Best Keyword Strategy for Lower-Authority-Ranked Domain
-
Hi,
What should a lower-authority-ranked blog (DA - 21) who is trying to increase general traffic focus on above all when selecting keywords: difficulty, monthly volume, opportunity, or priority? I know that all are important factors to consider, but I fear that without an already consistent following our new content will just get hidden behind more established domains if we select too difficult of keywords. I'd love to hear from someone who's built up a blog audience as to what strategy they used here.
Thanks!
-
Thanks for the suggestion (and the initial response). This was a really helpful explanation of what quality content entails!
-
Ross Hudgens has a good article that describes what it takes to be competitive.
-
What exactly did you mean by 'ability to compete' though?
Ability to compete is the ability to create spectacular content, promote it with titles and headlines that people will respond to and spontaneously share, and have a tribe that will do that for you, or an ability to ask for and get valuable links.
Most people can't do this.
Most who can do this only achieve it with a fraction of their articles - even though they work hard at every one of them.
A lot of people think that they have "good content". Perhaps an English professor would have given the writing and the presentation a "good grade" but that isn't enough. You need writing and images that people see and say... Wow!... then they share it because they want their friends to know what they have found. For that to happen you must have content that is at least one clear step above all other competition.
-
Thanks for the response! At this point we're primarily going to be doing informational. Our tribe is about 15,000 spread across various social media platforms (not so much email yet, unfortunately).
It's encouraging to hear someone say that it is indeed possible to rank for difficult keywords with good content--which I'm confident we can create--when there are already juggernauts out there. What exactly did you mean by 'ability to compete' though? And is there a difficulty score that would be considered too high right now for a beginner? I'm looking at publishing an article this week focusing on a keyword with a difficulty score of 39 and a priority of 46 (the highest score I've found for the topic). the competition for which would be some fairly established websites, including NBCNews. I've also looked at similar keywords with with lower difficulty scores, but they also have somewhat lower priority scores.
I look forward to your response.
-
I believe that the strategy is better determined by 1) the type of site you are working on (transactional vs informational); 2) the quality of content that you are best able to produce; 3) the investment that you are willing to put into the content; and, 4) the strength of your tribe.
For informational, you can pick and choose the keywords to where you have the ability and resources to defeat the best content on the web, or at least compete with it. If you don't have the content-producing ability or the ability to pay for it, your chances of success are greatly diminished. If you can compete with the best content of the difficult keywords then you should attack the biggest keywords where you have the ability to compete. Don't fear competition because where there is a lot of competition, there is usually a lot of traffic and a lot of money changing hands.
If you don't have the ability to produce or pay for highest quality content and intend to attack with prattle, then your chances of success are greatly diminished. Just sayin'.
In transactional, a good method is to publish content that is highly useful for the people who are about to make a transaction or have made a transaction and now need information. How to select the product, how to use it, how to fix it, how to enjoy it are very good fields for transactional websites. They earn respect of shoppers and earn respect of people with an interest in the products you are offering. They pull links, traffic, social engagement and make your site a "go to place" on the web.
Your tribal resource might be current traffic who will share your content or current social strength that will enable you to share and that sharing be spread. Here, again is where highest quality content succeeds and prattle is not worth much.
It's not about the authority that you have today... its the authority where your content can take you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why do the Ranking Report emails differ from the acutal Ranking Report?
I have been noticing that the Rankings listed in the emails are far different from the ones in my report once I log in. Any idea what this is about? Often the rankings in the email are much better then in the report. And I am talking about on the same day as the email was sent out, not a week later.
Moz Pro | | 2CDevGroup0 -
Why do my Rankings Report show different results than the Rank Tracker tool?
I noticed that my ranking report puts be at 33 in google for one term, but when I use the Rank Tracker under Research tools it places me at 15.
Moz Pro | | trainsimple0 -
Does the page authority data also considers the on page factors like the presence of keyword in the title,meta text, and keyword frequency ??
The moz difficulty score considers four factors for the top websites. are the on page factors included in the page authority data ?
Moz Pro | | iQuanti0 -
Rankings csv export doesn't show local rank
Is there a way to enable this in the settings somewhere? or is this simply not an available feature yet? Would be really great if there was an extra column in the report that shows local rank, as 93 of our top 100 keywords we track are all blended search results and a lot of the time this shows really inaccurate results because of this.
Moz Pro | | adriandg0 -
Ranking
Why is comunicatedepresa.net ranking better than comunicatedepresa.ro for the term "comunicate de presa" Absolutely ALL the factors (links, domains linking, authority, onpage etc) seem to say that comunicatedepresa.ro should have ranked better.
Moz Pro | | seo.academy0 -
Do keywords in drop-down menus count?
In running one of my campaigns in SEOMoz Pro, it was recommended that I reduce the amount of times a keyword is used to 15. On the actual page, there are fewer than 15, but when you include the number of times it is used in drop-downs from the nav bar, the number is 53. I know there is really no hard and fast rule about how many instances of a keyword make for keyword stuffing and the drop-downs only use the term where needed. Without it's use, it would be difficult to navigate the site. Is this a problem or should I focus on more important fixes?
Moz Pro | | rdreich490 -
Quick Keyword Difficulty Question
Hello good people. Quick question about the Keyword Difficulty Tool (which is great by the way). I am wondering specifically about the "keyword difficulty score" If I were to type in "blue widget," the tool returns a diffiiculty score of 51%. "red widget" on the other had returns a score of 40%. My question is how much more difficult is the term, "blue widget" when compared to "red widget?" 20% harder? more, less? I just don't know. I'm sure the info is somewhere on the seomoz site, but I have searched high and low and cannot find it. Thanks a lot, Joe
Moz Pro | | sawa00190