Does relative CTR affect organic SEO efforts?
-
Hello fellow MOZ'ers!
Like many of you, I've been reviewing the Search Engine Ranking Factors 2015 Expert Survey and Correlation Data. My SEO Specialist position requires me to create positive SEO results for our clients' organic search ranking campaigns.
As I understand it, "Relative CTR is a valuable number that can show users how their ads are stacking up compared to their competitors ads appearing on the exact same websites."
My question is...Does relative CTR affect organic SEO efforts (positive or negative) in anyway? The campaigns I'm working on do not include AdWords efforts.
Is this a factor I should ignore/look over? Or is there something I can do "organically" to influence this ranking factor in a positive way?
Thanks!
-
My pleasure Randy.
-
Sorry for the late respond Dave.
Incredible response and answer to my question.
I appreciate the time and effort that went into your response. I will share this with our development team and discuss.
Best,
Randy
-
You're bringing up a subject that's much disputed in the SEO community as I'm sure you well know. I note this so you'll take my answer as educated opinion rather than fact. Before we get into the exact question you're answering it's worth noting a hangout recently in which John Mueller answers a different but related question. In the hangout he was asked whether Google uses onsite user actions as a factor. His answer was "no" and noted that he doesn't believe they know what people are doing in the context of filling out a form or making a purchase and that it's not used as a ranking factor. Conversion and goal tracking aside I choose to believe him as factoring this in would force Google to compare apples and oranges with sites that use Google Analytics sending different signals than those that do not. The reason I mention this is that while he answered that questions and I believe he did so honestly, there's a bigger point in there that ties to your question. So let's get to that ...
Does Google Use Clickthrough Rates?
To answer this we have to answer two things ...
1 - can clickthrough rates provide a positive signal on a site's likelihood in addressing the searchers need, and
2 - can this create false positives?The answer to both of these questions is "yes". If a site appears in the search results and is clicked by a user that is a signal that the site likely matches the users need. If I searched for "blue widgets" and a site with a title like "Exclusively Red Widgets | OnlyRedWidgets.com" appeared in the results then it would likely have a low clickthrough rate and that can be used as a signal. The signal shouldn't count as an overall quality-of-site signal, just a signal based on that specific query as the site might be a great supplier of red widgets. Now, this leads us to the second question, can it give false positives?
Let's image that red widget site used the title "Red & Blue Widgets Galore" but still only sold red widgets. This is where functions to address the second question would be necessary and that is tracking the user's site behavior. Since John has said they don't do that in Analytics or, by extension, Chrome, etc. use (and again - I believe him) then we have to look to Google themselves. We can see in the SERP URLs themselves that Google is tracking which sites get clicks. Past that they also know (just like you or I do) when that user is back at Google. So while they may not be tracking the users behavior on a specific site for the SERPs it's certainly possible (dare I say "probable") that they are tracking the time from the click to the site to the searcher's next appearance at Google. Whether said searcher has remained on your site or simply read a blog post there and followed a link to a different article is irrelevant, they have found what they wanted.
What I see is four core scenarios:
1 - the user clicks a link in the SERPs and returns quickly to Google and selects another site under the same query. This would be a negative relevancy signal.
2 - the user clicks a link in the SERPs and after a good deal of time returns to Google and selects another site under the same query. This would indicate a positive experience where the user was simply seeking additional information or options.
3 - the user clicks a link in the SERPs and after either a short or long period of time returns to Google and adjusts their query to a related but different one. This would indicate the user needs to refine their search to find what they want and send neither a positive nor negative signal.
4 - the user clicks a link in the SERPs and after either a short or long period of time returns to Google and adjusts their query to a completely unrelated one. This would indicate the user found what they were looking for and has moved on to another task sending a positive signal.So to your question, I believe the answer is a conditional "yes". Clickthroughs can send a positive signal to Google however that requires that the user found what they wanted to boost the relevancy for that phrase.
The real perk here is this, whether you believe this explanation or not (and again - this is opinion) the actions you need to take are the same. Regardless of whether clickthroughs or even onsite time are a ranking signal the purpose of your site is to attract clicks and satisfy the users so the actions you need to take are the same regardless. One has to love those types of scenarios.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does data-bind hurt SEO?
sleepcountry.ca uses Oracle Commerce Cloud which uses Knockout data-binds syntax to attach events to DOM elements like this (A <a id="s0207useresourcesinwidgets01"></a>Knockout custom binding named ‘widgetLocaleText’ - I am not familiar this technology stack): Same applies to H1 tag - you can't find H1 tag in Source. In short, the text binding causes the associated DOM element to display the text value of your parameter. Data binding is applied to all DOM elements on pages of sleepcountry.ca even that this technique doesn't pass W3C markup validation: Error: Element title must not be empty. MOZ reports that all H1 Tags are missing on ALL PAGES of the site. Same is reported by Semrush and other respected services. However, it seems like Google automatically adds tagging to all data-bind(ed) elements including Title! site:sleepcountry.ca I'm no expert in Oracle Commerce Cloud or Knockout, but I'm confused.
Moz Bar | | allagringaus
QUESTION: Does this data-bind hurt organic search and if it does, why Google still sees all TITLES while Moz and other services report it as a major problem - titles are missing. ? Thank you so much in advance! (I'm not an SEO expert but this problem might be related to my project)0 -
Is there a way to view difficulty for related keyword suggestions?
I'd really like to view the difficulty/organic CTR/priority of suggested related keywords without having to click on each individually - is there a way to do this?
Moz Bar | | avfundstack2 -
Does "Disallow: /xmlrpc.php" in robots.txt affect moz tools ability to fetch DA?
Just checked a website for Domain Authority using Moz' tool, however it returned 1 for DA, which should be unlikely. I have been trying to find the problem and found "Disallow: /xmlrpc.php" in robots.txt. Could this affect Moz' tools ability to get the required data?
Moz Bar | | Foli0 -
Negative references to Javascript in Beginners Guide to SEO (chapter 4)
There are numerous negative references to using JavaScript in the Beginners Guideto SEO. Our site was created on Wix that uses JavaScript. Can this impact our Google rankings? Are the references still valid? We rebuilt our site on Wix in July, 2015. Previously on GoDaddy for 4 years, but could not make the site mobile friendly via GoDaddy editor, so moved to Wix. ANY Suggestions for www.MyLongarm.com? mike
Moz Bar | | MyLongarm0 -
Why is the exact same URL being seen as duplicate and showing an error in my SEO reports
Well, I am still having duplicate page issues. I have a question about one of the errors SEO is giving me when I download a crawl report. I am going to attach a screen shot of part of the report so you can see for yourself, along with explaining it here. SEO shows the list of URL's that it crawled in the report. In this(see attachment) portion of the report it has 321 results for the exact same URL. It also says all of these exact same URL's have received a 404 error. What I want to know is how does it make 321 results for the same URL? And with this error that I don't see when I look at the page? 0hkRDST
Moz Bar | | JoshMaxAmps0 -
Does anyone have a good article or video on how to read the SEO MOZ crawl report column by column?
I am trying to find a good how-to on how to read and analyze each column of the SEO MOZ crawl report, specifically, the excel sheet it allows you to export. What I'm really trying to get to the bottom of is what the "Yes" indiciates under rel-cononical. If it says "yes," does this mean that the link in question has been canonoicalized?
Moz Bar | | armcwill0 -
Is it possible to extend my crawling date in SEO Moz?
My web site was crawled by MOZ before week, next crawling date is tomorrow. Because of some reason I am not able to take any action on last week MOZ report.I want to extend MOZ next crawling date, Can I ?
Moz Bar | | ankit.rahevar0