Links
-
Hi, im wondering if links that is not exact anchor links gives any boost for rankings?
Example if lets say somebody links to my site http://domain.com/category/article with anchor: domainname or url link.
-
Hey Paddy,
Great summary man!
Your 1,2, 3 = There are lots of other signals as well which Google can look at besides anchor text.
Overall site health is essential
All the best,
Tom
-
Hi Rob,
There are some great answers in this thread, so I won't repeat too much. But just a few additional points:
- Ultimately, the quality of the site should be an important factor for you to consider. If the site is high quality, then it's likely to help you in terms of traffic and rankings no matter what the anchor text is.
- Anchor text still plays a big part in rankings. But as others have said, it can be risky to have too much anchor text which doesn't look natural i.e. is stuffed full of keywords. So you do need to be careful not to look manipulative and I'd advise not taking risks and focusing on the quality of the link as noted above.
- There are lots of other signals as well which Google can look at besides anchor text. A few may be - the position of the link on the page, the surrounding text, whether the link is in a list or not, whether the link is followed or not.. countless things which can help Google decide if a link is good or not.
I hope that helps!
Paddy
-
Just in case all these excellent answers are not compounding enough I want to let you know I concur with everyone.
Today you want to be careful of using anchor text. I'm not going to lie and tell you that it is a more potent however the best way to do it is naturally most people will not give you incredible anchor text when linking to you if it's done naturally.
It's fine to get a lot of "click here" check out the site" for site's name or the URL. Also, Google is not stupid they have an excellent idea of rather not it's a little bit over optimized and may be a buddy helped hypothetically let's say you sell tennis shoes For clay courts. "Clay-court tennis shoes" looks like it would fine only If rarely done and people will do that on their own so don't do it yourself.
Backlinks and anchor text are still a way to get you removed from the SERPS by Google, but if it is over optimized, it's so easy to tell that you have manipulated the links.
Put it this way Google looks at every link with its AI machine learning algorithm it knows what normal is and what normal is not. You will always get some very optimized URLs and its natural.
One rule I have with Google if you think it's possibly going to be an issue then stay away from it or do what you did here and got good information.
** excellent references on Natural Anchor Text vs Unnatural Anchor Text**
- https://www.semrush.com/blog/8-signs-that-indicate-youre-over-optimizing-your-blog/
- https://moz.com/blog/anchor-text-distribution-avoiding-over-optimization
- http://www.wordstream.com/anchor-text
- https://blog.kissmetrics.com/avoid-over-optimizing/
- https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66356?hl=en
What you have to deal with if you do not pay attention to what Google tells you to do.
Tools For checking your back links.
- https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/
- https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en
- https://ahrefs.com/
- https://majestic.com
Tools for checking your external links on your site:
- https://moz.com/researchtools/crawl-test
- https://www.deepcrawl.com/index-of-reports/
- https://analytics.moz.com/manage-campaigns
- https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
** I hope that this helps and you have avoided some issues with Google.**
** All the best,**
** Tom **
-
Hi Rob.
Long story, short? Yes, they do impact possitevely in your SERPS.
I agree with Bas.
My personal advise: mantein the diversity in every aspect. Google is able to find out whether you are trying to manipulate the SERPs. And ALWAYS, think the linkbuilding strategy as making it look natural and organic.Hope it helps.
GR. -
Well: like i said: it's better to have 'natural anchors'. So, yes, you can score with a different anchor text.
Say for example: you wouldn't tell anyone to which page they would have to link to and what anchor or IF they need to use an anchor text. In this case: the inlinks and anchor texts would probably be very 'natural'. Meaning: all different.
In that you will very probably gain DA or PA with these inlinks.
It's not only the anchor text, or the source URL, or the relevancy of the content of the linking domain to your domain: it's all these and much more combined. The anchor text is only a part of the complete 'calculation'.
To come back to your question if such a link will give you a boost: there is a high probability that it will, no matter what the anchor text is. Since the site that is linking to you is about a similar topic, i would expect a positive effect. Whether you can measure the effect or not depends on a lot of other elements that we (in this forum) don't know.
Of course: a link with an anchor text containing the keyword that you chose to the page you've chosen would be perfect. But that doesn't mean all other combinations are useless. Maybe less effective towards to your personal or business goal. That might be the case.
Does this help you?
Bas -
Thanks for the answer, i understand that. But i wonder if it will give any boost in rankings if lets say somebody links to me from his blog that is about fruits and the article is about apples. The anchor text is my domain name or my URL and it links to my site with this url: http://domain.com/fruit/apple.
