Google Listings EMD Bias
-
I've been looking at 60+ location based searches for the base two months and noticed a big issue I can't explain. I know EMD was hit hard in the general SERPs but it obviously has not effected the location SERPs.
The main way I'm finding these situations is by seeing the 7 pack and it shows a site with only a quarter amount of the citations the other sites have and jumps to the top very quickly. It appears to be working because of the EMD bias in the Local SERPs algorithm.
From what I understand you are not suppose to add a TLD domain into a G+ listing and then 301 redirect it to your real domain but Google doesn't seem to mind at this point. I'm wondering if this tactic is a valid Local tactic at this time or if, from what I understand, it is a shady tactic that will end up hurting brand and have a strong chance of penalizing the real domain.
-
Ben,
If you're not already using it, 51 Blocks Local Competitive Analysis tool is a good one, and it's free:
http://www.51blocks.com/online-marketing-tools/free-local-analysis/
Might be of help to you in your research.
-
I appreciate you taking the time to explain all that. I'm looking at all the usual ranking local ranking factors and need to compile a list of what they have that doesn't "compete" with all the other.
From my initial research it appears that the only thing these listings have in common with each other is an extremely low number of citations, an EMD that redirects to a different URL and they are listed as high as #3 but usually #5 or #6. It's just strange. I haven't looked at a domain ownership timeframe or even if they did possible make a move recently but I will do that.
Thanks again for all your help Jarno and Miriam.
-
Hi Ben,
Very good question. In the Google Places Quality Guidelines, Google states:
-Do not provide phone numbers or URLs that redirect or “refer” users to landing pages or phone numbers other than those of the actual business.
So, from this guideline, we know that Google doesn't want you to list a URL that redirects to something you don't own, but in this case, apparently this business owns TheCarmelDentist.com. They are not redirecting to a domain that doesn't belong to the business.
This scenario brings up questions. Why is this business doing this? One good guess might be that they've bulit this new website at thecarmeldentist.com and have redirected the old fishers site to the new one, but have yet to update their Google+ Local Page to reflect the URL. All attempts to reach the fishers site are redirecting, so the + Local Page is simply redirecting, too. I can't think of any good reason why they wouldn't just simply list the URL, so my best guess is that they just haven't updated the + Page yet.
Looking at this specific scenario, I just doubt that the redirect is being done with an intent to spam. Because the whole old site has apparently been redirected to the new one, I think this business has simply moved to a new domain.
I would also guess that the redirect rule in the guidelines is meant to speak to the practice of either competitive hijacking of listings and redirecting the URLs to competitors' stuff, or, possibly, spammy stuff in which a snake oil marketer might convince a business owner that their URL should be redirecting to some sort of directory page instead of to the company's website. But, it doesn't look like this is what is happening in your example, unless I'm totally overlooking something.
Now, you are quite right that the EMD penalty does not seem to have hit hard in Local. Like you, I see plenty of these rankings just fine. At this point, it is still quite possible to rank well with an EMD, and if the EMD is supported by strong content, it probably won't ever be penalized.
That being said, if asked whether I would personally advise a client to switch from BobJonesDDS.com to carmeldentist.com, just in hopes of a ranking boost, my answer for 2013 would be a resounding 'no'. Every move Google has made over the past 2 years clearly supports, in my eyes, their preference for authentic presentation of brands. If Bob Jones DDS is your brand, then use it, I say. Don't go for the EMD because it doesn't truly represent your brand...it represents an attempt to rank. Google is getting impatient with anything done simply to rank.
Within the scope of Q&A, I can't do a a full competitive analysis of the situation you've highlighted, Ben, but remember, a domain is just a fraction of the local search ranking factors. Don't forget proximity to centroid, business cluster, domain age, links, citations, reviews, etc. All of these things and so much more determine rank. I don't believe an EMD can be seen as THE cause, though it could be part of the cause.
