Difference on full and partial URLs in Open Site Explorer?
-
Hi, I am pretty new to SEO and it might show. Here is my question, regarding the difference on "full and partial" urls in Open Site Explorer (OSP). That is, the difference on http://www.mywebsite.com and http://mywebsite.com.
I get very similar results for the two variations, but not exactly the same. That suggest to me that OSP most of the time find the same links regardless of whether the url put into the search field is full or partial. But not all the time.
Can anyone clarify?
Thx in advance
-
A search for the www subdomain will likely pull up very similar results to searching for the non-www root domain, but it's still possible that the results will be different, depending on how other sites are linking back to yours.
You can always use the filters to see links pointing at the root domain level!
-
Thank you, very much for the quick response.
Just for clarification.
Is it correct to assume that the search for links including the "www" will produce pretty much the same results as the search without?
Best wishes, Lars
-
Hi there! Tawny from Moz's Help Team here.
This is a great question! The reason you might be seeing different inbound link information for mywebsite.com and www.mywebsite.com is because of the way other sites link back to yours. Some folks might link directly to the root domain, mywebsite.com, while others might link to the www subdomain. In that way, the two links might have slightly different backlink profiles, and could turn up different results in Open Site Explorer.
Typically if a site has both a www subdomain and a root domain page for their homepage, they'll redirect from one to the other so that visitors only see one version of the page, and so that link equity gets passed along to the correct page. In those cases, Open Site Explorer will see the redirect and offer to analyze the main page instead.
Hope that helps explain! If you've still got questions or need some clarification, feel free to drop us a line at help@moz.com and we'll do our best to sort you out!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why are my trackable links appearing in my site crawls?
Our Google-created trackable campaign URLs are appearing in site crawls and often triggering error warnings.
Link Explorer | | K.Reeves0 -
Open site explorer Update
Hi Moz community, I have been using this tool to check my DA & PA and backlinks of my website. Since last week we have some outbound links to my website as I knew it but MOZ havent pointed out these links when I use the "Open site explorer" tool. Please answer this for me. Thanks & regards, Zita
Link Explorer | | zita.vn0 -
Root domains that link to the URL or domain
Hello Everyone, I need help understanding how does Moz linking root domains work. My website shows 73 domain pointing backlinks to my domain in google webmaster where on Moz Linking domain it only shows 18 domian. Any help on how this works. Thanks in advance. Sagar
Link Explorer | | wolfeyes1 -
Link Acquisition Assistant redirect to Open Site Explorer??????
Link Acquisition Assistant redirect to Open Site Explorer?????? How can i use Link Acquisition Assistant?
Link Explorer | | bondhoward0 -
[No Title] in Top Pages using Open Site Explorer
Hello!
Link Explorer | | eagleleather
All of my pages contain properly formatted title tags which display in the browser. However, when I view the 'Top Pages' area of the Open Site Explorer, 99% of those pages show [No Title] in the Page Title & URL column. Does anyone know what might be causing this?0 -
Is there some way to tell the Moz crawler not to crawl URL's with particular dynamic tags such as "?redirect-to:http//" ?
We are encountering an issue where the crawler is finding a ton of pages from our wordpress login url that has this dynamic tag in it to kinds of different blog entries. It's madness. I can't figure out what is causing these URLs to generate to be crawled in the first place! Does this sound familiar to anyone out there, any constructive suggestions? Robots text or maybe meta robots tags that would resolve this crawl issue?
Link Explorer | | RegistrarCorp0 -
Why doesn't my site show up in Moz Site Explorer
I started this website about 2 months ago, www.guyetteroofing.com. I know it still needs a lot of work, but I can't find any information on it on the site explorer tool.
Link Explorer | | billyguyette1 -
Removing the clutter of site-wide links
I have a multi-part question with regard to the moz link index and some presentation suggestions. Firstly I would be interested to know how the link index treats site-wide links with regard to metrics such as DA, and PA. We all know that it is highly likely that SE's are unlikely to pass full link value across from sitewide links, and therefore it would make sense for Moz values to account for this as well - if they do not already. One annoying thing that also relates to sitewides is that they tend to clutter the much of the information presentation in a few of the tools (you can't see wood for trees as it were). This is most prominent in the "Just Discovered" page - if you have a sitewides on a large site, you can often find that this screen is just totally filled with these links as they are found. It would be very useful to be able to filter these out, as they are of little interest - currently I can't see a way of filtering them out. A further value where they create to much noise is the 'Total Links' value. Where sitewides are included in this value, the value actually becomes pretty meaningless as you can find that the majority of that value is sitewides. It would therefore be useful if there was another value for 'Total Links - Excluding Sitewides' where maybe value of 1 was just added to the count for a site wide
Link Explorer | | James770