Plurals and the SEOmoz On Page Report Card
-
I have some pages on my website that receive an "A" grade with the SEOmoz On Page Report Card if I use a plural term in a phrase (say, "landscape designers in Dallas") but an "F" grade if I use the singular term (say, "landscape designer in Dallas").
Is this a true and accurate reflection of how search engines see the page?
Am I going to rank well for plural terms but not for singular, given the specific on-page content I'm using in this example?
Or is this an opportunity for SEOmoz to tweak its' algorithm to better reflect the search engines?
-
Thrilled to help! I know it's a pain, but it's worth it!
-
Good advice, Matt, and thanks for taking a moment to provide an actual data point!
And yes, we definitely take a balanced approach combining on page, off page, PR, social, and more. This just happens to be "on page" day for me.
-
I'm a huge fan of the SEOmoz Report Card, and what I would say is that it rates your page for the provided keyword, not for variations. The Report Card is meant to be a tool, and like any tool, the user and the users brain is an intended element.
I would say that if your primary exact match searches prefer a plural, over a non-plural, you primarily optimize towards the plural, but you also build anchor text links that support both.
If I were in your shoes and I got an F, I would go in and use the non-prefered phrase in an effort to reach a "B" or a "C" letter grade from the report card tool.
Google does discriminate against plurals. I just ran a test using one of our clients, with the plural, and then without, and they were #1 for the plural, and #2 for without, with someone else ranking #1. The plural does matter, thus if you're targeting the plural, and you were given an F by the Report Card tool, you will get SOME credit for Partial Match usage, but probably not enough if you're optimizing based on on-site factors alone.
Remember, per the 2011 Search Engine Ranking Factors, on-site SEO only make sup what, maybe 16% of the sites total ranking?
My best answer is a balanced strategy, with a diversified backlink portfolio that covers multiple bases of anchor text, both exact and partial match, plural and singular.
Cheers!
-
Hi Matthew,
I agree with all of your points.
Nevertheless, I still think that it's overdramatic for the On Page Report Card to go from an "A" grade to an "F" grade when changing a single letter. It just doesn't seem to reflect the reality of how search engines look at content.
Akira
-
Hi Ahirai,
This is a great question and something that comes up quite a bit.
Google has some basic forgiveness for Plurals, but you want to mix up your keyword placement at least a little bit so that you're not 100% exact match (this is my opinion, others might disagree). Naturally, websites are going to reference keywords in partial match and exact match formats, and my belief and in my experience I've seen Google give credit for partial match keywords above and beyond simply following the SEOmoz Report Card.
What also supports this is your inbound link anchor text. Diversity is everything. You want to have some nofollow links, you want to have some exact match anchor text links, some brand name anchor text links, some partial match anchor text links. Google doesn't respond well to 100% Exact Match thinking.
We're all taught, in link building, that No Follow is bad, but what if all the competitors have 30% NoFollow links on average, and your site has 0% NoFollow links. That might sound like really good SEO, but you've created an unnatural Backlink Profile.
So mix up your usage as best you can, within reason, and use a majority of exact match keywords, but also use a few iterations and variants as well.
We get so hung up on the keywords themselves, but often just as important is the words that are around the keyword, the "Trees" that support your "Landscaping", etc. You have to look at the bigger picture.
Hope this helped!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved On page grader
All of my keywords score a 53 using the on page grader. When I look at the notes it indicates I don't have the keyword in question anywhere on the page which, while true in some cases, is not always factual. Does anyone have a similar experience?
Moz Pro | | josayoun0 -
On Page Reports for Long-Tail Keywords?