One last note. The dentist in question does have some problems going on. Their +Page is calling them The Fishers Dentist. Their website is calling them The Carmel Dentist and their address listed on their website is Indianapolis. Even if I'm not predicting a swift EMD penalty, the confusion of the signals they are sending to Google about their brand and locale is pretty serious and could lead to all kinds of problems for them. Not good.
Hope these thoughts help. Please, feel free to share more about your study, Ben.
-
Ben,
no, i did not see anyone get kicked out of Google because of something like this. It indeed is theoratical but there is an bigger chance of getting kicked.
I am really trying to imply that you should only use white hat tactics and not black hat. Just advice your client that it is a possibility but that the risks are great and that you're not liable (don't know if this is the right word).. for if the sites does get penalized.
Jarno
-
Thanks for the response Jamo. I'm asking if there is anything that this tactic directly offends in Google's eyes. The reason why I am asking is not so that I can justify it but so that I can speak from more experience than myself.
I've never seen a site get kicked out of the listing because of this so I'm not sure if it is something that I should warn clients about or not.
Have you seen anyone get penalized or is it like me, a theory?
-
Ben,
I would not go there if I were you. Why add a URL and then redirect that URL to another where your site is being set up? Why not include the right domain name then?
I would avoid this tactic. Even if it does work in the short run it could end up with a complete ban from Google. Keep it clear, keep it fair, keep it white hat. Do things you know are honest. This, in no way to my opionon, seems honest.
Regards
Jarno
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I am confused/frustrated/surprised how bad my website is doing on google ranking
Hello, I am confused/frustrated/surprised how bad my website (flyhy.co) is doing on google ranking and I have no clue why even though I have been doing my homework regarding SEO. Just a bit of background, I have created a new website about 6 months ago for the paragliding community, the primary goal is to provide a platform for people to publish their ads (osclass), but also to provide some interesting reviews and tools to help paragliders chose their wing. We have been putting a lot of effort to provide a nice user experience and tio build the tools mentioned above. Our main channel to connect with the community is Facebook, and we have been quite active there. I have looked at many SEO articles and I made sure the website provides a good UX, the URLs are SEO friendly, good meta data, etc. Also have been using the google search console and analytics to monitor all of this. But here is the thing, all these does not seem to change anything in our ranking for important keywords such as "paraglider for sale", "paragliding equipment", etc. We seem to only rank (looking at Google’s keyword tool) for very specific wing model names that people have mentioned in their ads. I have ran out of ideas on how to improve our SEO !!!!!! I know the website is only 6 months old, but by now we should get some results. As an example, I will mention one our main website competitors: www.paraglidingequipment.org. OK the URL is pretty obvious and this website ranks in page #1 for "paragliding equipment" (but also for "paraglider for sale" and other paragliding related key phrases). OK there is the URL (paraglidingequipment.org), but I thought nowadays google bots are smarter than just that. The website is 1 year old (so not really much older than us, and was ranking high anyway even 6 months ago). The website looks like it was clearly made by one person and then quickly just left it running, so no content has been added (except for people putting their ads), there is almost no activity on the Facebook account. I have run some test such as "pagespeed insights" and we both rank the same. On "seositecheckup.com", we are clearly better with more 10 points. Is there anyone out there who can tell me what is going on? Have I missed a very important aspect of SEO? Is our website somehow compromising the robots crawling (although I can see about 80 pages have been already indexed in google search console)? I know content is king, but in paraglidingequipment.org the only content I see are ads, and we have ads and other interesting (ie reviews and tools) for paragliders. To conclude, I am basically completely clueless of what to do to rank at least on the first couple of pages of google for the key phrases above. I need help. Hichem. PS: in Moz bar our score is non existing (PA=1,DA=10), on paraglidingequipment.org (PA=23,DA=15). So it looks that essentially we are not apparent on the web! PSS: We have also tried to build some backlinks on few important paragliding community websites.
Competitive Research | | hichemboudali0 -
I Got A Scraper Delisted From Google ...
