How to detect which is a bad link ?
-
Hi..
Our Link Builders at office collects the lists for directories, social bookmarking websites and press releases, article directories.
But Im not sure, which all are good links, etc, since I dont get time to check.
Is there a way, I can train them to know, which is a bad link, so they can just ignore that link ?
-
This is a great tool, it will show you not only the sites they are linking to, but the sites that the sites they are linking to are linking to, if that makes sense.lol
This has false negatives, like "sussex" gets flagged for "sex" so you need to read between the lines, but it's extremely valuable to tell at a glance if the site you are interested in getting a link from is linking to bad places such as adult, meds or casino sites.
-
Great! Now, I have an idea to clean our lists then. Thanks.
-
How to detect which is a bad link ?
The first step is defining what makes a link "bad". Everyone can agree a link which violates a search engine's terms and has a risk of getting the site penalized is bad. Your link builder should be intimately familiar with Google's Technical and Quality Guidelines.Any site which violates those guidelines should be avoided.
Another thought is links which do not add any positive value to a site should be avoided. One strategy is to install Google's toolbar and any page with a PR of 0 should not be used. There is a strong change the site has been penalized. Toolbar PR is updated only once every 3-4 months so it is not a great tool, but it can still help.
If you use the SEOmoz search you will find there are articles which relate to link building published almost on a monthly basis. A good WBF on the topic: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-link-farming
In short, you know what good links look like. Links from reputable sites such as the New York Times, Time Magazine, government organizations like the FDA, authentic colleges such as UCLA, etc are great links to earn. You also know what bad links like. Link exchanges, paid links, penalized sites, spammy sites, low quality (most) link directories, etc. are bad links.
The challenge link builders face is their job is to build links but quality is always going to have a measure of subjectivity to it. A link builder is always seeking to boost their numbers, meanwhile if you do a bad job of link building you can cause a site to be penalized and removed from Google's index. You can also cause a situation where a lesser penalty is incurred meaning only particular pages or links are penalized. The client may lose a lot of traffic and not even realize it because the impact is not site wide. If you do realize the error, it can be difficult to fix because in many cases the link can't simply be removed so you need to bury it with good links (i.e. build 10 good links for every bad one).
Treat link building like marketing. When a link builder reaches out to the community and becomes a genuine part of it by becoming known in a positive manner, they have the opportunity to earn quality links. Spending time looking for blogs which do not nofollow comments, forums which offer followed links, article directories, free directories, link exchanges, footer links, etc. is mostly a complete waste of time. Links of such low quality that OSE cannot see them are mostly a waste of time. Clients want links which can potentially improve their traffic, and the link you just earned from a PR8 chinese web blog who allow followed comments isn't going to help with that goal. Google already decided before you found the blog site the link was of no value, but the link builder still builds the link and pats themselves on the back for their good "find', the client pays for the link, but receives no value.
How to detect a bad link? Put on your marketing hat and ask yourself if a search engine did not exist, is this a link I desire for traffic? If the answer is yes, it is a good link. If the answer is no, there is a strong likelihood you should look elsewhere for your link.
-
The easiest thing to do is to download a SEO plugin for Firefox or Chrome. SEOmoz actually has a really good. Once that is downloaded and they start looking into good sites to link build with, you need to explain to them the importance of quality. A lot of companies are not putting their time into finding quality and it will eventually down grade you. Maybe for a short term it will do well, but in the long run it will not. The ones I look at are inbound links, domain authority, linking domains, and domain trust. I make sure that they are all good. After I find a good site, I make sure that the site has follow links. If you have Chrome, there's an awesome really easy tool called SEO for chrome that allows you to click a button and it will highlight those that are not follow links. I have this permanently on. THe last thing I check is that the page where my link is going to go also has a good page authority/page rank. This is also really important.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links warning, Should I do something?
Hi, I got: "Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative links pointing to pages on this site. Some links may be outside of the webmaster’s control, so for this incident we are taking targeted action on the unnatural links instead of on the site’s ranking as a whole. " I don't see any dropping at rankings, could the best solution here to be, just to leave everything as it is and be more careful with the link building in the future? Or is there a danger that Google gives further penalties if I don't act on this one do something? I am little afraid that if I start removing links, my rankings will drop, even though they have remained same if don't do anything? Any help is appreciated.
Link Building | | pok3rplay3r0 -
Sitewide links
Hi there, We operate about a dozen websites that are part of the same parent company. All these websites are in the same vertical, and link among each other in the footer section. The anchor for each link is the brand name, so we are merely doing it to show what other products the parent company has to offer. My question is: do you think this is still advisable, or it might trigger a penalty? Also, what would you choose between: Sitewide footer links from each site to the other sites. A single footer link on the homepage from each site to the other sites. A presentation page on each website, one click away from the homepage, which presents the company's other websites. Thanks.
Link Building | | propertyshark0 -
What is the number of links do you require your link builder to attain each week or month? What is a reasonable goal?
Hello Mozzers... I would like to get a survey or feedback from other Mozzers who owns an SEO company or manages / hire link builders. **What is the average number of links does your link builder need to attain per week or month? what is their goal? ** I understand quality over quantity but I want to make sure there is a reasonable average to provide them goals and something to achieve on. Of course reward them more if they exceed or get .edu links. What do you institute? What do you think is fair and achievable per website? PS. There is no right or wrong answers here. I am looking for a measurable answer not subjectable. Again just gathering MEASURABLE GOALS.
Link Building | | ChatterBuzzMedia0 -
Link removel
When removing links should I be worried about bad links from websites that have already been deindexd from Google or should I think that since it is not in these index any more it cant do harm?
Link Building | | Joseph-Green-SEO0 -
For a new site, does it matter which sites I get back links from first? I.e., are the first back links more important than later ones?
I've heard that when a site is new, the sources from which it gets its first back links are very important -- that the early links are more important for ranking than later links. Is this true. If so, what would be some good places to get these very first links? Thanks.
Link Building | | sigma3x0 -
Buying links
I have 2 websites to pay monthly to gain links from, number 1 is on the homepage of a directory, it has a PA of 90 and DA of 88.
Link Building | | myloseo
the link will be on the right hand side along with 55 other featured sites.
these links are there throughout the whole site. number 2 is from a website with 20 max sponsored links on a page and will be one of the sub pages on the site with a PA of 74. How valuable if any would these links be? My current pa on the site i wish to send the links to is 26 Can i expect my PA to go up by much? Also i currently have 317 links from 7 root domains on my site will this effect the rank of the paid links? Thanks in advance0 -
Removal of dodgy links
Examining the backlink profile of a new client I can see a large number of links developed by an offshore agency they used for link-building. The client is a reputable, professional company but some of the links are on very low-quality sites in-between viagra, online pharmacies, cosmetic surgery etc. It is unclear whether some of the links are paid or not. There is no indication that they have been penalised for these links but they are obviously unhelpful. Can I use GWT to request Google ignore them or should I just leave them and move on with more appropriate link building techniques?
Link Building | | bjalc20110 -
If I write a PR release on a site such as PRweb with anchor-text links that is picked up and published by other news sites, do the engines consider this duplicate content or additional, beneficial links?
I recently wrote a news release on PRweb that was picked up identically by 8 other news websites, with the same anchor-text links as the original. Is the reproduction of duplicate content and links across different websites like this to the benefit or detriment of SEO and ranking power? Some of the links are: http://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/view/pressrelease/eventa-new-eventa-christmas-parties-website-is-launched-648923?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=Alert&utm_content=pressrelease http://www.prweb.com/releases/christmasparties/neweventasite/prweb8562064.htm Many thanks!!
Link Building | | RobertHill0