Should you leave an EMD?
-
Hi
I've never recommended exact match domain names as good SEO ; the problem being that they don't help you create brand identity and even when someone remembers your site's name (seo-question-answer-forum.com for example) they are going to type it into Google and they'll see competitors all around the link in the SERP - and you'll probably only have one link, no site links.
In a recent talk at a local Chamber of Commerce I drove this point home again with the new threat of penalties from Penguin (now and moving forward) and a reported EMD penalty that may or not be active in France.
So I've pretty much convinced everyone that EMD's are now toxic and if they are thinking of launching a new site they should avoid them.
But what if you have one already? I've had this question from people that were in the audience. Should they leave their domain now and set up a new site?
Not sure how I should answer!
The question comes from Chamber of Commerce audience and therefore people with bone fide businesses - so my gut feeling for the initial reasons above is "Yes" ; not using your company name as your main online identity was an error and you should correct it now. Create a new domain name and move to it via a simple 301 rewrite rule
But am I right? Or are there cases where this is bad advice
- Neil in France
-
Thinking it through I think that your ScrantonAutoGlass.com and ClevelandRealEstate.com suggestions are bad advice. I appreciate your opinion though!
For a local business the disadvantages from this type of name outweigh the one advantage you gain by having a better chance of ranking for popular search term. IMO.
This discussion has helped me think it through. Thanks all
- Neil
-
I agree that my examples were online business where domains can work well as a brand.
I believe that SOME local business names lend themselves well to an EMD that might attract traffic. Examples would be
There is viable search volume for "scranton auto glass" and "cleveland real estate" and these domains would work well.
Not every business has a current name that would work well, but if I had an auto glass service in Scranton I would be willing to acquire that domain and change my name (if a competitor didn't already have claim.
-
You're giving me a lot of examples of online businesses rather than what I imagine my Chamber of Commerce audience was: local businesses who have an existing highstreet identitiy
Hotels.com with the .com is a great brand for the online business that is behind it. Would hotel.com have been a good domain for a hotel in Paris ? I don't think so. But I don't think hotel-paris.com is a good domain either. It might have given you an advantage for this search term but it's crummy and cheap as an online identity.
The examples I'm seeing are like this
www.hotel-restauraunt-town-name.com
www.oil-industry-job-offers.com
Behind each site their is a business that has a business name
It's as if McDonald's had decided to go with www.hamburger-restaurants.com rather than www.mcdonalds.com
15 years down the line whould you suggest they change?
- Neil
-
Takeshi,
I'm assuming that this sort of anchor text has a negative effect since Penguin
SearchEngineLand.com is not an EMD in my opinion as I don't think that people were searching for a "land of search engines" before the site existed
SeoTools.net is a good example though and for me it's a poor domain name. If I search for "seotools" in Google (here in France) I get seobook, seomoz and a few French sites before I get seotools.net and then seotools.com
- Neil
-
You don't think that domains like Wine.com.... Weather.com.... Hotels.com... are great brands?
-
I agree with Takeshi - a hybrid of both is best, in my opinion
EMD just means you need to be extra careful with anchor text ratios and over optimization penalty. Less is more with on page exact match keyword phrases and not too much main tail anchor texts from external sites
-
There are many legitimate EMDs. They're harder to brand, but it's possible. For example, FreeCreditReport.com. They're only toxic if they're idiotic like best-pay-day-loans.info.
-
There is nothing wrong with EMD domains, as long as you're not being spammy. Having your keywords also helps with link building, since people will link to you using your keywords as anchor text.
EMDs can still be brandable if you're smart about it. Look at searchengineland.com for example, or seotools.net. A domain name should say what the site is about, and sometimes that means having and EMD.
-
The EMD update was applied to lower the added benefits of having an EMD. I would only see an issue on domains like www.aReallyLongExactMatchDomain.com or with www.key-wo-rds.com. That being said, I do recommend using the brand instead of keywords.
To answer your question, I would personally leave good quality domains as they are, even if they are an EMD.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
URL too long. Shorten and redirect, or leave alone?
MOZ is indicating that i have several URLs that are too long. Should I shorten the URLs and redirect the long URLs to the new, shorter, URL? Or should i leave them alone, as I've been reading to avoid redirects.
Technical SEO | | Hanover4401 -
We are migrating a site and are seeing alot of 301s and 302s already in the old site is it ok to leave those as is?
