Penguin: Carry On & Hope Or Start A New Site
-
I'm at a loss and no so-called SEO agency/expert I've hired appears to know the main causes of our post-Penguin downfall of our traffic.
To set the scene, I set up a voucher code site (www.ozvouchercodes.com.au) in Australia 3 years ago and since, it's been growing very well up until Google launched the Penguin update in April.
Having read as much as I could on the update my understanding is toxic links cause the slap. For on-site I've checked the site and tried to reduce keywords [spamming], increased [unique] content across the site and made sure there are as few instances of duplicate content as possible.
To attempt to understand my back link profile I've used SEOmoz & Link Detective as the current SEO agency give me little visibility on this.
It appears we're a little top heavy with 32% & 11% of are keywords containing 'coupons' and 'promotion codes' respectively. Consequently we no longer appear on those two terms but also hundreds of other terms we once appeared in the top 3 postitions.
The Link Detective report downloaded also appears to have a number of back links with the words 'Penalized' and 'Banned' next to them. Unfortunately there is no explanation on Link Detective whether this needs action or not.
My current SEO agency suggest that we have been too focused on a limited number of keywords and that a few more months of diversifying the range will solve it.
So do I spend another £X amount for 3-6 months of SEO or drop the site on a new URL and start again.
Any ideas?
Any help is very welcome & appreciated.
Henry
-
Thank you for sharing that story. It all makes sense. Using an automated link building script to create spam links with "natural" anchor text.
I wonder how the site owners will react when Google improves their algorithm next and all the old links PLUS all the new ones need to be removed. What a mess.
-
Ryan - Thanks for taking the time to discuss Penguin recovery. Your initial thread and follow-up Moz article were very informative. On a lighter note, I moderate all of the comments to my blog. I almost fell out of my chair laughing when an automated spamer targeted the keywords "click here". LOLZ. I suppose they were going to use a bot to attempt to spam a more "natural" link profile. Only one comment like it I've seen and I was tempted to award a small amount of creativity points although their clients are probably being sold a terrible bill of goods about how to acquire a "natural" link profile.
-
Hey Henry, if you put this work out to 'seo experts' you are pretty much a victim of the system and bad advice (and people making a quick buck like you say). Sorry buddy, hope it works out for you. Marcus
-
Thank you for your help Marcus.
Whilst I have some knowledge of SEO it was good of you to put my sites situation into perspective with an honest answer to help me make a better decision.
All the best.
-
Thanks Ryan for your help. I wish I had the knowledge and help a few years back when I first started. I put my trust in to 'SEO experts' who quite possibly acted as agents on behalf of cheap out-sourced labour from developing countries with the aim of earning a quick buck. I'll do some sums and work out whether I want to start again or not.
-
**It appears we're a little top heavy with 32% & 11% of are keywords containing 'coupons' and 'promotion codes' respectively. **
You understand the basic problem... but you are sugar-coating it with the words "a little". Get rid of all of these links or move any worthwhile content to a new domain. After you have done than then stop "building links" and start earning them.
-
Hey Henry
I have just taken a quick look at your link profile in open site explorer and I think your agency is being wildly optimistic. Simply, adding more links with a wider variety of keywords is simply not going to work. Likewise, if they are using the same historical approaches to add the links then they are likely to dig you an even bigger hole.
There is only one well documented case of recovery I am aware of being the WPMU site and they were fortunate in that they could remove a huge swathe of links in one fell swoop. Looking at your link profile, you don't have any such options.
Some very quick statistics here.
1400 linking domains
- 300 approx are branded (various)
- 100 branded + keyword (various)
- 1000 keywords only (various)
Then, anchor text is only part of the picture, looking at the sites that are linking to you, they are pretty weak in general. Link farms, content farms, article sites - it's a real mess! In fact, I have not found one good to honest link that is not from a spun, barely literate article.
So, what do you do? Well, in my mind, the first thing you should do is clean up the mess and see if you can bounce back. But you have some real work to do here, no doubt about that.
I wish I could give you happier news but when it comes to applying the phrase 'toxic link profile' then your link profile is just that. Lots and lots of, and I hesitate to even use the word, 'articles' with links to your site but they are clearly outsourced webspam articles written by someone who's first language was not english.
It's very hard to advise the exact course of action, but certainly, just 'throwing some more links at it' is not the way to go here. Any work you do should be to clean up but looking at your link profile, I have looked at about 100 links and not found one that was not a 100% total webspam.
The fact of the matter is, your site, and your marketing is exactly the deliberate manipulation of search results which Google has been targeting so it may be that starting again is your best approach. Certainly, if out of that 1400 links, if there are such a small percentage of real, honest links, then that may be your only real choice.
Google has targeted three things of late:
- link farms
- web spam
- artificial links
Unfortunately, your site is (was) propped up by artificial links from web spam on link farms - so to dig your way out of this hole could be tough and may leave you with little actual link equity to make it worthwhile.!
