ROI on Policing Scraped Content
-
Over the years, tons of original content from my website (written by me) has been scraped by 200-300 external sites. I've been using Copyscape to identify the offenders. It is EXTREMELY time consuming to identify the site owners, prepare an email with supporting evidence (screen shots), and following up 2, 3, 15 times until they remove the scraped content. Filing DMCA takedowns are a final option for sites hosted in the US, but quite a few of the offenders are in China, India, Nigeria, and other places not subject to DMCA. Sometimes, when a site owner takes down scraped content, it reappears a few months or years later. It's exasperating.
My site already performs well in the SERPs - I'm not aware of a third party site's scraped content outperforming my site for any search phrase.
Given my circumstances, how much effort do you think I should continue to put into policing scraped content?
-
I watch my traffic increases and decreases. You can do that with google analytics. I do it with clicky. When I see an important page show traffic losses, I go looking.
One of my retail sites suddenly was not selling a certain product category very well. I looked into it and hundreds of "made in China" blogs had scraped my content.
Then, I have images that are often grabbed. I watch image search traffic and watch for them.
I have tens of thousands of pages on the web. Its hard to monitor all of them, but it is easy to monitor when you can download a traffic spreadsheet that has % up and % down, sort it and then investigate. So, I am being responsive instead of proactive. And, really, I don't look at it as ROI, it is loss prevention.
-
Thanks for the detailed suggestions!
As a follow up: what metric do you use to decide which offenders to go after, and which ones to ignore? I simply don't have time to go after everybody who has copied my content so I need a way to prioritize.
There are two obvious situations where action is warranted: first, when the infringement is committed by a competitor in my industry, and second, when the infringing content outperforms my own site in the SERPs. What else would you suggest?
Thanks again.
-
Over the years, tons of original content from my website (written by me) has been scraped by 200-300 external sites.
I have the same problem on multiple sites. Most of the time the scraping is not harmful. But, on several occasions it has cost me thousands of dollars and forced me to abandon product lines and donate thousands of dollars worth of inventory to Goodwill. Infringers have included websites of many law firms, a state supreme court. a presidential candidate, an Ivy League law school and many others. Infringers can be using images, video or text.
It is EXTREMELY time consuming to identify the site owners, prepare an email with supporting evidence (screen shots), and following up 2, 3, 15 times until they remove the scraped content. Filing DMCA takedowns are a final option for sites hosted in the US,....
I am not an expert in intellectual property law, so what I do or say is not advice. Filing a DMCA can get you sued even if you are in the right. If you file a DMCA all of the details including your name and why you filed will be easily available to the person or company that you complained about. They can retaliate against you, call begging you to retract the DMCA, they can do anything they want against you.
If I contact someone two or three times without results I go straight to DMCA. One thing that I can say about Google is that they generally respond promptly about removing infringing content from their web SERPs and image SERPs. They also generally respond promptly to infringing content on Blogspot and YouTube. Ebay will shut down auctions en masse in response to a DMCA if a seller or group of sellers are using your images or other property.
When infringing content is on a university, government agency, or prominent company's website they usually respond immediately to notification. I usually contact a provost, legal department, or internal manager instead of writing to "webmaster" - who probably was involved in the problem and simply does not understand intellectual property. I usually don't prepare a big document. An email pointing out the infringing work and offering a resolution of "take it down right away" will usually get fast results.
quite a few of the offenders are in China, India, Nigeria, and other places not subject to DMCA.
If you can't identify the owner of the website or if they are outside of the USA, you can still file a DMCA to have the content removed from search engines or websites like YouTube or Blogspot who have an international user community but are owned by a US company. Some of them will insist that you deal with their infringing member, having an attorney contact them might yield quick results.
A lot of the professional spam is done from outside of the USA but there are a few spammers and simply arrogant cowboys in the USA. DMCA is the route to take, but you do risk retaliation with some of them.
Sometimes, when a site owner takes down scraped content, it reappears a few months or years later. It's exasperating.
Yep.
I spend a good amount of time protecting my content. The problem is so big that I can usually only afford to do it in situations where the scraping, infringing or whatever is costing me or my content is appearing on the website of an established business or organization who should have people in leadership positions who would not want that happening.
