High PR networks look like they are gaining traction - and working!
-
Let me put a disclaimer here that I do not use high PR networks in any of my seo endeavors. That being said, they have always looked attractive - especially post panda where in content links from high pr websites are valuable.
I run seo campaigns for a large lot of websites & have been noticing my competition creeping past me who are using links from these networks to increase their positions for hard to attain keywords.
Has anyone here had experience building links using these types of networks? It looks like they are under google's radar for now & are a great way to get some powerful links to your site. Any thoughts on if google will catch onto these types of links if they are properly protected (limited footprint, revolving links, unique content, etc.)?
It's tough not to be at least interested in networks like this b/c of the results they provide.
-
I want to say that I 100% agree with Ryan, but I will play devil's advocate.
There is a time and place for everything, including black hat SEO. If your goals are well-aligned with short term success, then black hat SEO is probably the cheapest and most effective option you have. To me, link building isn't an ethical consideration, but a business decision. If black hat tactics fit my goals, or my clients' goals, and everybody is aware of the risk involved and all of the options at play, then why not?
There's no doubt about it - these are paid links, and as Ryan said, they will eventually be addressed by Google's Webspam team, and when that happens, you're going to lose a large share of your link portfolio (at best) or receive a penalty (at worst). But there is no Matt Cutts fairy that haunts black hatters at night, preying on them as they dream of paid links and content farms. It's economics, plain and simple. I don't know what industry you are in or what your exact situation is, so it would be presumptuous of me to completely rule out black hat SEO strategies.
That said, I've yet to encounter a situation where I've needed to resort to black hat tactics, for personal projects or client work. Just sayin...
-
Do you feel something like this, if done right, will be "busted" by Google?
Of course it will. It's only a matter of time.
Many people refer to Google as a nameless, faceless group. People often refer to "the government" in a similar manner. The Google spam team, headed by Matt Cutts, is a highly educated, experienced and savvy group of people. They are also very patient. Time is on their side. When they find a violation, there is no rush for them to quickly take action. They could choose to study sites for months to gather further information.
So how does one person or group run these 35-55 sites in a cost effective manner? The only possibility is all these sites need to be offered by one host. Each host is assigned their own C block, but some companies offer "seo hosting". I don't know for sure how it works but I imagine they pay for rack space to have their servers hosted with dozens of ISPs, thereby acquiring numerous C blocks.
Google can easily open one account with any one of these companies, capture all the IPs, then effectively take down every site on the network. The entire idea of "seo hosting" is to manipulate search engine results, so it is definitely a black hat technique.
You are always welcome to report any paid links or other information to Google. They do listen. It's important your report is not a "this site is outranking me and I don't like it" type of report. I have read Google's forums and it seems MANY of the complaints take that exact tone. You need to offer very specific, verifiable reasons as to why you believe the links are a violation of Google's policies. Your suspicions and feelings are not of value and will be received with the standard "thank you for your report and we will investigate the matter" and that will probably be the end of it. But if you can offer a thorough, logical analysis, then you are making it easy for the Spam Team to investigate the issue.
-
Sorry, I should have been more specific with my initial question. A high PR network is a privately owned network of websites each hosted on different class c ip addresses, with unique or private whois information, no website footprint between the sites (the html structure / layout of each site is different), and all reflecting good PR ranging from 3-7 with no historical large fluctuations in PR.
Owners of these networks will sell in-content homepage text link advertisements for a monthly fee ranging from $80 per month to $150 per month. A network usually consists of 35-55 websites and the link to your site using your targeted keyword would be made available on each site, usually with a unique content "blurb" on each website of about 150 words. If you stop payment, your link is removed from the entire network.
This is a very "black hat" technique to attain rankings but it appears to be working well for huge serp gains. Do you feel something like this, if done right, will be "busted" by Google? It's not fair to engage in ethical SEO and be circumvented by the black hatters!
-
Can you be more specific about what you mean by "high PR networks"? Are you talking about Web 2.0 websites like Squidoo? Or microsites / linkwheels? I'm a bit confused.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I work with current site or start a new site with more keywords?
I have been working with my site for some time. Sadly, I am moving lower and lower in ranking. I am wondering if I should just transfer my site to a new URL (this time including keywords). I don't understand the whole disavow link thing. I hired someone about 2 years ago, when I lost my ranking due to malicious software. Well, it turns out that, she submitted my link to weird sites that I don't even know what they are. It is like sites with thousands of websites just listed. Things have never been half of what they were and I am really just growing frustrated. I understand that having an a URL for awhile is helpful, but I appear to have lost many of my good linking sites. Any thoughts?
