Why moz do not show website competitive metrics
-
-
Hi There,
This is a fairly tricky one to answer, though it does seem that I will need to agree with our crawler on this one. There seems to be a few questions so if I miss something or you would like some additional clarification let me know.
My instinct is that when it comes to the contact info the .lv is throwing us off. Though we are working hard to include more TLD's my gut instinct is that when we attempt to parse the page the lack of a .net or .com email is throwing us off. One important thing to know when it comes to spam score is that these are just general indicators that we associate with spam. There is always the chance that a non spammy site will have some indicators attributed to it but still not be spam, depending on how the site was set up.
The next two issues are not mutually exlusive because it looks at the site as a whole and not the homepage. So for example if you have a portion of the site that is comprised of a small amount of text without any substantial content both of these triggers could occur. We know this is a lot so I would really recommend reviewing Rands post on spam score here: https://moz.com/blog/understanding-and-applying-mozs-spam-score-metric-whiteboard-friday
I would really recommend reviewing this material and speaking to your web developers. Spam score is a great first step to facilitate a conversation between you and your developers to focus on areas of the site that may be problematic. It may be the case that the portions of the site that have thin content have a very good reason for being there so they should stay.
I know this is a lot so if you have any questions for me let me know!
-
About spam score. I do not understand these marks
1. No Contact Info
None of the pages crawled contain an email address or links to a social profile.Every page contains email and phone.
2. Thin Content
A subset of pages within this subdomain have little content.There is so many good texts. And all landingapges has A grade, i realy do not understand
3. I do not understand this markup
Site Mark-up is Abnormally Small
There's a high ratio of visible text compared to HTML, JavaScript, etc.One point says i have too little content and other says that visable text is to much!!!
Could you please help to understand it? I really try to make good webpage with good content.
webpage had different url mekounko.lv so it was bad quality i choose to use other domain with less characters and redirected old page to new domain.
-
Hi there! I'm sorry your site isn't showing up in Open Site Explorer yet. This generally indicates that your site has not been included within our index. While we are working hard to continue to expand upon our index some sites may not be included which appears to be the case for meko.lv
For some more in-depth info, here's how we compile our index:
- We grab the most recent index. - We take the top 10 billion URLs with the highest MozRank (with a fixed limit on some of the larger domains). - We start crawling from the top down until we've crawled 90,000,000,000 pages (which is about 35% the amount in Google's index).
So, if the site is not linked to by one of these seed URLs (or one of the URLs linked to by them in the next update) then it won't show up in our index.
Other tools, such as Webmaster Tools, Ahrefs, and Majestic will alway show more link data as they target the quantity of links, while OSE focuses more on quality and Domain Authority.
Mozscape focuses on a breadth-first approach. Therefore we almost always have content from the homepage of websites, externally linked-to pages, and pages higher up in a site's information hierarchy. However, deep pages that are buried beneath many layers of navigation are sometimes missed and it may be several index updates before we catch all of these.
We update once a month and you can view the next scheduled update here: http://moz.com/products/api/updates
So there is a chance that we should be able to pick up the site within the next index.
Concerning the spam score we will provide the reasons in our spam score section here: https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/spam-analysis/flags?subdomain=meko.lv
The bolded check marks represent all of the indicators of spam that we were able to find. If you see some indicators that you do not feel apply to your site please feel free to email help@moz.com and we would be happy to take a look.
Hope this helps provide some clarity. Please let me know if you have any questions!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz report not updated
Hi, Our Moz report does not seem to have updated this week? Thanks,
Product Support | | Ski-Solutions
Sacha1 -
Moz not tracking search traffic & not displaying correctly in pdf report
Hi For one of our clients search traffic has stopped tracking and there are no error msgs. For the same client, when you save the report to pdf format, it appears as per below?
Product Support | | Nikki9590 -
Is the Moz site behind for this week
We have not gotten our updated stats for this week. Is anyone else having this problem? We usually see the updates by 6am on Tuesday mornings.
Product Support | | baseballbargains0 -
Moz has stopped crawling my site
Hello, We have been using Moz Pro for over a year on our site and in the last month noticed that our site is not being crawled anymore. I took a look in Google Search Console, and everything seems to be fine there, so I think it is just the Moz tool that is not working. Has anyone else experienced this? Are there any tips for troubleshooting it? Thank you, Adam
Product Support | | cwells0 -
Moz disconnecting from Google Analytics
Hi A number of our campaigns have been disconnected from GA and every time we connect them it says it has, but when you go back, it is disconnects again. I found this thread on this forum: https://moz.com/community/q/google-reauthorization-in-moz#reply_216161 Is this still relevant? Thanks. Regards
Product Support | | Nikki959
Nikki https://moz.com/community/q/google-reauthorization-in-moz#reply_2161610 -
Is anyone else having problems with Moz Analytics?
None of my campaigns are updating, and one is not showing any data (even old data)
Product Support | | DarrenD0 -
The websites I add to my Moz Analytics account do not appear in the old "Pro" account. What is going on here?
The websites I add to my Moz Analytics account do not appear in the old "Pro" account. What is going on here?
Product Support | | GameDay1 -
Moz forum response seems to crash Outlook?
Hi, Like the new look of Moz. I got an automated email the other day saying someone had responded to a question we asked on Moz. However, when opening the email, it really held Outlook 2010 up. So slow that it crashed Outlook a couple of times. When trying to forward the email to a colleague, I got the 'Contacting \d1...cloudfront.net\img_users' dialogue box, which just stood there for ages, and eventually I had to give up and force Outlook to quit. Please see attached screenshot. Looking at the URL Outlook was trying to reach indicates it's trying to load up the avatar of the person who responded. Which would look nice I admit, but don't really need it in the email if it's going to cause Outlook to crash. There is an 'image not found' icon next to the post, so that's why I assume Outlook is searching for that image. It's almost as if the image is incorrectly referencing a local source (network drive) which it can never find. Perhaps there is a missing http:// prefix before the image in the tag? Anyway, was curious to know if anyone else has this problem, or if anyone at Moz can check this out (update template?) Regards, Rich M6AY0GQ
Product Support | | STL2