Niche Research: Broad Match V.S. Exact Match
-
Hey SeoMozzers,
Do you guys use broad match or exact match to gauge whether or not there's enough volume to be worth your time?
Take the freelancing niche for example. These are the results for broad match:
<a class="aw-ti-resultsPanel-details">how to be a freelance writer [2,740,000]</a> how to freelance [165,000]
In exact match however:
<a class="aw-ti-resultsPanel-details">how to become a freelance writer [1,000]</a> how to freelance [480]
In this niche in particular, there's not really any keyword that gets more than 20,000 exact match searches a month. However, the broad level keywords have more than 2 million searches.
Here's my thinking: Instead of targeting highly specific terms to optimize for, I'm just going to optimize for broad terms and aim to capture the long tail. It seems there's a lot of people searching for things, but they're all spread out across different keywords.
So my instinct is to go with the broad match results, assume there's enough traffic to support a profitable website and ignore the low exact match results.
Your thoughts ... ?
-
My advice for keyword research is too not just factor on exact match and broad match, you need to factor in other forms of research to supplement your data.
You need to remember this data is only a guide from Google Exact match data is in no way an accurate determination of what traffic the specific keyword gets.
MY advice it the following -
Split up excel into the following:
1. line Exact 1. line Broad 1. line other research 1. line competitive analysis for the term.
You need to pull information from various sources, do not rely only on Google.
Kind Regards,
James Norquay.
-
Hey Derek
First, check this out to be sure of your understanding of broad, phrase and exact match: google documentation
I almost always use exact match to gauge search volume. A search for "how to be a freelance" counts as a broad match. Even "freelance" or "writer" counts as a broad match. These aren't relevant at all, so thus a very bad assessment of search volume.
Even phrase match is misleading. "Hire a freelance writer" could count as a phrase search, totally not relevant and therefore shouldn't count.
It is therefore, I ONLY want to know how many people are searching, exactly for "how to become a freelance writer". Its guarenteed to be that exact search, which guarentees relevance.
If you optimize and rank for "how to become a freelance writer" you may also rank for similar or related phrases, like "how to be a freelance writer" or "be a freelance writer".
Exact match is your best bet when judging search volume, because phrase and broad are way too unpredictable, as to whether the search variations are going to at all relevant.
So choose a good phrase with a decent amount of exact search volume, optimize for that, and you may also naturally rank for related long-tail more specific phrases as well - like "how to become a freelance writer from home", etc.
-Dan
-
I guess I meant something different by long tail. I'm not talking about targeting specific longtail keywords, but just aiming to get the broad phrase ranked and taking the incidental search results.
In my experience, a ton of traffic doesn't necessarily come from the keywords you're targeting, but for these weird incidental searches.
The #1 search result for "freelance writing" has just 68 linking root domains. The #1 and #2 results for "how to freelance" don't have enough data in OSE, but #3 has 250 linking root domains.
A lot of the competition is using pretty weak link strategies as well. Do I think I can get on Page 1 - Yeah, I do, I think the content that's up there right now is pretty weak, as is the backlinking.
My question isn't so much about the competition - But whether or not there's volume. I'm seeing two DRASTICALLY different numbers between broad and exact. I'm thinking of just going for the main keyword, and the other searches (I'm guessing) will come from incidental long tail searches that I'm not necessarily aiming for.
-
Derek,
The key component you didn't mention is competitiveness. My decisions in this area are based primarily on competition for the term.
Using your example, if I can earn rank #1 for the longtail phrase "how to become a freelance writer" then I would expect on average 440 visits to my page. This figure is based on the stats 44% of searches choose the top search results. I also know I can improve upon the CTR with a solid page title and meta description so lets call it 500 visits.
If you go for the broad match, where will you rank? Can you even make page 1?
This particular example isn't ideal. The entire idea of long tail is you are focusing attention on a less competitive version of a keyword phrase, but in this case there are sites focusing this exact phrase. The overall point is you need to determine how much traffic your site will likely receive by using each method, along with how qualified that traffic is for your web page. Long tail search results are more focused and I would expect the bounce rate to be substantially lower then broad searches.
-
Interesting, I am fairly new to the nuances of seo, although I have been doing seo writing for almost six years. I mostly work with small businesses and so look for seo competition and the current status of the optimization of those competing for the term and variations of it. My assessment is focused on lower numbers of traffic but targeted specific to the business and its offerings.
Long tail is what I work with almost exclusively. So, I look at the broad to phrase match results (percentages) and the existing competition first and toss quite a few terms in the process. Usually the exact numbers tend to be low but if you find the sweet spot, it helps a lot with organic.
I'd be interested in what some of the veteran seos have to share as I am currently pondering the same question for a new site that wants to go national.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to do proper keyword research to content URL-mapping?
