Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hello all,

I have created a page and published it 2 days ago and it does not appear in the Google Search.How much time can usually/on average take to index a page by Google in order to appear in the search results of a web search?

I have check the Google Webmaster tools and neither no urls have been reported to be blocked nor the content should be blocked.

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Antonio

I'm just looking for a backup application in Wordpress. I've found BackupWordpress y BackWPup. What of these ap. is the best in terms of performance and functionality? Is there any plugin better?Thanks in advanced.

Thank you Matt, it does make sense!

Matt, I have another question from a different topic that you may help,

Do you have an idea where I can get a website/traffic income estimator according to the page views & unique users in terms of ads-platforms? I mean strictly due to ads prints.

It is just to have a rough idea of what could be the income of a website with 5000 unique visitors per day (assuming no product/service is sold).

In any case thank you very much for the great info provided,

Antonio

Thank you Matt for the great help,

Yes, I will create a page exactly with the same content than the old post, but with right title and url path names according to best SEO practices.

Matt, what I do not still understand is, if I use the canonical, the content will be still in a post (no good SEO) and in a page (good SEO) but my main concern is if the old post that still exists will penalise my SEO overall as the post is not properly in terms of lengths for names and urls.

Thank you very much Matt!

Antonio

Hello Mathew and Mark congrats for the great support and highlights.

In the light of what you are explaning here could you please supoport me in this question concerning Canonical or 301 redirect? My issue is in terms of SEO when doing canolical.

I have a page with a long post title and url path name (more than 70 caracters and 115). This page has many visits but I am changing the SEO website structure according to SEOMOz and forums guidelines for the length names so: I WILL CREATE A DUPLICATE PAGE WITH THE SAME INFO.

This issue has been marked as an issue in the SEO tools, for long names>70 and url path names>115

My question is which option should I use and you would recommend me?

1. OPTION 1: Ideally I would like to keep the old post, so I should use the canonical tag, but my main concern is if the search engines in terms of SEO, even the canonical has been done, will penalise my SEO as there is still a post with bad SEO optimising, or if this is not the case because I already used the canonical. The duplicate content would still exist!

2. OPTION 2: Eliminate the post and redirection 301 to the new page to keep the juice.

I would prefer option 1, as I keep both post and page, but only if searchengines do not penalise my SEO as they detect a long post name and url path name.

Thank you very much for the help,

Antonio

Hello all,

I would like to have an idea of the potential monthly income for traffic generation (I mean just for visits to the website and not considering the sales of any given product or service) in a website, in the case I am using ads&marketing platforms for ads diplays.

I know it can be very variable, depending on sales achieved, leads generated,etc...but just focusing on traffic on the website, what would be a reasonable figure?

1000 visits per day?= $1 dollar?

100,000 visits per day?=$???

Thank you very much for the help and support,

Antonio

Hello all,

I have a page with a long post title and url path name (more than 70 caracters and 115). This page has many visits but I am changing the SEO website structure according to SEOMOz and forums guidelines so: I WILL CREATE A DUPLICATE PAGE WITH THE SAME INFO.

This issue has been marked as an issue in the SEO tools, for long names>70 and url path names>115

My question is which option should I use and you would recommend me?

1. OPTION 1: Ideally I would like to keep the old post, so I should use the canonical tag, but my main concern is if the search engines in terms of SEO, even the canonical has been done, will penalise my SEO as there is still a post with bad SEO optimising, or if this is not the case because I already used the canonical.

2. OPTION 2: Eliminate the post and redirection 301 to the new page to keep the juice.

I would prefer option 1, as I keep both post and page, but only if searchengines do not penalise my SEO as they detect a long post name and url path name.

Thank you verty much,

Antonio

Hello all

I am working in my website and analysing the potential best keywords for the SEO (post/page name and url path name).

1. I am using Google Adwords. Any other tool you would recommend?

2. Which selection should I make in the Google Adwords Keyword Tool in order to know the monthly global searches of the keywords I should target?