Link Building | | tiffany11030 -
Total Exact Match Anchor Text Percentage or a Few High Quality Exact Match Backlinks, which is better?
Hello, I was wondering if anyone could help me. I am trying to rank a web page for a competitive regional search term. Upon inspecting all the competitors’ backlinks they appear to using an overly high exact match anchor text to rank on the first page for this keyword. Somewhere in the region of 15 – 55% exact match anchor text. So the question is what does big G provide a heavier weighting for, A.) The total percentage of exact match anchor text for all your backlinks, until it reaches the point of over optimization. A higher percentage up to about 60% will help you rank in the top 3. Meaning I should change a 1,000+ backlinks on multiple domains to the exact match anchor text. B.) Or just a few backlinks with the exact match anchor text but from really high quality domains with a ‘Majestic SEO’ Trust and Citation Flow above 40. Any help would be appreciated, exact match anchor text is meant not to work but it still does.
Link Building | | tomfifteen0 -
How is this site ranked so high on Google?
How on earth does "southeastasiatravelblog.com" rank No 3 on Google for "Asian travel blog"? It's just a collection of basically PR type travel articles. I have profiled its backlinks using Open Site Explorer and 71% of them are dead. The rest seem to be mostly "run of site" links from his other websites, which aren't particularly travel or Asia related. The highest PA for a live backlink to this site is a link from within his own website (PA 27, DA 15). Most of his backlink anchors are URLs and look fairly EMD to me. The site has few shares (6 FB shares, 7 FB likes, 1 Twitter share). So what makes it rank so highly for this phrase? My site I'm comparing against is "travelnasia.com" which is a fairly new domain with a DA 23, PA 31 and about the same amount of shares but far fewer backlinks at this stage because I recently changed URLs to shake off what might have been an algorithm penalty from Google. I am now receiving a growing level of Google search traffic again, but it's a long climb back. I'm looking at strategies, which is why I was checking out the site above.
Link Building | | Gavin.Atkinson0 -
Our anchor-text profile is natural, but looks spammy, what to do?
We are a site with about 12 directories, each one in a sub-folder and previously had their own URL which we merged together for increased branding efforts. When I was analyzing our anchor-text profile of our study abroad directory, it seems that the anchor-text profile is heavy on your key keywords, such as 'Study Abroad' and then some branded. When I say heavy, I am talking 88% are 'study abroad'; followed by 4% are branded, and 2% are branded the old URL that is 301'd to the new subfolder. We have never bought links nor have we really had a strong link building strategy. I am currently thinking of disavowing the links with low DA and are part of the heavily used (study abroad) keywords. Is this a good idea? What should we do to show that these are natural links?
Link Building | | GoAbroadKP0 -
What do the "best" backlink profiles look like, in terms of percentages from quality content, bookmarks, social media, directories, etc?
I recognize that there is no such thing as one ideal link profile, per se, but I am curious, if you sampled 100 high authority sites, what would their inbound links look like on average, broken out by source type? Some sites would have a ton of social sharing due to their funny pop-cultural content, while others might be quoted and linked in context for their brilliant insights. A very technical resource might gain a lot of links from forum discussions. If I can complete this exercise on my own, I welcome your advice on how to do that with OSE or the like.
Link Building | | withoutthestress0 -
Exact match domains still work??
I'm sure this has been asked and it also has been answered but I'd like some insight from another SEO as to why this site -> <cite>www dot newhomesglasgow.co.uk/ </cite> is ranking on the first page for the keyword(you guessed it) 'new homes in glasgow' OSE shows about 4 backlinks. Is it just the content on the page(that's jammed with keywords) and the matching URL? Any feedback would be appreciated 🙂
Link Building | | DanHill0 -
When searching for high quality links, in a niche area such as real estate, does page rank factor into a search or is page / domain authority the most important factor?
After having employed many different methods for finding good link partners I am now finding it more difficult to reach out and identify good quality links for a niche area such as real estate. Does page rank factor into the search much or is it better to focus on page / domain authority as a major factor?
Link Building | | casper4340 -
Do you get linkjuice from a dofollow redirect (Like Yahoo! Article links)?
I've recently hired a company that publishes my press releases for me. One of them is on Yahoo! Finance. When I went to the Yahoo article, my keyword link was dofollow, but had a very long Yahoo redirect link instead of just a direct link to my page. Am I still getting link juice out of this Yahoo redirect?
Link Building | | Shawn1240