Too many on page links
-
I'm having trouble interpreting this data. It says several of my blog pages have too many on page links, some as high as 140 and there is no example of a blog post that they are referring to. What am I missing? I never post more than a handful (5-7) in our 600-1000wd blogs. When I drill down, it doesn't give me very much information except "Found over 41 years ago" off to the right. When I click on the "too many on page links" URL, it provides a long list of website pages that are renamed with the blog name. huh?
A lot of this stuff isn't very intuitive, SEOMoz.
-
Tried to set up my campaign to look at the root domain, but it said that my website is set up as a subdomain automatically converted this step of the process to "subdomain".
I believe this would be due to either the root domain being redirected to the subdomain, or there not being any content on the root domain address. If another mozzer does not offer a definitive answer, try contacting the SEOmoz help desk for more information.
When you say "choose" one version of my site, do you mean as far as what SEOMoz crawls? Or are you suggesting I make a change to the site itself?
The site itself. You have one website and it's content should only be available via 1 address. Think of it this way. You can create a website at the address "mysite.com". Next, you create another site at the URL "www.mysite.com" which is an exact duplicate of the "mysite.com" site. This is exactly what you have done. You can even repeat the process further and create subdomains such as "www1.mysite.com". Each subdomain is a duplicate of the main domain and causes confusion for users and search engines alike. Resolve this confusion. Choose ONE way to present your site and remain consistent.
The blog is, I believe, set up as a subdomain (with www.blogs.aerohive.com) and it is hosted by a third-party.
The URL "blogs.aerohive.com" is indeed hosted elsewhere, but the URL "www.blogs.aerohive.com" is hosted at the same location as your main site. It is a mirror of your main site. Remove this subdomain.
I am trying to understand what was set up correctly or incorrectly within SEOMoz and what can fix and what I can fix with my website
Presently there are two major issues which need to be resolved. Both issues are with your website itself, not the SEOmoz tools. If you have managed hosting, the easiest step is to call or open a ticket with your hosting provider and make two requests:
1. Add a 301 to redirect all non-www traffic to it's www equivalent
2. Delete the www.blogs.aerohive.com subdomain
You should be able to copy and paste the above two requests and paste it into a ticket. Your hosting provider should completely understand what actions are necessary.
-
Thanks Sha,
There seems to be a consensus on what issue is, although I asked some extra questions in my reply above to Ryan. Kind of confusing. The blog should be setup as a subdomain, right?
Amanda
-
Thanks Brian - there seems to be a consensus on what issue is, although I asked some extra questions in my reply above to Ryan. Kind of confusing.
Amanda
-
This was very helpful (as were the other two replies) so I am hoping you can help clarify how I can get this addressed. (going with list format to simplify):
1- I tried to set up my campaign to look at the root domain, but it said that my website is set up as a subdomain automatically converted this step of the process to "subdomain".
2- SEOMoz Pro did tell me at some point in the setup process about what you mentioned above, which is that there are two versions of my site. This may have been at the setup point where it converted root domain to subdomain, though I can't recall.
3- When you say "choose" one version of my site, do you mean as far as what SEOMoz crawls? Or are you suggesting I make a change to the site itself?
4- The blog is, I believe, set up as a subdomain (with www.blogs.aerohive.com) and it is hosted by a third-party. I set up the dedicated blog campaign as a subdomain, but had some difficulty with it as well. Not sure if that was correctly set up or not.
Basically I am trying to understand what was set up correctly or incorrectly within SEOMoz and what can fix and what I can fix with my website so that I can better analyze it here (and obviously get search engine approval as the ultimate goal).
Thanks,
Amanda
-
Hi Amanda,
I don't think the problem is with the tool. The tool is simply reporting what the crawler sees.
Since you have said "an actual blog page, which I am attempting to analyze as a dedicated campaign for my blog" I am thinking that you have set up a separate campaign for what you think of as the "actual blog" and designated the campaign as a subdomain?
If this is the case, then presumably, you also have a campaign set up for what you think of as the main site. So, as Ryan and Brian mentioned, you have two copies of all content in your blog, but it exists in two different locations on your server, so is being seen by two different campaigns with different URL's.
The 100 links per page is a recommended rule of thumb to protect usability and avoid degrading the value of individual links on the page. So, as both Ryan and Brian advised, it is much more important right now to deal with the duplication issues on your site.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Ouch, yea I see. I would definitely get those canonical (www / non-www / www.blog) issues resolved first, then worry about the links
Brian
-
It seems a subdomain was created for your site and errors were made in the process.
If your main URL is www.areohive.com and you decide to offer a blog as a subdomain, the recommended name would be blog.aerohive.com. Your main site is located on the "www" subdomain and the blog would be offered on the "blog" subdomain. It is unnecessary and a bit confusing to keep the www prefix with another subdomain as happened with http://www.blogs.aerohive.com/.