Exact? Phrase? Broad?

For instance,

KEYWORD SEARCH:"Information about Madrid"

BROAD MATCH: 300,000

EXACT MATCH: 1,500

Te potential of the keyword is 300,000? 300,000 searches are undertaken on a month that contains that sentence and its variations? Or the relevant keyword potential is the exacta match traffic?

Thank you very much!

Antonio

Thank you all,

Just one question, which selection should I make in the Google Adwords Keyword Tool in order to know the monthly global searches of the keywords?

Exact?

Phrase?

Broad?

For instance,

I get 300,000 gobal monthly searches for a broad search for a specific "information about New York and only 750 in the "exact filter".

Thank you!

Antonio

Eyepad, thanks a lot, and for sure you earnt more than 2 cents!

Really helpful information

Cheers

Thank you very much Eyepaq!

Would you mind what you mean by commecial keywords? (I am sorry I am new on this of SEO).

I guess you mean by "comment" in the "content/ body of the post/page"?

Thx a lot, it has been of great help,

More inputs from others are more than welcome!

Antonio

Hello all,

I have one doubt concernig SEO optimization as I am buiding the structure of my website to be sound with the Keywords I am targeting:

I have read that the post/page name is very important (selecting the right keywords you are targeting and the lenght) and also the url path name, taking into account both keywords+lengt.

I still have the doubt if (Imagine I am considering 5 keywords for SEO.):

1) OPTION 1

I should use as far as it is possible, the 5 keywords in the post/page title and repeat the 5 same keywords in the url path name?

OR

2) OPTION 2

I should use these 5 keywords spread between title and url path? I mean maybe I use 3 keywords in the post/page name and 2 keywords in the url path, but my main concern is as search engines gives more weight in SEO for post/page name rather than to the url path name, maybe I will miss 2 of the keywords I used in the url path name?

My choice would be OPTION 2 as I can have:

• Shorter post/page name - Shorter url path name.

• More caracters for targeting the keywords: 75 (from post/page name) + 115 (from url path name).

• I avoid repetition of keywords in both title and url path.

Thank you very much,

Antonio

Hello Maurizio,

I have one doubt concernig SEo optimization as I am buiding the structure of my sebsite:

1. I have read that the post/page name is very importante (selecting the right keywords you are targeting and the lenght. And also the url path name. (Keywords+length)

My question would be concerning the keyword strategy to target both Page/post name and url name, I still have the doubt if (Imagine I am considering 5 keywords for SEO.):

1. OPTION 1 I should use as far as it is possible, the 5 keywords in the post/page title and the 5 same keywords in the url path,

OR

2. OPTION 2I should use these 5 keywords spread between title and url path? I mean maybe I use 3 keywords in the post/page name and 2 keywords in the url path, but as search engines gives more weight in SEO for post/page name, maybe I miss 2 of the keywords I used in the url path name.

I would prefer to use OPTION 2 as I can have:

• Shorter post/page name

• Shorter url path name.

• More caracters for targeting the keywords: 75 (from post/page name) + 115 (from url path name).

• I avoid repetition of keywords in both title and url path.

Thank you very much,

Antonio

Hello all,

I would like to use the Google Adwords Keywords search tool, in order to start working in the structure of my website and targeting the right keywords. I am targeting all the world, all languages, global monthly searaches but:

1. I have the doubt which filte I should use: broad?, exact? or phrase?I am using "braod" but I do not know if I should use exact instead for keyword selection.

2. Would you recommend me any other tool instead of Google Adwords Keywords Search for keyword analysis?

Thank you very much

Antonio

Hello Dana, thank you very much for the answers to all my questions in th Q&A.

