Site property is verified for new version of search console, but same property is unverified in the old version
-
Hi all!
This is a weird one that I've never encountered before.
So basically, an admin granted me search console access as an "owner" to the site in search console, and everything worked fine. I inspected some URL's with the new tool and had access to everything. Then, when I realized I had to remove certain pages from the index it directed me to the old search console, as there's no tool for that yet in the new version. However, the old version doesn't even list the site under the "property" dropdown as either verified or unverified, and if I try to add it it makes me undergo the verification process, which fails (I also have analytics and GTM access, so verification shouldn't fail).
Has anyone experienced something similar or have any ideas for a fix? Thanks so much for any help!
-
That assuredly did used to be a problem and in these times I've found it hit and miss. Sometimes Google is able to reach the file directly and not be redirected, but sometimes Google still can't reach the file. In which case, you modify your .htaccess file to allow that one file (or URL) to be accessed via either protocol. I don't remember the exact rule but from memory, doing this isn't that hard
Failing that you should have access to this method:
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9008080?hl=en
Ctrl+F (find) for "DNS record" and expand that bit of info from Google. That version works really well and I think, it also gives you access to the new domain level property
The htaccess mod method may be more applicable for you. Certainly make the change via FTP and not via a CMS back-end. If you break the .htaccess and kill the site, and you only have the CMS back-end to fix it - which also becomes broken, you're stuck. Modding your .htaccess file should not break FTP unless you do something out of this world, crazy-insanely wrong (in-fact I'm not sure you can break FTP with your .htaccess file)
Another option, temporarily nullify the HTTP to HTTPS redirects in the .htaccess, verify, make your changes, then put the rule back on. This is a bad method because, in a few weeks Google will fail to reach the file and you will be unverified again. Also your site may have legal reasons it must, must be on HTTPS. Also allowing HTTP again may shake up and mess up your SERPs unless you act lightning fast (before Google's next crawl of your site)
Something like this might help: https://serverfault.com/questions/740640/disable-https-for-a-single-file-in-apache or these search results: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=disable+https+redirect+for+certain+file
Hope that helps
-
Thanks very much for your response. You are exactly right about the travails of the multiple properties, and I hadn't even thought about how the new domain level access should handle the multiple versions of each site (I'm still used to having to verify four separate properties).
In the end, you were exactly right; I just had to FTP the verification file once more and it worked immediately.
A question, though: if you were trying to verify a non secured protocol (http://) of a site that is https://, and you were for some reason unable to verify through GA or GTM, wouldn't uploading a verification file automatically create a secured protocol and therefore be invalid for verification? This is (thank goodness) purely theoretical, but it seems as though it would be a rough task which I'm sure happens periodically.
Thanks again for the insight. You were a great help!
-
I have no experience with this particular error but from the sounds of it, you will just have to re-verify and that's all that you can do. One thing to keep in mind is that different versions of the same site (HTTPS/WWW, HTTPS, HTTP/WWW, HTTP, any sub-domains) all count as separate websites in Search Console
The days of that being a problem are numbered as Google have come out with new domain-level properties for Search Console, but to verify those you need hosting level access so most people still aren't using that until Google can make the older verification methods applicable
What this does mean is that, if the URLs which you want to remove are for a different version of the site (which still counts as a separate property) then you still have to verify that other version of the site (maybe the pre-HTTPS version, or a version without WWW). If you have the wrong version of the property (site) registered in your GSC (which doesn't contain the URLs you want to remove) then you still need to register the old version
A common issue is when people move from HTTP to HTTPS, and they want to 'clean up' some of the old HTTP URLs and stop them from ranking (or at least, re-direct Google from the old property to the new one properly). They delete the HTTP version of the site from their GSC, but then they can't get back to do proper clean-up. In most instances Google still considers different site versions to be different sites in GSC. As mentioned this isn't a problem for some people now, soon it won't be a problem for anyone. But if you're looking at any kind of legacy account for sites that were built and verified up to a few months ago, the likelihood is you still have to re-verify other site versions
The new domain level properties may also have bugs in, where they defer back to the non-domain level properties for some stuff. You may have just found an example of that to be honest (but I can't confirm this)
I'd advise just doing what the UI tells you, it's really all you can feasibly do at this juncture
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Impression and click discrepancies in Search Console when filtering by date
I recently filtered query information by week and day. The impression and click totals were different depending on whether I looked at totals by a full weeks or by day. So for example, the impression and click totals when I choose a date range of monday-sunday are different when I look at impressions and clicks that same week by day and then add up the click and impression numbers to get a weekly total. At first i was expecting a slight difference since I know the data is heavily sampled but the totals were very different. Any explanations for this? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | znotes0 -
When migrating to https should you unlink the verified http version from my GA account?
