Option 1 domain.com/blog = <link rel="canonical" href="domin.com/blog"> domain.com/blog-category/general = <link rel="canonical" href="domain.com/blog"> domain.com/blog-article/how-to-set-canonical = no canonical option 2 domain.com/blog = <link rel="canonical" href="domin.com blog"="">(as option 1)</link rel="canonical" href="domin.com> domain.com/blog-category/general = <link rel="canonical" href="domain.com blog-category="" general"="">(this time has the canonical of the category)</link rel="canonical" href="domain.com> domain.com/blog-article/how-to-set-canonical = <link rel="canonical" href="domain.com blog-article="" how-to-set-canonical"="">(this time has the canonical of the article full URL)</link rel="canonical" href="domain.com> Just not sure which is the best option, or even if it is any of the above! Thanks Dan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Dan1e10 -
URL rewrites
We have a problem whereby a number of our urls are adressable from different urls - I'm told because of a quirk of developing in .net. e.g. mysite/FundComparison mysite/Fund-comparison mysite/fund-comparison We asked our supplier who hosts this section of our site to do some url rewrites so that the duplicates would 301 to the correct url. They're on IIS 6.0 and are not ready to upgrade to IIS 7.0 (my recommendation, which makes it easier for them to do the rewrite using the rewrite module). They said it would take 6-8 weeks to implement a web controller to do this. "The bulk of the time for this implementation is in the build of the engine + the addition of all the possible permutations of the URL to redirect to the proper URL." This sounds absolutely insane to me. I would have thought it could be done in a matter of hours. What do people think?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SearchPM0 -
Does URL format affect Keyword effectiveness for a URL?
I am looking at our site structure, and don't want to have to rebuild the way the site was linked together based on it's current folder structure so I am wondering what option would work better for our URL structure. I will uses car categories as an example of what I am talking about, but you can insert any category structure you like. For example I would like to have pages like this: www.example.com/ford-convertibles
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SL_SEM
www.example.com/chevy-convertibles But instead due to the site structure I will need to have pages like this: www.example.com/ford/convertibles
www.example.com/chevy/convertibles But wonder if I shouldn't do the following to ensure the proper phrase is known for the page: www.example.com/ford/ford-convertibles
www.example.com/chevy/chevy-convertibles The "/ford/ford-convertibles" just seems odd to me as a human, but I haven't seen anything on how well a keyphrase in a URL split by /'s does and I know dashes for phrases are fine. This means I am inclined to go with the"/ford/ford-convertibles"style because it keeps the keyphrase separated by dashes even if it is a bit repetitive. There will be other pages too like "/ford/top-10-fords-ever" but I don't wonder about that since it isnt "ford/ford-xxxxx" Thoughts on whether /'s in a keyphrase are as good as dashes?0 -
Is My Competitor Beating Me With A Better URL Structure?
A competitor is consistently beating my website on non-competitive, long tail keywords. His DA is 32 compared to my 46. His average PA is 23 to my 28. His average On Page Optimization Grade is a C compared to my A. His page speed score using YSlow is a 71 compared to my 78. The only thing I can think of at this point is that he has a better URL structure. We both have the keyword in the URL, but his structure goes like this (keyword: apw wyott parts): www.competitor.com/apw-wyott/parts While mine goes like this (I had nothing to do with this site's architecture; this is what I'm stuck with for the time being): http://www.etundra.com/APW_Wyott_Parts-C347.html It should be noted that the last word in these keywords is always the same - "parts." These keywords are for parts by different manufacturers so they follow a consistent pattern: [manufacturer-name] followed by "parts." Also, the "C347" on the end of my URL is the category number given to this particular category of products in our database. Are his URLs beating me or should I continue to look for other factors? If so, what other factors should I consider?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eTundra0