Should a 301 from a penalised domain to a new domain be removed?
-
A business traded on a domain let's say example.COM which was heavily penalised due to non-removable spammy back links. Their previous SEO advised them to set up on example.CO.UK but redirected example.COM to example.CO.UK.
Example.CO.UK ranks very poorly, presumably due to being 'tarred with the same brush' i.e. attributed with the ills of example.COM.
Will it do any good to remove the redirect or is example.CO.UK now doomed as well?
-
Hi Robert,
Thanks and sorry for my slow reply.
Loads of good points you've raised here.
You're quite right to challenge my presumption that the new domain is ranking poorly due to the 301 since there could be many other reasons.
It's difficult to describe all the circumstances in a short question, so I guess I was going on my gut feel to some extent. Not ranking in the top 100 for a non-competitive term. I don't think the question of correlation arises here since there are no data sets to relate but I understand the point you make about cause and effect.
For me a 302 doesn't really feel like that's what it's intended for so is not ideal.
I think when Matt Cutts said 'start again', he meant really start again' i.e. no 301 so removing the 301 and having no other kind of redirect seems intuitively like the best option to me.
Cheers.
-
Hi Marcus,
Thanks and sorry for my slow reply.
I guess removing the 301 has the short term disadvantage of losing any traffic that might have come via the good links to the old domain but that's probably the lesser of two evils so a worthwhile trade-off longer term.
Cheers.
-
Ewan,
I would remove the 301 on a very simple premise: the previous domain had (based on you stating it was penalized) a lot of poor links. If that is true, why would you want to even go down that road to try to bring juice that likely does not exist any longer? Also, was the "penalty" a manual or algorithmic? Was it based on a date of inception for something like Panda, Penguin, or an update of same?
But, even though I would remove the 301, you cannot draw a correlation that a new domain: example.co.uk is ranking poorly due to the 301's from the .com. That is correlation equalling causation and, typically, it does not. First, what additional quality links are now coming to new domain that are independent of the 301 coming in? Second, is on-page, KW analysis, etc. for new domain all as it should be or did previous SEO miss on any of that? If it is possible for localization there with the domain, when new domain was created did someone make changes to local, citation sites, etc.? Is there a change from previous social such that the social now resolves to the new domain.
There are many questions here, but I think I would be remiss to claim that taking the 301 off would cause some rise in rankings. It is more likely that other factors will have a larger impact. Note, given you still need to redirect to the new site, you could use a 302 (temporary) redirect to prevent juice passing. You could use a meta refresh but that is a bit slow to most and not really recommended. There are other redirects and I would be interested to see what others suggest as a way to redirect while preserving the "autonomy" of the new domain. My first thought is still the 302. On a certain level, you could continue to attempt removal and mitigation of poor links to old site while you keep new up. Ryan Kent does a lot more with link removal I believe. If the site is of particular value in customers/revenue, etc. you might PM him. If you do a site search on him here, you will find several links to answers on link removal/penalty removal.
I hope this helps you out,
Robert
-
Hey Ewan,
By all accounts, if you 301 a penalised domain to a new domain, you are just passing the penalty along (5h1t rolls down hill) and if the whole reason they moved domain was to move away from an inescapable penalty then 301'ing the bad domain to the new domain makes no sense whatsoever.
If you remove the 301 you will eventually remove the problem. If it was a manual penalty then you may need to submit a reconsideration request (it may not hurt to do this anyway) but the new domain is not broken assuming nothing untoward has been done there.
This is basically a severing of ties, remove the 301 is removing the bad links so whilst you may need to do some SEO to move things forward you will not be fighting a losing battle.
Hope that helps!
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Old domain to new domain
Hi, A website on server A is no longer required. The owner has redirected some URLS of this website (via plugin) to his new website on server B -but not all URLS. So when I use COMMAND site:website A , I see a mixture of redirected URLS and not redirected URLS.Therefore two websites are still being indexed in some form and causing duplication. However, weirdly when I crawl with Screaming Frog I only see one URL which is 301 redirected to the new website. I would have thought I'd see lots of URLs which hadn't been redirected. How come it is different to using the site:command? Anyway, how do I move to the new website completely without the old one being indexed anymore. I thought I knew this but have read so many blogs I've confused myself! Should I: Redirect all URLS via the HTACESS file on old website on server A? There are lots of pages indexed so a lot of URLs. What if I miss some? or Point the old domain via DNS to server B and do the redirects in website B HTaccess file? This seems more sensible but does this method still retain the website rankings? Thanks for any help
Technical SEO | | AL123al0 -
301 domain name to another site
I had 2 websites. I decided not to maintain one of them and set it to 301 to my main website. However, i see people getting 404 errors when they land on my main website but with a page name from the old site. How can I set things so that anyone who tries to go to the old site goes to my homepage of my main site? http://siteA.com http://oldsiteB.com/oldpagename sends them to http://siteA.com//oldpagename = 404 - I want them to go directly to homepage on siteA.
Technical SEO | | bhsiao0 -
Remove a page after redirection
Hi, I had page eg. www.example.com/page1 and I redirect 302 it to > www.example.com/page2 After that I fatch this page (page2) with GSC and this page was index in serp. Can I remove this old redirect page > www.example.com/page1 now? Will this remove harm my page?
Technical SEO | | Tormar0 -
Blogging on multiple domains
We have three different domains for geotargeting (za,uk and .com). Each site at at the moment has the same content with only country specific details changed like currency etc. What is the best way to get maximum SEO benefit when posting new content.When we post new content should we repost to all three domains (the same content) or will Google only index the url on the domain which is crawled first. Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | aquaspressovending0 -
Importance of 301 Redirects
Hello, I have been brought in at the last minute to consult for an e-commerce client who is about to relaunch their website. The site currently receives 8000 visits a month, 3100 of which are from organic search. They have a few thousand product pages. The web development firm they are using is changing all of the old product page urls and using 'search engine friendly' urls for the new site, which is expected to launch in a few weeks. However, they did not/are not planning on including 301 redirects from the old URLs. Other than simply stating 'this will be bad for your SEO', what would be a correct way of explaining to the client how much of a problem it will be if their new site launches without 301s. For example, is this a big enough issue to delay the launch of the site / get in a contract dispute with the web developer?
Technical SEO | | stageagent0 -
Followed Linking Root Domains and No Followed Linking Domains
If you have more NoFollowed Linking Root Domains than Followed Linking Root Domains is that a problem?
Technical SEO | | INN0 -
Subfolder to Root Domain, Should i or not?
Dear All, I am kinda of stuck and need your helps, I have major client's site which is located in subdirectory. Instance: http://www.majorclient.com.cn/cn/ and as you can see domain name is already localized and they are not planning to make any english version of the site, So there will be no /eng/ folder but clients whole website is /cn/ subdirectory which is totally unnecessary and i would like to 301 whole site to **http://www.majorclient.com.cn ** But the problem is that this site has been /cn/ folder forever since the beginning and lot of trusted links are pointing to www.majorclient.com.cn/cn/ So should i move it or just configure 301 www.majorclient.com.cn to www.majorclient.com.cn/cn/ leave it there and don't bother. Help?
Technical SEO | | DigitalJungle0 -
Should I 301 redirect my country specific sites, or use them as linking root domains?
I have loveelectronics.co.uk, but I also own 10 other country code specific domains. I am short on links (i'm actually still setting up the website) and wondered that until i have country specific content, should I 301 redirect these websites to the homepage of my main site, or could I use them as links which would mean I have more linking root domains? Sorry if this is a beginner question, but it would be good to know so I can sort this.
Technical SEO | | jcarter0