Hi We had a new site design at the end of April and at the same time changed to https. Over the last 6 months, according to our analytics account the traffic has dramatically dropped especially from mobile. We were at 3607 new visitors from mobile in April and now 32! in September. Technically (other than page speed and some meta issues that I'm aware of) there doesn't initially appear to be anything wrong. I have just been into search console and notice that the old http site still has the GA code on it, could it be that this is why the data is showing such a massive drop? Should we have taken that off when we migrated the site? The same analytics account is also on the new site. Thanks in advance Janine
Reporting & Analytics | | Janine10 -
Is it possible to set up one of the Goal Conversions on Google Analytics for a different site?
We are in the process of a website migration and need to set up the conversions for the new site. What is the most effective way of doing this?
Reporting & Analytics | | Sable_Group0 -
Why do WMT's Search Analytics & GA's Real Time Keywords Differ?
I took a screen shot of the keywords from Google Analytics Real Time Keywords for Google / Organic. Then I waited a week and filtered Google Webmaster Tools' Search Analytics for queries with those keywords. None of them showed up. Why not? What I missing? Why do some keywords show up in Google Analytics RT for Google / Organic while most others are in Not Provided? I see WMT's Search Analytics says that it doesn't always show queries that "are made a very small number of times or those that contain personal or sensitive information." But most of my queries are like that. Anybody know any patterns / criteria that leads WMT to show some but not others? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | GilReich0 -
New website server code errors
I launched a new website at www.cheaptubes.com and have recovered my search engine rankings as well after penguin & panda devestation. I'm continuing to improve the site but moz analytics is saying I have 288 medium issues and i see the warning "45% of site pages served 302 redirects during the last crawl". I'm not sure how to fix this. I'm on WP using Yoast SEO so all the 301's I did are 301's not 302's. I do have SSL, could it be Http vs Https?
Reporting & Analytics | | cheaptubes0 -
Finding an Explanation for a Massive Spike in Organic Search Traffic
Hi, I watch analytics on a website (for a friend's business) that is reasonably stagnant, which just experienced a massive spike in search traffic for no explainable reason. The organic search engine traffic had always been steady, but about two months ago, organic search traffic started rising slowly. I checked OSE & a few other tools, but couldn't find any massive source of gained links or other explanations - just the usual occasional blog post about the company. I got in touch with my friend to see if maybe they'd gone with a competitor or something else, but he also had no idea (and even if he wasn't being honest with me, we still should've been able to spot links or social metrics or something!) Then, yesterday, their organic search traffic just tripled. The crazy thing is, it's not from one keyword: Every search term, and (not provided) essentially went up 200-400%. And I have no freaking idea why. No large gain of links. No website editing. The only possible explanation I thought up is maybe one of their competitors got knocked out, but I doubt that would cause such a stratospheric rise. So figured I'd turn to y'all. Any ideas on what might be causing such wonderful results? Anyone have any good tips on figuring out why a website could all of a sudden be doing incredibly? Analytics chart is below for the curious, and thanks in advance for any ideas / tips! nQHrscw.png
Reporting & Analytics | | FlynnZaiger0 -
Best way to measure local search keyword rank
I have several clients that have a regional or local presence and want to track their rankings for various keywords, but only in the areas they are located in. What are the best ways to track keyword rank in specific locations or regions of the US?
Reporting & Analytics | | TheURLdr0 -
Overall site traffic - 3 quick questions
3 things : 1. Does Google factor in overall site traffic in rankings? So for 2 sites, all other things being pretty much equal, the one with higher traffic will be listed higher? 2. Does this logically imply that sites with lower traffic overall face an uphill struggle to be ranked highly??? 3. As an extension to this, would it be true to say that by increasing site traffic, say with Google Adwords or other online or offiline or whatever advertising, that might help get higher SEO rankings??? Thanks so much for your responses. This forum is great!
Reporting & Analytics | | inhouseninja0