URL tracking on offline material
-
Hi there,
Hope someone can give some advice.
We are doing some magazine advertising, the main purpose of the advert is to promote one of our new products, however the URL goes something like this:
http://www.domain.com/products/new-product-libra-furniture/ which is just too long for anyone to remember, I think it should be simply domain.com/libra which redirects to the product page, however how can I track this in Google Analytics? if using a 301 that's impossible?
Any advice would be grateful.
-
Hi Gary,
Has your question been answered? You've received some stellar responses in this thread!
Christy
-
I agree! And thanks for reminding the community about to award great answers with the "Helpful Answer" status, Paul!
-
The level of thought and comprehensiveness Jason has put into each of these replies is really impressive! Such great answers around each of these specific issues. Gotta agree with him on each one.
Nicely done, IMO.
Paul
P.S. Gary, when you feel the question's been fully answered, don't forget to mark the most useful responses with "Helpful Answer" status. You got some great info here and it's a great way to reward the folks who helped most.
-
Hi Jason,
Thanks for you detailed reply.
The conversion will be for the consumer to enter a give-away on a new product we are soon to launch, which is exclusive to a particular magazine.
Yes, prints ads will be a primary ongoing marketing vehicle which will be promoting the same product but in different magazines however using different CTAs so I will have to create various landing pages for this, maybe this could be an issue in the near future?
Thanks
-
Great question. I debated suggesting that your just keep all those landing pages out of the index, but I don't know enough about your content/use-case to make a suggestion.
What's the conversion action you are trying to achieve? Are you selling a product or service right on the landing page, or are you sending them to a Product Detail page to make a purchase?
The challenge is that, you might have users see your magazine ad, and then later try to find you with "Cool thing I saw in Time Magazine"
You have to balance a number of factors:
1. Are print ads a primary and ongoing marketing vehicle for you. So you'll have an ever growing inventory of publication specific landing pages.
2. Do you get a lot of search volume that would convert better if it went to a non-publication specific landing page.
3. Is there a high converting canonical non-pub specific version of all the content that will exist on the pub specific landing page?
4. What is your sales cycle? Are you a low-consideration product that a prospect will buy shortly after consuming your landing page content, or will a prospect make numerous visits to your site, and consume dozens of pages of content before making a purchase?
Part of the fun of what we all do for a living is that every circumstance is different
-
Thanks Jason.
Would you not use a noindex tag on the page instead of rel=canonical?
-
Yep, if you're willing to set up a separate landing page for each Ad/Campaign, then by all means do that. Then you can assume all direct traffic on the URL is the campaign traffic.
That would also let you customize each landing page for the publication, which will improve your relevancy and reduce your bounce rate. I.E. If www.mysite.com/life has an image with the cover of the actual edition of Life magazine I saw your ad in, then I know I'm in the right place.
As you mentioned, if the content of many landing page is basically the same, then make sure you use rel="canonical" tags to consolidate your link juice.
My suggestion to use vanity urls linking to a landing page with campagin codes, would be if you wanted a single landing page to serve multiple campaigns (or other sources of traffic).
-
Hi All,
Thanks for all your feedback so far.
I don't think I will use a URL shortener, not memorable enough.
QR Code, not quite right for the audience.
Regarding:
Then set up a redirect for that URL that redirect to a landing page with a campaign code:
http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
Why don't I just use www.mysite.com/Life as the landing page which replicates the original product page and put a noindex on the page or a canonical?
What do you think?
-
Create a short vanity URL to put in the magazine (i.e. Life Magazine).
Then set up a redirect for that URL that redirect to a landing page with a campaign code:
http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
Now you have a campaign in GA you can track.
Alternatively, (as others have suggested) you can use a URL shortener:
bit.ly/adsf72 -> http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
The shortener gives you a short url and an extra layer of tracking, but the short url will be less meaningful or memorable (unless you do a completely custom one).
If you want to go with a QRCode, do it in addition to (not instead of) printing, the short URL.
Use the shortest URL possible in the QRCode because short URL's = lower density QR Codes that are easier to scan.
-
A 301 redirect or something like bitly should work.
-
Hi Gary,
You can use Google's URL shortener to manage your campaigns and then set up Custom Segment and view it in the report in Google Analytics. I know this works for Social Media and Email campaigns but not sure about offline campaigns. http://www.mktdojo.com/how-to-track-email-and-social-media-campaigns-with-google-analytics
Another way I guess is to use bit.ly, when you shorten a link, they provide stats to track the number of people clicking on the link. Once again, I know it works for Social Media campaigns but not sure about offline.
