Can anyone see what hurt me in my traffic
-
http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/
I need some fresh eyes on this traffic of mine. I have compared the dates to when updates have been rolled out (panda, penguin, page layout, top heavy, etc...) and I cant match these dates with any of them. Can anyone maybe shed some light to my traffic drops and recovery then traffic drop again and see if there is a correlation with any major updates?
- Dropped Jan 22 2014
- Dropped April 4 2014
- Recovered August 25 2014
- Dropped September 18 2014
-
Yeah - it doesn't seem to match known updates, but it's certainly dramatic movement. This isn't some seasonal shift or cyclical thing - these are clearly steep climbs and drops. We don't know the dates of most of the Panda data refreshes, but we do pin one at Sept. 23, 2014, so even that's not lining up cleanly here.
Are you seeing a lot of losses in the long-tail? The site doesn't seem to have much authority, but you've got 10K+ pages indexed, and I strongly suspect that many of them may look thin to Google. It feels Panda-like, for lack of a better word, even if it isn't quite Panda (maybe just a very strong filter). Meanwhile, if the links you have our problematic at all, you could be hitting a double-whammy. It might not be a single update, but you could be getting hit by a number of different changes over time. The trend-line certainly isn't promising.
My concern is the individual definition pages, like:
http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/dictionary/word/barrio/
While it looks to have a lot of content, the definitions come from online dictionaries (or, at least, are shared with them), and the examples seem to be drawn from publicly available web pages. So, it's very possible that each element on these pages looks duplicated across the web to Google. With a strong link profile, it might not be a problem, but if you're struggling on links and with content, the odds could end up stacked against you.
Truthfully, you may have to see where your strongest ranking pages are (are they top-level or long-tail) and consolidate. If you've taken losses on individual word pages and most of your traffic is coming from pages like this:
http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/word-lists/words-with-a/
...then you might want to consider not indexing those lower-value pages and focusing on what's working. This could help concentrate your link equity on a stronger offering. It's a difficult choice, but I don't think you're looking at a technical problem here or a clear, single-shot penalty. I think you're looking at a systemic problem.
Looks like you've got a chunk of 404s in your category pages, too, such as:
http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/word-lists/words-with-z/10-letters/
Not sure what's up there - if you're trying to de-index those, or if there's a technical issue.
Unfortunately, I suspect this is a complex, multi-layer problem and there probably isn't a single solution. I hope I'm wrong, but that's my gut feeling at a glance.
-
I just saw that every one of my dictionary word pages 280,000+ of them all had a list of anagram words on them ranging from 10 to 50 of them and they all contained links like this
[[the word]](/dictionary/word/[the word]/ "check and see if [the word] is in the scrabble dictionary")
[the word] represents the specific word. "Scrabble Dictionary" was my main and hardest hit keyword. Could this have been spammy to Google? That title contained scrabble dictionary in it and it could have been on each one of those 280,000 pages at least 10 - 50+ times?
-
Well the biggest change I did in the last week was completely refresh my site to a new responsive design. I made sure all my canonicals and redirects are setup properly and checked them 10 fold.
Some changes I have done over the last few months was focus on Panda related issues and noindexed about 90% of my site. This was after the traffic drops and not before. The reason I did this was for instance all my dictionary pages get their definitions from an API provided from another site called wordnik. Since that would be considered duplicate content I went ahead and did that.
Example Page: http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/dictionary/word/test/
I also did the same for all my quotes and sentence examples as well since all those would be considered duplicates. Everything else is original content which used to rank very well. Because of all the duplicate content I thought that possibly could be an issue...no changes yet.
Went through my backlink profile and got some links removed that I suspected spammy as well and disavowed ones I could net get removed and were very spammy.
That is where I am at so far. I used to rank very well in my niche for years and during the Panda/Penguin days is when my rankings tank so I was suspecting that had something to do with it. At this point I have tried so much I feel like there is nothing else.
-
During the low traffic periods, did you make any changes to the site to try and recover? Was any additional link building performed? Anything else outside of the new site design? And do you know when that happened?
Your backlink profile certainly isn't the worst I have ever seen, although a bit of a disavow wouldn't go amiss with some of them, and I wouldn't necessarily be jumping the gun thinking that you have been hit by a penalty.
Where is your traffic at right now?
-Andy
-
Hi there
I would take a look at your backlinks - you have a TON of backlinks coming from sites that look just like yours. I am using Majestic data in my quick scan. From there you can decide which links you wish to remove or disavow. This is something you need to take care of.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
This is strictly organic / google
No changes that I am aware of, but at the time I had a old site design. I have a new one now
Never had a manual action
I annotate when I make changes so I had none then
I am strongly suspecting Penguin even though the dates don't line up but I have to wait for the refresh before I know
-
Hi there
Is this strictly organic traffic? Did you make any changes on these days pertaining to GTM and GA?
Did you check and see if you have any manual actions? From here on out, if you do any changes to your site or properties, annotate it so you can watch changes perform.
