Which is best for SEO: Dedicated landing pages for contests or templated page URL?
-
A colleague and I were having a discussion about this and wanted to get insight from the community about this. Most often we run contests on social channels, but for some we place them on our e-commerce web site - particularly those which have a universal appeal to customers since these also tend to be included in our e-mails.
So our question is with regard to any links built to those contest pages, is it better to:
- have them point to a unique page, Example: domain.com/customer-appreciation-contest
OR
- A reusable page/URL that can continuously be repurposed and updated for new contests. Example: domain.com/contests
We discussed pros/cons of each but am curious if anyone here has insight or source that definitively advises which method is best. Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
-
Thanks Jared for your thoughts/insight! I was leaning toward the dedicated/unique landing page for each contest as well.
-
Hi Vanessa,
First off, really awesome question, I definitely had to give this one some thought! I would do both...
You're right about there being pros and cons, but if it were me I would create a dedicated landing page for each contest then 301 them to the main /contest page after it was over.
The reason for my preference is because you may be more likely to earn certain links from certain places if you have a very specific landing URL vs. a generic one. I know you mentioned changing the "catch all" page each time, but you lose the ability to change the URL in that scenario. If it's always going to remain /contest, this might be a turnoff (albeit very slight) to someone that might have otherwise linked to you if it was /unique-content-title instead. Not to mention, if there are any semi-shady domains that end up linking to this unique page, the URL specifically is another signal that might reinforce the idea of "Don't-penalize-me-because-their-spammy-site-is-linking-to-me-I'm-just-running-a-contest" to the engines because of its onpage relevance (this also assumes it's a relevant spammy site linking to you in the first place).
All that being said, you would lose about 10% of link equity anyway by 301ing the unique link every time, and the scenario of getting one bad link that ends up hurting you is unlikely, so it really could go either way. This decision might also be swayed by how hard it is to get something redirected in the first place. If you're in a "typical" corporate environment, it may be an act of congress to get a 301 pushed through instead of just changing the body content of an existing page.
Hopefully that helped Vanessa and didn't just generate more questions...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
New FaceBook Fan Page Call To Action Button !
Hi On one of my projects FB fan pages ive been given option to create a CTA button such as 'Shop' 'Contact Us' 'Watch Video' etc etc However on another projects FB fan page i logged in to try and set up for too and not being given the option although has many thousands more fans than the page i had been offered it for !1 Does anyone know how new this option is and likely reason only being offered it for a low fan number page and not pages with high fan numbers ? All Best Dan
Social Media | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Counting unique landing pages in Google Analytics: social vs organic channels
Remember the technique Rand posted for counting the unique indexed landing pages on a site? http://moz.com/blog/indexation-for-seo-real-numbers-in-5-easy-steps I'm using Google Analytics to compare this result for the "social" channel vs. the "organic search" channel. The idea is to see whether social or search delivers people to more unique landing pages. I would expect organic search to yield a significantly higher count, due to long tail searches for relatively obscure terms. We have an archive of over 500k pages that Google could be indexing, even if only a fraction of a percent of those might be getting social mentions. But that's not what the numbers show -- I'm seeing roughly 10% higher numbers for the Social channel than for Organic Search. Again, I'm counting unique landing pages here, not the total pageviews or visits. If anyone else here is monitoring these metrics, please chime in with your results. What's the baseline expectation for a large website with hundreds of thousands of pages of issue-centric user-generated content? Should search traffic provide 2x more landing page exposures than social? 5x? 10x? or 0.9x, as in my case? In short, I believe these numbers are pointing to an indexing/ranking problem following a recent site redesign.
Social Media | | mcglynn0 -
Google+, Link from My Site to Author's Google+ Page or to Company Google+
Recently I verified authorship for my Website. So the image from my personal Google+ account appears in search results. My website has a Google+ social media button. Should the link point to my corporate Google+ account or to my personal Google+ account? What is more credible from Google's point of view? What are best practices for this issue? Look forward to hearing from the MOZ community. THANKS!!!
Social Media | | Kingalan1
Alan Rosinsky0 -
Does Traffic help improve my page rank?
I've learned many things to do to improve my page rank over the past several months (thanks, seomoz). Our website, www.farnorthkennel.com, has improved greatly thanks to your help. Here's my question. I have 13000 fans on FB. If they all read a blog post I put up, does this help my page rank? Does new visitors hitting up my website make the Google gods smile upon me?
Social Media | | Joshlaska0 -
Dealing with Pinterest Traffic | Best Practices?
I've not been able to determine what a best practice might be in this situation. Maybe you can help. One of my sites (built on Wordpress) had a blog post go viral on Pinterest. We went from about 1-200 visits a day to more than 17,000 visits daily. All the traffic was basically coming through this one blog post. The site was not built to accommodate that much traffic. We quickly received a call from the hosting company that they had to take our site down because of the load that was being placed on the server (shared hosting.) This is a small, niche site. The products & services being advertised are extremely niche. There is no intent to ever have huge amounts of traffic because we know the customer base is so small. In order to keep the site up, and to reduce the amount of traffic coming from Pinterest, the hosting company modified the .htaccess file to block all traffic coming from pinterest.com. We know that 99% of all the traffic coming from Pinterest not only were not potential customers, but are in the wrong demographic. So, there's no worry for us in losing that traffic. I also know we're not the first site this has happened to. So, what's the best practice here?
Social Media | | Imperi0 -
How does Google handle URL shortening, do they pass link juice?
When I'm Social Book marking my websites I use a url shortening service such as bitly.com or onlywire.com. Do these services transfer link juice in the same ways as a direct link would do?
Social Media | | iansellman0 -
How can I see Facebook Comments associated with a url
I was on shared count and saw a URL that i have has 103 FB comments. I was wonder if there was a way to see those comments at all. Thanks!
Social Media | | Gordian0 -
What's the best way to get links from images?
I have a few images that I have taken recently and I was wondering what might be the best way to use them. Ideally I would like to get a few links or some interest via social networks. I know I've a few options including: adding images directly to the website adding images to Flickr or similar adding images to Google+ adding images to Facebook adding images to twitpic or similar I was also intending in keeping some images to include directly in posts. Should I concentrate posting images directly on the site or use social networks? Which social networks work well for images? How can I use images to get links?
Social Media | | andywozhere0