Hi to all, If you can share your ideas on how to do a proper setup, it would be great. Cheers
Keyword Research | | joel.cortez0 -
Supplementing Moz's Keyword Explorer When Volume Has "No Data?"
Many of the keywords for which I'm trying to find volume information in Moz's Keyword Explorer have "no data." This makes it difficult to determine the value of the keyword compared to other options. What tools / techniques do you use as a stand-in for this data?
Keyword Research | | Kevin_P0 -
Any recommendations on how to find non-branded keyword phrases revealing searcher’s intent with high volume and CPC?
-Most of the organic keywords driving traffic to our website are branded. -I’ve used UberSuggest, but those keyword phrases tend to have low CPC and low volume -Thus, the UberSuggest keywords usually produce a low benefit & K.O.B score. -Andrew
Keyword Research | | Todd_Kendrick0 -
Lawyers or Solicitors when Key word research feels like splitting hairs
Buongiorno from 16 Degrees C wetherby UK 🙂 What if a client wants to rank for commercial solcitors & commercial lawyers regardless of the best argument you could present. Isee this as a problem as semanticall lawyers & solicitors semantically mean the same thing like ATM & cashpoint, cab & taxi So your left stuck with two phrases both menaing the same thing and you have to create physical web pages. Do you A
Keyword Research | | Nightwing
Create pages just about commerciual solicitors
& Create Pages just about commercial lawyers
Do you B
Create & blended page with copy focused on Laywers & solicitors Help my head hurts http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/confused.jpg Grazie Tanto, David0 -
How reliable is GWT's keyword data & what is the most accurate way of determining keywords you currently rank for?
I have been monitoring the query data (keywords, average position, CTR, etc.) in GWT, but sometimes the ranking data seems off. I filter the dates for the past week, so it is the most recent. I manually check some of the rankings and they are way off. Does anyone have feedback on this? If you have access to multiple domain data, that would be great. What is the most accurate way of determining keywords you currently rank for? I have also used keywordspy, and that is off too!
Keyword Research | | inhouseseo0 -
What do you consider a good Global Exact Match for a key word?
The following article implies that 2,400 isn’t bad……Quote from second to last paragraph of #2: “The real problem comes when you choose to target a keyword like 'ladies leather handbags' which has a broad match search volume of 2,400 but an exact match search volume of only 260” http://www.seomoz.org/blog/6-keyword-research-mistakes-you-might-be-making I like to keep mine under 50% competitive. For one site which is in high competition market (as far I can see) has SEO irrelevant brand name domain, a primary key word at 51% with 2900 Global EM for page name with a secondary keyword at 44% and 590 GEM. Another site with primary domain and keyword at 50% and 1000 GEM with other keywords between 40% and 50% and GEM’s of 1300 (also a page title), 1900 (also page title), 1000 (also a page title), 2400, 5400, 14800 (niche I might work on later), 1000, 1900, 4400, 3600, 5400, 1600, 3600 (also a page title), 1300, 1000, 2900, 1300. SEO won’t be my only approach but within my competitive capability I think that’s the best I can get. So, wondering what your thoughts where on a good Global Exact Match?
Keyword Research | | Zoolander0 -
Niche vs One massive site
In the past I've done fairly well building niche sites for automotive accessories. The problem is, it's hard paying attention to 50+ sites after a while, and the quality ends up going down. Because of this, I've decided to focus on one large site for trucks and their accessories. I have a site called truckprofile.com where people can create profile pages for their various trucks. It gets fair traffic for not doing much with it. I recently threw a blog on the site: truckprofile.com/blog. This will be my area for posting articles on niche, commonly searched, easy to rank for phrases. So my questions are: Is building one massive site better? If so, how should I structure the blog area so that each article ranks well? Would it be better if they were well categorized pages in wordpress instead of blog posts? By posting all the articles on a single site, does that mean it will be harder to rank for any single thing since the topic is so broad? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Keyword Research | | daenterpri0 -
Broad Vs. Exact Match
My question seems basic in nature but some recent keyword research has caused me to re-think broad vs. exact match. I was taught to focus on exact match for the short term and broad match for the long term prospects of a keyword. Today I was researching a niche of keyword phrases where the local search volume (broad) was, for example 33,000. The local search volume (exact) was only 500. What I know about broad vs. exact doesn't help me to determine if this keyword is worth going after. The keyword difficulty score by the way was 35% Yes, I do know that I will probably go after this keyword anyway but to refine my question, how do I get an idea of how "big" this keyword is? Is it more on the broad or more on the exact match of things? How do I determine the various derivatives of the phrase that occur under the broad match?
Keyword Research | | leaseman0