I have an electronics niche news website. A scraper who had an online store selling products in my niche copied every one of my articles and posted them on his site under the heading "News" ... generally within 1/2 hour of me posting them on my site. His site was even showing up in the rankings before mine. I filed a copyright infringement claim with Google two weeks ago via their online form explaining what he was doing. Today, I received an email from Google saying that they have reviewed his site and have delisted it from the search engine. I just checked, and he is GONE ... completely delisted, no trace. My site traffic has also jumped at least 25% today. It pays to complain! Just sharing 😉
Competitive Research | | Humanovation3 -
Majestic gives me a 24 situation and 24 trust flow. Seomoz just a total number of 7\. How come the difference? My ranking is still bad, so is Majestic crawling faster then google?
Hi, my total domain value number on SEOmoz is 7. In Majestic it is 24 situation and 24 trust flow. My ranking is still bad (page2) and my competitors have a lower trust/ situation flow in Majestic. But in Seomoz the're better. Is the conclusion that Majestic is more up to date then Google itself and that Seomoz is more inline with the google crawling? Because Majestic doesnt reflect my ranking. (ps I started with the domain for a month, and I only have some history in registration)
Competitive Research | | remkoallertz0 -
What are the competition's Google Places pages optimised for?
I'm doing some work on a client's Googe Places page, and wondered if there's any way to see what a completitors Places page is currently optimised or categorised for? Basically, we're trying to rank for 'Bathrooms Edinburgh' and almost all of the page 1 SERP's are (unsurprisingly) full of Places results, with #1 Organic slot right down at the bottom of the page. In short - we NEED to get our Places page kicked into shape, and pronto! So, is there any way to find out how the competition's Places pages are ranking so well? e.g. What have they categorised themselves under? Cheers in advance folks, JM
Competitive Research | | JamesMio0 -
Unjustified ratings and reviews in google SERP?
I was checking Google US for some search term my company is interested for and found a thing I cannot explain well. The site Tradecarview is shown with a rating of 4.4 stars from 4209 reviews. (Please see attached image).The same rating is shown on their homepage, but I could not find much more details. (By the way: Tradecarview is a sort of directory for used car dealers to post their vehicles, something similar to Ebay or Yahoo motors.) The question is simple: is Google trusting the ratings given directly on the website? Maybe just summarizing the ratings shown here? http://www.tradecarview.com/pr/providerlist.aspx?pn=0&st=7 Or are there other sources I couldn't find that Google used to specify the rating? What do you think? Thank you in advance for your answers, Dario Pe1ft.jpg
Competitive Research | | Darioz0 -
Any chance to out rank Google flight data for company name?
If you search any number with "co" after it you get Continental Airlines flight information of the corresponding number. So you if you search "4co" you get the current flight details for Continental flight 4. Is there any chance if you have a company called 4CO and you own 4co.com that you could get the number one spot for that term or will google flight results always trump the "organic" results? Thanks!
Competitive Research | | 2comarketing0 -
Why do i not receive google traffic?
İ have published over 3000 unique articles to pr3 drupal site over the past 3 months, yet only get about 20-30 visitors a day from google to my new 3000 articles. i have spent over 10 000usd for those articles, all range between 400-800 words and all pass copyscape. 90 percent of the articles are indexed and site pr3 site. the site is alltopics.com why do i not receive traffic?
Competitive Research | | rxesiv0 -
How does a site get to no 3 in Google with no KW in their links?!!
Hello everyone, my first post - ahhh I'm investigating a niche and there is a site that should have no right being there in my view. It's no. 3 Google UK for 'company formation' with a small site with 65 weak links from only 7 domains and hosted in the US. But more importantly, the Open Site Explorer says there is not 1 link with that term in its anchor text. This I find crazy and makes me suspicious. But before I go back to my client saying "oh they must be black hat" I would like your expert views. I'm not sure whether to tut or congratulate them and for the first time I'm not sure what reasons to give for their amazing performance! What's your views?
Competitive Research | | GOYMedia480