Are SEO fundamentals accurate or real?
-
Hi
I've been studying about seo for quite a good time. I have learned about linking building, on page optimization, and so on but I in the real word all these fundamentals seems not be followed but google's algorithm and here is an example.
On google.com.br (brazilian google) I'm trying to rank for the main keyword "airsoft" and its variation for the website www.qgairsoft.com.br. But the the top 1 os SERP is:
http://lojaairsoft.com.br/index.php
But this website doesn't follow almost any seo advice:
1. It has almost no backlinks at all
2. It has no good content (both on pages and doesn't have a blog)
3. url's are not user friendly
4. It doesn't have a mobile website
5. It has almost no presence on social media, with almost no interaction
6. It doesn't have H1
7. I doesnt have any "canonical" set
8. It has a lower DA
9. It has a lower PA
10. Moz metrics are lower
11. It is not as old as my target website...
12. .. I think you got the point.
And dispite all that the website do better than my website and also better then other websites with theoretically better 'seo'.
What is wrong? What I am missing? Does all these principals really matter for ranking?
-
I agree. And that is the reason why it is better to spend your time improving your website than worrying about a site above you that is impossible to understand. It's possible that they earned those rankings. It's possible that Google has incorrectly ranked them (which most often happens in low competition SERPs such as the ones here).
-
I think nobody can really tells me what's wrong and why a page that has several non optimzed seo issues rank better than a page with better seo optimization (onpage and backlink).
-
It is no good to know the tools are often wrong. I've been using about 5 tools to compare the results and they moslty shows the same.
But if we can't rely on the seo tools as well as on the seo fundamentals (as I showed comparing the 2 websites, better seo does not reflect on ranking) we are left with an trial and error situation...
tks for the advices.
-
The tools are often wrong, and should only be used as indicators. I try and do as many as three tests for the same problem. After time, you gain more confidence is some tools than others. Interesting your comments of page speed, as you should be able to check the history on those services and see if you can identify an issue.
On user experience though there is some argument not from me though - Google has been constantly improving their algorithms to improve searcher experience, and a factor is clicks. Actually it is not the click that is important though google see all, it is what happens with the user after they click through. If the customer sticks around and completes some on page tasks, google considers this a positive on rankings. After all, if there are large numbers of people clicking on your links, and completing transactions on page then you must be providing searchers with relevant information or services.
So if you are confident with everything else then go back to user experience. Do not do it yourself - get a person you do not know to compare the two sites. Then listen to there feedback.. (don't be defensive as I often am) the customers is always right...
-
First thank you all for your comments.
Regarding page speed, how did you get that? I mean. I run a speed test at least once a day an at least for me the results showed are not like that. On pingdom tools I get 85/100.. On webpageteat I get A rating for all and on gtmetrix I'm getting 82% score. Usually load time is around 1,5s... My results are better than the competitor I have pointed using webpage test, page speed insight, gtmetrix and pingdom ...
so I'm confused about this 30 s ...
Anyway im not trying to get any short cut... and it is a not a 5 min setup...
I'll check usability as you pointed as well but putting website 1x1 my website do better on: backlinks, page authority, h1, alt image (90% of images do have them), url structure is user friendly, content, meta/title tags, mobile friendly, speed and on any seo tool available, including moz, semrush, cognitiveseo, seoquake... Are all these tools wrong ?
-
There are two fundamentals that need to be addressed:-
Page speed - I just ran a test on webpagetest and your loading time was 33 seconds. Your repeat view was 30 seconds. That is actually the slowest I have ever seen. I would imagine 70% of your problem is there.
Secondly CTR is not a factor however what customers do after they click through is a factor. I imagine the other site has a better/easier user experience. It looked slightly better from a quick look.
It appears you are are looking for short cuts and doing things quickly. Stop!! slowdown and tackle each element properly and meticulously. Richard has made some excellent points and if true that is not great. So I urge you to slow down - go through a proper audit of your site and actually check each element and then tackle it properly. Go back to the fundamentals, just because you spent 5 minutes on it does not mean you have done it properly.
Apologies if a bit blunt but the page speed result was a shocker - I believe that is an indicia for a patches rather than solutions.
-
It makes sense and we can't inspect that to compare. But are this so much a ranking factor more than backlinks, content, friendly url, mobile friendly, social media presence, h1, canonical, DA, PA, website age....
Regarding speed:
https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.qgairsoft.com.br/S1VhjII1 x https://gtmetrix.com/reports/lojaairsoft.com.br/JeiT3Q8j
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150726_XM_RB4/ x http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150726_0C_RE1/
-
I agree and I'm working on that.
