Is it better to try and boost an old page that ranks on page #5 or create a better new page
-
Hello Everyone,
We have been looking into our placements recently and see that one of our blog posts shows on page #5 for a popular keyword phrase with a lot of search volume.
Lets say the keyword is "couples fitness ideas"
We show on page 5 for a post
/couples-fitness-ideas-19-tips-and-expert-advice/
We want to try and get on the first page for that phrase and wanted to know if it is better if we did one of the following:
1. Create a new page with over 100 ideas with a few more thousands of words. with a new url (thinking /couples-fitness-ideas)
2. Create a new page with a new url (thinking /couples-fitness-ideas) with the same content as the currently ranking post. We would want to do this for more freedom with layout and design of the page rather than our current blog post template.
Add more content, let's say 100 more ideas.
Then forward the old URL to the new one with a 301 redirect.
3. Add more content to the existing post without changing the layout and change the URL.
Look forward to your thoughts
-
I just wanted to thank everyone again for their insight as well as send an update on the status of our page.
We are now ranking #2 for our target keywords as well as other top10 rankings for similar keywords.
Appreciate all your insight and feedback.
-
Looks good plan. Except content promotion. You need to do them both (updating and promotion) at same time.
-
I have a question regarding adding content to the page.
Currently we have the 19 ideas. Would it do more harm than good to add 5 ideas then publish it.
Then add 10 then publish, add 20 then publish. And so on. Basically updating the post every week or daily with more ideas. Rather than update it one time with 100 new ideas.
Would it be more beneficial or harmful to update the post more frequently than one major update.
Then once we have a significant number we would promote across social and outreach for links.
-
I have a question regarding adding content to the page.
Currently we have the 19 ideas. Would it do more harm than good to add 5 ideas then publish it.
Then add 10 then publish, add 20 then publish. And so on. Basically updating the post every week or daily with more ideas. Rather than update it one time with 100 new ideas.
Would it be more beneficial or harmful to update the post more frequently than one major update.
Then once we have a significant number we would promote across social and outreach for links.
-
Thanks for your feedback. It's good content it can just me expanded upon and have more added to it. This will make it great content.
-
I love how Peter actually brings this point as I recently faced this problem with one of my client. Here is what I would have done if I would be at your place.
If the content you are trying to rank is not good enough, after all the effort all you will get is more traffic with higher bounce rate which I am sure you do not want at the end of the day. One thing you need to make sure that the content you are planning to create is more powerful or the one that you already have is good enough for your target audience.
If you are fine with the content you currently have, stick with that and move as Peter suggest but if you think that the content you are planning is more powerful, I would suggest creating a new page and redirect the current page to the new URL. This way you will skip self-cannibalization plus the audience will get new and more powerful content than the one you were previously targeting.
Now you have the new content ready with old one redirecting to the new URL, it’s time for you to properly optimize your page, get some links and get it rank on your targeted key phrase.
Hope this helps!
-
Awesome.
So add some new ideas to the current post that ranks while we work on the new and improved page. This will move it up a little bit to make the switch even more effective.
Your other insight is great as well. I love Brian Dean's stuff too. Super Helpful.
I'll keep you updated on our progress.
Hopefully it can be a learning experience for all.
-
True.
First make backup and then proceed with #2 or #3. Also you can improve little bit #3 with few "extra" tips and just to see movements in SERP. Because you know - there is vacantions ahead and probably beginning of 2016 you can see move.
Of course implement good and old tricks - social signals, little bit fresh links from authoritative and trusted sources. Also you can put there videos - one video can put your average visit duration up and do engagement. Example is Moz - their regular articles are text-text-text-image-text-text-image and so on. But their WBF articles are text-video (length approx. 10 mins)-text-text-text.
#2 is same way as Brian Dean (Backlinko) - Skyscraper Technique.
Also Rand Fishkin talk about that as 10x http://www.slideshare.net/randfish/onsite-seo-in-2015-an-elegant-weapon-for-a-more-civilized-marketer/102-10X_Content_is_the_Future -
Thanks for your feedback. I would assume if did a whole new page/post for the same keyword we would be competing with ourselves and do more harm than good.
We are going to move forward with number 2 and see how it goes.
-
First you need to read this one:
https://moz.com/ugc/how-to-keep-keyword-cannibalism-from-robbing-your-sites-performance
and more articles about "keyword cannibalism" or "content cannibalism" or something.