Hope this helps - good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can I replace categories with a static page
Hello there. I want to replace all of WordPress categories with static pages so that users see a well designed and constructed presentation of all the articles within each topic instead of just a long list of excerpts. I've already done this with 2 categories and although it is hard work I can't help feeling it is a much better thing for my users. However, I'm concerned that I am embarking on this project without being totally sure that it makes sense from an Seo point of view, or whether there are any downsides I haven't thought of? My idea is that the WordPress categories are set to noindex and nofollow. Search engines should find all of my static category pages and all of the content within each category will be spidered from there instead. Just to be sure you know what I mean here is a link to a normal category - https://www.whitegoodshelp.co.uk/category/consumer/ and here is my static page replacement for it - https://www.whitegoodshelp.co.uk/consumer-rights-appliances/ Both pages contain links to all articles within the category except the one generated by WordPress is just a long paginated list, and my replacement is a proper category page, which is hopefully far more useful . Can someone please confirm that there are no downsides to this strategy? 🙂
On-Page Optimization | | Snowdune1 -
Can Google read this code?
I'm working on some basic on-page SEO content for a website within my company and I need some guidance as far as 1. whether Google can read the small amount of existing text (not optimized) and if it isn't spiderable, then 2. what code should be there instead. Here is the site: https://www.le-velgear.com/store/catalog The text I'm referring to is toward the bottom of the page (isn't it always?) and says this: Designed for a Thriving Lifestyle The Le-Vel Gear store is an extension of the LV Life, the Thrive product line, and the world's largest health and wellness Movement, which you helped create. Living a life you deserve includes looking good while showing the world your pride in being a Thriver...Check out all the new and incredible gear and tools and take your Thriving lifestyle to the next level!!! When I "View Source," I cannot see the text, however, the text is highlight-able with my cursor and I can see it when I "Inspect Element" in a container that says Thanks in advance for any help!
On-Page Optimization | | lizzyr0 -
Can lost pages be redirected with a 301 in order to do not lost keyword rankings?
Hi, I have got a website and some posts rank well, but I am not so interested in keep them for branding reasons. So I planned to do 301 redirects to home and remove those contents. Is it ok? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | patrizia_h0 -
Keywords in site maps. Can there be too many? Can they be considered to be stuffed?
Hi everyone,
On-Page Optimization | | TheJewelleryEd
I'd appreciate some insight on a keyword stuffed site map I've seen on a site similar to ours (we don't have this kind of menu ourselves).
https://www.1stdibs.com/sitemap/jewelry/stone/pink-diamond/
This is accessed from a site map. Do you think it's too blatant / keyword stuffed? I haven't done this with our site, but am interested to see a big reputable site doing something so clearly just for SEO.
Would it work? Or would search engines dislike it? I'd really appreciate your thoughts.
Thank you.0 -
Best way to move traffic/juice from one page to another?
I’ve got some pages that provide information on some companies in my website topic space, and also corresponding pages that allow users to rate and review those companies. So, for example: Company A information Company A reviews Company B information Company B reviews Google searches for “Company A” or “Company B” generally result in my information page ranking #2 behind the actual company’s website, and the reviews page ranking #3. (Probably not good to have two pages ranking for the same keyword in positions 2 and 3). The information pages do very well in Adsense while the review pages do not. The review pages have always had comments open for reviews, and I’ve just recently opened the information pages to comments. This has resulted in less of a need for the reviews pages as the comments on the Information pages are now serving the same purpose. I can even add a star rating to the information pages if I want so the review pages are completely unnecessary. So, I’d rather strengthen my information pages 1) to more solidify their rankings, and 2) get more visitors there than the review pages as they convert way better in Adsense. Question is, what is the best way to proceed? Option 1: remove internal linking to the review pages (I have sidebar links too), so less link juice just naturally goes to the review pages. On the review pages, direct people to click the link to the information page to go there instead. Eventually, the review pages will fall off the front page of the SERPs and people will just go to my #2 ranked company information page instead (and maybe #1 if I’m lucky, but doubt I’ll get ahead of the brand). Option 2: 301 Redirect the review pages to the information pages. Functionally, this would work well for me, but I fear that Google may not like it for some reason. My information pages are ranked so well that I do not want to risk them dropping. Are these fears unfounded? Is either of these two options better than the other, or does anyone have a better idea? Whatever I do, I don’t want those company information pages dropping from their #2 positions.
On-Page Optimization | | bizzer0 -
Does anyone know how I can see the original date of a link to my website?
Hello community, I'm trying to find the oldest links to my website/places that have referenced my company. By old, I'm looking for anything 2008 or older. I have access to a bunch of backlink tools, but they all log stuff based on when they discovered it, and we didn't begin using the tools until June 2013. I'm hoping there's some tool or some easy trick where I can quickly sort my links based on original date they linked to travelexinsurance.com. Thanks, Patrick
On-Page Optimization | | Patrick_G0 -
How can I find out which filter my site has fallen under?
How can I find out which filter my site has fallen under? there only 22 pages (out of 380) that are not under Google filters Thank you in advance.
On-Page Optimization | | andreysmiling19870 -
How can we get Google to offer postcard verification for our Place Page?
Most of the time, when we claim a Google Place Page, they give 2 choices to verify ownership: 1) phone verification and 2) postcard verification. But right now (and for several weeks), for our listing, they are only giving the phone verification choice, which unfortunately won't work with our automated phone system. How can we get our Place Page listing verified through a postcard sent to our address, when Google isn't presenting that as an option?
On-Page Optimization | | DenisL0