How to prevent duplicate content within this complex website?
-
I have a complex SEO issue I've been wrestling with and I'd appreciate your views on this very much. I have a sports website and most visitors are looking for the games that are played in the current week (I've studied this - it's true). We're creating a new website from scratch and I want to do this is as best as possible. We want to use the most elegant and best way to do this. We do not want to use work-arounds such as iframes, hiding text using AJAX etc. We need a solid solution for both users and search engines.
Therefor I have written down three options:
- Using a canonical URL;
- Using 301-redirects;
- Using 302-redirects.
Introduction
The page 'website.com/competition/season/week-8' shows the soccer games that are played in game week 8 of the season. The next week users are interested in the games that are played in that week (game week 9). So the content a visitor is interested in, is constantly shifting because of the way competitions and tournaments are organized. After a season the same goes for the season of course.
The website we're building has the following structure:
- Competition (e.g. 'premier league')
- Season (e.g. '2011-2012')
- Playweek (e.g. 'week 8')
- Game (e.g. 'Manchester United - Arsenal')
- Playweek (e.g. 'week 8')
- Season (e.g. '2011-2012')
This is the most logical structure one can think of. This is what users expect.
Now we're facing the following challenge: when a user goes to http://website.com/premier-league he expects to see a) the games that are played in the current week and b) the current standings. When someone goes to http://website.com/premier-league/2011-2012/ he expects to see the same: the games that are played in the current week and the current standings. When someone goes to http://website.com/premier-league/2011-2012/week-8/ he expects to the same: the games that are played in the current week and the current standings.
So essentially there's three places, within every active season within a competition, within the website where logically the same information has to be shown.
To deal with this from a UX and SEO perspective, we have the following options:
Option A - Use a canonical URL
Using a canonical URL could solve this problem. You could use a canonical URL from the current week page and the Season page to the competition page:
So:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-8' would have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/' would have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
The next week however, you want to have the canonical tag on 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-9' and the canonical tag from 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-8' should be removed.
So then you have:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/playweek-9' would have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season/' would still have a canonical tag that points to 'website.com/$competition/'
In essence the canonical tag is constantly traveling through the pages.
Advantages:
- UX: for a user this is a very neat solution. Wherever a user goes, he sees the information he expects. So that's all good.
- SEO: the search engines get very clear guidelines as to how the website functions and we prevent duplicate content.
Disavantages:
- I have some concerns regarding the weekly changing canonical tag from a SEO perspective. Every week, within every competition the canonical tags are updated. How often do Search Engines update their index for canonical tags? I mean, say it takes a Search Engine a week to visit a page, crawl a page and process a canonical tag correctly, then the Search Engines will be a week behind on figuring out the actual structure of the hierarchy. On top of that: what do the changing canonical URLs to the 'quality' of the website? In theory this should be working all but I have some reservations on this.
- If there is a canonical tag from 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8', what does this do to the indexation and ranking of it's subpages (the actual match pages)
Option B - Using 301-redirects
Using 301-redirects essentially the user and the Search Engine are treated the same. When the Season page or competition page are requested both are redirected to game week page.
The same applies here as applies for the canonical URL: every week there are changes in the redirects.
So in game week 8:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8'
A week goes by, so then you have:
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-9'
- the page on 'website.com/$competition/$season' would have a 301-redirect that points to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-9'
Advantages
- There is no loss of link authority.
Disadvantages
- Before a playweek starts the playweek in question can be indexed. However, in the current playweek the playweek page 301-redirects to the competition page. After that week the page's 301-redirect is removed again and it's indexable.
- What do all the (changing) 301-redirects do to the overall quality of the website for Search Engines (and users)?
Option C - Using 302-redirects
Most SEO's will refrain from using 302-redirects. However, 302-redirect can be put to good use: for serving a temporary redirect.
Within my website there's the content that's most important to the users (and therefor search engines) is constantly moving. In most cases after a week a different piece of the website is most interesting for a user. So let's take our example above. We're in playweek 8.
If you want 'website.com/$competition/' to be redirecting to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-8/' you can use a 302-redirect. Because the redirect is temporary
The next week the 302-redirect on 'website.com/$competition/' will be adjusted. It'll be pointing to 'website.com/$competition/$season/week-9'.