Because for you it's much more important to not harm current position as primary goal and secondary goal is to get some improvements.So it's safe to try N:3 on same or other page just for test. But N:2 is probably correct way. You just to watch for implementing same on-page SEO optimization for new layout if there is new one.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking content for phrases that don't exist on-page
I am experiencing an issue with negative keywords, but the “negative” keyword in question isn’t truly negative and is required within the content – the problem is that Google is ranking pages for inaccurate phrases that don’t exist on the page. To explain, this product page (as one of many examples) - https://www.scamblermusic.com/albums/royalty-free-rock-music/ - is optimised for “Royalty free rock music” and it gets a Moz grade of 100. “Royalty free” is the most accurate description of the music (I optimised for “royalty free” instead of “royalty-free” (including a hyphen) because of improved search volume), and there is just one reference to the term “copyrighted” towards the foot of the page – this term is relevant because I need to make the point that the music is licensed, not sold, and the licensee pays for the right to use the music but does not own it (as it remains copyrighted). It turns out however that I appear to need to treat “copyrighted” almost as a negative term because Google isn’t accurately ranking the content. Despite excellent optimisation for “Royalty free rock music” and only one single reference of “copyrighted” within the copy, I am seeing this page (and other album genres) wrongly rank for the following search terms: “free rock music”
On-Page Optimization | | JCN-SBWD
“Copyright free rock music"
“Uncopyrighted rock music”
“Non copyrighted rock music” I understand that pages might rank for “free rock music” because it is part of the “Royalty free rock music” optimisation, what I can’t get my head around is why the page (and similar product pages) are ranking for “Copyright free”, “Uncopyrighted music” and “Non copyrighted music”. “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted” don’t exist anywhere within the copy or source code – why would Google consider it helpful to rank a page for a search term that doesn’t exist as a complete phrase within the content? By the same logic the page should also wrongly rank for “Skylark rock music” or “Pretzel rock music” as the words “Skylark” and “Pretzel” also feature just once within the content and therefore should generate completely inaccurate results too. To me this demonstrates just how poor Google is when it comes to understanding relevant content and optimization - it's taking part of an optimized term and combining it with just one other single-use word and then inappropriately ranking the page for that completely made up phrase. It’s one thing to misinterpret one reference of the term “copyrighted” and something else entirely to rank a page for completely made up terms such as “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted”. It almost makes me think that I’ve got a better chance of accurately ranking content if I buy a goat, shove a cigar up its backside, and sacrifice it in the name of the great god Google! Any advice (about wrongly attributed negative keywords, not goat sacrifice ) would be most welcome.0 -
Why ranks my site so bad?
hello together, i think, that you read questions like this very often, but i hope someone has some good ideas for me. https://goo.gl/3iOmcqy with the keyword "sophos sg 210" we rank very bad. But i don't know why 😞 We have trust elements, a very good "avergage time on page" unique content... But i don't know, what can we make better 😞 Thx you so much
On-Page Optimization | | enbitcon0 -
Theme create category page stuffed with Keyword
Hi All, Quick question and I think I already know the answer but wanted to get a second opinion. We have a ecom site running woo commerce and the theme is coded to insert the product category name under the product name on the category page. This has resulted in the category page being stuffed with my keyword 'sofa beds'. Am I right in thinking that in the eyes of Google this page will be penalised for over use of my keyword or does Google view category pages differently? Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | Jon-S0 -
Does having landing page text beneath the products at the base of the page hinder SEO?
I have a site that is capable of hosting the landing page description either above the products under the H1 or below them at the bottom of the page before the footer. I have always chosen to keep the text "above the fold" as presumably this would be crawled sooner in relation to the rest of the page content than had it been at the bottom. However, this means that I can only really write just a few sentences for each landing page - otherwise the products would shift further down the page - and I don't think this is good from a UX POV. Question: If I move the bulk of my landing page descriptions to the text snippet located underneath the products, could this negatively affect my SEO? Text at the bottom of the page is obviously not significant for users, so is there a chance this could be seen as spam?
On-Page Optimization | | Silkstream0 -
Too many on page links - created by filters
I have an ecommerce site and SEOmoz "Crawl Diagnostics Summary" points out that I have too many hyperlinks on most of my pages. The most recent thing I've done that could the culprit is the creation of number product filters. Each filter I put on the page is creating a hyperlink off that page. As an example, there's a filter available for manufacturers. Under that, there are 8 new filter links, thus new hyperlinks. On one category there are 60 new links created because of filters. I feel like these filters have made the user experience on the site better BUT has dramatically increased the number of outbound links off the page. I know keeping it to under 100 is a rule-of-thumb but at the same time there must be some validity to trying to limit them. Do you have any recommendation on how I can "have my cake and eat it too?" Thanks for any help!
On-Page Optimization | | jake3720 -
One page dropped like a stone from rankings - why?
I have one page targeted to a specific keyword that seems to have dropped into oblivion but rest of website seems Ok and as usual. website is www.pod-exhibition-systems.co.uk search term is "banner stands" Grade is A in SEO moz tools and 3 other SEO programs. looking for an avenue to try as has been 2 weeks so far. regards Joe
On-Page Optimization | | podweb0 -
Landing Pages: New Domain or Sub Folder?
I use premise for landing pages. I have some extra domain names that are fantastic in my industry. I'm wondering if I should use those domains for these landing pages? The header, nav, footer, would be the same as my main site, the body and content would be totally different. will google penalize me if I have the same header and footer on a landing page?
On-Page Optimization | | homebizsmart0 -
How long would it take for On-Page Optimization to have an effect on Google Rankings?
Hi there, I have a page on our website with an Interview with the author Tess Gerritsen. There has been a reasonable amount of Social Media buzz related to the page and lots of links. According to SEOMoz we are an A grade for the keyword Tess Gerritsen, we currently rank 29th on Google.co.uk for a 'tess gerritsen' search. My question is - how long would it take for any new changes to have an effect? I presume the answer would be whenever the page is crawled again. But is it wise to change one thing, then get crawled and see what the effect is, then the next day change something else and see what the effect is. Or is it wise to change one thing and then leave it a week or so to see the full effect of the change? Apologies for the vague question, if you need any more clarification just let me know. Thanks. Benj
On-Page Optimization | | Benj250