The problem is that it is even with all these issues my target website is still better than the other website on all those aspects I have pointed. At least all seo tool that I run to compare both websites, my target one do better, regarding alt image, links, titles, and so on. E.g., on a semrush audit scoring 70 x 46 ... for sorting issue we are using rel=canonical... for layered navigation results we are using NOINDEX, FOLLOW to avoid duplicate content.
There is also the backlink issue. This is said to be a major ranking factor but the competitor has no backlinks... See my point?
-
You site doesn't really follow on-site best practices. For instance, you have a large amount of links on each page, few images are using alt text, the titles look keyword stuffed and most are far longer than they should be (some are 6x longer than they should be,) your sorting system is causing duplicate content issues which looks like the solution for was to noindex and canonical the pages, which should never both be done. I'm also not seeing any real product descriptions other than what are likely manufacturer specs.
I would stop worrying so much about your competitor and get your own site in order.
-
Hi Paolo,
It is very likely(or actually proven), that Google considers GA data as well. So it could be, that engagement and CvR is relatively high. That many people are visting your competitors site without bouncing. It is not unlikely that Google interprets this in the way, that searchers are happy with what they find on position 1.
Another aspect might be the site speed. As you will know, it has an major impact on site performance and user satisfaction as well. Probably the navigation and internal links are set in a way, the crawler and the visitor expects them to see.
So to sum up: I truly believe, that your bullet points do have a positive impact on rankings and are accurate. Though as many other aspect are influencing rankings too, they are not a guarantee like. (Make sure to get all this points right and you will go to number 1).
-
I'm not sure this is the case. These keywords have a lot of competion. On the adword it will show a low competition as these keywords are not allowed to be adwords promoted so there is no one making adds.
We have several seo principles that are supposed to work, like onpage and backlinks, but this competitor website doesnt follow any of this and rank better in a large range of keywords.
So that leads us to ask: Are backlinks that important? What about on page optimization?
I have listed several topics that are supposed to make you rank higher that are simply not reflection in the results on real life.....
tks, btw.
-
One reason for relatively unoptimized pages to rank high is, that the keyword you're looking at has low or no competition. I checked adword keyword planner really quick and it seems to be the case for your term. If you've optimized your page and your content better matches the searchers intent (CTR and Engagement on your site will proof) than it is very likely that you will go up. Give it some time though.
Cheers
M
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best Name for Business and Backlinks / SEO
Sorry if this is a basic question I should know the answer for. We have just acquired the .org for a moderately well searched keyword set. Our objective is to fight for rank specifically on this one set of two keywords. We want make sure our site is setup and business named optimally for this. Here is my question. What is the best business name for SEO and keyword rich backlinks, or anything else I'm not thinking of? KEYWORDS: Blue Widget DOMAIN: BlueWidget.org BUSINESS NAME OPTIONS: A) simply BlueWidget.org. We like this but do we lose some benefit of "Blue Widget" with a space on backlinks? **B) Blue Widget Foundation. Is this better because people will reference us by the keywords with a space "The Blue Widget Foundation", instead of "from the people at BLUEWIDGET.org"? ** Am I missing anything important here in the name? We just want to start everything off on the right foot. Thank you Moz. Just joined and my first post.
Link Building | | RetBit0 -
Article submission web-sites and SEO
Does article submission web-sites have any impact to SEO in these days? There are a lot of good/not so good article submission databases, but does it really matter if you spend a time to write unique articles for them? I mean, is it a good way for link-building, or should I spend more time for other parts of SEO? There are also a special websites (for example SubmitYourArticle) which automate this process, does it make sense to use this services? Alternates? Lots of questions… Update Sorry, I found some good answers only after that I posted this question.
Link Building | | ditoroin0 -
I want to design SEO link building strategy for my website? Is wordpress.com, squidoo, tumblr, blogger, typepad - Good option for link building?
I am currently concentrating on 8 keywords, for e.g (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H). I will be writing blogs with 2 of any related keywords present in it. I am thinking to post 5 blogs on 5 different platforms as (wordpress.com, Squidoo, Typepad, Tumblr, blogger) respectively. I am thinking a strategy as: Monday: Keyword A,B on Wordpress/ C,D on Squidoo/E,F on Typepad/G,H on Blogger/ A,C on Tumblr. Tuesday:C,D on Wordpress/E,F on Squidoo/ etc.... and will rotate these keywords through out the week and the cycle restarts on Monday. The URL for every keyword will be different and relevant to that keyword. I need quick suggestion on this topic..Please..
Link Building | | Christain0 -
Are sites that "smell of SEO" being demoted?