Finally, you can try using QR codes. QR Codes are widely used in off line campaigns or events. Readers don't have to memorize the link and enter it in the url, they can simply scan it with their phone. Furthermore, you can use either method mentioned above and create a QR code with it so that you can track the number of visits.
Why create a custom link and use it for the QR Code instead of your original link? If you are using the custom link for the QR code, then you know that if you have visits via the custom link, they are definitely from scanning the QR code.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
301 vs Canonical - With A Side of Partial URL Rewrite and Google URL Parameters-OH MY
Hi Everyone, I am in the middle of an SEO contract with a site that is partially HTML pages and the rest are PHP and part of an ecommerce system for digital delivery of college classes. I am working with a web developer that has worked with this site for many years. In the php pages, there are also 6 different parameters that are currently filtered by Google URL parameters in the old Google Search Console. When I came on board, part of the site was https and the remainder was not. Our first project was to move completely to https and it went well. 301 redirects were already in place from a few legacy sites they owned so the developer expanded the 301 redirects to move everything to https. Among those legacy sites is an old site that we don't want visible, but it is extensively linked to the new site and some of our top keywords are branded keywords that originated with that site. Developer says old site can go away, but people searching for it are still prevalent in search. Biggest part of this project is now to rewrite the dynamic urls of the product pages and the entry pages to the class pages. We attempted to use 301 redirects to redirect to the new url and prevent the draining of link juice. In the end, according to the developer, it just isn't going to be possible without losing all the existing link juice. So its lose all the link juice at once (a scary thought) or try canonicals. I am told canonicals would work - and we can switch to that. My questions are the following: 1. Does anyone know of a way that might make the 301's work with the URL rewrite? 2. With canonicals and Google parameters, are we safe to delete the parameters after we have ensures everything has a canonical url (parameter pages included)? 3. If we continue forward with 301's and lose all the existing links, since this only half of the pages in the site (if you don't count the parameter pages) and there are only a few links per page if that, how much of an impact would it have on the site and how can I avoid that impact? 4. Canonicals seem to be recommended heavily these days, would the canonical urls be a better way to go than sticking with 301's. Thank you all in advance for helping! I sincerely appreciate any insight you might have. Sue (aka Trudy)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TStorm1 -
Help with facet URLs in Magento
Hi Guys, Wondering if I can get some technical help here... We have our site britishbraces.co.uk , built in Magento. As per eCommerce sites, we have paginated pages throughout. These have rel=next/prev implemented but not correctly ( as it is not in is it in ) - this fix is in process. Our canonicals are currently incorrect as far as I believe, as even when content is filtered, the canonical takes you back to the first page URL. For example, http://www.britishbraces.co.uk/braces/x-style.html?ajaxcatalog=true&brand=380&max=51.19&min=31.19 Canonical to... http://www.britishbraces.co.uk/braces/x-style.html Which I understand to be incorrect. As I want the coloured filtered pages to be indexed ( due to search volume for colour related queries ), but I don't want the price filtered pages to be indexed - I am unsure how to implement the solution? As I understand, because rel=next/prev implemented ( with no View All page ), the rel=canonical is not necessary as Google understands page 1 is the first page in the series. Therefore, once a user has filtered by colour, there should then be a canonical pointing to the coloured filter URL? ( e.g. /product/black ) But when a user filters by price, there should be noindex on those URLs ? Or can this be blocked in robots.txt prior? My head is a little confused here and I know we have an issue because our amount of indexed pages is increasing day by day but to no solution of the facet urls. Can anybody help - apologies in advance if I have confused the matter. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HappyJackJr0 -
Is 1:1 301 redirect required on indexed URL when restructing URL even if the new URL is canonicalized?