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news so don't shoot the messenger!
Marcus
-
Henry,
I encourage you to read this article: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/identifying-link-penalties-in-2012
My current SEO agency suggest that we have been too focused on a limited number of keywords and that a few more months of diversifying the range will solve it.
I hear this advice a lot and to be quite candid, it pisses me off.
Google's message is quite clear and it has been for some time. STOP BUILDING LINKS AND START EARNING THEM. The point of Penguin is to penalize sites which built links in an effort to manipulate search ranking. The manner is which Penguin identifies links currently is to examine anchor text.
Many SEOs have the idea that all they need to do to fix manipulative links is fix the anchor text. It is shocking to see how many people are confusing the mechanism with the message.
White hat SEO....the kind of SEO which does not get penalized....is about building value for clients. It's about never having to worry that a client's site will be penalized. It sounds like you paid an agency in the past to build manipulative links on your behalf, and the result is your site is now penalized. So the solution they are proposing is to build more manipulative links to your site, but this time the links will be disguised better.
Could this solution work? It might! The question is...for how long. I predict Penguin will continue to evolve in a similar manner to Panda. If that is true, Google will continue to focus on manipulative links and get better at detection just how Panda continues to improve its ability to detect low quality content. IF that happens, then paying for more links to be built is likely a very bad idea for the long term health of your site.
As far as ideas, you can clean up your link profile by removing the bad links to your site, or find another domain. Those are the only two choices I would recommend.
Please note this advise is controversial and many SEOs will disagree. The advice offered is mine which you are welcome to take or leave.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can a feeder site link directly to the main site?
I have a client that has several coupons sites. They have about 15 different URLS all of which are [city]deals.com all of the domains have coupons lists that are relevant to that area. Other than the coupons there is not any other content on the sites. There is a Main site however, that has coupons, content, store locations, blogs, news etc... The coupons on the feeder sites are displayed differently than what is displayed on the main site. They are also categorized differently. So the question is on the feeder sites can they have the coupon link directly to the store page on the main site?
Link Building | | Firestarter-SEO0 -
Too many links from one site?
In webmaster tools in 'links to your site' I have a totla of 819 links but 580 have appeared from one site. Is this bad for SEO?
Link Building | | SamCUK0 -
New world order
Hello all I see many talk about it but still I feel that the conversation is full of alogans and cliches are flying around, so here goes. In the not too far distant past I could get sites climbing and getting more traffic just by gettinhg simple links from sites. do that on a monthly basis, and see results. Now it is better for end users and tougher for us SEO guys. we need quality content and strategic postings. I like the new way and the higher quality it brings. As many of you probably expieienced getting clients actively engaged is really hard and most times clients are too busy. We need the involvement to succeed, we need quality content and valid places to post (mostly blogs). My questions are most budgets are not adjusted by clients and as such it creates a problem getting qualuty content. How do you still stay profitable? How did you adjust? Do you feel that much more actuale work on clients' project is needed and as such profits are declining. How di you reacts? what are the adjustment you made Thanks Guy C
Link Building | | ciznerguy0 -
How can see the total # of links to my site?
WMT shows only top 1000 domains that have links to my site. Where or how I can see the total number of domains or links pointing to my site ? Thank you
Link Building | | orion680 -
Guest posts on sites you buy advertising with?
What are your thoughts about the following scenarios. Scenario 1: You purchased a banner ad on a site for $50. Then you notice that the site accepts guest posts and you contribute a guest article which has a followed link. Scenario 2: You pitch a guest post to a blog and they say sure but first pay us $50. You say, I can't pay for links but how about I buy an ad spot for $50 instead in appreciation of you reviewing by submission. Scenario 3: You pitch a guest post to a blog and they say sure but it will cost $50 to be published. You say sure and pay them. Which of these would go against Google's guidelines and be considered a paid link? It seems like they are all buying links to a different degree, but they would all be indistinguishable to Google.
Link Building | | ProjectLabs1 -
Please have a look at the SEO of our site
Hi, Could you look at nlpca(dot)com and give me feedback and hints about the on -page SEO of our site, as well as any suggestions of link building strategies to move us up to first for the head term "NLP" as well as the long tail Thank you, Bob
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
New website start of SEO
I have a new domain name starting its SEO have added it to Pro Dashboard campaign of my ac. Started doing is Research with competitiors backlink analysis as well. 1. If i do i say 10-30 back link requests in a day for 1 domain name using research of the analaysis tools will it be ok or it will be high numbers to start with ? 2. Shall i in start itself of SEO start doing blog commenting or not recommended. 3. Having same email id and name for 3-5 blog comments day for new domain with same email di and same name cannot it hit to any spam issue ? Asking however i read blogs and then only do good post of comment to ensure that it also contribute something in name of fresh good content to the comment box area to get good approval rate as well. I want to know the basic numbers to start with SEO for fresh new domain and how shall it be progressive in numbers etc. Will wait for reply of the community members...
Link Building | | anand20100