Solving Keyword Cannibalisation WITHOUT exact match internal links
-
Hi guys,
I have an ecommerce client I'm working with (they are a tour operator).
The client has multiple variations of very very similar tours which has created a keyword cannibalisation issue.
I've read this blog from Rand on the issue, and I understand that I need to use internal links to show the bots which page I want to rank for which term.
Problem is, I cant use exact match anchor text as it wouldn't adequately describe the tour from a user's perspective.
eg I want a single page to rank for 'Los Angeles Tour' however, because the tour also takes in san francisco, I cant use the exact match anchor text 'Los Angeles Tour' because it doesn't give users a realistic indication of the page that they are going to.
My solution...
Is to use the internal linking structure eg 'San Francisco & Los Angeles Tour', This has the keyword phrase I want to optimise for within the anchor text.
Does this have the same effect as using the exact match anchor text?
I cant really see any other solution, so I'm guessing that s the right course of action
Your thoughts would be much appreciated
-
Consistent anchor text can help you resolve the issue. If you have several pages which cover very similar topics, that's great! You can rank for multiple pages in SERPs. You can even land several of your links at the top of the first page.
"Los Angeles tour", "Los Angeles tours", "LA tour", "LA tours", etc. can all be used. If you have 4 strong pages that cover that topic, split up your keywords and if your pages are great quality you can dominate the SERPs.
Do you have more the 4 pages for that topic? "Two day LA tours", "2 day LA tours", "LA tours 2 days", etc. You can expand or contract to meet your needs. The key is generated GREAT content, and consistently using proper anchor text throughout your site.
-
Hi Ryan,
That's very clear and you've stated exactly what i'm planning to do, which is always good to hear:)
I know that I need to map keywords intelligently and use on page content and meta data to reinforce those keyword choices, however the crux of my issue (keyword cannibalisation) is that I have tens or hundreds of pages with similar content and phraseology.
Normally, I would use internal linking to indicate to the bots what page I want to rank for what phrase.
But if (for whatever reason) I cant use exact match internal links, do non-exact match internal links have the same effect?
I suppose to attempt to answer my question, (and to avoid going round in circles!), because I cant fix the problem as usual through exact match internal linking, I need to look at the issue holistically and rather than say the internal linking structure will fix the problem for me, I also need to be very careful with every aspect of on page (meta tags, alt tags, image filenames, on page content).
It's not the silver bullet that I was hoping for, but do you think that is the best solution?
thanks for all your help
j
-
Cannibalization happens when your site has multiple pages competing for the same keyword or phrase.
Let's assume your site has a page offering a tour of Los Angeles, another page which offers tours of Bevery Hills (part of the LA area for those not familiar with California), and another page offering a combined tour of LA + San Francisco. It would be reasonable to refer to all three pages with the term "Los Angeles tour".
The problem is when someone types "Los Angeles tour" into a search engine, which page does Google return to represent your site? While all three pages can represent your site somewhere in SERP, it is more likely that you can miss the first few pages because you are cannibalizing your own traffic. Rather then having one strong "Los Angeles Tour" page, you have three pages dividing the juice.
The solution is, for any page on your site, determine which keyword phrases are the primary focus of that page. Going forward, always direct any appropriate phrases to the page using anchor text. What you would not want to ever do is use the same "Los Angeles tour" text as a link to different pages on your site.
Is that a bit clearer?
-
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for the response. Unfortunately it's not 100% clear to me still though.
I think the problem stems from the fact that I don't have a simple 'vanilla' product, I have a complex product that needs to be described properly in the internal linking to be clear to users
So in response to your response!
I do appreciate the good point you make in the second paragraph about relevance, however following my example:
My page is highly relevant for the query 'Los Angeles Tour' as the product spends 5 days in LA and one day in SF.
Therefore my page should quite rightly rank for 'los angeles tour'...however it is not just a 'Los Angeles tour' it also takes in SF, and I need to specify that in the internal link to be clear to users.
So, if I cant use the exact match phrase "Los Angelese Tour" my intention is to use the phrase "San Francisco & Los Angeles Tour" in the internal linking and that by having the phrase "los angeles tour" within the internal link (as long as I dont use that phrase in internal links anywhere else on the site), I will indicate to Google that that is the page I want to rank for the phrase "los angeles tour", thus preventing keyword cannibalisation
Does that work as a way of preventing keyword cannibalisation, and if not, how do I avoid the keyword cannibalisation problem without exact match internal linking?
thanks v much for your help
j
-
Hi James.
You can certainly use "San Francisco & Los Angeles Tour" as your anchor text. Clearly, that will only offer an exact match if a user entered in that phrase as their search query. All things being equal, if someone entered "Los Angeles Tour" as their search query, your page would not appear until after all the "Los Angeles tour" exact match pages. Of course, all things are never equal, but I think this is the information you were seeking.