I'm working with a site owner who recently hired an SEO to work on just one particular type of keyword. It seems like the more work the SEO did, the lower the keyword gradually dropped. Granted, the "work" is pretty low quality - anchor texted bookmarks, comments and low quality articles. We're doing an experiment where we are going to disavow those links and see if the previous rankings return. Another site that I am consulting with has a lot of good natural links and then some anchor texted links, but from decent sources - some guest posts (on good sites - not a spammy site that exists only for guest posts) and some places where decent websites have agreed to link to the site. The anchor texted links do not make up very much of the overall anchor text. There is good diversity and lots of brand and url anchored links. It seems like the more the SEO does for this site, the more the rankings drop. And it's not all about anchor text. The SEO placed a link in a relevant directory, using the url as anchor...rankings dropped a little. They obtained an expired domain with relevant and very natural links and 301'd it to the new domain...rankings dropped several places. And so on. Occasionally the rankings will pop up a little, but overall it's a downward spiral. Check out this post by Gary Taylor. He did an experiment where he took an established site that was ranking well and threw some spammy links at it. To quote the article, 'every day goes by my ranking for the term “domains” is getting harder to maintain.' He recently tweeted that he has been removing and disavowing links and the rankings are returning. I was looking at searches for real estate related terms in different cities. In some cities, the top sites are ones that have ZERO obvious SEO done to them. There are sites ranking on page 3 that have been SEO'd, and not all of them have poor SEO. Many are what I would consider really well done. Some of the sites ranking on page 1 have under 10 links. There was one with 2 followed links and they were not from super authoritative sites! To complicate matters though, if you look at searches like "Toronto Real Estate Agents" some of the top sites have lots of keyword anchor texted links. Perhaps this should be a blog post rather than a Q&A, but I would love to hear some of your thoughts. My personal thought is that Google's main goal with Penguin and the unnatural links warnings is to make it so that not only is it not profitable to try to manipulate the SERPS, but that every time you try to do so, you potentially do your rankings harm. I used to say that Penguin could only affect a site on the date of a Penguin refresh, but I am thinking now that Google has managed to roll Penguin into the algorithm to some extent so that it can demote the majority of any work that smells of SEO. Thoughts?
Link Building | | MarieHaynes0 -
Web Designers and SEOs using backlinks from client sites
What are your thoughts on SEOs and web designers putting their own links in the footers of client sites. For the sake of argument, lets assume that the client is happy for the link to be there. I'm referring to the SEO merits of the link being there from an 'irrelevant' website. My belief is that this goes against what Google is looking for and that these are irrelevant links and likely to be picked up and penalised. That's what I believe! However, I see lots of sites offering SEO services that have dofollow links from their client sites, using exact match anchor text and they are all ranking highly. Is it just a matter of time before Google sniffs them out and penalises them for it? Or should I be going through my client sites and adding myself a dofollow link in the footer? (with their permission of course). The highest ranking sites in any UK city do this. If you search SEO Manchester, SEO Leeds etc and find the top ranking sites and check them out on opensite explorer, they are all using a disproportionate amount of dofollow backlinks form client sites.
Link Building | | littlesthobo0 -
Purchasing local domains for SEO
Hi, I'm considering buying domains to help build our SEO traffic. But, I'm looking for some advice on whether or not this can hurt us. For example, if our site is www.brandname.com and the site is all about online education, would it beneficial for us to purchase a local domain like education.boston.com and optimize with unique content so we can point back to our own site (if "education boston" is a high volume keyword)? Thanks!
Link Building | | BenchPrepCourtney0 -
SEO value in Twitter bit.ly links?
When I use opensiteexplorer for my webpage www.novelaspect.com and go under the "linking domains" tab, there is only 1 Twitter link that shows up. However, my competitors have multiple Twitter links. I've posted many many times on Twitter and linked the posts back to our website, but I've always used bitly to shorten the URLs. Is this what's keeping me from getting more backlinks from Twitter (which has a high domain authority!)? I haven't been able to find a straight answer anywhere yet, so I assumed using bitly is ok. Could it also be that opensiteexplorer takes months to register links? I seem to be missing many external links...In fact, the number of external links have dropped by around 10,000 in the past 2 months, and I know I didn't remove any links. Thanks!
Link Building | | Novelaspect0 -
Can I start SEO before finishing my website?
Hi, I'm new to SEO and websites. I'm slowly building a website at the moment. I was wondering if I could set up a blog at the domain name I will use for my final website and begin doing SEO. Eg. I set up a blog using a CMS like Squarespace and begin blogging at domain.com/blog (with links to the domain.com/blog from the domain.com home page) and inbound links point to the domain.com 'front page'. And then add the design of the 'front page' of the website using Squarespace at a later stage eg. domain.com. Is this a good idea? Will it work? I'm anxious to get started on SEO. Thanks!
Link Building | | doblstp0