Your subdomain is currently set up as a mirror of content for your main site. Both URLs you shared are valid URLs with identical pages displayed and a header code of 200 is returned. This duplication should be resolved immediately.
Upon further checking, I just realized your site is set up with a blogs.aerohive.com subdomain, and it does show unique content. Therefore the necessary step is to remove the www.blogs.aerohive.com subdomain.
Another major SEO issue involving duplication is your site is also available in both the www and non-www form of the URL. http://aerohive.com and http://www.aerohive.com are both valid URLs which display content and 200 header response codes. This issue should also be fixed immediately. Your site has backlinks to both versions of the URL.
Choose one version of your URL, the www or non-www version, then be consistent. 301 redirect the unused version of the URL to the main URL. This step will consolidate your backlinks and improve your ranking. Next, review your entire site to ensure all links consistently use the chosen URL format. Also check your social sites and signatures to ensure they are updated as well.
Once the above major issues are resolved, we can then loop back to the linking issue. Relatively speaking, it is a much less important issue.
-
Hi Brian,
I think you are right, but I think there is something wrong with the way this tool is analyzing my pages. I explained what I think is going on in Ryan's thread above. Like maybe this is an analysis of the website page (which I have analyzed in a separate campaign) vs. an actual blog page, which I am attempting to analyze as a dedicated campaign for my blog.
amanda
-
I think what's happening, and I don't understand this part especially (although I eluded to it originally), but I am analyzing my blog, the "too many links" is under my blog campaign, but when it names a "page" it is actually a website page renamed with the blog title. I will post an example but it will come up as a bad link for you I think.
1- I think that perhaps I have this campaign set up wrong? So it isn't analyzing the pages correctly, or the right pages
-
The issue here is likely that your blog template and plugins combined are creating a situation where there are lots of links on the page to begin with (navas, footer, archives etc. etc.). As Ryan said, all of those other links on the page that are not in your post (page) count too, so when you add a few more inline in your post (or page) you are pushed over the top.
Depending on what type of CMS you use, getting the number links on the page down is probably going to involve some kind of change (template/plugins) to remove some site wide links you don't really need. Once you do that, you should see that 140 number go away (or at least way down).
Side note, it was reported elsewhere that the "Found over 41 years ago" thing is a bug, you should open a help ticket and let the staff here know you were affected by it.
Brian
-
If you can offer a link to the page, we can be a lot more helpful.
Based on what you shared all I can offer is the software looks at the <a>tags on the page to locate links, and apparently 140 were located. Links include all the links on the page include the site's navigation links, footer links, sidebar links, image links, social sharing links, etc.</a>
<a>You may also use the "Highlight Links or Text" icon located on the MOZbar to locate various links on a given page.</a>
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Having 200 internal links on a page...is always bad?
I have an e-commerce site with a very important page that have over than 200 links...I have read in various sites that is bad to have too much links in page...what do you think? This is one of the most important pages in my site = general product page. Thank you!
On-Page Optimization | | Maximilian210 -
Should I link G+ and social accounts to internal pages?
Hi Gang, We are a multi-state law firm (Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico) that is looking to increase ranking for Michigan and New Mexico for 2015. (Michigan and New Mexico used to exist as subdomains under 2keller.com but have now been incorporated as pages under the main domain.) The question is whether or not we link directly to what we call the "main state pages" from various accounts like G+, FB, Yellow Pages, Yelp, etc.? For example, should we link from our New Mexcio G+ page to our New Mexico main page, or should it be linked to the main domain at 2keller.com where our general branding is on display? I seem to remember somewhere seeing a Whiteboard Friday or some other forum in which Rand had spoke to something similar. I believe he advised AGAINST trying to control the "user experience" for instances like these, but I can't locate same. I understand that clients/customers are looking for our main brand, but it would seem to be the better experience to get users in state specific locales to their state specific page. Am I thinking wrong about this? Thanks in advance! Wayne
On-Page Optimization | | Wayne760 -
Home page or landing page?
Hello, I want to ask a question related to that - Should we put keywords in the home page title if we wish to position another landing page better for particular keywords? I have read in one website about SEO that it's good the main keywords of your website to be positioned in homepage title also. f.e. Let's say we have website about web-design and our company is named Company Ltd. The title of the home page is "Company Ltd. - Web design, SEO, etc" We have also another inner page named "Web design | Company Ltd.". So should we leave the first page name only "Company Ltd." and the landing page's name "Web design | Company Ltd." . I don't know if they both have the same keyword in their title they won't compete with each other.
