Anything to bear in mind when setting up a related 'family' of sites with linking between them?
-
We've spun out content from a single finance related news/analysis site (running for about 2 years) into several topic-specific sites on individual topics (markets, investment etc etc). They're all on the same server, use the same CMS (using a multisite setup), and share largely the same codebase, though obviously with customisations for the site names, and we've made sure each has a distinct identity.
At the bottom of each page, we're linking to 'latest posts on the network', aggregating the 5 most recent posts from all the sites and displaying them in the footer. We've obviously made sure the actual content is completely unique on each site though.
Just wondering if anyone has any tips about ensuring we don't dilute our SEO too much. and how to maximise our effectiveness?
-
Thanks Ryan - that's great to know. We'll definitely bear both of those in mind!
-
There are only two concerns I would express from a search engine perspective:
1. Be sure not to perform any black techniques, intentionally or unintentionally, on any of the sites. Your sites are related and a penalty may affect multiple sites.
2. Be aware of any content which may be duplicated between your sites.
-
Thanks guys - point taken on the fact that the links won't be worth a great deal - the actual intention with spinning out the sites was to serve quite distinct users, rather than to try anything black-hat, and obviously we'd expect the site value to decrease by at least the amount of any content moved off the site. The topics are pretty distinct, so the feeling is that over time, they'll each be able to build up value in those distinct areas.
I guess the real question (and I could have phrased this better!) was whether there's anything else we should be particularly careful to avoid? We're fine with engines realising that all the content is from the same source, and it's pretty well advertised all over the sites, but the last thing we want to do is take a big SEO hit beyond that initial one of just shifting a couple of posts around to have a few things on the other sites after launch?
-
We've spun out content from a single finance related news/analysis site (running for about 2 years) into several topic-specific sites on individual topics. Anything to bear in mind when setting up a related 'family' of sites with linking between them?
Yes... the links between these sites will be nearly worthless.
-
Since your sites are on the server they will be recognized as a network of sites and the links will be devalued.
From a search engine's perspective, the value behind a link is when it represents an independent endorsement of your website. It is basically a "vote" for your site. When you link to your own site, the vote should not count.
Search engines will examine your site's content, code, IP address and other factors in an effort to determine if your site's links are independent in nature, or part of a network of sites as in your case. There is not a white hat means to create a network of sites on related financial topics as in your case. From a search engine's perspective, the desire is for you to make a single site and provide all your content at that location. They reward this action with increasing DA for your site. The idea of creating many micro sites is not ideal for SEs nor users, and the effect is to litter the internet with many small sites.
The SEO methods used on the blackhat side for micro sites is to scatter the sites across different IPs, change the coding and other efforts designed to manipulate search engines view of these sites. Some results are effective, others are not. Most people who are successful at performing this type of manipulation are only getting away with things for a period of time until they are caught. It's a shell game.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Other sites linking to our site through sitewide footers
Hello, We have other sites linking to our site through images in sitewide footers, resulting in a link from every page of each site. Those sites are not owned by us and they decided to link to us on their own. They usually link to us as their "sponsor" or "partner", sponsor as in sponsor of some event and partner as in we sometimes work together on joint initiatives. I've searched Moz forum and other articles, but haven't been able to find an answer to this question. We'd like to make sure Google doesn't consider it to be spammy and we don't get any sort of penalty. Should we ask them not to link to us through those images in a sitewide footer or ask them to simply add "nofollow"? We don't want to remove those links if they are not considered to be harmful and removing them will hurt our DA/PA.
Link Building | | marynau0 -
Is there value of consistently getting a link from a high DA site?
Is there value in consistently getting a link from a high DA sites? For example, consistently posting on a blog monthly rather then only doing it once and getting a link/being done with it. Could you list the pros of consistently getting links on high DA sites?
Link Building | | calf0 -
I have links coming from spammy sites that DO NOT exist anymore... Disavow or not?
Hi There !!! I´m cleaning the link profile of one of our sites and making the typical analysis I have found the following scenario: All SEO tools that helped me to gather the data (WMT, opensite, majestic) are showing me that I have links coming from spammy sites that actually are not online any more. In other words, the spammy site where the link is coming is not alive (when I try to check the page itself I´m having a 404 or domain expired). My main question is… Should I disavow these domains links? or should I simply ignore them? We got an unnatural penalty and we are doing the whole proccess (checking sites, contacting, etc….). Many Thanks for your help
Link Building | | AutoEurope0 -
Are these links to my site bad?
I am the owner of two diffrent ecommerce sites. Lets call them A and B. Site A is a larg site with ower 5000 pages. In the footer off site A there is a link to site B. Is it bad for site B to get 5000 links (to homepage) from site A? Should i remove these types off links? Thanks for your help!
Link Building | | Spletnafuzija0 -
Advisable to pay for a link from a highly reputed site in same domain?
Is it okay to pay for a link if the site is a very highly reputed (PR4) one in the same domain as your site? Thanks
Link Building | | EricMoore0 -
Pursuing Links on Sites You Have a Link From
Is it a bad idea to spend resources to get a second link from a site that already links to you? It seems like the marginal value of each additional link is much smaller than the first link.
Link Building | | ProjectLabs0 -
Has anyone seen positive results from using Submiteaze to submit to directories? I know an SEM agency that uses it for clients' link building campaigns, but I don't know if it is worth buying. Are there better alternatives?
I would like to start a link building initiative at my company for a new website, and would like to know if the value of the links built using Submiteaze would be worth the money.
Link Building | | pbhatt0