Current Thoughts on Directories?
-
I have heard pros and cons on directories forever, just wanted to check in to see what everyone is saying about them currently.
-
Thank you for your very detailed answer.
-
I agree with what Ryan has already said., but i would also suggest local directories, i triied to find the Matt Cutts video where he stated local mixed with a few quaility links is a good idea but i could not find it, you will have to trsut me. To me it makes sence to get a local link pattern, if you are a local business.
If a directory is nich then by nature not everyone is included, and can be usefull
Matt Cutts has stated that they still give weight to directoreis that dont accept eveyone -
When you mention directories I presume you are referring to Link Directories as opposed to Article or other directories. Some examples would be DMOZ, Yahoo, Business.com and BOTW.
In the mid 90s, link directories were a helpful way for sites to be discovered. Search engines didn't exist and when they started, the results were low quality. People could visit a directory site, type in a topic and find a list of sites with information about that topic.
Fast forward to present day and most directories have absolutely no value. Generally speaking, the value of a link can be measured by how difficult it is to obtain. Free directories normally have no value as anyone can get a link. The pay directories offer no value since paid links are not trusted by search engines and therefore do not pass link juice.
That leaves two types of directories which have value:
1. Pay for review directories. Sites such as Yahoo directory, BOTW.org, Business.com charge for a REVIEW of your site. The fee must be paid in advance and is NON REFUNDABLE. The review is a quality check of your business and website. If you do not pass the review, your site is not listed and you are out the fee. If your site passes the review, you earn a listing.
2. Niche directories. Some niche directories require a fee for a review and others are free. The only general free directory I am aware of which usually offers value is DMOZ. There are directories which focus a specific topic such as Wines or Particle Physics which can be valuable. Other niche directories charge for a review or have various requirements which, upon meeting, your site can be listed. The BBB would one example while Verified by Visa is another.
As with most of SEO, there are many factors to consider when weighing the value of a directory. You can't just say "blogs are good" or "social network sites are good" as a blanket statement. It is their proper implementation as a strategy which has tremendous potential. Along the same lines, directories are neither good nor bad but the overwhelming majority of directories are bad for various reasons. SEOmoz has offered a list of quality directories. Please not the list is NOT perfect. There are some directories on the list which may not offer value, and there are likely some good directories which have not made this list.
There are tons of articles on this topic already on SEOmoz. You are welcome to use the Search function and you will find many opinions. I would suggest focusing the more recent articles first.
The most valued web directory is DMOZ as it's home page has a PR of 10 and it is has been specifically favored by Google in the past. Even so, there are pages in that directory so deep that Google doesn't even crawl them and therefore the links have no ranking value.
One sign of a quality directory: imagine search engines did not exist. Will membership in this directory lead to any direct traffic? If the answer is yes, it is likely a "good" directory.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz recommends submitting to directories?
In the Moz Beginners Checklist for Small Business SEO, it's recommended to "Add your client's website to industry specific directories" That's not recommended anymore, right?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | CFSSEO0 -
Help figuring out if certain paid directories are worth it
The person in my position previously had quite a few paid directories our site was listed on. What is the best resources you guys have used or know of to figure out which ones are good to keep? For instance one that is up for renewal this week is site-sift.com. I know the person previous to me did some not so ethical stuff and I'm trying to clean up messes. Any advice on directories would be much appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | inhouseninja0 -
Speculations about current and future status of Panda
I would like to discuss how you think Panda is currently affecting the Google index, and if actually the so much discussed "Panda Update" is still an hot topic in the SEO world. We got the last official manual update back on March 14, and at that time Matt Cutts said that Panda would have been integrated in the regular algorithm. Fact is: since then I haven't heard about Panda anymore, despite my main e-commerce website as well as many others, is still under a strong Panda penalty. I have worked hard in the past 2 months to cleanup my site, removing thin and duplicate content. But so far I haven't gotten any positive signs from Google. Can we say that Panda is now officially integrated in the algorithm? Do we have any signs on that? If so, why we can't see any improvements on our sites, well cleaned-up? Thoughts? Speculations? I am eager to know your thoughts about this very sensitive issue that looks like has been forgotten a little bit in the past few weeks. Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | fablau0 -
Does the SEOmoz Suggested Directory List Need to be Updated?
So, since Google updated their link schemes page (http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66356) with avoid using "Low-quality directories", I've been thinking a lot about what makes a directory "low-quality". Obviously, this is important, or Google wouldn't have mentioned it. I was wondering if someone could explain to me how some of the directories suggested by SEOmoz at http://www.seomoz.org/directories are NOT low-quality, specifically some of the ones marked "General". The page lists stuff like busybits.com, for instance. One that I guess many are aware of, and yea it has a high home page PageRank, and it's got some history, and it's human-edited, ok great. But does it actually add any value to anyone that's not just looking to get a link? A page like http://busybits.com/Business/Others/2/ having (dofollow) listings like "Phone cards, Calling cards" "Insurance in Canada" .... ect. It just looks like an SEO backlink hub. No value at all to a user trying to discover new sites/content. Anyway, back to my main question, how is something like this NOT "low-quality"? Thank you
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MadeLoud4 -
Ethical question about setting up a local business directory...
I've just launched a local business directory that allows the small businesses in my local area to get noticed by a very targeted audience. People such as self-employed builders, painters and decorators and the like. As well as helping them out, they'll be helping me out by testing the waters of local keywords and seeing just how difficult and how much traffic they'll get. Kind of like spreading myself across 100's of keywords without the need for domains etc. All the links on there are nofollow, but what are the ethics behind letting my clients have a dofollow link from it? I wouldn't use this directory as a marketing tool for my self and my business, but if I acquired a client from my website or other source, but they would benefit from a dofollow link?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | jasonwdexter0 -
Link-Building - Directories
Hello, The SEO world is a bit confuse in the last months with the Google Antartic updates. Its normal since Google is trying to kill SEO to have more Adwords publicity results. My most recent doubt is about directories. I heard Matt Cutts from Google in a recent Google Hangout saying that registering a website in directorys was ok, but not the ideal method to become relevant in the internet world. However it seems that this procedure is not against the Google policies. Now, here in the forums, I already saw someone writing about adding your site to directories and how dangerous that situacion is. So, whats your opinion about adding your site to free and pay directories as first link-building strategy? If directories are out of the question, why SEOmoz as a huge list of paid directorys? Is SEOmoz outdate?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | PedroM1 -
Using an auto directory submission
Has anyone used easysubmits.com and what's your experience with it? Any other directory submission or link building tools that help automate and manage the process like easysubmits.com says they can do? I'm just looking at it currenlty and wanted to hear others thoughts before I get taken in by some black hat method that hurts my websites instead.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Twinbytes0 -
Is a directory like this white hat? Useful?
This is one of my competitor's backlinks: http://bit.ly/mMPhmn Prices for inclusion on this page go from $50 for 6 months to $300 for a permanent listing. Do most of you guys do paid directories like this for your SEO Clients? My gut is telling me to run away...but I don't want to miss a good opportunity if I should be taking it.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MarieHaynes0