First Q&A here, so take it easy on me. Hopefully this is not a dumb question. 99% of the on page reports I look at are for local keywords. I'm finding that some of the page reports get and F where they should be receiving A's. I noticed if I manage a long-tail keyword like "books in houston tx" that I get a grade based on the exact phrase as opposed to a combination of the keywords. So when I have text in the body saying "books in the Houston area" or "Houston Books" for example, instead of using my exact managed keyword, it will tell me that the keyword is not mentioned in the body anywhere. When it is, it's just not in the exact order... I'm trying to write my pages for users and I don't think the users want to hear "books in houston tx" several times. If I do a report on the same page for the keyword "books" I get an A. So this is where it gets a little in the grey area for me. I need a solid on page report for local long-tail search terms. Anyone have any advice? Is there a way I could be using this tool to better suit my needs?
Moz Pro | | AmericomMarketing0 -
Functionality of SEOmoz crawl page reports
I am trying to find a way to ask SEOmoz staff to answer this question because I think it is a functionality question so I checked SEOmoz pro resources. I also have had no responses in the Forum too it either. So here it is again. Thanks much for your consideration! Is it possible to configure the SEOMoz Rogerbot error-finding bot (that make the crawl diagnostic reports) to obey the instructions in the individual page headers and http://client.com/robots.txt file? For example, there is a page at http://truthbook.com/quotes/index.cfm month=5&day=14&year=2007 that has – in the header -
Moz Pro | | jimmyzig
<meta name="robots" content="noindex"> </meta name="robots" content="noindex"> This page is themed Quote of the Day page and is duplicated twice intentionally at http://truthbook.com/quotes/index.cfm?month=5&day=14&year=2004 and also at http://truthbook.com/quotes/index.cfm?month=5&day=14&year=2010 but they all have <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> in them. So Google should not see them as duplicates right. Google does not in Webmaster Tools.</meta name="robots" content="noindex"> So it should not be counted 3 times? But it seems to be? How do we gen a report of the actual pages shown in the report as dups so we can check? We do not believe Google sees it as a duplicate page but Roger appears too. Similarly, one can use http://truthbook.com/contemplative_prayer/ , here also the http://truthbook.com/robots.txt tells Google to stay clear. Yet we are showing thousands of dup. page content errors when Google Webmaster tools as shown only a few hundred configured as described. Anyone? Jim0 -
Does SEOmoz give a way to know what link on what page produces the 404 errors that SEOmoz is telling me I have??
SEOmoz gives me a report of 404 errors on my site. Do they give a way to know from what link on what page produces the error?
Moz Pro | | MeridianGroup0 -
"Too many on-page links" warning on all of my Wordpress pages
Hey guys, I've got like 120 "Too many on-page links" warnings in my crawl diagnostics section. They're all the pages of my WordPress blog. Is this an acceptable and expected warning for Wordpress or does something need to be better optimized? Thanks.
Moz Pro | | SheffieldMarketing0 -
Pages Crawled: 0 ?
I've been with SEO Moz for over a month and a half. Why would this weeks crawl have Pages Crawled: 0? I've made no changes since the crawl last week that had 10k pages crawled...
Moz Pro | | mr_w1 -
Truncate page URLs
We have some pages (for example a contact us form) for which the URL is modified by the CMS depending on the referring page (this helps to put the form submission in context for the sales reps who get the contact submission). The SEOmoz crawler considers each URL a new page -- and so numbers like in diagnostics are all inflated as the same page is listed multiple times (e.g. for too many links) Is there a setting to change what the crawler considers to be the same page? Here are two URLs for the same page that the reports treat as separate pages: http://www.spirent.com/About-Us/Contact_us.aspx?referurl=0F528F4D703D8BB3523738D6373AA8AD http://www.spirent.com/About-Us/Contact_us.aspx?referurl=10ACDA6055244E369395223437FDCF30 The page is actually: http://www.spirent.com/About-Us/Contact_us.aspx Thanks Ken
Moz Pro | | spirent.marcom0 -
I have another Duplicate page content Question to ask.Why does my blog tags come up as duplicates when my page gets crawled,how do I fix it?
I have a blog linked to my web page.& when rogerbot crawls my website it considers tags for my blog pages duplicate content.is there any way I can fix this? Thanks for your advice.
Moz Pro | | PCTechGuy20120