Hello folks, We are restructuring some URLS which forms a fair chunk of the content of the domain.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HB17
These content are auto generated rather than manually created unlike other parts of the website. The same content is currently accessible from two URLs: /used-books/autobiography-a-long-walk-to-freedom-isbn
/autobiography/used-books/a-long-walk-to-freedom-isbn The URL 1 uses the URL 2 as the canonical url and it has worked allright since Moz does
not show the two as duplicate of each other. Google has also indexed the canonical URL although
there is still a few 'URL 1s' which were indexed before the canonical was implemented. The updated URL structure will look like something like this: /used-books/autobiography-a-long-walk-to-freedom-author-name-isbn
/autobiography/used-books/a-long-walk-to-freedom-authore-name-isbn It would be great to have just a single URL but a few business requirement prevents
us from having just the canonical URL only even with the new structure. Since we will still have two URLs to access the same content and we were wondering
whether we will need to do a 1:1 301 redirect on the current URLs or since there will be canonical URL
(/autobiography/used-books/a-long-walk-to-freedom-authore-name-isbn),
we won't need to worry about doing the 1:1 redirect on the the indexed content? Please note that the content will still be accessible from the OLD URL (unless 301ed of course). If it is advisable to do a 1:1 301 redirect this is what we intend to do: /used-books/autobiography-a-long-walk-to-freedom-isbn 301 to
/used-books/autobiography-a-long-walk-to-freedom-author-name-isbn /autobiography/used-books/a-long-walk-to-freedom-isbn 301 to
/autobiography/used-books/a-long-walk-to-freedom-authore-name-isbn Any advice/suggestions would be greated appreciated. Thank you.0 -
Google Disavow wrong Sample URLs
Sometime last year we were penalized for unnatural links by Google. We followed a couple of good posts on MOZ on how to go about correcting all of this (Excel Showing work, Google Docs, Ahrefs, semrush, etc...) and submitted a reconsideration request as well as a list of urls using Disavow Tool. So today, about 20 days later, we get a reply from Google stating that we still have some links that are outside their quality guidelines with 3 examples. Problem is, none of the 3 examples they listed have our website on them. I even did a View Source and checked all our inbound link reports for these websites. All of the 3 examples are Lawyer / Legal Advise websites and ours has nothing to do with this. Any ideas on how to reply and ask them to double check? Maybe they mixed up with another account they were working on at the same time.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Apex-Lighting0 -
Blog URL Canonical
Hi Guy's, I would like to know your thoughts on the following set-up for blog canonical. Option 1 domain.com/blog = <link rel="canonical" href="domin.com/blog"> domain.com/blog-category/general = <link rel="canonical" href="domain.com/blog"> domain.com/blog-article/how-to-set-canonical = no canonical option 2 domain.com/blog = <link rel="canonical" href="domin.com blog"="">(as option 1)</link rel="canonical" href="domin.com> domain.com/blog-category/general = <link rel="canonical" href="domain.com blog-category="" general"="">(this time has the canonical of the category)</link rel="canonical" href="domain.com> domain.com/blog-article/how-to-set-canonical = <link rel="canonical" href="domain.com blog-article="" how-to-set-canonical"="">(this time has the canonical of the article full URL)</link rel="canonical" href="domain.com> Just not sure which is the best option, or even if it is any of the above! Thanks Dan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Dan1e10 -
Local language for folders in URLs?
Hi, We're working on a e-commerce project that will be launched in several countries. My question is this: Are there any advantages to name the URL-folders in the local language? Ie. International site: www.domain.com/product/adidas-model-x www.domain.com/category/adidas Norwegian site: www.domain.no/produkt/adidas-model-x www.domain.no/kategori/adidas As i like things tidy, I guess that would also mean we would have to rename the cart URLs and so on. ie. International site: www.domain.com/checkout Norwegian site: www.domain.no/kasse
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rtora0 -
Should you replace the url on a damaged page and 301 to it ?
Hi, We have a couple of pages which have been damaged due to an SEO person we hired creating a stupid amount of bookmarks and generally poor links. I've tried to get the links removed where I can but on most of these blogging sites there is no contact webmaster etc so I am struggling. Panda update as also affected traffic by about 35%. My question is , should I consider creating new urls for the "damaged " pages and then doing 301 redirects to them from the damaged page to the new page. Then start to build up good links to the new page whilst google should de-index the old pages over a couple of months ?. Just at my witts end how to get rid of these blogging rubbish etc etc. Thanks Sarah.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SarahCollins0 -
Capitals in url creates duplicate content?
Hey Guys, I had a quick look around however I couldn't find a specific answer to this. Currently, the SEOmoz tools come back and show a heap of duplicate content on my site. And there's a fair bit of it. However, a heap of those errors are relating to random capitals in the urls. for example. "www.website.com.au/Home/information/Stuff" is being treated as duplicate content of "www.website.com.au/home/information/stuff" (Note the difference in capitals). Anyone have any recommendations as to how to fix this server side(keeping in mind it's not practical or possible to fix all of these links) or to tell Google to ignore the capitalisation? Any help is greatly appreciated. LM.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CarlS0