Advantages
- We're putting the 302-redirect to its actual use.
- The pages that 302-redirect (for instance 'website.com/$competition' and 'website.com/$competition/$season') will remain indexed.
Disadvantages
- Not quite sure how Google will handle this, they're not very clear on how they exactly handle a 302-redirect and in which cases a 302-redirect might be useful. In most cases they advise webmasters not to use it.
I'd very much like your opinion on this. Thanks in advance guys and galls!
-
Hi Andy and Peter, thanks for your response.
@Andy: the rel=next and rel=prev markup won't really help in solving the problem we had. We will use it though because it's very helpful.
@Peter: yeah it's been something we've been struggling with for a while but we've finally made a decision on it.
The /current solution wasn't really a good solution because at the start of a season all the gameweeks are planned and created so it would become quite complex. We've done some calculations on how much duplicate content we would have if we would not use any of the redirects of canonical tags and the percentage of DC is very small (below 1%) so we're going to put our faith in Google's hands and let them figure it out. It's a good quality website with loads of links we're talking about so I don't expect to much issues. We'll monitor it closely though and stand by to interfere when needed.
Anyways, thanks for your suggestions. Although it didn't solve my problem 1:1 it did make me think and make a decision.
Bye, Steven
-
Yeah, time-sensitive information is always tough. I think you're dead on about the disadvantages - the timing of Google's application of these rotating tags would always be off, and you could end up with some really weird search results that are not only bad for SEO but could create bad UX (people landing on old pages thinking they're new).
What about another option - could you take more of a news/blog approach and have a "/current" page that is always the current week? As the current week changes, roll that content into an archive page ("/week8", etc.). That way, the content lives on, but the current URL never changes.
In terms of duplication, is this really full duplication? It sounds like some pages (like the season) just have snippets of the current week. That's not necessarily a problem. If they are very similar, could you "widgetize" it somehow? Could be straight HTML, but use a condensed format for the season page that links to the full version on the current week page. This would be much like a snippet of a blog post - instead of repeating everything on all 3 pages, have one main chunk of content and two summaries.
-
Hi,
Does the rel=next, rel=prev markup help you out with this problem? See http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html
Ive used it a couple of times to help stop pages been seen as dupe content where those pages are duplicate (meta, main content, images etc) except for example reviews, or comments e.g. /product_x /product_x_review_page1 /product_x_review_page2 /product_x_review_page_3
Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate page content errors for Web App Login
Hi There I have 6 duplicate content errors, but they are for the WebApp login from our website. I have put a Noindex on the Sitemap to stop google from indexing them to see if that would work. But it didn't. These links as far as I can see are not even on the website www.skemaz.net, but are links beyond the website and on the Web App itself eg : <colgroup><col width="529"></colgroup>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Skemazer
| http://login.skemaz.net |
| http://login.skemaz.net/LogIn?ReturnUrl=%2Fchangepassword |
| http://login.skemaz.net/Login |
| http://login.skemaz.net/LogIn?ReturnUrl=%2FHome | Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards Sarah0 -
What is best practise for markup in a nav bar, avoid duplicate content.
I'm wondering what's best practise for markup in the nav bar. So if we have <nav> Can we have headers in there, does it help? If we do, would a H1 confuse google as to wether that is the H1 of importance of the one in thein the </nav>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TrueluxGroup0 -
Duplicate page content errors stemming from CMS
Hello! We've recently relaunched (and completely restructured) our website. All looks well except for some duplicate content issues. Our internal CMS (custom) adds a /content/ to each page. Our development team has also set-up URLs to work without /content/. Is there a way I can tell Google that these are the same pages. I looked into the parameters tool, but that seemed more in-line with ecommerce and the like. Am I missing anything else?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | taylor.craig0 -
Are all duplicate content issues bad? (Blog article Tags)
If so how bad? We use tags on our blog and this causes duplicate content issues. We don't use wordpress but with such a highly used cms having the same issue it seems quite plausible that Google would be smart enough to deal with duplicate content issues caused by blog article tags and not penalise at all. Here it has been discussed and I'm ready to remove tags from our blog articles or monitor them closely to see how it effects our rankings. Before I do, can you give me some advice around this? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Daniel_B
Daniel.0 -
All Thin Content removed and duplicate content replaced. But still no success?
