Question, Directory Listing Text Best Practices
-
I have been doing some reading on directory link anchor text and it appears the best practice for 2018 and beyond would be to build your brand. For Example Sue's Shoes and her website is shoesbysue.com
Directory Anchor Text As Follows
shoesbysue.com
http://wwwshoesbysue.com
Sue's ShoesNow my question would be if you had a competitor site who was top position on google and ALL anchor text for all directories at leat 90% was
Buy Shoes Here
I do not understand how they are following best practices? What do you recommend to be safe.
-
Just bare links and natural links go to your homepage and give it power. Then links from your homepage to other pages on the site contain the anchor text that tells google what the page is about. Also sometimes external places will link to particular pages inside your website (deep linking) with anchor text or not. Better with but it's becoming less and less important as time goes by. I don't think we'll all be talking about anchor text or maybe not even about links at all in a few years time.
Some of my best pages are ranking number one nationally (for the whole of the UK) and they are super-high competition and they don't have one single backlink. That must tell you something...
Likewise some of my pages I've done 'linkbuilding campaigns' and spent weeks and months building links to and it's not made a blind bit of difference.
Please remember to mark the answer as a good one if you like it. Helps me get recognition for helping out. And feel free to ask more questions. I only started learning SEO in May 2017 and my site back then had 900 users a month. Since then I wrote and optimised about 60 pages and we now get 32,000 users a month and our business has tripled in size. Linking was the last thing on my mind. Writing good content came first. And proving to google that we are who we say we are with links from universities and professional bodies for the dentists. those are the real power links. You must have suppliers who will link to you in their 'find a distributer' sections?
-
Hi Ed
Greatly appreciate the response and help THANKS, I have checked both those links working on the 50 list as we speak. While you made a great point, these are all relatively new links my competitor has added in the recent weeks to months. I read a great article on how you want to use anchor text for your brand first and foremost with less than 10% anchor text to be about the specific topic of the page. But what you said makes sense how does Google know that content is about that specific topic if the only anchor text is on your brand name?
-
Anchor Text is only one of the many ways google understands what a page is about. And links are only one of the many ways google verifies a domains authority to rank it.
Be careful of modelling your 'top competitors' because they may have been doing SEO on the site fr 10 years which means they may have all these dodgy "exact match" anchor texts and even dodgier domain listings.
You only need national, local and hyperlocal citations for your business. The practice of adding it to web directories is hopelessly out of date and worth nothing. You're more likely to get a penalty.
Google have said that you may use exact match internal anchor text liberally but if you start using exact match EXTERNAL anchor text (i.e links from other sites) then you'll get an algorithmic penalty or even a manual action.
Take a look here to get your first 50 links, here for some link strategies that will help your site and are up to date and STAY OFF THE DIRECTORIES. I answered a directories question the other day so it should be available in the search. We've done soem tests on using directories and it really, really doesn't work. Be aware this is not the same as the ESSENTIAL practice of 'citation building'
As for anchor text you have to make it look natural and mix it up. But just using bare URL's and the name of your site will work for now while you're building your brand. But blindly following the 'big players' out of date tactics can be suicide. All their dodgy links will still be there it's just that google will have updated and discounted them. But if you start getting bad links and over-optimising anchor text when that is known bad practice then you'll get stung.
Hope this helps. Please remember to mark it helpful if it's helped!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Exact Keyword is Used in Page Title & Exact Keyword Used in Document Text at Least Once
Hi Folks, I have a page https://purplegriffon.com/courses/itil-training/itil-foundation-training/itil-foundation that grades with the 'On-Page Grader' as a B grade for the keyword 'itil foundation' but reports that there is no 'Exact Keyword is Used in Page Title' and 'Exact Keyword Used in Document Text at Least Once'. The thing is, it actually is but because of IP (intellectual property) rights we have to include a '®' (®) symbol when we mention the course title 'ITIL® Foundation'. Now I believe Google is smart enough to recognise that this symbol should not be included but it seems that for the specific criteria mentioned above, the MOZ bot isn't smart enough to recognise this, even though it recognises the keyword usage elsewhere. So my question is this. Would this constitute an issue in terms of ranking? Another question I have, is how significant are the gains with shorter URL's? For example, the URL to the page in question is: https://purplegriffon.com/courses/itil-training/itil-foundation-training/itil-foundation Would a URL such as below have a significant effect on SEO?: https://purplegriffon.com/courses/itil-foundation Thanks for your feedback.
