How do I fix 885 Duplicate Page Content Errors appearing in my Moz Report due to categories?
-
Hi There,
I want to set up my Moz report to send directly to a client however there are currently 885 duplicate page content errors displaying on the report.
These are mostly caused by an item listed in multiple 'categories' and each category is a new pages/URL.
I guess my questions are:
1. Does Google see these as duplicate page content? Or does it understand the categories are there for navigation purposes.
2. How do I clear these off my Moz report so that the client doesn't panic that there are some major issues on the site
Thanks for your advice.
-
Greetings Stacey,
If your site is built on WordPress, you can use the Yoast SEO plugin and set categories to "noindex". You can find this in the menu for "Titles &Metas" and then "Taxonomies" in the Yoast plugin. I did that recently for tags, categories and archives within a client's blog to remove duplicate content notices in my Moz reports.
That being said, it MAY have some impact on your position in the SERPs.
I hope that helps.
Best Regards,
Mark
-
Hi,
Duplicates of this nature can only be fixed by adding canonical tags to one preferred version of that product. When you have multiple instances of the product throughout many categories, search engines aren't sure which to show, so they'll usually not show any of your results. For more on canonical tags, read this Moz article.
You cannot remove it from the Moz report, as that's part of its purpose - to show you instances of duplicate content.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How is Moz DA affected by spam links? Disavow file?
So it does not appear that moz let's you upload your disavow file. So when moz calculates your DA how do spammy links factor in? After digging through our GA it appears our site was hit with the 2016 penguin update and never recovered. Our weekly visitors were 2k, then dropped to 500 and have stayed close to that level for a while. We've used the disavow tool, without success over the past 3 years. During that time we have done link out reach and built around 10 legit good quality DA links since. But we have not recovered. At this point i'm thinking I should just remove the disavow file. Moz says our spam score for our domain is 5%.
Link Explorer | | jessicapremier0 -
Moz OSE not working
Open Site Explorer doesn't seem to be working for me. Any one else got the same?
Link Explorer | | seoman100 -
Does MOZ have a Flash test tool?
I want to test my websites and see if they use Flash, is there a flash check tool like on SEO tool kit here on MOZ? Thanks, Lance
Link Explorer | | BlueprintMM0 -
Detected duplicate content with canonical applied
Dear all, We are getting duplicate content from items which have a canonical applied.
Link Explorer | | Eurasmus.com
This error is coming in every report and we have no way to mark an error as revviwed what it takes double time for us to check it again. Is there any solution for this, are we doing something wrong???0 -
HTTP Status no data to report
In my Moz top pages report, why is there "no data" in the HTTP Status column? Is this an indication of something missing or an error?
Link Explorer | | jessential0 -
Why MoZ Bar gives different PA and DA to my homepage? Surly they should have the same metrics?
Hi guys, is it normal that when looking at my homepage with the mozbar i get the same DA and PA? It seems that it should provide the same results. Thankss
Link Explorer | | artdivision0 -
Open Site Explorer not reporting all 301 redirected links
Our site had over 2,000 root domains linking to it as reported in MOZ Open Site Explorer (and Google Webmaster Tools). We then changed the domain and made sure that 301 redirects were set up for all pages across the site. That was about 1 month ago. Open Site Explorer is now reporting less than 300 linking root domains. For the links that it is reporting the majority of these are being 301 redirected to the new URLs (some of them we changed the links directly). However the majority of the links that are being 301 redirected are not being reported. It is reporting most of the links coming from the old to the new domain. Google Webmaster Tools is reporting over 1,000 linking root domains to the new domain (it has a max of 1,000). We did notice that MOZ took some time to update the domain authority of the new domain. It was 1 for along time and it has now jumped up to 46 ( it was previously at 74). Maybe this is a time delay thing and eventually Open Site Explorer will report all of the 301 redirected links? It is a bit frustrating at the moment as we can't fully analyse the links to the site to try to focus on the high domain linking sites to get them to change the link directly. Also, If all links are being 301 redirected to the new domain should the authority not be close to where it was previously after one month? Our search traffic has dropped considerably since the launch of the new site and hasn't returned yet, so just wondering if the 301 redirected links pass on as much value as thre original direct links. Thanks, Damien
Link Explorer | | james.harris0 -
Does the inbound links report include links to all pages of the domain being researched?
If I enter 'abc.com' am I only getting results for 'abc.com' or will I get results for the internal pages of 'abc.com' as well (i.e. 'abc.com/page1.html)? There is a bit of a discrepancy between these results and inbound link results in semrush for example. Then again it seems whenever you use different tools to measure the same thing you get wildly varying results. How do you all deal with that?
Link Explorer | | AISEO0