Will it give any boost at all or is it only when the right anchor is used?
-
Hi: best to have natural anchor texts. Rand said in one of the Whiteboard Friday videos that it's better to not have all anchor texts the same. That's not natural. Have some variation in anchor texts.
As long as the anchor texts resemble the content and your chosen keyword(s), the anchor text will still push you in the right direction.
Hope that helps.
Bas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does this lose link value?
I have a link to my site from a post on an online forum. I now want to include the forum in a blog post about good industry-related e-forums. If I link to them in this article, will I lose the value from the link on the post in their forum, and could it be seen as spammy?
Link Building | | AHC_SEO0 -
When we use 'link:' for who get the link, how come google show us the same domain as a link.
the search result show the domain of its own. what is is? and is it meaningful as a link?
Link Building | | onedaykorea0 -
A few questions about unnatural links
i have just had another reconsideration request rejected by Google. In my rejection message they have given me 3 examples of unnatural links, but two of them I have had nothing to do with. My website is http://www.seoco.co.uk Here are the 3 links they mentioned: http://www.pyjamapeople.com/articles/authors/107/David-Eaves http://www.timeandattendance.co.uk/blog/?tag=access-control http://www.worx.at/blog/und-punkt/ the 1st one is just a website that republished one of my articles, I never submitted there or anything. Do I need to contact every single website that republished one of my articles and get those removed? Are they not classed as natural? Also, the page is not even cached by Google, why are they telling me to get rid of links that are not even in their index? The 2nd link is a client site and is definitely unnatural, I removed my link from the main part of the site a while ago but the blog footer was not updated, I will take care of that one. The 3rd link is a totally natural blogroll link that I had nothing to do with. What do you think I should do about it? Should I mention to Google on my next reconsideration request that it is in fact natural, or should I just bite the bullet and get it taken down? Also, there are a few pretty decent links out there that I am thinking about getting taken down on good sites, what do you think I should do with these two: 1. http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/search-engine-optimisation/directory-submission.shtml 2. http://www.webpronews.com/10-reasons-why-i-hate-shout-outs-on-digg-2007-10
Link Building | | Eavesy1 -
Internal linking anchor text with automated ASP.NET link building
Hi Everyone I really need some help here, the problem I have must be one that many have. I have a simple e-commerce style website so 1 product page can in fact get 40-50 internal links to it. These links come from a mixture of: 1. The parent category pages that the product sits on (Rugged PDA) and in turn the 10 filter pages of this category page (Rugged PDA, ordered by battery size). 2. Alternative product list on other product pages, So many products link to each other as alternatives. From Google analytics we can see that visitors like to browse product to product seeing 5 alternatives on each page with titles like "Smaller", "more rugged" etc. 3. Manufactuer pages, so we have a link to each product from each manufacturer home page where we talk lots about each manufacture we resell. We also have links from images used in the website. So its a nice usable website but we're finding that Google is still telling us in Webmaster tools that it thinks some links are dubious and we're trying to find out why. We only now have 190 external links to the website, most are internal and from the website or our blog on a subdomain. The problem we think is that we generate the category and products pages all dynamically so the anchor text is looking the same. Will this potentially create issues for us? Dave
Link Building | | Raptor-crew0 -
Footer Links And Link Juice
I'm starting to learn about link juice and notice in GWMT > Traffic > Internal Links, that the list is in this order by the links counted on each page. Some are in the footer and some are in the header, with some being more important than others commercially i.e. /register /privacy /terms /search /sitemap /disclaimer /blog /register So I am wondering if I should add a 'no-follow' attribute to the footer links i.e. privacy, terms, disclaimer and leave the others as they are? Does this help retain link juice on each page where the links appear? Or am I missing the point all together? This is my website: http://goo.gl/CN0e5
Link Building | | Ubique0 -
Outbound links
We are working with a large, global customer that has asked us to link to their website from about 5,000 pages of our website. The links would either point to one page on their website, or they would point to specific pages throughout their website. Is this a bad thing from an SEO perspective, as in - would either of us be penalized from search engines for doing this?
Link Building | | Prospector-Plastics0 -
Too Many Links???
SEOMOZ is telling me I have more than 100 links on quite a few of my pages, and I cant seem to find out what links they are finding. Like for instance on this page http://standupguys.biz/what-we-haul/commercial-junk-removal-services/computer-removal-recycling/ It is telling me that I have 117 hyper links (which is WAY too high). Can anyone explain to me where these are coming from, and how I can avoid this?? Please and thank you.
Link Building | | Caseman0