If your client offers tours of Los Angeles, tours of San Francisco, and a combined tour of both I would consider offering a page dedicated to each tour. If the only tour is a combined tour, then clearly your tour is less relevant to the "Los Angeles tour" term, and your rankings should reflect that relevancy.
Your question jumped around a bit so I am not sure if that is the answer you are seeking.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which links to disavow?
I've got a new client that just fired their former SEO company, which was building spammy links like crazy! Using GSC and Majestic, I've identified 341 linking domains. I'm only a quarter of the way through the list, but it is clear that the overwhelming majority are from directories, article directories and comment spam. So far less than 20% are definitely links I want to keep. At what point do I keep directory links? I see one with a DA of 61 and a Moz spam score of 0. I realize this is a judgement call that will vary, but I'd love to hear some folks give DA and spam numbers. FWIW, the client's DA is 37.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rich.owings0 -
Internal Linking - Can You Over Do It?
Hi, One of the sites I'm working on has a forum with thousands of pages, amongst thousands of other pages. These pages produce lots of organic search traffic... 200,000 per month. We're using a bit of custom code to link relevant words and phrases from various discussion threads to hopefully related discussion pages. This generates thousands of links and up to 8 in-context links per page. A page could have anywhere from 200 to 3000 words in one to 50+ comments. Generally, a page with 200 words would have fewer of these automatically generated links, just because there are fewer terms naturally on the page. Is there any possible problem with this, including but not limited to some kind of internal anchor text spam or anything else? We do it to knit together pages for link juice and hopefully user experience... giving them another page to go to. The pages we link to are all our pages that produce or we hope to produce organic search traffic from. Thanks! ....Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
International SEO
We want to expand to a few new regions internationally. My question is if we register sites in different geographies and upload our exact site to these web addresses (exact duplicates) so our web addresses will then be www.mysite.co.uk (current site) www.mysite.com (new intended site) www.mysite.com.au (new intended site) and add rel=“canonical” linking elements to prevent duplicate content issues.Will our content production on our current site www.mysite.co.uk retain its value within all the other sites. Is this the best way to do it? Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aquaspressovending0 -
Do I have to many internal links which is diluting link juice to less important pages
Hello Mozzers, I was looking at my homepage and subsequent category landing pages on my on my eCommerce site and wondered whether I have to many internal links which could in effect be diluting link juice to much of the pages I need it to flow. My homepage has 266 links of which 114 (43%) are duplicate links which seems a bit to much to me. One of my major competitors who is a national company has just launched a new site design and they are only showing popular categories on their home page although all categories are accessible from the menu navigation. They only have 123 links on their home page. I am wondering whether If I was to not show every category on my homepage as some of them we don't really have any sales from and only concerntrate on popular ones there like my competitors , then the link juice flowing downwards in the site would be concerntated as I would have less links for them to flow ?... Is that basically how it works ? Is there any negatives with regards to duplicate links on either home or category landing page. We are showing both the categories as visual boxes to select and they are also as selectable links on the left of a page ? Just wondered how duplicate links would be treated? Any thoughts greatly appreciated thanks Pete
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PeteC120 -
Correct Internal Linking Flow / Keyword Cannibalization
Hi, Would like some advice re our internal linking structure and possible keyword self cannibalization on our ecommerce site.. Will try and give you an overview. Imagine this page structure: Site
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bjs2010
Brand 1
Brand 2
Brand 2 Shoes
Products
Brand 2 Sweaters Then say in Brand 2 Shoes page we have the shoes, e.g., the products labeled as Brand 2 Shoes "Name of Model"
Brand 2 Shoes "Name of Model" Now, what I'm worried about is that if I do a search for "Brand 2 Shoes" it should bring up my landing page right? But it doesn't, it brings up some of the products instead... I'm worried that we may be self cannibalizing some of the keywords - and thinking of changing the product page to be "Brand Name of Model Shoes" or "Name of Model Shoes by Brand" Any ideas or comments appreciated! Thanks all0 -
Can you recover from "Unnatural links to your site—impacts links" if you remove them or have they already been discounted?
If Google has already discounted the value of the links and my rankings dropped because in the past these links passed value and now they don't. Is there any reason to remove them? If I do remove them, is there a chance of "recovery" or should I just move forward with my 8 month old blogging/content marketing campaign.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Beastrip0 -
Charity links
Quick question - Are links on charity websites with a small mention about what your company does good links to go for?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson1 -
Can keyword in onpage links be seen as spam?
My seo strategy relies heavily on a lot of great relevant content on the domain. To achieve this, I have a section with 'information docs' on each product page. They are lists with links to informational pages relevant to the product. For instance; domain.com/apples/ On this product page there are 30 links to articles; domain.com/apples/how-to-store/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Koenseo
domain.com/apples?recipes/ etc. The anchor texts of these links are the titles of these articles, so on the product page the list of links looks like this: How to store apples
Recipes with apples etc. Question: Are those keywords in the links (apples) counted as onpage keyword usage an can it be seen as keyword stuffing by Google? Thanks a lot.0