Concerning the keyword strategy to target both Page/post name and url name, I still have the doubt if (Imagine I am considering 5 keywords for SEO.):

1. I should use as far as it is possible, the 5 keywords in the post/page title and the 5 same keywords in the url path,

OR

2. I should use these 5 keywords spread between title and url path? I mean maybe I use 3 keywords in the post/page name and 2 keywords in the url path, but as search engines gives more weight in SEO for post/page name, maybe I miss 2 of the keywords I used in the url path name

Thank you very much,

Antonio

Thank you very much for the great help and answers!

Thank you very much for the great help, still interested to know the opinion of other WP users in terms of which SEo plugin they would recommend, thanks a lot

Antonio

Hello all,

I am working on my SEO strategy for a WordPress site.

1. I am trying to cover all my keywords in:

1.a) Page title trying to have a length <70

1.b) Page url trying to have a length<115

My question is: should i try to focus all my keywords in both name and url page path? or only in the Page title as the SEOMOZ's guide suggest? I would go for a mix strategy with my keywords in both page title and url path name, but I do not know if the search engines PAY MORE ATTENTION TO THE PAGE TITLE, so mixing 1.a) and 1.b) would mean I am loosing keywords.

2. I am using the WordPress All in ONE SEO Plugin. Do you recommend me this or any other plugin?

This plugin has 3 input fields:

a) Title tag b) Description tag c) Keywords

My questions here are:

a) If these tags replace the standard settings of WP as described in point 1.a)

b) If the description and title tags are META TAGS that are not taken into account in terms of SEO but in terms of customer description of the contento of the page.

c) Where are the keywords listed inserted in the page? In H1, H2, H3 and H4 tags?

My feeling after reading the SEOMOZ guide is that this plugin is not providing any added value for SEO any more??'

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Antonio Alcocer

Thank you very much, great replies and help for all the questions raised, Dana and Maurizio

Hello all,

I am working in the keywors structure of a web and I have the following doubt:

1. If I want to target these keywords: great food madrid

and my website is: http://www.madridlive.com

I do not know if I should keep either:

OPTION 1: page url: www.madridlive.com/great-food-madrid

or

OPTION 2: page url www.madridlive.com/great-food

I do not know if the search engines "understands" madrid in "madridlive", therefore I can avoid the "madrid" keyword, dicarding option 1 and going for option 2. Additionally I avoid duplication of the madrid keyword  that can be seen as redundancy and also have a shorter page url.

Thank you very much and sorry for such a question but I am new in this SEO field...just the excellent SEOMOZ's SEO Guide for beginners!

Best regards,

Antonio

Thank you very much for the help!

Regards,

Antonio

Thank you very much Bryan for the help, it has been of great help,

Cheers,

Antonio

Hello there,

I have a Wordpress site and would like to know if it is better to have 600 posts or 600 pages in terms of efficiency in the site.

I would like to publish the content as pages, as I can have subapges,etc... and keep the path: www.website.com/page/subpage1... in terms of good SEO.

This structure of using pages rahter than posts allow me to keep the path as stated above (with a category/post path I could not manage in this sense as a pile of articles is displayed although the path category/post in terms of SEO I understand would be good too).

Thank you very much for your thoughts here as I would go for a page structure.

Antonio

Hello all,

1. I have a website under WordPress and I would like to know whici is the best permalink structure? I have seen in many post that /%postname%/ would be the best in terms of SEO although performance is not very good (But in WP latest version the speed issue has been solved?).

2. Additionally I would like to know if in terms of SEO it is better to publich the content as a page or as a post. The page publishing allows to have the path:

www.example.com/page/subpage/etc... root that I understand is good for SEO?

3. How does affect for SEO a page i.e. www.example.com/page1 with links to different posts that have the permalink structure i.e: /%postname%/

I mean, if I click on the page www.example.com/page1 and then in the link to the POST inside that page and I am redirected to www.example.com/post

How does affect the SEO?

Thank you very much for the help,

Best regards,

Antonio

Hello, I am wondering if the canonical warning should be seen as something wrong in terms of SEO and Google, and therefore the similar contentatr pages must be eliminated to only one page, or if the canonical could be mantained,

Thx a lot

Antonio