I watch my analytics watching for traffic drops, etc. Occasionally I go out looking for infringement. The cost of policing can be astronomical. I could have a full time employee working on this if I was going after everyone - and its not cost effective. Most of the people who are grabbing your stuff are putting it on domains that can't damage your rankings.
A greater problem than verbatim theft, in my opinion, is the people who grab your articles and simply rewrite them. You spent tons of time doing the research and preparing the presentation. They simply do a paragraph-by-paragraph rewrite into something that is not detectable or recognizable beyond structure.
Good luck.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content From API - Remove or to Redirect ?
Hi Guys,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PaddyM556
I am working on a site at the moment,
Previous developer used a API to pull in HealthCare content (HSE) .
So the API basically generates landing pages within the site, and generates the content.
To date it has over 2k in pages being generated.
Some actually rank organically and some don't. New site being launch: So a new site is being launched & the "health advice" where this content used to live be not included in the new site. So this content will not have a place to be displayed. My Query: Would you allow the old content die off in the migration process & just become 404's
Or
Would you 301 redirect the all or only ranking pages to the homepage ? Other considerations, site will be moved to https:// so site will be submitted to search console & re-indexed by Google. Would love to hear if anyone had similar situation or suggestions.
Best Regards
Pat0 -
Content change and variations in ranking
Hello, I have create a new webpage and asked google in the webmaster tool to crawl it. Within minutes it is ranked at a certain spot. I did make changes to it to increase the ranking and right away I could see variations in ranking either up or down ? I have done the same same thing for a page that has been existing on my website for many years. I changed the content, asked the webmaster tool to re-crawl it. It got the new content within minutes but the ranking doesn't seem to change. Maybe my content isn't good enough but I doubt. Could it be that on old pages it takes a couple weeks to see ranking changes whereas on new page it is instantaneous. Has anyone experienced something similar ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics1 -
Benefit of internal link in content
Hi, Is there a real benefit to having internal links in content other than at the bottom of a page for example and not surrounded by content. Would the benefit be 1 to 10 or 1 to 1.5 ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Content very similar on different websites
Hello, I am in the travel industry and I am currently building the same website (different domain names), one for the US and one for the UK (same website design). They will both features the same content (itinerary, activities) on the page with 2 exception, the 1 st one is that I will use different hotels for my uk clientele and for my US clientele and on the UK page I will use the word "holiday" in the UK and the word "vacation" in the US. Can the fact that I do the same "itineraries" and use the same text on 95 % of the page hurt my ranking in one country or another ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Content question please help
Would content behind a drop down on this site Https://www.homeleisuredirect.com/pool_tables/english_pool_tables/ you have to click the - more about English pool tables text under the video Work just as well for SEO as content on the page like this site http://www.pooltablesonline.co.uk/uk-slate-bed-pool-tables.asp
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
How do I Syndicating Content for SEO Benefit?
Right now, I am working on one E-Commerce website. I have found same content on that E-Commerce website from manufacturer website. You can visit following pages to know more about it. http://www.vistastores.com/casablanca-sectional-sofa-with-ottoman-ci-1236-moc.html http://www.abbyson.com/room/contemporary/casablanca-detail http://www.vistastores.com/contemporary-coffee-table-in-american-white-oak-with-black-lacquer-element-ft55cfa.html http://www.furnitech.com/ft55cfa.html I don't want to go with Robots.txt, Meta Robots NOINDEX & Canonical tag. Because, There are 5000+ products available on website with duplicate content. So, I am thinking to add Source URL on each product page with Do follow attribute. Do you think? That will help me to save my website from duplicate content penalty? OR How do I Syndicating Content for SEO Benefit?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CommercePundit0 -
Duplicate content on sub-domains?
I have 2 subdamains intented for 2 different countries (Colombia and Venezuela) ve.domain.com and co.domain.com. The site it's an e-commerce with over a million products available so they have the same page with the same content on both sub-domains....the only differences are the prices a payment options. Does google take that as duplicate content? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | daniel.alvarez0 -
I have a duplicate content problem
The website guy that made the website for my business Premier Martial Arts Austin disappeared and didn't set up that www. was to begin each URL, so I now have a duplicate content problem and don't want to be penalized for it. I tried to show in Webmaster tools the preferred setup but can't get it to OK that I'm the website owner. Any idea as what to do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OhYeahSteve0