On-Page Optimization | | HrishikeshKarov0 -
Does Google follow link path or url path when it comes to passing link juice
I noticed something with one of my sites and now I am thinking I made a boo boo (I think) here is what I have On my homepage I have 5 links Link1
On-Page Optimization | | cbielich
Link2
Link3
Link4
Link5 Links 1 - 4 go to a page and stops there. So my URL structure is www.mydomain.com/Link1
www.mydomain.com/Link2
www.mydomain.com/Link3
www.mydomain.com/Link4 So naturally my link juice passes down to these links evenly. Link5 also goes to another page, but on that page I have more links that go down further. www.mydomain.com/Link5 -> more links On page Link5 I have links that go to more pages, BUT my URL structure for these pages go like this Lets say on Link5 page I have another link that goes to AnotherLink1, AnotherLink2 and AnotherLink3 When you click on those links it takes you to those pages just fine, BUT my URL structure is like this www.mydomain.com/AnotherLink1
www.mydomain.com/AnotherLink2
www.mydomain.com/AnotherLink3 Basically I put all the "AnotherLink1-3" in the root directory as well. My question is concerning how Google passes the link Juice from my pages and if it is passing based on the path of the links and how they point to those pages, or do they pass link juice based on the URL structure. So since "AnotherLink1-3" is located in the root directory am I dividing my link juice from my home page to all the links as well based on the URL structure. For instance www.mydomain.com/Link1
www.mydomain.com/Link2
www.mydomain.com/Link3
www.mydomain.com/Link4
www.mydomain.com/Link5
www.mydomain.com/AnotherLink1
www.mydomain.com/AnotherLink2
www.mydomain.com/AnotherLink3 Do I need to change my path for Link5 page to www.mydomain.com/Link5/AnotherLink1
www.mydomain.com/Link5/AnotherLink2
www.mydomain.com/Link5/AnotherLink3 ?0 -
Dynamic pages on a static html pages websiite
Good evening everybody. I am new on SeoMoz that I find very helpful in my work. I am not a web developer so please excuse me if my technical language is poor.I have an issue that maybe you can help me to solve. I work for a company who has a website, which is old and very well positioned on google for the most important keywords for the field of the company I work for (dentistry). It is a website made some years ago and it's made of static html pages.I would like to add a section in my website where I can post articles, like a blog (I think of a wordpress-style website) with daily posts (so with a dynamic page). Is there a way to do this without modifying the structure of the website and without losing pages, urls and ranking? We're on the first google page for many keywords of interests in our city and it would be a great damage for us to lose those positions.Thank you very much!
On-Page Optimization | | adec0 -
Is it ok to point internal links to index.html home page rather than full www
I thought I saw this somewhere on SEOmoz before but I was so busy by the time I got around to work on my SEO on my site, I realized I have this happening and can't recall if it is a problem which takes away from my ranking. If my www.website.com is ranking well but I have internal menu links pointing to www.website.com/index.html instead of www.website.com will that take away from my www.website.com rankings? Should I change all my menu links that point to /index.html to the full website url path www.website.com ?
On-Page Optimization | | Twinbytes0 -
To Reduce (pages)... or not to Reduce?
Our site has a large Business Directory with millions of pages. For examples' sake, let's say it's a directory of Restaurants. Each Restaurant has 4 pages on the site, each tied together through a row of tabs across the top of the page: Tab 1 - Basic super 7 info - name, location, contact info Tab 2 - Restaurant menu Tab 3 - Restaurant reviews Tab 4 - Photos of food The Tab 1 page generates 95% of our traffic, and 90% of conversions. The conversion rate on Tab 2 - Tab 4 pages is 6 - 10x greater than Tab 1 conversions. Total Conversions from search queries on menus, reviews and food are 20% higher than are conversions resulting from searches on restaurant name & info alone. We're working with a consultant on a redesign, who wants to consolidate the 4 pages into one. Their advice is to focus on making a better page, featuring all of the content, sacrifice a little organic traffic but make up any losses by improving conversion. My counterpoint is that we shouldn't scrap the Tab 2-4 pages just because they have lower traffic - we should make the pages BETTER. The content we display is thin, and we have plenty of data we could expose to make the pages more robust. By consolidating it will also be hard to optimize a page for people searching for name/location AND menu AND reviews AND photos. We're asking that one page to do too much, and it's likely we will see diminished search volume for queries on menu, reviews and food. I think the decline will be much more significant than the consultant estimates. The consultant says there will be little change to organic traffic. since Tab 1 already generates 95% of traffic. Through basic math, they're saying the risk is a 5% decline in organic traffic. Further, they see little chance of queries for menu, reviews, and food declining because most of those queries tend to send people too the home page or Tab 1 page anyway. Finally, the designer of the new wireframes admitted that potential organic traffic risks were not taken into consideration when they recommended consolidating the pages. I sincerely appreciate your thoughts and consideration! Trisha
On-Page Optimization | | lzhao0 -
Link cannibalization
My on page report card gives me an "A" in every category but "link cannibalization". The key word is I am targeting is "home care". It says my links to "home care blog" and "in home care agency locator" are cannibalizing my home page. Am I indeed causing problems by using these modified versions of the keyword? Also is it okay to have the link "home care" for the home link in the main navigation bar? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | mmaes0