Good morning, Over the last three months i have gone about replacing and removing all the duplicate content (1000+ page) from our site top4office.co.uk. Now it been just under 2 months since we made all the changes and we still are not showing any improvements in the SERPS. Can anyone tell me why we aren't making any progress or spot something we are not doing correctly? Another problem is that although we have removed 3000+ pages using the removal tool searching site:top4office.co.uk still shows 2800 pages indexed (before there was 3500). Look forward to your responses!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | apogeecorp0 -
Duplicate content across hundreds of Local sites and they all rank #1
Usually when we discuss duplicate content, we're addressing the topic of penalties or non-indexing. In this case, we're discussing ranking high with duplicate content. I've seen lots of dental, chiropractor and veterinarian sites built by companies that give them cookie cutter sites with the same copy. And they all rank #1 or #2. Here are two companies that do that:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | katandmouse
http://www.rampsites.com/rampsites/home_standard.asp?sectionid=4
http://mysocialpractice.com/about/ The later uses external blogs to provide inbound links to their clients' site, but not all services do that, in fact, this is the first time I've seen them with external blogs. Usually the blog with duplicate copy is ON SITE and the sites still rank #1. Query "Why Your Smile Prefers Water Over Soft Drinks" to see duplicate content on external blogs. Or "Remember the Mad Hatter from the childhood classic, Alice in Wonderland? Back then, the process of making hats involved using mercury compounds. Overexposure could produce symptoms referred to as being" for duplicate content on chiropractor sites that rank high. I've seen well optimized sites rank under them even though their sites have just as much quality content and it's all original with more engagement and inbound links. It appears to me that Google is turning a blind eye on duplicate content. Maybe because these are local businesses with local clientele it doesn't care that a chiropractor in NY has the same content as one in CA, just as the visitor doesn't care because the visitor in CA isn't look at a chiropractor's site in NY generally. So maybe geo-targeting the site has something to do with it. As a test, I should take the same copy and put it on a non-geo-targeted site and see if it will get indexed. I asked another Local SEO expert if she has run across this, probably the best in my opinion. She has and she finds it difficult to rank above them as well. It's almost as if Google is favoring those sites. So the question is, should all dentists, chiropractors and veterinarians give it up to these services? I shudder to think that, but, hey it's working and it's a whole lot less work - and maybe expense - for them.0 -
Content Marketing: Should we build a separate website or built in site within the Website itself?
Hi Mozzers, Client: Big carpet cleaner player in the carpet cleaning industry Main Goal: Creating good content to Get more organic traffic to our main site Structure of the extra content: It will act like a blog but will be differentiated from the regular site by not selling anything but just creating good content. The look and design will be different from the client's site. SEO question: In terms of SEO, what would be the most beneficial for us to do, should we built in this new section/site outside or inside the client's site? I personally think that it should be separated from the main site because of the main reasons: A followed link to the main site Anchor texts implementation linking back to our service pages If we would to choose to build in this content, it would be highly beneficial for getting organic traffic within the main site but I am afraid this will not provide us any link juice since anchor texts won't be accounted the same since all of those would be located in the Nav bar of the main site. Can someone tell me what would be the best in terms of SEO? P.S: My boss doesn't agree with me and would rather go the second option (build in within the main site) that's why i am asking you guys what would be the most beneficial? Thank you Guys
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
Removing Duplicate Page Content
Since joining SEOMOZ four weeks ago I've been busy tweaking our site, a magento eCommerce store, and have successfully removed a significant portion of the errors. Now I need to remove/hide duplicate pages from the search engines and I'm wondering what is the best way to attack this? Can I solve this in one central location, or do I need to do something in the Google & Bing webmaster tools? Here is a list of duplicate content http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?dir=asc&mode=grid&order=name http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?dir=asc&mode=list&order=name
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SteveMaguire
http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?dir=asc&order=name http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?dir=desc&mode=grid&order=name http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?dir=desc&mode=list&order=name http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?dir=desc&order=name http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?mode=grid http://www.unitedbmwonline.com/?mode=list Thanks in advance, Steve0