Moz Pro | | PurpleGriffon0 -
A question on keywords that rank 51+
Good afternoon everyone. I wanted to pose a question to the group about keywords and the "on-page optimization - grade a page tool." I have a list of keywords that I am trying to rank for. Some of them are not ranked in the top 50, so on the keyword ranking tool it gives you the 51+ message in the rank column. For the items that are ranked I can try to improve them by looking at grade a page and typing in the URL and keyword. It will then give me a score and suggestions on how to improve it. With that being said, is there an easy way to find out which pages I should be optimizing those keywords which rank at 51+ for, besides typing the keywords in Google and seeing what URL it associates with the specific keyword? I hope the question above is clear.
Moz Pro | | trumpfinc0 -
Best On-Demand SERP Tool? - Need for Presentation This Week
Hi there, I have to run a SERP report for about 200 keywords for 5 different domain names for a competitor analysis. I cant add them as campaigns here because I need to data before Thursday. Does anyone have a good on-demand tool they recommend? I need to run a SERP on both Google.com & Bing (US only)
Moz Pro | | digitalimpulse0 -
How can I export from Followerwonk into a Twitter List?
I use Hootsuite but can't see anywhere in there or find any other tools to import a text file of Twitter usernames into a Twitter list. Does anyone know how?
Moz Pro | | benners0 -
Best way to rank an E-commerce site fast? [GOOGLE]
Does anyone have experience in ranking E-commerce sites? I'm trying to rank 1000+ subcategorys and 300+ products. All less than 1k Exacts some are just 20ish some go up to 1k. I've used Traffic Travis all keywords are ranked as [Easy] along with the tools here. My competition have 0 backlinks to there sites. Some sites have PR1-4 (only 2-3 per SERP rest are 0 so should be quite easy. However I'm up against Amazon and Google shopping for the products. Anyways what would you guys recommend me do?
Moz Pro | | InkCartridgesFast0 -
Do new Mozzers realise it takes effort to respond to their questions?
I see a lot of people asking questions and getting some pretty good responses, but the people who are responding, often do not get a thumbs up for their answer. If you are new and you are reading this, then you maybe do not understand that a thumbs up actually helps the person who gave their time to answer your question. There are several ways it helps, including giving feedback that the answer or the attempt to answer was actually useful, that you learned something or you appreciate the time it took to check your questions and give you feedback that you don't get in other forums, where you might be ignored for weeks or months. This is a collaborative forum and we are all here to learn something and to pass some of our knowledge to others who need it. Not every answer we give needs a thumbs up, but if you got something out of the answer, then, surely it is worth a second of your time to say "Thanks, that helped me" or "Yes, I agree with this"
Moz Pro | | loopyal13 -
Why would Open Site Explorer say some internal links are images when in the source code they're text?
Hi, All! I was looking at OSE for one of my client's site's pages, and I saw that all internal links were said to be images. I was pretty sure their menu was CSS, and all the links were text. So I did "fetch as Googlebot" and looked in the resultant code of one of the homepage to see the main navigation bar. The navigation link for one of those pages looked like this: `onmouseover="doMenu2on(this);">[](http://www.mysite.com/solution_sub.asp?ID=8)` [``` <code>![](images/arrow6.gif)Anchor Text Here</code> ```](http://www.mysite.com/solution_sub.asp?ID=8) ``` The nav link for a page that does show internal anchor text in OSE looks like this: onmouseover="doMenu2on(this);">[](http://www.mysite.com/solution.asp?ID=5) [```
Moz Pro | | debi_zyx
<code>Anchor Text Here</code> So there is an image in the link (it's the little arrow before the text to indicate a sub-category), but the anchor text comes right after it. Is Linkscape (and therefore potentially Google) seeing them as two different links to the same page and only counting the first? But it's all wrapped within the same <a></a>tags. Any ideas on if this is a bug in Linkscape, or a real issue, and what should be done? Thanks! Aviva``0 -
Hello I am new to SEO. Does SEOMoz have a to do list or can you send me one.
I just need to know what steps I should take to improve my site. My website url is : http://nuscopemed.com Thanks
Moz Pro | | NinaGraham0