For the 3xx’s I’m not sure if it’s okay for us to redirect to these so please advise on that
Technical SEO | | lina_digital0 -
301 or 302 or leave at 410
I have a client who manages vacation rental properties and those properties get links. If an owner pulls their property off the rental market the current status given is a 410 which I instinctively want turned into a 301. The problem is, often those properties come back online with the same URL so the question is, when a 301 is turned into a 200 - has anyone noticed a significant delay in time for that page to rank?I know technically it should probably be a 410 or maybe a 302 but ... you know ... the link weight. 🙂
Technical SEO | | BeanstalkIM1 -
Branding in a post EMD/Panda world?
How do non-business websites think about exact match domain names and branding after EMD and Panda? What is an EMD and what is a "brand" when there's no business or commercial brand involved? And does it impact your SEO outcomes? I have a Thailand travel blog which is a personal crusade of mine. I like Thailand, I love travelling there and I like sharing my experiences and knowledge. I don't have a business name, so when I started the blog I just used the best phrase I could find that was available as a domain name - at the time it was "bangkoktravelthailand.com". Late in 2011 I thought this sounded a bit spammy, so I found a new domain name "traveltipsthailand.com" and 301'd across to that. All went well and traffic grew consistently thanks to good writing and some basic SEO, until in late September 2012 the site got 'whacked' by Google - possibly due to EMD, but I think more likely due to Panda and some accidental poor quality backlinks (I posted a reply on another travel site, pointing back to my site, but it ended up becoming 100s of low value backlinks because of the way that site managed it's "latest comments" widget). Since then I've been trying very hard to rebuild my traffic, but it's a tough gig. I am now averaging better than I was in Sept 2012, but nowhere near where I was on trend to be by now. I have a small social media profile (800 Twitter followers plus Google+, Facebook and Pinterest) and I am slowly building some supporting pages on prominent Web 2.0 sites and seeking out quality guest post opportunities. But I still worry about the domain name. Does Google see it as an EMD? I don't use the domain name words at all in my page titles (I use xxx | Thailand travel blog) and I try not to use it in anchors either (I tend to use "Thailand travel blog" or my own name. But I still have a few old backlinks that say "Travel Tips Thailand" and I use that phrase as my brand when talking about the website. So how should sites like mine think about "brand" and "EMD"? Is it an issue or not? Is my domain name holding my site back? I have others I can use like "1travelthailand.com" and "thailand-travel-blog.com" but I'm just sitting on them, not sure where to go. I also have "asiantraveltips.com" and a long term view of rolling this site up with other blogs I'm slowly developing about China, Cambodia and Vietnam. But again, not sure where to go any more. Anyone care to share their thoughts?
Technical SEO | | Gavin.Atkinson0 -
An EMD with top level domain of another country. Still useful ?
Normally, EMDs (with couple of keywords in it) has more advantage over other domain names ( I understand other factors matters too & I am aware of EMD update). But what if there is an EMD with couple of keywords but top level domain is of another country. Confused? see ex - shoesinsydney.co.uk Will it STILL have a natural advantage over other domains (with no keywords in them)?
Technical SEO | | Personnel_Concept0 -
Is it bad to have same templates for all of my EMDs
I have been working on EMDs and they are more than 40 EMDs. All 2 KW EMDs with DA around 35 Now they all have same templates. Can it be a problem in future ? (though they don't have similar content)
Technical SEO | | Personnel_Concept0 -
Duplicate XML sitemaps - 404 or leave alone?
We switched over from our standard XML sitemap to a sitemap index. Our old sitemap was called sitemap.xml and the new one is sitemapindex.xml. In Webmaster Tools it still shows the old sitemap.xml as valid. Also when you land on our sitemap.xml it will display the sitemap index, when really the index lives on sitemapindex.xml. The reason you can see the sitemap on both URLs is because this is set from the sitemap plugin. So the question is, should we change the plugin setting to let the old sitemap.xml 404, or should we allow the new sitemap index to be accessed on both URLs?
Technical SEO | | Hakkasan0 -
Can leaving up old web pages no longer accessible through my site navigation hurt my rankings?
My firm recently overhauled a client's website. As part of the project, we gave the content a new structure, eliminating certain pages and creating several new ones. However, I just found out that some of the "old" pages (the ones we supposedly eliminated) still appear in the Google SERPs. Somehow, the client - who handled the coding - let these pages remain live even though they can no longer be accessed through the site navigation. This seems like something that could hurt the client's SEO rankings, but I want to make sure before contacting the client and suggesting they take down the old pages. Can anyone confirm my suspicion?
Technical SEO | | matt-145670